Not criticising, but....

[dirtydudedub]

The law isnt the same globally. There is a surprising amount of talk about underage fucking. Even some artwork. Not every country allows this but this site targets many parts of the world. Im fairly sure its fully illegal in the uk.  It will get you jail time in Oz and many other countries.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_drawn_pornography_depicting_minors

If there is underage fantasy or art then anyone outside America should realise they might end up on the sex offenders register by simply being on the site...

 

Quote

All sexualised depictions of children under the age of 18 are illegal in Australia, and there is a "zero-tolerance" policy in place.^[8]

In December 2008, a man from Sydney was convicted of possessing child pornography after sexually explicit pictures of children characters from The Simpsons were found on his computer. The NSW Supreme Court upheld a Local Court decision that the animated Simpsons characters "depicted", and thus "could be considered", real people.^[9] Controversy arose over the perceived ban on small-breasted women in pornography after a South Australian court established that if a consenting adult in pornography were "reasonably" deemed to look under the age of consent, then they could be considered depictions of child pornography.^{[citation needed]} Criteria described stated "small breasts" as one of few examples, leading to the outrage. Again, the classification law is not federal or nationwide and only applies to South Australia.^[10]

Edited May 11, 2019 by dirtydudedub

[Pozlover1]

With the realism of CGI they cannot claim a real child was abused in filming it, but it is still illegal in the US, presumably because it encourages people to act on the real thing. I find it odd that obvious animation like Hentai and its male counterpart is so widely available. Some States have banned actual movies like Salo and Lolita because the legal age actors portrayed under age characters. Hollywood is always pushing the boundaries with kisses and suggestive situations, and apparently those are real moneymakers. Mainstream audiences also seem to have a huge and probably unhealthy interest in what I call “chicken movies” with under age main characters like D.A.R.Y.L and Escape To Witch Mountain. 

There are of course well made “coming of age” Gay movies like North Sea Texas, Beautiful Thing, Dream Lover, Get Real, Summer Storm, that are honestly made to encourage young gays that “there are others like them”. It’s no stretch to imagine these being banned at some future date.

You realize that the excellent pro-Black movie Song Of The South is unavailable because Uncle Remus speaks in a Negro dialect. I own several copies of Blazing Saddles because it too will probably disappear within our lifetime. A 1959 Film Noir pro-Castro movie, Pier 5 Havana, is unavailable on video, as is The Legend of Hillbilly John.  

The “fictional movie” See You Next Wednesday seen on a marquee in American Werewolf in London, on a billboard in Blues Brothers and a poster in Trading Places is reputed among film fans to be a movie that was banned in the 1930’s by the Hays Commission, and lost forever.   

[Spunkinmyarse]

Hi Dirtydudedub- I haven’t come across any art like that on this site, and do not intend to look to see if there is any.. I’m presuming/hoping the moderators are keeping the site clean of such stuff? As far as I might aware, they seem to be doing a good job...  However, as a UK resident, what you say obviously gives me cause for concern.  The idea of ending up on the sex offenders register for simply being on this site is alarming.

The same goes for any talk of underage sex, obviously.  The rules regarding this seem to be quite clear: discussing it in a manner that eroticizes it in any way is quite rightly prohibited.

I was wondering if the moderators have any comments that might help clarify this matter further?

[blackrobe]

I don't think banning (non-realistic) cartoon images of fictional characters that are minors really contributes to making children safer. I'll get to why in a second.

I understand that the goal of those who want to ban all images interpreted as minors is to protect children. I'm 100% behind banning pornographic photographic images that contain minors. That is sexual abuse and sexual exploitation on a life-ravaging scale. I've personally known men who had that happen to them as boys. Banning these kinds of images is, it's hoped, going to dry up the demand that would lead to sexually abusing and exploiting more children to create them. I think that's a fair and credible intervention.

Banning pornographic cartoon images of clearly fictional characters is a much harder case to make. Firstly because there is no child victim in the creation of the image, and second because it might be that the availability of clearly non-realistic pornography with fictional characters diverts men and women who might otherwise abuse children into an alternate outlet for their sexual needs. 

There is something else to be considered here. Society has failed spectacularly at protecting children from sexual abuse and exploitation for many hundreds of years. Tackling images instead of changes in human interactions that protect children is the wrong priority. Research has shown that even when children tell adults they are being sexually abused, the vast majority of the time the adults don't believe them and no action is taken. As a result of societies failure we have always had a significant community of adults who were sexually abused as children with all the kinks and paraphilias that result from that kind of early and, many times, traumatic introduction to sex. Older/younger fantasies where the well-adjusted adult projects themself back to the time when they were a child and experience the first rush of sex with their parent/cousin/sibling/teacher, etc. and kinks about size and age differences that these cartoon images can trigger. Having created these kinked-out kids through its negligence, is society going to "protect" them by taking away a non-harmful way for them to live with what was done to them and experience a rewarding sexual fantasy life that hurts no one? 

I'd assert that the case for banning pornographic cartoon images of clearly fictional characters is far from proven.

[drscorpio]

Moderator's Note: If you have underage porn illustrations on this site. Please report them immediately and ask for them to be removed.

If you see such images, please report them, they will be removed immediately. 

The only time discussion of underage sex is allowed is when you are talking about things that happened to you when you were underage. The description should be brief and clinical. No blow-by-blow or attempts to make it into an erotic story.