PozBearWI Posted March 20 Report Posted March 20 4 hours ago, BlueSaphir said: We have lots of problems to fix once Trump losses again the next cycle. Yes, I anticipate there will be a period of reconstruction. Hopefully we can settle public expectations on the whole "owning other humans" thing that keeps coming to the surface. Evidently that's for when money isn't enough? Quote
Moderators viking8x6 Posted March 20 Moderators Report Posted March 20 6 hours ago, BlueSaphir said: We have lots of problems to fix once Trump losses again the next cycle. If Trump is even running in 2028 we have more than lots of problems, we have a Constitutional disaster. 3 Quote
rawfuckingonly Posted March 20 Report Posted March 20 1 hour ago, PozBearWI said: Yes, I anticipate there will be a period of reconstruction. Hopefully we can settle public expectations on the whole "owning other humans" thing that keeps coming to the surface. Evidently that's for when money isn't enough? Not sure what what you mean by "owning other humans(?)." What is that a reference to exactly? 1 Quote
PozBearWI Posted March 20 Report Posted March 20 (edited) Is that seriously difficult to figure out what "owning other humans" means? But even if that weren't the case, we still have this ancient human thing going on about "race", when humans are a mix anyway. We seem to be relitigating the Civil War. Edited March 20 by PozBearWI 1 1 Quote
hntnhole Posted March 20 Report Posted March 20 5 hours ago, viking8x6 said: If Trump is even running in 2028 Or, if we even have elections anymore by then .... or, maybe hold elections, but they're so heavily meddled with they lose all meaning. Frankly, I think the decades of all his haute dining at Mickey D's will catch up with him before too long. He's already obviously diminished, and only getting more-so by the day. 1 1 Quote
rawfuckingonly Posted March 22 Report Posted March 22 (edited) On 3/20/2025 at 9:08 AM, PozBearWI said: Is that seriously difficult to figure out what "owning other humans" means? You tell me, IS it? I asked you what *you* mean by "owning other humans." What YOU mean. Not what it means. Not what the concept of "owning other humans" is. What YOU mean by it. WHAT is it in reference to(?). That's what I meant. Pretty sure you knew that already. So your "Is that seriously difficult to figure out what..." condescending sarcasm -I'm not amused. On 3/20/2025 at 7:09 AM, PozBearWI said: Hopefully we can settle public expectations on the whole "owning other humans" thing that keeps coming to the surface. The "whole 'owning other humans' thing"? What is that in reference to? The "thing that keeps coming to the surface" -What specifically are you talking about? That's in reference to what exactly? Edited March 22 by rawfuckingonly 1 Quote
rawfuckingonly Posted March 22 Report Posted March 22 On 3/20/2025 at 1:38 PM, hntnhole said: He's already obviously diminished, and only getting more-so by the day NO...he isn't. In *Leftist-Lliberal-Fantasy-Land* he is. In REALITY however, he is NOT. Just because you ("obviously") wish something was true........ ......... doesn't mean that it is. 1 1 Quote
Erik62 Posted March 22 Report Posted March 22 On 3/21/2025 at 1:34 AM, viking8x6 said: If Trump is even running in 2028 we have more than lots of problems, we have a Constitutional disaster. Don't think it would be Trump, even if possible but Heritage Foundation will have Vance well primed. I belive JD to be a very dangerous man & that's exclusive of claims by lip readers as to comments he ??? 🤔 has made. 2 Quote
Erik62 Posted March 22 Report Posted March 22 34 minutes ago, rawfuckingonly said: NO...he isn't. In *Leftist-Lliberal-Fantasy-Land* he is. In REALITY however, he is NOT. Just because you ("obviously") wish something was true........ ......... doesn't mean that it is. 34 minutes ago, rawfuckingonly said: NO...he isn't. In *Leftist-Lliberal-Fantasy-Land* he is. In REALITY however, he is NOT. Just because you ("obviously") wish something was true........ ......... doesn't mean that it is. Wishes aside, Trump is DEFINITELY NOT in the best of health. He is displaying to many "symptoms" that indicate major health issues. He is grossly obese, certainly high BP, continually repeats / slurs words & statements, rambles / irrelevant in speeches, forgetfulness, definite right sided leg weakness, rapid fluctuation in moods. These are just some of his obvious health issues & with rumours that his last Presidency was held under a falsified medical examination (examining Dr stated, he had not signed the report) his prospects of seeing out 4yrs do not look good. 2 1 Quote
hntnhole Posted March 22 Report Posted March 22 7 hours ago, Erik62 said: certainly high BP BP, meaning blood pressure? On a side note - the tv news stations are carrying a photo of him from behind, and only showing the back of his head. There is a flowing mane of orange-ish hair on each side of the head, beginning at the temples and sides, combed back over the bald top of his head (in the photo, they don't cover all the rear of his head), so a swath of completely bald skin - from the top of his head backwards and down to his neck - is completely bald. The hair on his forelocks must be decades old ... It's not like he can't afford to buy the best wigs available - why go to all that bother, trying to cover up all the bald parts? No one gives a rats ass about that silly hairdo ... Quote
Erik62 Posted March 23 Report Posted March 23 4 hours ago, hntnhole said: BP, meaning blood pressure? On a side note - the tv news stations are carrying a photo of him from behind, and only showing the back of his head. There is a flowing mane of orange-ish hair on each side of the head, beginning at the temples and sides, combed back over the bald top of his head (in the photo, they don't cover all the rear of his head), so a swath of completely bald skin - from the top of his head backwards and down to his neck - is completely bald. The hair on his forelocks must be decades old ... It's not like he can't afford to buy the best wigs available - why go to all that bother, trying to cover up all the bald parts? No one gives a rats ass about that silly hairdo ... Yep👍blood pressure. Another question I would ask is, "What exactly does that 'ORANGE' fake tan cover 🤔???" I can't remember when he actually started being orange but, NO ONE would choose to look like that unless they had SOMETHING TO HIDE. 1 Quote
hntnhole Posted March 23 Report Posted March 23 On 3/22/2025 at 7:59 AM, Erik62 said: Heritage Foundation will have Vance well primed. The R's may put up Vance in the next cycle, but he's not bright enough to pull it off. Once the pestilence has left office, I think Vance will be reduced to a minor historical footnote. He has demonstrated absolutely nothing of note, other than taking all that money from a gay billionaire <polite cough> to get elected to the Senate. Trump wouldn't have a Veep that's at all capable of threatening his own position in any way. Only a dullard like Vance - or similar - would be acceptable to Rump. 1 1 Quote
hntnhole Posted March 23 Report Posted March 23 17 hours ago, Erik62 said: "What exactly does that 'ORANGE' fake tan cover 🤔???" I can't recall which one just now - but one of the venereal diseases often causes skin problems, scarring, etc. Considering all the call girls, whores, prostitutes, loose tarts he's "been with" through the years, it's no surprise there's plenty to cover up on that corpulent bag of filth. I'm surprised he has any money left, after paying for all the "working girls". 1 Quote
PozBearWI Posted March 23 Report Posted March 23 1 hour ago, hntnhole said: I can't recall which one just now - but one of the venereal diseases often causes skin problems, scarring, etc. Considering all the call girls, whores, prostitutes, loose tarts he's "been with" through the years, it's no surprise there's plenty to cover up on that corpulent bag of filth. I'm surprised he has any money left, after paying for all the "working girls". Are we assuming it is a thin coating? 🙂 Quote
Erik62 Posted March 23 Report Posted March 23 3 hours ago, hntnhole said: The R's may put up Vance in the next cycle, but he's not bright enough to pull it off. Once the pestilence has left office, I think Vance will be reduced to a minor historical footnote. He has demonstrated absolutely nothing of note, other than taking all that money from a gay billionaire <polite cough> to get elected to the Senate. Trump wouldn't have a Veep that's at all capable of threatening his own position in any way. Only a dullard like Vance - or similar - would be acceptable to Rump. gay billionaire - do tell, please 🤭🤭??? I still think of Vance as a "Smokey" but, I will aquiese to as you are closer to ground zero (LoL), for info. Quote
Recommended Posts