Top equivalent to “No Load Refused” bottom

[NastyRawBottom]

Hey guys,

We know there’s plenty of “No Load Refused” bottoms(I identify as one). But is there a Top equivalent to this. That is, a “No Hole Refused” Top?
 

Do any of you Tops consider yourself like this? I mean, would you fuck any and all holes presented to you? 
 

Obviously, as No Load Refused bottoms, we don’t discriminate. No matter the guy, Poz or not, no questions asked, all that matters is taking the load. Would it be the same for a No Hole Refused Top? Or are somethings just different between Tops and bottoms? I’d love your insight. 😊

[BootmanLA]

2 minutes ago, RawBottomAriel said:

Hey guys,

We know there’s plenty of “No Load Refused” bottoms(I identify as one). But is there a Top equivalent to this. That is, a “No Hole Refused” Top?
Do any of you Tops consider yourself like this? I mean, would you fuck any and all holes presented to you? 
Obviously, as No Load Refused bottoms, we don’t discriminate. No matter the guy, Poz or not, no questions asked, all that matters is taking the load. Would it be the same for a No Hole Refused Top? Or are somethings just different between Tops and bottoms? I’d love your insight. 😊

Not speaking for any tops out there, but (a) I suspect this kind of top is rare and (b) I've only known one such in my life. 

I'd add that there may be some escorts who are "no hole refused" in their professional lives. 

[Moose143]

Yeah inquiry minds and that crap want to know

[BadInBrooklyn]

Well kinda, tho I wouldn't advertise it that way.   If I'm going to visit a no loads refused bottom and he hasn't asked for my pic, I won't ask for his.  Kind of adds to the excitement not knowing anything about a guy other than he's gonna have my cock inside him soon.

And if I'm at a sex party or club well I want to try as many different guys as possible.  Sometimes the ugliest guy in the room gives the best head!

[Guest]

13 minutes ago, BadInBrooklyn said:

  Sometimes the ugliest guy in the room gives the best head!

I totally agree, especially in dark rooms

[NWUSHorny]

If we are at the same sex club or orgy taking all cocks in a public play space, I'm going to fuck you. I may not fuck you for long, but I'm going to want to sample your hole for a few strokes.

[Loveitraw]

"Spelunker" seems apt 😉

[ErosWired]

I realize this question is aimed primarily at Tops, but it might help to clarify a little about what you mean by ‘no holes refused’. Does this mean that the Top will fuck any and every hole that presents itself, or simply that the Top doesn’t discriminate?

In the first case, it’s hard to draw an equivalency between a ‘no loads refused’ cumdump and a Top because the cumdump’s hole is capable of taking serial use repeatedly in relatively quick succession, and realistically, the number of Tops available to actually penetrate him will be limited. The Top, however, is not equipped to perform in such a serial way, certainly not in terms of actual breeding. He may accomplish multiple penetrations, but ejaculations are going to be limited; he must, eventually, refuse a hole because the equipment is spent.

It’s also a question of volume - while in most cases the cumdump will have a limited number of Tops interested in using him, a Top might find himself in greater demand than he can supply, simply because bottoms outnumber Tops to such a great extent.

In the second case, it’s easier to understand how a Top might consider himself ‘no holes refused’, in that he may take an opportunistic approach and enjoy sampling whatever comes his way, with little or no discriminating, until he has finished his play. This is sort of ‘no holes refused (in context)’

This suggests that there may be Tops who will fuck any and every hole available A) out of sheer appetite, an appetite that must necessarily be limited as discussed above, or B) out of a sense of duty and service - a type I have never encountered in the wild.

I am interested to hear Tops’ responses to this because there is still, as far as I (admittedly poorly) grasp the workings of the Top mind, a difference in fundamental psychology between a bottom’s receptivity and a Top’s penetrative drive. I take all men who want to fuck me because it is my role as a vessel to serve penetrators. If there is a Top equivalent I would be fascinated to know it.

[Kayne]

6 hours ago, ErosWired said:

I realize this question is aimed primarily at Tops, but it might help to clarify a little about what you mean by ‘no holes refused’. Does this mean that the Top will fuck any and every hole that presents itself, or simply that the Top doesn’t discriminate?

In the first case, it’s hard to draw an equivalency between a ‘no loads refused’ cumdump and a Top because the cumdump’s hole is capable of taking serial use repeatedly in relatively quick succession, and realistically, the number of Tops available to actually penetrate him will be limited. The Top, however, is not equipped to perform in such a serial way, certainly not in terms of actual breeding. He may accomplish multiple penetrations, but ejaculations are going to be limited; he must, eventually, refuse a hole because the equipment is spent.

It’s also a question of volume - while in most cases the cumdump will have a limited number of Tops interested in using him, a Top might find himself in greater demand than he can supply, simply because bottoms outnumber Tops to such a great extent.

In the second case, it’s easier to understand how a Top might consider himself ‘no holes refused’, in that he may take an opportunistic approach and enjoy sampling whatever comes his way, with little or no discriminating, until he has finished his play. This is sort of ‘no holes refused (in context)’

This suggests that there may be Tops who will fuck any and every hole available A) out of sheer appetite, an appetite that must necessarily be limited as discussed above, or B) out of a sense of duty and service - a type I have never encountered in the wild.

I am interested to hear Tops’ responses to this because there is still, as far as I (admittedly poorly) grasp the workings of the Top mind, a difference in fundamental psychology between a bottom’s receptivity and a Top’s penetrative drive. I take all men who want to fuck me because it is my role as a vessel to serve penetrators. If there is a Top equivalent I would be fascinated to know it.

I'm not a TPP exactly- more like Top - adjacent,  But? Speaking g for me? You hit the nail on its head.

[Luxbrit]

I think tops can be equally as picky as bottoms to be honest 

[NastyRawBottom]

7 hours ago, ErosWired said:

I realize this question is aimed primarily at Tops, but it might help to clarify a little about what you mean by ‘no holes refused’. Does this mean that the Top will fuck any and every hole that presents itself, or simply that the Top doesn’t discriminate?

In the first case, it’s hard to draw an equivalency between a ‘no loads refused’ cumdump and a Top because the cumdump’s hole is capable of taking serial use repeatedly in relatively quick succession, and realistically, the number of Tops available to actually penetrate him will be limited. The Top, however, is not equipped to perform in such a serial way, certainly not in terms of actual breeding. He may accomplish multiple penetrations, but ejaculations are going to be limited; he must, eventually, refuse a hole because the equipment is spent.

It’s also a question of volume - while in most cases the cumdump will have a limited number of Tops interested in using him, a Top might find himself in greater demand than he can supply, simply because bottoms outnumber Tops to such a great extent.

In the second case, it’s easier to understand how a Top might consider himself ‘no holes refused’, in that he may take an opportunistic approach and enjoy sampling whatever comes his way, with little or no discriminating, until he has finished his play. This is sort of ‘no holes refused (in context)’

This suggests that there may be Tops who will fuck any and every hole available A) out of sheer appetite, an appetite that must necessarily be limited as discussed above, or B) out of a sense of duty and service - a type I have never encountered in the wild.

I am interested to hear Tops’ responses to this because there is still, as far as I (admittedly poorly) grasp the workings of the Top mind, a difference in fundamental psychology between a bottom’s receptivity and a Top’s penetrative drive. I take all men who want to fuck me because it is my role as a vessel to serve penetrators. If there is a Top equivalent I would be fascinated to know it.

It’s very true that Topping is much exerting than bottoming. So it’s just unrealistic for a Top to run through as many bottoms as vice versa. 
 

I guess the way I was thinking when asking this question is that from experience, Tops tend to be more discerning about what hole they are willing to put their cock in.  As a “No Load Refused” bottom, I really don’t care if the Top is old, young, fat, thin, poz, neg, or his cock size. There’s just no discriminatory   
tendency in my body when it’s comes to taking loads. I’m not sure if many Tops could say the same about fucking any hole. To some degree it makes sense. I don’t have to see the guy who is loading me up at all. Whereas the Top very much has to see where to put their cock, and so has to see the bottom he’s using. Still, I wonder if Tops like that exist. Ones who just think a hole is a hole and nothing more. Doesn’t matter who it belongs to. Likewise, I’m curious to know if anyone on here is like that 

[ErosWired]

2 hours ago, NastyRawBottom said:

Whereas the Top very much has to see where to put their cock, and so has to see the bottom he’s using.

Except sometimes he doesn’t. There are darkrooms, where he’s fucking blind, or gloryholes, and even in a dimly lit hotel room when he walks in and all he sees is an ass up an ready, he may not have much more visually to go on. Even in the fog of a bathhouse steam room, when I take a train of three or four cocks one right after the other, I often wonder if the’ve even got a good look at me - because I sure didn’t get a look at them, and have no idea who just enjoyed the feel of my insides.

Edited October 2, 2022 by ErosWired

[Spunkinmyarse]

4 hours ago, ErosWired said:

Except sometimes he doesn’t. There are darkrooms, where he’s fucking blind, or gloryholes, and even in a dimly lit hotel room when he walks in and all he sees is an ass up an ready, he may not have much more visually to go on. Even in the fog of a bathhouse steam room, when I take a train of three or four cocks one right after the other, I often wonder if the’ve even got a good look at me - because I sure didn’t get a look at them, and have no idea who just enjoyed the feel of my insides.

I’d add to this- a row of bottoms all lined up face down arse up on a fuck bench in a dimly lit cruise bar-  does a top really get much idea of what the individual bottoms look like? From my admittedly bottom perspective, they just look like a row of holes, and with my cumdump mindset, I can’t help thinking that if I were a top, I’d want to work my way down the line and try them all.  But in real life, this seldom happens, and tops usually just pick one hole seemingly at random, and stick with it. 
 

So there’s clearly something going on, and I would agree with some of the other posts on here that ‘no hole refused’ tops are very rare. I’ve often thought that for a lot of tops, the most attractive hole in the room is the one getting fucked by someone else. This generally trumps looks, age, body type and everything else- which is why for a bottom in a group situation it’s so important to get any cock inside you, if only to attract all the rest.

 

[RawUK]

25 minutes ago, Spunkinmyarse said:

This generally trumps looks, age, body type and everything else- which is why for a bottom in a group situation it’s so important to get any cock inside you, if only to attract all the rest.

This is so true, in my experience also, once the 'party' starts with a top fucking a bottom particularly in clubs,  other tops will follow

Edited October 2, 2022 by RawUK

[NWUSHorny]

16 hours ago, ErosWired said:

This suggests that there may be Tops who will fuck any and every hole available A) out of sheer appetite, an appetite that must necessarily be limited as discussed above, or B) out of a sense of duty and service - a type I have never encountered in the wild.

If you will take an answer from a versatile guy, in my case it is very clearly option A, sheer appetite with limitations based on how many times I can cum.

If I'm at a sex club or orgy in an active city on a weekend night, I will usual give 25 to 30 bottoms a few strokes, but at my current age I can't cum more than 3 times in a night and rarely do more than twice. So only about 10% of the guys I fuck on a given night will get a load. If I had been doing more barebacking 15 to 20 years ago the percentage getting loaded would have been a lot higher.

I do love to fuck.

Edited October 2, 2022 by NWUSHorny