brnbk

I am a bit confused and thought I would post this question so that others who have the confusion will also have their doubt cleared up. Is rape Fiction i.e. with the narrator/cartoonist, wanting to commit homosexual rape and successfully doing so (or at least half way) allowed on the site. From what I have read and understood, it is not allowed but I am not sure. I am wondering about the reasoning behind this view. After all drug usage, and incest stories - in appropriate forums is allowed on the site. Incest and drug use are both illegal and familial incest can said to be a crime at par with rape, to some degree. I would appreciate if the moderators could clarify if rape/forced-sex stories ever allowed on any of the forums here , say for e.g. in the Fetish Section - Hardcore Stories or in the Backroom stories?

He did exclude that option.

Would the role of a co-founder be like a Board Member of a corporation?

Options 2 and 4 would be the closest options for the situation you propose as both are scenarios that call for casual sex without barebacking. Option 2 would be if you choose to bareback only with your partner, but have condom sex with others; and Option 4 would be if you choose to bareback- rarely when having casual sex, and almost always use a condom.

the question basically tries to understand what barebacking- gay sex without condoms, and casual sex -sex without commitment and usually someone u might not necessarily know before hand, for eg a guy u run into in a book store, a sauna, a park, or an empty office, a male toilet etc. – mean to you. In hindsight, I should have added the option of "Undecided" as it allows people to express themselves, if the have some other option in mind - but often feel that doing so would make more likely to choose it, rather than the options presented. Which option you would have preferred to be added to the poll?

Is barebacking inseparable from casual sex, or can a Man indulge in one without the other? The decision to bareback i.e. have sex without condoms is often seen as synonymous with casual sex. However, a recent musing by one barebacker on the merits of barebacking, after a visit to his oh so freúndlich doctor is making me wonder what these terms mean to people. Can one bareback without having casual sex or does barebacking always include casual sex? Can a gay man realistically expect to have casual sex without barebacking? Are there guys who have casual sex and yet not bareback but use condoms?

From the sound of her views, it seems like she a strident person with strong views. Unfortunately, people with rigid views can be wrong. If you told her that u are fairly contentious in your medication regiment, as a medical professional she should think of other causes for your symptom —BLIP on viral load — instead of insisting or implying that you are lying. Sounds like she is put off by the fact that you have Syphilis a disease which still conjures negative connotations in the minds of some. It makes sense that you feel judged coz it does sound like she is Her value system does seem to include the maxim: do not have casual sex, as sex increases the risk of diseases. Does she realize though, that not everyone shares her value system. Even the great German thinker Martin Luther ended up marrying, as he could not endure being a priest, and ultimately rejected the idea that Lust was inherently evil. If you do meet her again or decide to continue as her patient do mention how even great Germans like Luther thought differently that her. Maybe it might open her mind? The flaw in her approach is that, as the doctor she assumes u might have the same value system as her OR that you should; and she does not give you options. She does not listen when you tell her about your actions and tries to put the fear of God/disease into you. There are no easy answers for questions about values as what might be stupid or unhealthy to some might be very attractive to other. Many Germans for e.g. might judge Sumo Wrestlers of Japan to be fat/obese/unhealthy however to a sumo wrestler, he is carrying on the traditions of a great sport. We all takes risks- more than nature requires. People who lives in cities are taking risk with the quality of air, food and life compared to someone in a rural areas. Workers in industries are taking risks compared to non industrial employees. I am told now, that even sitting in an office is unhealth as it leads to a sedentary lifestyle. Most of us do take risks, in that sense. Where is the risk justified, depends on the individual and his society. Football apparently brings with it the risk of concussion - is this doctor really going to tell her football player patient to stop playing football? Not likely. Sounds like you are confused about both your lifestyle choices i.e. barebacking as well as medical information regarding it : do HIV meds eventually stop working, and can you really get re-infected if you takes Meds as they have PrEP in them. A good place to start would be to gather all relevant medical information. how safe is barebacking for a HIV positive person, what are the risks of casual sex and barebacking etc, how well does PrEP protect people. Websites like the CDC offer fairly accurate information. For eg. on their website they say that Prep protects 99% but I am not sure if that rate is true for all prep users including HIV poz people. CDC - Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Print Posting here is great as well as there is some relevant information coming up from the great guys on here. I do believe there is some truth to the possible causes sited by EU Raw Bull. I do know that I once caught an infection coz some horny guys had a piss session in the Sauna of a YMCA gym that i had just joined and before I could do anything i got a serious hepatitis infection! So even going to a gym, can get u sick. Once u are clear about the information, you will be in a place to make a more informed decision. Life is short and each person has to decide what feels right for them. It is possible that you might decide that casual sex and its risk are not for you but you can choose to bareback in a monogamous relationship. I am surprised by your experience but not totally shocked. Capital cities of even western countries can be super conservative and can attract all sorts of government types, most are greedy and some add their version of godliness to the greed. It would be a pity if you cannot find a more gay friendly doctor especially in a large city like Berlin. You should never have to fear your doctor or their judgements. Hope you feel better soon!

Thank you, so much, for letting me know. Well, there is an incentive for me to reply to more threads/share my opinions with the world barebacking world. I was afraid often that I was too outspoken in my views and shouldn't be so vocal about them but doing so does seem to have an benefits.- an ability to offer more reactions.

Unfortunately, I believe there are limits to the amount of reactions one can do in a day . I am getting an error message "Sorry, you cannot add any more reactions today."

To answer this question, we need to first respect history and begin, by taking a good look at it. Medical sciences originated, and was practiced in the East(Egypt, India, Americas -Inca, Maya) for at least 3500 years before the West got a whiff of it. Asia and the Americas had made breakthroughs in medicine and invention, while Europe learnt and copied them. I am not suggesting that someone of Asian or American descent is necessarily more civilized than someone who traces their origins to Europe, as the reasons for the Asiatic origins of Civilization rather than European can be explained by the wonderful Truism - Necessity is the mother of Invention - White people lived in Europe and did not face the diverse climatic conditions that Asians and Americans had to conquer, and which required invention and medicine. In the past 250 years with the large scale migration of the Westerners into what was Eastern lands due to imperialism and colonization, the West adopted Medical Science and indeed became a pioneer in it. This was largely funded by the gold of the Indians and the colonies, almost much of it was mercilessly looted and helped the newly arrived European tribes to Americanize themselves and establish themselves into someone else's homeland. To add insult to Inquisition, native American tribes where systematically diseased out by the invading European tribes and eventually marginalized in their own Continent, without any compensation for their land, gold or civilization. The reason why I mention the history and tried to follow the money trail, is to make sure we understand that no "western government" – by which I think u mean the governments of US and Canada etc., – deserve any kind of opportunities to make money from medicine, diseasing people etc., as they have already made enough money through it. The wealth of the colonies was created by murder, loot and pandemica of its natives It is a well established fact that Aids became a full global crisis simply because the Republican and right wing government lead by Regan did not show any initiate to try to deal with this issues as the group that was predominantly affected in the United States by AIDS where gay men. HIV/Aids was seen as a punishment from the white Christian god who disapproved of sodomy and was initially even named "Gay-Related Immune Deficiency". I doubt if the government would have been so slow to act if pregnant women suddenly faced a health crisis, say in prenatal health; would the US government be blaming the inherent sinfulness of Women or even mother Eve, for it? or actually work within doctors to find a solution. The only reasons gays where treated differently from other citizen groups of the United States was because homosexuals where considered a threat to the established white family order of the US. Gay man when choosing to pursue the homosexual lifestyle in an assertive fashion threaten the social order of the United States. The operative word is in an assertive fashion i.e. refusing to follow the well established hypocrisy of the past of doing ones duties and having children, raising white christian children so as to create more WASP individuals. AIDS is not anyone's fault. least of all Aids victims. No human being is to blame for the harms done by a Virus. Gay men did not choose to become HIV positive. HIV is a virus and gay men are not to blame for it. Actually in Africa its straight people who are predominantly HIV positive. There are no sane arguments for the non treatment of HIV AIDS. the only arguments that favor a price for HIV Aids treatments are those rooted in plain bigotry towards gay or a Nazi like attitude towards human beings and medical science. The poor are human, with a christian soul and deserve treatment, just like anybody else.

I believe you are missing the point. Of course a guy who claims in a "Christian Church" that the Devil is a god, or God, can expected to be tossed out on his ear or perhaps spend a day in jail for disturbing the Sunday service. But does he have the right to state that and inform the church goers, that their belief in God, is mistaken is the question here. Many churchgoers might find his view distasteful and even violent, but how much freedom does this man have to express his beliefs is the hallmark of a civilized and truly free country. Not so long ago, maybe just a few years in some countries and a few decades in the States, if someone expressed their opinion or belief or desire that men should be allowed to fuck men, they would find the police rushing to bring it to a halt. My point is deciding which set of beliefs are correct or acceptable is difficult as standards and views change over time. In ancient Britain, a king could demand that his wife prove she had not committed adultery by passing through fire. In Islamic law and practice, a "marriage" conducted with a what we would consider an underage girl - under the age of 18 but has reached puberty is legal!! Some cases of free speech are easy to decide. Fucking young and I am assuming you meant -underage --boys would be clearly seen as offensive and criminal in most jurisdictions. However, if someone insists that his religion allowed a "marriage" to an underage girl... and that he should be allowed to at least state his religious practice, if not practice it... how should the State/powers that be react. Of course crimes such as calling for the murder of a mayor or a citizen is always a crime, but if someone wishes to inform the world that he is the next Christ or even the real Christ, shouldn't he have the right to it including informing on social media, gathering enough followers and setting up a new group/religion etc.? After all when the historical Christ set up His religion, did not the powers that be disapprove and demand His death! I am assuming the divine Masters claims must have assumed absurd to many people of His generation. Who decides what is true or false. Somethings are fairly easy and some moderately easy. For e.g. say on the contentious issues of vaccines, we can find the answers in health research and outcomes that can say wether vaccines are useful or not. This is a data driven question and has a relatively easy answer. However on question of society and morality and values and religion... Who decides what is acceptable?

Sorry, I think our discussion went a bit sideway - from the main topic , and unfortunately I cannot think of any book that has captured the whole history of this important topic. Most of knowledge about those times exists mainly in history and magazine articles. If i come across something, I will definitely let u know.

There isn't a whole lot of books out there, since the Jesuits and the Protestants did a superb job of burning native American libraries and temple records, and a whole lot is not known about it, at least in the English speaking world. Perhaps there are more historically accurate accounts in Spanish sources, but I am not sure. There is one book that I am currently reading that I think is worth a look, American Holocaust by David E Stannard. Maybe I might have to dive into it... and try to find out more..

You are most welcome! One of the challenges that you are going to have, just as I found out, is finding authentic material. The problem is for the past 500 years, the Europeans, both the protestant and the catholic "missionaries", where hell bent on getting their sorry & poor white ass out of Europe into this wealthy continent- America, and once they got here, systematically destroying all traces of American civilization, culture and identity and appropriating the wealth and the lands. The Native Americans after repeated programs of the Europeans, have lost a lot of their culture and civilizational knowledge and treasures and what we find now, is from us trying to put the pieces of the puzzle together. However, mercifully not all is lost...yet...

I don't intend to make you question the validity of your experience, but was just posing some questions for you to consider before you judged the man. 1) the harshness that you refer could just be a reflection of the racial injustice and deep oppression that native Americans have been subject to, but is largely ignored in the United States. 2) some dominant men do seem to like to spit on their bottoms. sometimes i find it so sexy, and sometimes I would be scared if someone did it to me, if i was not in the right mood, or rather did not "connect" with that person. 3) His associated actions seem to emphasize the warmth and welcome that Natives are know for. if he really had any kind of real racial animosity towards you, wouldn't he have left, rather than have sex with u? 4) Striking u sharply on ur back and ass, and grabbing u, are things that are unhelpful and can be excessive -depending on the context. The fact that he seemed to be more comfortable in a native American language and spoke in it rather than in English, while fucking you, tells me that there is also a cultural confusion. He obviously did not know enough English to realize that you did not quite trust him and that he probably should have asked you, or won your trust before engaging in such behaviours. Sounds like this noble native man assumed u where into him and wanted to try some masculine S/M dom-sub kink with you. However, since u had already become suspicious of him, in the beginning because of his language - that you urself admit you do no understand- the hook up made u feel strange. And as you rightly say,

yup. Since 2010, the United States has removed all anti-HIV discriminatory laws from the immigration process. wohoo! 🌹 Final Rule Removing HIV Infection from U.S. Immigration Screening : Additionally, effective January 4, 2010, CBP officers shall not consider a lack of HIV test results when making a determination of admissibility on an arriving immigrant or refugee.

Thanks for filling us in! I had no clue... about this disgusting policy. This is from their website - Canadian Government HIV Surveillance Alert General overview of the policy All permanent resident applicants who are 15 years of age or older, as well as children who have certain risk factors, such as having received blood or blood products, having a mother living with known HIV or showing failure to thrive are required to undergo an HIV test as part of the medical examination. As part of this medical examination, the responsible panel physician will provide post-test counselling to applicants who test positive for HIV as per the Canadian Panel Member Guide to Immigration Medical Examinations. The panel physician will have the applicant sign the Acknowledgement of HIV post-test counselling form [IMM 5728E (PDF, 528.39 KB)]. HIV positivity does not make a client inadmissible due to public health concern. In some cases, it may lead to inadmissibility if their health care costs would exceed the excessive demand threshold. Since when did having a HIV mom, make a child a "risk factor" to the Canadian government and Canada ! Such a discriminatory and stupid policy needs to be thrown in the dustbin right away. HIV Positive people contribute to society far more than what circumstances has challenged them with, and all these inflated costs are any way a big money gain for big pharma companies anyways and is not a sufficient reason to justify such a discriminatory policy. It reeks of Nazism- separating the abled from the disdifferently abled towards and end that could harm their well-being.

I went and checked their website, just to make sure it is true, coz it sounds like something from 2002 and not 2024! Yes, you are right: the Australian government requires anyone above 15 yrs of age and wanting to relocate to Australia to be tested for HIV. I can't believe that a western government could follow such a shameless, ruthless, inhumane and homophobic policy. I wonder what the HIV experts esp. gay-rights advocates have to say on this issue. Being gay is SUCH a difficult thing to deal with in Asia, and most Asian gay men, including east, west and south Asians always hope to escape to a western country where they can live their lives in peace. I always thought Australia was a bastion of gay rights and freedoms in the Asia-Pacific but finding out about this policy of theirs, has dented their image in my eyes. It is time to hold them accountable for this blatantly homophobic law.

Fair Enough! To the issue that u raised about Nikki Hailey dodging the issue of slavery, with the added implication that she somehow harbors anti-black sentiment; could it be the case that she is being misunderstood? She never really thought that anyone would question that the Civil War was primarily about slavery. After all, you yourself state that slavery wasn't the direct cause of the war! Just to be clear. I am not a fan of Nikki Hailey. I personally think she is more white than the Whites! She is an anti trans, selfish, rich, self serving person who totally forgets that there was a time, she was the child of an immigrant and was treated really badly in the southern state, that she now seems to think is some kind of christian heaven on earth and a light to the rest of the United States and indeed even the world. My point is, is her response being misunderstood or misstated?

May I ask, how you are so sure that the Native American guy was saying "hateful things". Do you speak or understand some Lakotan or any Native American language? Is it possible that he was doing "dirty talk" in Lakotan; since it is a foreign language, and often people can misunderstand speakers of a language that they don't understand as hostile, aggressive or even malicious. Also, could be doing some native American spiritual chant — and asking the American gods to bless your homosexual sexual union, as there are no Judeo-Christian like injunctions against gay people in the traditional Native American culture; they where always seen as being spiritual and part of the religious life of the community. The White arrival and presence in the Americas brought a lot of anti-gay attitudes and programs that where not part of the Native American fabric, both North and South.

The issue i wished to raise was how there is a complete erasure of Native American history and heritage, as if this was a continent that was bereft of civilization before the White European god with his army of beggars on a boat landed at mythical Mayflower to "christianize" the Americans; and boy oh boy, has this been a profitable endeavor of genocide, murder, loots and robbery for the "Christians!". The Native American has entirely been eradicated from his own continent and both the South and the North Americans are practically slaves of the Europeans who now determine where they can live(reservations), what gods they are allowed to worship(conversion to "Christianity"), how much of their own historical knowledge, whose achievements in science and technology rivalled the Europeans, they are able to transmit - thanks to the Inquisition of both the Catholic and Protestant "missionaries". America i.e. the United States is founded on someone else STOLEN land and WEALTH.....

I am grateful for the invitation to look at your 'record' on Native American issues, and am happy to report that, I think, you do acknowledge the plight of the Native Americans and the truth of the Americas. Indeed as you rightly state, ever non Native-American is an immigrant in this beautiful continent.

Thank you so much!!!!!!! and I feel like a fool, for not figuring that i could probably search the term! I now do know why I keep coming back to this site, though. Very interesting discussions and sweet moderators. Much appreciated 🌻🎉

I tried doing a "Search" on your profile, and it will only show the last 5 or 7 posts you made, and thus, unfortunately, I am not able to access any of those where u referred to the Native Americans. If you would like to, please, feel free to either send me a link to those posts, here or in a message. It is not my place to sit in judgement of anyone, and when I raised the issue - It wasn't personally directed at you and again apologize, if it came across that way. Thank you for your generosity, in engaging with this important question.

I did not intend to make it sound personal — i.e. these where your personal views or actions — and apologize if it came across that way. I appreciate the invitation to go through you previous comments on the issue, and will take it up.