Phallarchist

Yes, I crave a large difference in height. 5'4"/1.63 m and below is best. I want to be able to easily control the boy's position and feel like I'm splitting him in half and stabbing up into his guts past his navel. Small hands trying to encircle my shaft look amazing, even while I prefer a generous mouth for obvious reasons.

19 hours ago, manux32ccs said:

I cry out rape me.

It's technically impossible to fulfill as a demand or request, but it wouldn't stop me from trying.

I like the idea of decisively negating the faggot clitoris. I do not like the restraining devices. Perhaps a punishment model could work instead. He wears a tracking device and I get a notification if it records undue motion or an orgasm. I make him regret his disobedience when I get home.

If a man orders a female (faggot) to impale herself with his penis for his enjoyment, then he is exercising a form of male dominance. The only justification he thinks he needs is the birthright of his sex. He believes that the only reasonable response to his demand is compliance.

My first impulse is to agree with his stunning arrogance. The opportunity to obey and satisfy a man is a gift. The Phallus imposes rough order on a chaotic universe. It both creates life and gives it meaning. Its power and beauty overwhelm the senses and exceed the bounds of reason. Yet, I submit that its vital work can only proceed by male intention and male action. It cannot be an immovable object. It must be an unstoppable force.

A man who fails to wield his penis with active purpose is lapsing in his duty. While I might find myself reflexively complying with a command from a seemingly superior, but essentially inert man, I would ultimately feel the act idolatrous. By his deliberate inaction, he undermines the very basis of his authority and carelessly forsakes my natural devotion.

I am loath to place limits on a man's prerogative. In general, power should be wildly imbalanced to his advantage. But I do think it rightful to require from him a consistent pattern of forceful penetration.

Let it be rough! Virginity is for the breaking. You will remember it always and thus take the essential lesson of self-sacrifice into your soul. Find an excellent brute to do the job. Don't waste your precious blood and tears on an unworthy male.

I have a long-standing notion to plunder a virgin at the moment of his majority. Local laws would vary the target age, but I would need the boy to be fully grown physically as well.

Mental maturity is probably a lost cause. You could wait decades for it to arrive.

Computer crap. It's tedious.

On 10/5/2020 at 1:14 PM, ErosWired said:

Pain is a very powerful instructor, and mis-applied can have unintended effects. If an aggressive Top takes an uncertain initiate with submissive inclinations, especially one uncertain about his orientation, and inflicts agony, blunt force and bloodletting, the shock may be enough to set the young man's sexual life in an undesirable direction. At best, he may carefully avoid certain types of men and thus fail to realize his potential; at worst, the experience may present an irreconcilable conflict between his instinct to submit and serve and his instinct for self-preservation and self-defense.

The two instincts are, in fact, inescapable and irreconcilable. The initiate must be certain in his own mind and a seeker after the ever-disturbing truth of sex. He must be intellectually committed to maximal sexual freedom for the man and convinced of the necessity of his own spiritual castration. As important as the transformative nature of cunt pain is the corresponding ecstatic rage of a phallus that has absolute power. The man must hammer into his victim's body and soul the truth that has already been agreed in principle: that his deep male fulfillment is paramount and that it requires the oppression of the cunt. The sacrifice must be made to accept that his willingness to suffer is the foundation of his utility to the male. (It also creates the possibility of love.)

Even with thorough mental preparation and an ironclad dedication to male supremacy, some boys will find the sacred violation intolerable. It is, after all, a shocking abuse of his colon and a deliberate assault on his (perhaps nominal) male identity. Rebellion might be unavoidable. It makes perfect sense for such a victim to attempt to reclaim maleness and heal the sacrificial wound by turning to the natural comforts of women. I do not consider this outcome at all undesirable. The functional ease of congress with females is as true as the joys and hardships of faggotry. There is unfortunate compromise and dissatisfaction on both paths.

On 10/5/2020 at 1:14 PM, ErosWired said:

On the other hand. what if the Dominant had instead, by a series of encounters and acts gradually increasing in pain and ever greater humiliation, drawn the young man into a slower realization of his world and his place within it? What if the Dominant leveraged the young man's instinctive pleasure and inner gratification in submitting to a more aggressive man, and by a conscious, calculated effort, conflated that instinct and pleasure with growing pain and deepening degradation until his subject lost the ability to tell the difference between pain and pleasure? What if, in the end, he had so cultivated his subject that the man accepted the skewering of his own testicles without any bondage at all, and felt a thrill of exhilarated accomplishment at being so debased at the hands of a dominant male? He would have not only achieved the definitive demonstration of his power over his subject male, but forced an indelible change in the man, and would have enjoyed a series of aggressions in the process.

This hypothetical is, of course, not a hypothetical. It is my lived experience at the hands of my former Master, a Dominant Sadist. Had he attempted to needle my balls on Day One, I would have been NOPE, and I would not be what I am today.

Seduction and a deceptively slow escalation of pain are appropriate for boys of exceptionally high value who do not know themselves and need to be lured into their self-enslavement. But they might also decide that they are not given to a life of cunt service. They might commit the odious crime of coitus interruptus.

I am rather referring to those who enter the sexual arena with a deep need to be defeated and forced into abject servitude. They are few but blessed of men. Cunting takes them directly from ideology to practice.

11 hours ago, parvenu said:

do you ever feel mercy for new faggots with soft holes that have no idea what they are in for?

This idea has naïve merit, but I think it's exactly wrong. The best a faggot can expect from life is a soupçon of happiness amid abundant pain and degradation. Therefore, I believe the first cunting should be sharp, brutal and traumatic. The victim should be fully aware of how he is to be sacrificed. He must accept it as part of his fate and as a vital lesson about his place in the sexual arena.

The fag will carry the memory of that agony forever and it will remind him that suffering for a man is a privilege, even as he finds opportunities to experience pleasure in his subsequent encounters.

It's possible that some boys will have a negative reaction to such an initiation. It's a defining moment that could push them towards other paths in life. Maybe they'll discover a latent interest in women. Faggotry is difficult. If they have other options, they should use them.

11 hours ago, Spunkinmyarse said:

Occasionally, I will try to make time for myself where I can be a total cumdump whore, where serving men takes priority over everything else.  But it’s only the odd weekend here and there, or the occasional sex vacation.

Yes, for high-quality sex, the period of receptivity has to be well-defined. Only in that context is a surrender to male sexual authority meaningful and valuable.

One of the advantages of a live-in relationship is that the man can track the fag's digestion and general life schedule. His opportunities to use the cunt on demand increase greatly.

Sex is naturally violent and injurious, so I expect the average man to enjoy phallic brutality to some extent. It would be strange if he didn't.

I love to hurt bitches and break cunts. The first time a boy yelped in pain and tried to get away, a jolt of power and joy transformed me into a sexual sadist in an instant. I felt perfectly male in that moment. The first time my weapon drew blood, I was thrilled. I hadn't realized how easily a rectum bleeds. Both discoveries were accidental, but I took to painfucking right away.

On 9/26/2020 at 8:01 PM, Tightass74 said:

I realized that tops decide when us cumslut bottom sluts will be used and bred. Whether we are horny doesn't matter. If a top says he wants to breed, I say when and where and bend over and receive his precious hopefully poz load!!!

The man should decide everything where sex is concerned, but I consider spontaneous rectum sex impractical. The cunt needs to be scrupulously clean and that takes plenty of time and planning. The fag should know exactly what's required of him and when.

18 hours ago, parvenu said:

oh trust me i masturbate to your stuff - i adore how tough and detailed you are about male sex, oral and anal rape and submission - we want MORE!

Thanks, I seem to be in tune with a few people. It's a small 'we'.

At least at first, the number of reactions a user can make is rather limited, so the system trained me to use them sparingly. It seemed better to highlight the few posts that I loved rather than waste my resources on the many posts that disgust me or otherwise engage my abundant capacity for disapproval.

My own views and preferences tend to be harsh. Believe it or not, I mostly keep them to myself. But I'm sure my expressed opinions have garnered many more downvotes than I have ever thought to use. I don't mind. I keep my own counsel and have no expectation that my conclusions will be broadly accepted.

To answer the question, I would tend to downvote a factually incorrect assertion if I considered the topic important enough.

3 hours ago, BlackDude said:

To me “ask me” means it your hot enough, I’ll answer what you want to hear. 

Yes, it's a power pose. Some of the people who strike it actually have the power, but many are delusional.

I'm unaffected and indifferent, personally, but I promote and encourage the desire to the extent that it lures boys into giving themselves to older men. I love to see a man score young pussy whatever the reason. A 25-year age gap is a good start.

On 9/17/2020 at 8:02 AM, dan123210 said:

I've never sucked cock nor recieved it,, ive had sex multiple times but blowjobs ive never done. I fear maybe my dick might be too sensitive as its a little sore when i touch the head of it directly. this means that recieving blowjobs might not be enjoyable, but everyone else seems to enjoy them,, am i the only one who dosent think they do.

 

Any advice on what to do would be good. 

Try it. Stop if you don't like it.

If you're going to fag out, then I think you're required to learn how to suck. Men tend to require it for purposes of dominance and sexual variety.

On 5/3/2020 at 9:52 PM, BlackDude said:

So I am just curios in what’s some guys opinion is in here on women overall. Now I have been called a “woman hater” simple because I talk about my experiences of how some can be and I have little interest  in most. As a gay man, is this extreme? 

No, it makes sense. People expect men to talk about women a certain way because the vast majority of men depend on women for sex and so have to maintain a certain reputation. You don't have that problem, presumably. It's like lesbians who are said to "hate" men. Some certainly do, but most just don't care much one way or the other. They don't really need men, and aren't going to go out of their way to accommodate us.

33 minutes ago, Scottyrim said:

What do people do if you have to get fucked multiple days in a row. How do you prepare for that ?

If you're in control of the schedule, I would just say "don't," especially because I think eating should be avoided beforehand. Space it out. If men are controlling you, then they have the primary responsibility both to oversee your digestive tract and maintain your health. They have to balance their greed for your cunt against its foul primary purpose.

It's especially a problem in a relationship where a normal man might reasonably want to fuck daily. He probably needs to accept the limitations of rectal sex and stick to once every two or three days, satisfying himself with the fag's throat on off days.

I'm speaking about men of substantial penis size. It's possible that a simple rectum rinse would do for a smaller penis. I have scant experience in that realm.

It's one of the greatest honours a fag can receive. It's impossible for me to even understand the idea of deciding whether or not to swallow a man's seed. Ingestion of the sacred substance was a foregone conclusion the moment the first knee hit the floor. It's basic to my conception of what it means to serve a man sexually.

11 hours ago, BareDublin said:

I learned by trial and error but I can certainly relate to this! Great guide.

It's a shame that you had to figure it out on your own, and presumably defile several men in the process. I believe that young fags should hand themselves over to experienced men for extended rectal training and sexual exploitation. Self-abnegation and a dedication to service don't always come naturally. The fag must often be bent and broken into physical and psychological compliance with male requirements.

8 hours ago, parvenu said:

this made me cum

Every fag should be so perfectly aligned with its natural state of self-enslavement.

5 hours ago, twstdpigboy said:

This is the best guide by far

 

 

cleaning out for bottoms 101.pdf 557.23 kB · 5 downloads

It's good that it emphasizes how thorough the process has to be. Faggotry is an extremely unfair and inescapable burden. A man need only have an erection. A fag has to wash his colon for hours at a time, get stabbed in the guts without a word of complaint, and thank the man for the privilege. It makes no sense whatsoever, but men and their dicks are just that valuable.

Clean-shaven، I'm afraid. It's not at all in line with my need for natural hair absolutely everywhere else, but I want to land on cunt-soft skin wherever my penis whacks him in the face. And I don't like seeing my seed stuck in a beard. I guess I'm generally boy-oriented when it comes to penetrating. I'm looking for intimations of youth and fertility, which are best conveyed by a clear, exposed face.

Odd. Half the thrill is aiming the stream directly into a boy's open mouth and watching the urine pool until he's forced to gulp. I don't want any extraneous equipment in the way.