Phallarchist

1 hour ago, ErosWired said:

"Defense” implies unwillingness, though, does it not? While I understand and appreciate the sentiment you express, do you think it applies to a majority of Tops?

The anus has no will. Its resistance is reflexive. I defeat it in order to further abuse the length of the terminal passage. The boy might or might not be able to relax somewhat. The struggle to stretch his rings open might be brief. He could also clamp down and try to make penetration difficult, because he is s a masochist and wants to be forced. Both approaches have advantages. Spicy variety and all that.

I am a twisted male who puts boys to female (cunt) use and takes untoward pleasure in the difficulty my inappropriate intrusion causes. I do not use "top" as a sexual noun or verb and I have no real idea if "tops" in general are similar or dissimilar to me. My impression is that most habitual homosexual penetrators consider themselves sexual egalitarians and at least evince a concern for the comfort and pleasure of their receivers. I, on the other hand, seek to empower the phallus above all. I certainly appreciate and enjoy a sexually responsive cunt and the occasional spasm of a spontaneous prostate orgasm, but I am equally pleased to witness his suffering for my benefit. Self-sacrifice is a cardinal virtue for a receptive boy.

Let the boy mount his best defence. The pleasure of forcing him open rivals that of completing inside him.

I do like them much shorter. Rectum sex is awkward but the process is easier and feels more natural with a smaller boy. I want to push him around as necessary without feeling like I'm moving heavy furniture. I also like seeing my impact on him as I push deep into his little body.

That said, an inordinate number of rather tall men want me to ram them hard. They're often sturdy and their cunts can take a beating. So it's not out of the question.

As to masculinity: yes. Fat: no.

On 7/7/2021 at 8:39 AM, RandyCubby said:

I'd be in the abortion clinic every 8 months. 😉 Then start over again.

Late abortions are rough and probably too complex for the average clinic. Five months seems like a good balance between being noticeably pregnant and reasonably convenient disposal.

On 7/7/2021 at 4:46 AM, swall0w said:

my Alpha would punch me, he has left me with a broken nose and bruised ribs

Was this kind of violence part of his sexual repertoire, or was he a simple domestic abuser?

With normal urine, it would probably be a bad idea. If the men are constantly drinking lots of water and excreting relatively little waste, then it's probably fine. If you start to feel sick, go back to drinking plain water.

I admire the mind that generated this proposal in any case.

Post a picture? They'll come running in all likelihood.

I certainly don't. Pissing in a faggot's face and making him swallow piss should be standard practice.

On 5/15/2021 at 7:08 AM, blackrobe said:

There is an effective vaccine against cancer causing strains of HPV, Gardasil. Everyone here should be vaccinated with it.

I've had it, but it's not studied or approved my profile, etc. I had to go through several doctors to find one that would administer it.

Yes, of course I would, but I might also be willing to trade it for a highly-effective vaccine against HPV. PrEP might be tolerable in the long term. Anogenital warts and the occasional cancer are not.

On 5/12/2021 at 3:22 PM, BlackDude said:

totally anti-gay

Can you describe what he said more specifically? There are vast differences between, e.g., simple disgust, and an opinion that homosexual behavior should be illegal, and an express desire to hurt or kill homosexuals.

[Deleted]

14 hours ago, poptronic said:

thick 7.5 inch

That's several standard deviations above any reported norm I've seen, e.g. [think before following links] https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/health/sdut-penis-length-study-2015mar02-story.html%3f_amp=true

Maybe one in a thousand online profiles I've seen actually requires 8" or more.

1 hour ago, ErosWired said:

There are illnesses one can contract from contact with the excretions of the bowel that are unrelated to STIs, and one need not have been sexually promiscuous, or even sexually active, to get them. But more to the point, given that one definition of sanitary is “free from fecal matter”, the entire notion of the anorectal area as a sanitary area is kind of silly.

Right, you can get those illnesses from anyone. If you're going to have any unprotected rectal penetration, that level of risk is unavoidable. The STD risk from cunts that get fucked by a lot of random men is added on top of that base rate. So, I consider @BreedingTop71's use of the word in context perfectly reasonable.

2 hours ago, ErosWired said:

Sanitary? It’s an asshole. I don’t think it’s sanitary under the best of circumstances...

I think he was referring to diseases made epidemic by promiscuity, not the rectal flora that everyone has.

I think 14" was a rhetorical exaggeration. I don't think I've ever seen anyone demand more than 9".

In fact, the most intense sexual pleasure I ever experienced as a receiver was from an enormous penis. If I were in the rectal-receptive habit, it would make perfect sense for me to pursue men with similarly massive genitalia and disfavor the rest.

Concentrating on my enjoyment would be inappropriately selfish by my own standards, and I think I have too much reverence for other aspects of maleness to ever really adopt this policy, but it seems straightforwardly logical that many others would do.

Urine is much safer than semen. I think most disease risk is hypothetical rather than clinically established.

[think before following links] [think before following links] https://www.gmfa.org.uk/how-risky-is-watersports

11 hours ago, Jake007 said:

Hey, nice guy wants to learn to be a cum dump. I have fantasised too long about this. I just want load after load after load inside me. 

I don't know what's to learn besides cleaning your cunt. Get a boyfriend and he'll provide you loads continually. I can deliver several loads per day and I don't think I'm much out of the ordinary.

25 minutes ago, fskn said:

above-average thickness

The original poster also has this feature. I would think that thickness counts. If a man's pride had the dimensions of a typical beer can, I would certainly be impressed, though it would be well under average length. And practically speaking, a thick one is more likely to hit the prostate (or press on internal clitoral structures, depending on the cunt).

While it's not my personal policy, I completely support the choice to reject men with small penises. Mating is brutally competitive of necessity. If you can't stretch cunt, you had better find other ways to demonstrate that you can make an impact as a man.

On 2/27/2021 at 11:48 PM, Steinn said:

One of the first guys I saw regularly liked this, he was much older than me. I didn't even know at the time about cleaning myself before getting a fucking. I had to suck him clean afterwards - he said it was my mess, and had to sort it. I did it out of respect

I hate shit more than anyone I know, but the fact is, the way both of you reacted to this situation is exactly right.

On 3/10/2021 at 2:27 AM, Steinn said:

Something I like to do is hold a subs eyes open, and cum in them. Just to see how submissive they are. I've seen it in straight porn, but rarely in gay. Anyone done this, on purpose as opposed to accidently.

Yes, it's a beautiful way to connect your moment of glory to the assaultive degradation of your victim. You might want to read a previous discussion.

On 4/24/2021 at 11:46 PM, Justuseme2020 said:

And nothing beat the feeling of that cummy foreskin as he rubbed his juices in my eyes.

Your post was excellent in every detail.

2 hours ago, Cumfilledbottomboi said:

So every “bottom” is presenting as “female” to you? Because that’s certainly coming from an exclusively heterosexual and/or religious POV and exactly why there are anti-gay (and increasingly anti trans) laws. 

No, they're functioning as female for the penis, factually. There is no such thing as breeding without a vagina analog.