Phallarchist

Yes, because I don't believe in double standards and have always strongly wished that the boys I want to fuck had vaginas. I am indifferent as to whether they would have penises also.

It needs to be naturally hairy, no alterations.

On 8/7/2021 at 10:33 PM, ErosWired said:

While sexual sadism is a formal paraphilia, your narrative here and elsewhere does not seem to suggest that you exhibit such traits to that extremity. I have been in the hands of unquestionable sexual sadists for whose methods the word ‘untoward’ would be darkly humorous.

Rather, the kind of pleasure you describe I have found to be relatively widespread among penetrators of at least geater-than-average aggression and drive...

I'm certainly not competing to be the cruellest of them all. I might be on the low end of the range, but inflicting a bit of pain for my erotic satisfaction fits the definition of sexual sadism as I see it. It's just not my only mode.

I do find that plenty of men in general are at my level or above. Their urge to cause momentary suffering, at least, is commonplace and demands some accommodation. To what degree female masochism should be expected in return is a difficult question, but I doubt the realistic answer is "zero".

On 8/7/2021 at 10:33 PM, ErosWired said:

I’m not sure I see what is necessarily twisted in cunting males if certain males (such as myself) were by every indication born for that very purpose.

From the dirt to the dryness to the ill fit to the pain, rectal penetration is an unsubtle abuse of the organ. The very wrongness of it has to be enjoyed for its own sake. We are not born to this difficult and unproductive joining, but our desires twist us to it. We mate by grease and force and it is a most glorious abomination.

On 8/28/2021 at 9:56 PM, poptronic said:

It’s that “at first” part that’s got me nervous. I’m not worried about him opening me up. It’s the pounding I’m going to get once he does have me open.

Do you have an idea of how much you would be willing to suffer for him? Would you feel bad about asking him to stop?

On 8/28/2021 at 4:03 AM, ErosWired said:

If you spend much time reading through the topics in this forum, I think you can pretty easily get a sense of why this fetish is so underrepresented - the vast majority would probably view it as a shocking waste of semen.

Nothing prevents the target from opening his mouth. The remaining facial deposits can also be scooped in once the spectacle is complete. In fact, I would insist in it.

Bukkake style, yes, with the right victim as the target of degradation. But I don't want a bunch of men just delivering free seed. The boy has to earn each load in turn. It would be a gang-bang with carefully targeted ejaculation.

"Clean" is a perfectly normal shorthand for "free of STDs". The common phrase is "a clean bill of health". In reality, it's extremely common to acquire an HPV strain and have no idea that you carry it, but the general intent of limiting one's exposure to disease is thoroughly laudable. It's fortunately quite easy to skip over the "clean" sermons cluttering up the dating profiles of self-righteous bores, because they're all the same. I am thankful that I wasn't paying attention when the faggot clerisy formulated this point of orthodoxy. The testimonials and editorials must have been as interminable as the topic is trivial.

Be young and beautiful? There's no replacement, I'm afraid. Suck service is a basic entitlement and easy to find. Supply radically outstrips demand, so you have to be exceptional somehow. 

No. Even if I didn't dislike the animal words and most of the vague and euphemistic terms that are current, "pig" seems to have connotations that are too expansive. I'm not polymorphously perverse. I like plenty of unsanitary acts, but they don't involve solid waste and I don't roll around in muck of any sort. I'm not interested in doing just anything with anyone or everything with everyone. Pigs are thought to be indiscriminate. I have nothing but strong preferences.

Even so, I tend to think that I'm more likely to find compatibility with someone who considers himself "piggy" than otherwise. If you're with me, I will put what I want in your mouth and throat and you will suck and gulp it down. I don't think people who describe themselves as "pigs" have much scope to object to my emissions or the taste of rectum.

1 hour ago, daemien said:

Honestly, I don't know. I was 10 years old when I first sucked a cock. Instantly, I loved it. All of it. How it felt in my mouth, how he smelled, all of the tastes, especially his jizz. 

There was no getting enough. He knew whenever he saw me what I wanted, and even though at the very start we had promised to never tell anyone it wasn't long before I found myself sucking his friends cocks. By the age of 12 I was a fuck toy, but I think all of the sex stunted me. I found that even with a belly full of cum, i wasn't getting the emotional connectivity I longed for. 

There were no kisses. No hugs. Occasionally a thank you, slut. 

At 16 I hooked up with another man. After sex he verbally abused me. When he dropped me at home, I felt like nothing. A few weeks later, I ran away from home to go live with him. 

I took his abuse for 5 years before I left with only the clothes on my back. 

So yeah, I really don't know.

It's sad to hear that they wasted these opportunities for true erotic love.

1 hour ago, ErosWired said:

"Defense” implies unwillingness, though, does it not? While I understand and appreciate the sentiment you express, do you think it applies to a majority of Tops?

The anus has no will. Its resistance is reflexive. I defeat it in order to further abuse the length of the terminal passage. The boy might or might not be able to relax somewhat. The struggle to stretch his rings open might be brief. He could also clamp down and try to make penetration difficult, because he is s a masochist and wants to be forced. Both approaches have advantages. Spicy variety and all that.

I am a twisted male who puts boys to female (cunt) use and takes untoward pleasure in the difficulty my inappropriate intrusion causes. I do not use "top" as a sexual noun or verb and I have no real idea if "tops" in general are similar or dissimilar to me. My impression is that most habitual homosexual penetrators consider themselves sexual egalitarians and at least evince a concern for the comfort and pleasure of their receivers. I, on the other hand, seek to empower the phallus above all. I certainly appreciate and enjoy a sexually responsive cunt and the occasional spasm of a spontaneous prostate orgasm, but I am equally pleased to witness his suffering for my benefit. Self-sacrifice is a cardinal virtue for a receptive boy.

Let the boy mount his best defence. The pleasure of forcing him open rivals that of completing inside him.

I do like them much shorter. Rectum sex is awkward but the process is easier and feels more natural with a smaller boy. I want to push him around as necessary without feeling like I'm moving heavy furniture. I also like seeing my impact on him as I push deep into his little body.

That said, an inordinate number of rather tall men want me to ram them hard. They're often sturdy and their cunts can take a beating. So it's not out of the question.

As to masculinity: yes. Fat: no.

On 7/7/2021 at 8:39 AM, RandyCubby said:

I'd be in the abortion clinic every 8 months. 😉 Then start over again.

Late abortions are rough and probably too complex for the average clinic. Five months seems like a good balance between being noticeably pregnant and reasonably convenient disposal.

On 7/7/2021 at 4:46 AM, swall0w said:

my Alpha would punch me, he has left me with a broken nose and bruised ribs

Was this kind of violence part of his sexual repertoire, or was he a simple domestic abuser?

With normal urine, it would probably be a bad idea. If the men are constantly drinking lots of water and excreting relatively little waste, then it's probably fine. If you start to feel sick, go back to drinking plain water.

I admire the mind that generated this proposal in any case.

Post a picture? They'll come running in all likelihood.

I certainly don't. Pissing in a faggot's face and making him swallow piss should be standard practice.

On 5/15/2021 at 7:08 AM, blackrobe said:

There is an effective vaccine against cancer causing strains of HPV, Gardasil. Everyone here should be vaccinated with it.

I've had it, but it's not studied or approved my profile, etc. I had to go through several doctors to find one that would administer it.

Yes, of course I would, but I might also be willing to trade it for a highly-effective vaccine against HPV. PrEP might be tolerable in the long term. Anogenital warts and the occasional cancer are not.

On 5/12/2021 at 3:22 PM, BlackDude said:

totally anti-gay

Can you describe what he said more specifically? There are vast differences between, e.g., simple disgust, and an opinion that homosexual behavior should be illegal, and an express desire to hurt or kill homosexuals.

[Deleted]

14 hours ago, poptronic said:

thick 7.5 inch

That's several standard deviations above any reported norm I've seen, e.g. [think before following links] https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/health/sdut-penis-length-study-2015mar02-story.html%3f_amp=true

Maybe one in a thousand online profiles I've seen actually requires 8" or more.

1 hour ago, ErosWired said:

There are illnesses one can contract from contact with the excretions of the bowel that are unrelated to STIs, and one need not have been sexually promiscuous, or even sexually active, to get them. But more to the point, given that one definition of sanitary is “free from fecal matter”, the entire notion of the anorectal area as a sanitary area is kind of silly.

Right, you can get those illnesses from anyone. If you're going to have any unprotected rectal penetration, that level of risk is unavoidable. The STD risk from cunts that get fucked by a lot of random men is added on top of that base rate. So, I consider @BreedingTop71's use of the word in context perfectly reasonable.

2 hours ago, ErosWired said:

Sanitary? It’s an asshole. I don’t think it’s sanitary under the best of circumstances...

I think he was referring to diseases made epidemic by promiscuity, not the rectal flora that everyone has.