Phallarchist

I certainly don't. Pissing in a faggot's face and making him swallow piss should be standard practice.

On 5/15/2021 at 7:08 AM, blackrobe said:

There is an effective vaccine against cancer causing strains of HPV, Gardasil. Everyone here should be vaccinated with it.

I've had it, but it's not studied or approved my profile, etc. I had to go through several doctors to find one that would administer it.

Yes, of course I would, but I might also be willing to trade it for a highly-effective vaccine against HPV. PrEP might be tolerable in the long term. Anogenital warts and the occasional cancer are not.

On 5/12/2021 at 3:22 PM, BlackDude said:

totally anti-gay

Can you describe what he said more specifically? There are vast differences between, e.g., simple disgust, and an opinion that homosexual behavior should be illegal, and an express desire to hurt or kill homosexuals.

[Deleted]

14 hours ago, poptronic said:

thick 7.5 inch

That's several standard deviations above any reported norm I've seen, e.g. [think before following links] https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/health/sdut-penis-length-study-2015mar02-story.html%3f_amp=true

Maybe one in a thousand online profiles I've seen actually requires 8" or more.

1 hour ago, ErosWired said:

There are illnesses one can contract from contact with the excretions of the bowel that are unrelated to STIs, and one need not have been sexually promiscuous, or even sexually active, to get them. But more to the point, given that one definition of sanitary is “free from fecal matter”, the entire notion of the anorectal area as a sanitary area is kind of silly.

Right, you can get those illnesses from anyone. If you're going to have any unprotected rectal penetration, that level of risk is unavoidable. The STD risk from cunts that get fucked by a lot of random men is added on top of that base rate. So, I consider @BreedingTop71's use of the word in context perfectly reasonable.

2 hours ago, ErosWired said:

Sanitary? It’s an asshole. I don’t think it’s sanitary under the best of circumstances...

I think he was referring to diseases made epidemic by promiscuity, not the rectal flora that everyone has.

I think 14" was a rhetorical exaggeration. I don't think I've ever seen anyone demand more than 9".

In fact, the most intense sexual pleasure I ever experienced as a receiver was from an enormous penis. If I were in the rectal-receptive habit, it would make perfect sense for me to pursue men with similarly massive genitalia and disfavor the rest.

Concentrating on my enjoyment would be inappropriately selfish by my own standards, and I think I have too much reverence for other aspects of maleness to ever really adopt this policy, but it seems straightforwardly logical that many others would do.

Urine is much safer than semen. I think most disease risk is hypothetical rather than clinically established.

[think before following links] [think before following links] https://www.gmfa.org.uk/how-risky-is-watersports

11 hours ago, Jake007 said:

Hey, nice guy wants to learn to be a cum dump. I have fantasised too long about this. I just want load after load after load inside me. 

I don't know what's to learn besides cleaning your cunt. Get a boyfriend and he'll provide you loads continually. I can deliver several loads per day and I don't think I'm much out of the ordinary.

25 minutes ago, fskn said:

above-average thickness

The original poster also has this feature. I would think that thickness counts. If a man's pride had the dimensions of a typical beer can, I would certainly be impressed, though it would be well under average length. And practically speaking, a thick one is more likely to hit the prostate (or press on internal clitoral structures, depending on the cunt).

While it's not my personal policy, I completely support the choice to reject men with small penises. Mating is brutally competitive of necessity. If you can't stretch cunt, you had better find other ways to demonstrate that you can make an impact as a man.

On 2/27/2021 at 11:48 PM, Steinn said:

One of the first guys I saw regularly liked this, he was much older than me. I didn't even know at the time about cleaning myself before getting a fucking. I had to suck him clean afterwards - he said it was my mess, and had to sort it. I did it out of respect

I hate shit more than anyone I know, but the fact is, the way both of you reacted to this situation is exactly right.

On 3/10/2021 at 2:27 AM, Steinn said:

Something I like to do is hold a subs eyes open, and cum in them. Just to see how submissive they are. I've seen it in straight porn, but rarely in gay. Anyone done this, on purpose as opposed to accidently.

Yes, it's a beautiful way to connect your moment of glory to the assaultive degradation of your victim. You might want to read a previous discussion.

On 4/24/2021 at 11:46 PM, Justuseme2020 said:

And nothing beat the feeling of that cummy foreskin as he rubbed his juices in my eyes.

Your post was excellent in every detail.

2 hours ago, Cumfilledbottomboi said:

So every “bottom” is presenting as “female” to you? Because that’s certainly coming from an exclusively heterosexual and/or religious POV and exactly why there are anti-gay (and increasingly anti trans) laws. 

No, they're functioning as female for the penis, factually. There is no such thing as breeding without a vagina analog.

21 hours ago, Cumfilledbottomboi said:

I’m a man who “exists” (in the bedroom) to be used by top men / alpha men.

Which is to serve and be used as female. Penises become erect solely for reproductive purposes and reproduction is exclusively the coitus of male and female. Offering a man your rectum as a vagina substitute is inescapably, and gloriously, to perform a female sexual function. It's just how penises work.

Looking or behaving like a real typical girl or woman ("femininity") is an entirely separate matter. For my taste, you should never aspire to be anything but a boy. But all men who fuck need cunt and encouraging them to think of your rectum in quasi-vaginal terms properly recognizes the nature of breeding. Your rectum only works for sex with a man to the extent that it resembles a vagina and you should be proud when his penis responds to it as if it might be the real thing.

On 12/24/2020 at 6:08 AM, Cumfilledbottomboi said:

who truly wants to live

Right, but that's not a given. I just don't want to have anything to do with such a person.

I'm glad a worthy man claimed your raw cunt and proudly took your true virginity.  Breeding is the path to erotic intimacy. Did receiving his seed cause you to consider him as a potential long-term mate? Did he show interest in possessing you?

Define "bad at it.".

On 3/31/2021 at 9:23 AM, BootmanLA said:

Toxic masculinity cleanup on Aisle four.

A thundering herd of desperate faggots tramples you in their rush to lick up the spill.

On 8/29/2019 at 4:32 PM, 408curious said:

What are some places where the local tops will chase some smooth white ass and not take "no" for an answer?

Since you'll presumably be unable to control the brutality level, you should also consider the availability and quality of emergency medical care. If you're looking to be violated without needing a colostomy, then you might want to pursue a "consensual non-consent" arrangement with someone less likely to do permanent damage.

6 hours ago, BootmanLA said:

In other words, as long as the top is rough enough, he'll get off and that's all that matters. Gotcha.

It's not what I wrote or intended, but your proposal is certainly pleasant enough.