PozBearWI Posted Thursday at 08:36 PM Report Posted Thursday at 08:36 PM (edited) I just stumbled across an interesting WAPO article I wanted to share here... As always be careful clicking on hyperlinks... [think before following links] [think before following links] https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2025/04/03/trump-wilson-world-war-hochschild/?utm_campaign=wp_post_most&utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter&carta-url=https%3A%2F%2Fs2.washingtonpost.com%2Fcar-ln-tr%2F41ebbe7%2F67eeb3401c02d2281d849193%2F66845dc845de25149424c9ec%2F19%2F65%2F67eeb3401c02d2281d849193 Jim Edited Thursday at 08:36 PM by PozBearWI 1 1
hntnhole Posted Friday at 07:48 PM Report Posted Friday at 07:48 PM 23 hours ago, PozBearWI said: [think before following links] https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2025/04/03/trump-wilson-world-war-hochschild/?utm_campaign=wp_post_most&utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter&carta-url=https%3A%2F%2Fs2.washingtonpost.com%2Fcar-ln-tr%2F41ebbe7%2F67eeb3401c02d2281d849193%2F66845dc845de25149424c9ec%2F19%2F65%2F67eeb3401c02d2281d849193 Thanks, PozBearWI, for (re)offering this timely article. Isn't it interesting how that old saw ... "history repeats itself" ... comes to mind? Let's cross our fingers, toes, arms, legs, eyes, that the result of that myopia is not included in the current iteration .....
PozBearWI Posted Friday at 08:02 PM Author Report Posted Friday at 08:02 PM We'll know for sure when we know for sure; but I think we'll weather this storm... 1
Erik62 Posted Saturday at 02:11 AM Report Posted Saturday at 02:11 AM 6 hours ago, hntnhole said: Thanks, PozBearWI, for (re)offering this timely article. Isn't it interesting how that old saw ... "history repeats itself" ... comes to mind? Let's cross our fingers, toes, arms, legs, eyes, that the result of that myopia is not included in the current iteration ..... WTF 😳SORRY 🤣, I'll cross anything you ask me too BUT, there is NO WAY IN HELL that I am crossing my legs, for you or anyone else, except for a female 🤣🤣🤣. 1
rawfuckingonly Posted Sunday at 05:12 PM Report Posted Sunday at 05:12 PM On 4/3/2025 at 2:36 PM, PozBearWI said: I just stumbled across an interesting WAPO article I wanted to share here... As always be careful clicking on hyperlinks... [think before following links] [think before following links] [think before following links] https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2025/04/03/trump-wilson-world-war-hochschild/?utm_campaign=wp_post_most&utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter&carta-url=https%3A%2F%2Fs2.washingtonpost.com%2Fcar-ln-tr%2F41ebbe7%2F67eeb3401c02d2281d849193%2F66845dc845de25149424c9ec%2F19%2F65%2F67eeb3401c02d2281d849193 Jim The Washington Post. Yeah, they're trustworthy... 1
BootmanLA Posted Sunday at 05:59 PM Report Posted Sunday at 05:59 PM I always find it amazing (well, not really) that reich-wingers are constantly denouncing mainstream news as "untrustworthy" when they're theoretically perfectly capable of researching the facts themselves, from the original sources of the day, and figuring out what happened. Oh, that's right, none of them paid attention one fucking minute in history classes, because it was BO-RING, and so they never learned HOW to go back to original sources. It's why the South managed to convince white people for a century or more that the Civil War was fought over state's rights and tariffs, not the institution of slavery, despite slavery being prominently mentioned as the issue in every surviving act of secession. Likewise the idea that the Union started the war, even though the record is clear that it started when the confederate armed forces attacked a federal military installation at Fort Sumter. And the record is clear how many of the early battles (which is to say, almost all of them) were fought on Union territory that the confederates invaded. If someone has concerns that a news story by a Washington Post (or New York Times, or CNN, or whomever) reporter is faulty, then go find the facts. Don't make an ass of yourself screaming "fake news" when you can't actually demonstrate any factual error in the story. 1 3 1 2
hntnhole Posted Sunday at 08:11 PM Report Posted Sunday at 08:11 PM On 4/4/2025 at 10:11 PM, Erik62 said: I'll cross anything you ask me too I would NEVER ask you to cross your legs. I definitely would ask you to open them as wide as possible, use certain items in the trunk in the slingroom to keep them that way, and (with the proper agreement prior) call every pig I know with a hot hard breedcock, full balls, and get them over here asap. 1 1
hntnhole Posted Sunday at 08:19 PM Report Posted Sunday at 08:19 PM 2 hours ago, BootmanLA said: reich-wingers First, if you were away for a while, hope you enjoyed yourself. I enjoy your input very much - as well as the zingers like the one quoted above. "Hair Furor" still gives me a chuckle. But humor only sharpens, enlivens the crux of the commentary, and yours is always well worth the read. I don't admire dullards, so I just ignore them. It seems the louder they holler the less inclined they are to - as you put it - "go find the facts".
nanana Posted Sunday at 09:39 PM Report Posted Sunday at 09:39 PM 3 hours ago, BootmanLA said: I always find it amazing (well, not really) that reich-wingers are constantly denouncing mainstream news as "untrustworthy" when they're theoretically perfectly capable of researching the facts themselves, from the original sources of the day, and figuring out what happened. Thanks for sharing how this hits you BootmanLA. I on the other hand am frequently amazed by how many people prefer "curation" of the news by some "authority" that likely has an unquestioned and unexplored editorial agenda. I used to like "curation" of the news, but now I prefer to read a diverse set of sources and bounce the imperfections off of each other to see a diversity of opinion on subjects, lest I simply be a good parroter of somebody else's editorial agenda. It does take a lot more judgement to do this than I used to need when I simply placed by faith in an editorial authority, but it seems more realistic to be aware of bias. It has also become more interesting to me to hear a wide variety of views on subjects than to quibble over sequestered fact bases and be unsatisfied with anything less than an unassailable monopolistic interpretation. I am definitely one of those who has seen newspapers spin facts and it is hard for me to read what they write without skepticism, certainly without the same amount of skepticism I apply to any source. If you have never been burnt, it is understandable that you may not be present to flame. 3 hours ago, BootmanLA said: Oh, that's right, none of them paid attention one fucking minute in history classes, because it was BO-RING, and so they never learned HOW to go back to original sources. It's why the South managed to convince white people for a century or more that the Civil War was fought over state's rights and tariffs, not the institution of slavery, despite slavery being prominently mentioned as the issue in every surviving act of secession. Likewise the idea that the Union started the war, even though the record is clear that it started when the confederate armed forces attacked a federal military installation at Fort Sumter. And the record is clear how many of the early battles (which is to say, almost all of them) were fought on Union territory that the confederates invaded. I think of you as a formidable debater, but this is a classic example of using a strawman. There was nothing in rawfuckingonly's remarks that had anything to do with the Civil War. Yet your remarks generalized about a group of people you conjure into rawfuckingonly's remarks, and then you have a debate with yourself about this cohort, and surprisingly enough, win your own argument. I am definitely a big fan of doing primary research and citing sources, but I also think we're all entitled to our own opinions, and if you always need to be right and cannot coexist with alternative views... Your commentary is very appreciated, as you seem to be able to channel a lot of the homos on this site and give voice to the way many of us think.
Erik62 Posted 18 hours ago Report Posted 18 hours ago 10 hours ago, hntnhole said: I would NEVER ask you to cross your legs. I definitely would ask you to open them as wide as possible, use certain items in the trunk in the slingroom to keep them that way, and (with the proper agreement prior) call every pig I know with a hot hard breedcock, full balls, and get them over here asap. 😢😢Oh GOD, why do I live so far away😭😭? A sling room, toys & extra pigs. You can have my consent NOW🍆💦💦💦💪🎱. So SWEET🥰🥰😘 1
PozBearWI Posted 11 hours ago Author Report Posted 11 hours ago Even Fox news sometimes gets it right... 🙂 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now