Some on Your Hole or All In?

[Guest BritBottom]

29 minutes ago, ErosWired said:

It’s rare that I find a point of discord with your views, but while I take no issue with the question of prerogative, I might debate the notion that shooting out then pushing in serves the Top’s overall satisfaction in a way that could be considered “a good compromise”.

The male is instinctively programmed to seek depth of penetration for ejaculation. That is not only reproductively optimal, but also an instinctive imperative rewarded by intense physical pleasure. Although I can understand that a Top might be of a mindset in which his desire to satisfy a different kind of dominant emotion might lead him to forego the sublime pleasure of his rightful climax deep within the cunt, I think it can only be considered a compromise in the negative context that he has sacrificed the ultimate for something lesser. The physical pleasure may be great, but still finally lacking that essential quality of deep release that takes him to Nirvana. And while it might be reproductively adequate, it is not reproductively excellent.

 I tend to remember Tops who are excellent fuckers - adequate fuckers, not so much.

Yes, it’s their prerogative... but why do it?

I agree with everything you say, especially about remembering the exceptional fuckers.

As to "Yes, it’s their prerogative... but why do it?" I don't know why they do it but I have encountered many tops who want to cum on my hole or on my ass, some even want to shoot on my face - maybne its the influence of porn and they think that's how its done, it must tale effort because , as you say, it is contrary to instinct..  I find a top finishing anywhere but inside me leaves me hanging  - it feels almost insulting and I'm unlikely to want a repeat.

[poztwink]

All in, please. I want to eat a load that's been in me, not on me,

[Devtylor]

I always want the load in me. It's a bit of a disappointment when he doesn't 

[Phallarchist]

4 hours ago, ErosWired said:

It’s rare that I find a point of discord with your views, but while I take no issue with the question of prerogative, I might debate the notion that shooting out then pushing in serves the Top’s overall satisfaction in a way that could be considered “a good compromise”.

The male is instinctively programmed to seek depth of penetration for ejaculation. That is not only reproductively optimal, but also an instinctive imperative rewarded by intense physical pleasure. Although I can understand that a Top might be of a mindset in which his desire to satisfy a different kind of dominant emotion might lead him to forego the sublime pleasure of his rightful climax deep within the cunt, I think it can only be considered a compromise in the negative context that he has sacrificed the ultimate for something lesser. The physical pleasure may be great, but still finally lacking that essential quality of deep release that takes him to Nirvana. And while it might be reproductively adequate, it is not reproductively excellent.

 I tend to remember Tops who are excellent fuckers - adequate fuckers, not so much.

Yes, it’s their prerogative... but why do it?

Male instinct has many splendours. Deep seeding is only one of them. Men gauge fertility with their eyes and furthermore crave visual confirmation of every aspect of their breeding process. They want to see the cunt spread. They want to see their erections split the entrance and disappear completely inside a bitch. They want to see the cunt gape and spasm on outstrokes, and they often want to see the excellence of their seed before they cram it in towards the waiting womb.

These considerations are luxuries to be sure. If a man is likely to have just one opportunity to impregnate, then certainly it is his duty to force the maximum quantity of seed as deep as possible. For most men historically, it was the only sensible strategy. Breeding-age females were claimed by the ruling class, so the opportunity for erotic completion was often limited to opportunistic attempts at cuckolding. A fast and deep violation was a narrow path to an unlikely victory for the common man.

But when a man has secure access to a bitch, he can afford to engage the full range of his urges towards sexual dominance and reproductive mastery. The symbolic act of ownership that is spraying seed on an upturned face or swollen cunt becomes central to his complete satisfaction.

It suffices to say that men alone decide where and how to spread their seed. It is immoral for a bitch to interfere.

[ErosWired]

@FaceLoad - An excellent reply.

[ErosWired]

@FaceLoad - Now that you mention it, it brings to mind a breeding I experienced a few months ago in which the Top had positioned me flat on my belly for deep penetration, but took time and effort to position his (extremely rigid) cock so that each outstroke pressed firmly against the rear side of my cunt, causing my cunt to pull outward along with his cock by friction. He fucked me that way from an upright position so that the tension pulling his cock downward ended up pulling my cunt upward, but looking back on it, I realize now that the entire arrangement had to have been entirely for his pleasure in enjoying the visual of his cock cunting me.

He did, in the end, finish with an emphatically deep seeding, but your point about Tops craving visual confirmation of their prowess and their dominance over a bitch is well taken.

[hornycumslut91]

I prefer the top cumming in me. I love nothing more than to know I helped a guy get off using my hole to pleasure himself.