Phallarchist

18 minutes ago, Steinn said:

Seeing a boys face all swollen and even bloody with cum dribbling out of his mouth or ass is so hot.

I have to agree. Blood and seed are the perfect combination.

On 2/10/2021 at 1:30 AM, Steinn said:

It's just what a cocksucker should expect. I've gone harder with a few guys to full on face punching, with their agreement.

On 2/19/2021 at 4:31 AM, BiDad said:

,..even punching him in the head. Never knocked him out but he’d be dazed af. 

I have to admire the escalation of sexualized violence, but wouldn't personally go to this extent because of possible brain damage.

51 minutes ago, wonderfulwoof said:

pulled my jeans down spit on my hole n his dick blew a load in my ass

By "affirmative consent" standards, it's definitely rape. By predominant legal standards, it's arguably rape. But it sounds like some version of a good day for a faggot. Do you actually consider it rape and does it trouble you?

I've never seen a convincing deception. There's too much focus on the man fiddling with the condom. If it's split from the start, then it's too easily discovered. If he has to spend 45 seconds breaking it, then it's obvious. I would favor

1. Rapid and silent complete removal. It takes practice and probably a lot of lubricant inside the length of the condom. The used condom needs to be hidden and seeding needs to be completed quickly before the victim finds out and protests. The victim will discover the deception immediately after the orgasm, so the man has to be prepared to make a quick escape or deal with the resistance. Obviously, this option is best for male pleasure.

2. Snipped or punctured tip, for when breeding alone is the primary goal. The smaller the hole, the harder the man has to work to expel the seed into his victim. There is a trade-off between ease of insemination and plausible deniability. It's mostly a psychological pleasure.

3. Seemingly natural breakage. Even with water-based lubricants, I have shredded several condoms in the past through some perfect combination of size, vigor, and the incompatible anatomy of the faggot cunt. They were sliced open lengthwise, so I had full raw contact with boy guts. Covertly adding some mineral oil to the lubricant mix would help this method along. This method is unreliable, but has a balance of pleasure and plausible deniability, as the man never has to withdraw from the cunt and can claim shock and ignorance at the breakage afterwards. "Didn't you feel it?" "No, baby, I just thought you had a magical snatch".

9 hours ago, Blatinobttm said:

I wonder if being sexually assaulted makes some individuals more promiscuous. I personally am all conflicted about the whole thing. When it was happening I felt absolutely violated and not in a hot way. After it was done immediately was turned on and wanted more violent/aggressive sexual encounters and have been drawn to that. Isn’t that fucked up?

No, I don't think there's anything inherently wrong with your reactions.

Many rape victims tend toward promiscuity, and promiscuity is the natural tendency among males anyway. In homosexual contexts, it's difficult to even avoid.

Violence is basic to maleness and male sexual expression. You were suddenly exposed to the extreme form, but it was always there in the background, so it's no wonder that your erotic attention was turned.

Whether or not these natural reactions are ultimately good for you is a different question. Re-exposure to a traumatic stimulus can be part of a therapeutic course.

On 1/20/2021 at 7:45 PM, FemNegBttm said:

Most of the guys I've sucked seemed to like cumming on my face. I think they get off on acting like a pornstar

I don't think there's all that much distance between male desires and pornographic content. The urge to dominate and degrade is widespread. And you probably have a face that makes for an attractive target.

On 6/26/2020 at 8:06 AM, subpig00 said:

I come from a country where seeing a bit shit was not a big issue.

Which country is that? I'm making travel plans.

Your other cunt is in your face. I think you're morally obligated to give it up to all the men you've teased so far.

Herpes is forever when you get it. A lot of people have mild symptoms, but some have extreme pain.

HPV infection is also a certainty. You will only know about it if you happen to get warts. They can grow inside your anus. There is no treatment, except to remove the warts surgically. Some of the many HPV strains are largely asymptomatic but can go on to cause anal cancer.

There's nothing inevitable about the shift from having a few raw encounters to exposing yourself to an endless stream of disease. You can choose to find a boyfriend/owner, or at least limit your risks. Youth is on your side for now.

7 hours ago, FelchingPisser said:

I think it there is also a hold over from the old condom porn days when you NEVER saw an insertion shot.   All those magically appearing condoms...

At least they realized that condoms are ugly and offensive.

2 hours ago, BootmanLA said:

Being mature - not as in old, necessarily, but as in owning up to your shit.

...is adulthood. Women are responsible, too, probably moreso, and they're not men.

I want to see the full process of insertion, whether it's a slow push or a brutal one-stroke slam to the hilt. I don't know why studios so often cut from suck to mid-fuck.

Fundamentally,

1. Have a penis that gets hard.

2. Use it to fuck and breed.

Of course, there are other secondary sex characteristics and factors that determine degrees of manhood. E.g., fag breeding is a simulation. If you've never fucked your seed into a vagina, then you're clearly missing an experience that's central to having a penis and being a successful male of the species.

No, not at all. Natural body hair is essential.

On 12/29/2020 at 2:01 PM, ErosWired said:

I imagine your 5-page application is designed to weed out all but the most serious applicants, but it still sounds fraught with risk.

I'm sure no one thinks it's a legally-binding document. As you suggest, it would be a way to make sure the candidate knows the parameters of the proposal and to gauge his actual level of desire for it to happen.

On 12/31/2020 at 8:50 AM, ErosWired said:

While I can see an obvious benefit to having a spare, I’m not sure I see how the arrangement improves the issue of maintenance

I have digestion mostly in mind. A faggot has to have an empty stomach or an empty and cleansed colon to be useful. It's unrealistic to impose both conditions on a boy's body every day. It's better that that he take enema rest and heal on alternate days at least. A 2:1 ratio also goes some way to satisfy the male ego and desire for variety.

I would match one man with two boys. Faggot cunt requires a lot of maintenance time, so having two in circulation increases cunt availability for the man. If a boy had a random male urge, he could dissipate it in the other boy (with the man's permission) and return to female service.

Men have limited opportunities to ejaculate, so they tend to choose their targets carefully. You should try to find out why men find you undeserving of their seed. It might be some factor that you can improve.

20 hours ago, Cutedelicategay said:

Bottoms are akin to females in hetero world. Can't imagine a hairless top so Can't imagine a Hairy bottom. 

Actual Female Cunt™ has even more hair than the average ass.

12 hours ago, bubblebottom991 said:

What do you guys think? Should i shave or leave it?

Leave it and grow more!

I am looking for completely untouched hair growth below the neck. I prefer an extremely hairy cunt. It's just beautiful. But I am perfectly happy with less hair as long as it's natural.

32 minutes ago, subBottomKink said:

Dominance is what turns me on, in the main.

On this opposite side of the equation, I would have to agree. An abundance of aggression and other secondary sex characteristics, like muscularity and body hair, can be decisive. A short man can certainly get inside me by displaying and using male power. The difference is that a tall man can intimidate and force me effortlessly if it's in his nature, while a short one has to work harder to achieve the same effect. I greatly admire the smaller men who spare no effort to seize the advantage and prove their manhood against me. Their determination is inspiring.

Nevertheless, I retain a general preference for the human pattern of sexual dimorphism. Males should ideally be larger.

20 hours ago, ErosWired said:

On the contrary, whereas a facial may be wiped off as though it had not occurred, a bred load must necessarily be at least minimally absorbed by the body, and thus become a physical part of the fucked man. A fusion occurs; whether by absorption of the Top’s water and semen chemistry by the bowel, or if swallowed, by the digestion and full integration of the Top’s proteins. The Top, by force of his ejaculation, adds himself to the sum of the bottom. The load is never lost.

This process is vitally important, but I submit that the effect is largely in the mind. What bodily integration does occur cannot be detected, and I believe that most seed leaves the colon by the unfortunate mechanisms of that organ. The oral route is actually more effective in the sense that all seed ingested is digested.

21 hours ago, ErosWired said:

Among bottoms, at least, there is a near-universal acknowledgment that semen is a valuable substance.

I don't really interoperate with the terms "top" and "bottom". Even a normalization to the more useful concepts of male and female is somewhat unsatisfactory. There is only a man's desire and its consequences for the cunt he chooses. Semen is valuable because it is the concrete manifestation of his will to breed. The thought process of his volunteer victim is a fly-buzz distraction.

21 hours ago, ErosWired said:

[G]iven the fact that a single orgasm may end a Top’s [sic] potential for that encounter, we necessarily have to have a sense of preference.

This expectation is the crux. Female preference aside, I would agree that deep insemination must be the objective if a man has only one opportunity to breed.

However, I do not assume the promiscuous model. I always have in mind an ownership relation between man and cunt-provider, wherein the man retains nearly unlimited long-term penetrative access and is thus assured of frequent delivery of his reproductive payload to its quasi-natural destination. In this context, any number of violent or degrading practices are available to him for the satisfaction of his phallic sadism and pride. These complementary acts reinforce his power and drive his lust for the subsequent productive copulation that he knows is forthcoming.

20 hours ago, ErosWired said:

I confess I’ve never understood the appeal of facials as an expression of Dominance. To me, the gold standard of Dominance is penetration, and the ultimate expression of that is the deepest possible deposit of the Dominant’s essence into the submissive where it can then never be completely removed. 

Penetration has, at the point of release, been well achieved, and possibly into both cunts in alternation. A bred load is quickly lost to the interior. An ejaculation into the face is a frontal assault on the (hypothetical) dignity of the victim. It also allows the man to view the splendor of his seed strewn over the (presumably attractive) face he has just fucked. I would also regard pissing or spitting on a face to be dominant. Slapping even more so. Is there any doubt that these acts convey contempt?

1 hour ago, BareLover073 said:

Can I join in?

Two fairly tall guys and 1 slim and short slut-boy...  😈

Yes, impale the little bitch from both ends. Or break his tiny cunt wide open with both cocks at once.