Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The conservative answer, if one could get sued for being "wrong", would likely be "yes" but this likely assumes the other person had HIV in sufficient concentration as usually measured to transmit it.

My personal answer would be that: "maybe possible, however extremely unlikely to the extent where a reasonable statistician would call it negligible; we need far more information about the other person to give any better answer than that."

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.