Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

How bout some historical shit.

1992  to 1996. IRC chat channel: #gaybb

Barebackrt in 21 years old

Before barebackrt there was barebackcity

Edited by muscmtl
  • Upvote 1
Posted

Right now, zero.  If I’m heading someplace new, I may subscribe to a few sites just to make connections with guys before I get there. But there’s too much free stuff available online.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
16 hours ago, muscmtl said:

How bout some historical shit.

1992  to 1996. IRC chat channel: #gaybb

Barebackrt in 21 years old

Before barebackrt there was barebackcity

And b4 adam4adam there was gay.com

Posted
12 minutes ago, muscmtl said:

Yes. But no barebacking on A4a or gay.com

Wow memories! Loved gay.com back in the day. It was the first online site I experienced, loved the local chat rooms, and was responsible for me losing my virginity. Miss that site every time I log into one of the current sites

  • Upvote 1
Posted

I pay for Grindr with varied success. Sometimes it's full of men looking for love, other times it's bisexual men who want you to wear female underwear. Barebackrt is a good site that I'll occasionally pay for too. 

Posted
On 6/29/2025 at 2:33 PM, muscmtl said:

How bout some historical shit.

1992  to 1996. IRC chat channel: #gaybb

Barebackrt in 21 years old

Before barebackrt there was barebackcity

Anyone remember a site called bnskin? Was always very raunchy as I recall

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 2
Posted
17 hours ago, Durhambottom said:

Anyone remember a site called bnskin? Was always very raunchy as I recall

I don't recall them having a paid option, but I had some memorable hookups and enjoyed their forums.

Posted

Had a sugar daddy back in the day. He was a great top would loved me as the boy I was. He let me utilize his multiple membership options on Squirt. I used it for all my hook ups before APPs took over. Its a great site and always felt more genuine over it

  • 5 months later...
Posted

I'm currently paying for bbrt and sniffies.com. Lately, I'm seriously considering dropping bbrt—I've gradually decreased the frequency of my visits there (maybe once a week) primarily to check new users since my last visit, so I'm poking my head in just to see what new meat has joined. But, when I look at who's on while I'm there, I would guess 75% (and I feel I'm low-balling that estimate) of those logged on are Bottoms, vers Bottoms, or versatile—and most of the versatile guys actually just want to Bottom. So, the site in my area is awash with guys who are looking to get fucked. It seems like any/every true Top in my area could fuck several Bottoms every day and not fuck any that they already fucked for a year. The supply/demand dynamic is such that any Top has nearly complete control over who he chooses to fuck and when and how frequently.

For a while, my go-to resource for sex "right now" has been sniffies.com. Whenever I connect to the site, I always find breeders to fuck me. I think part of my success is that I'm open to a wide range of different types of guys since I've always loved variety. So, I'm not declining guys because they're outside some arbitrary age range, I exclude no guys based on race/ethnicity. But that doesn't mean I'll sleep with any guy—it just means that since I don't exclude guys from consideration based on factors they have no control over,  e.g., age, race, cock size, the pool of potential sex partners is larger. For instance, if you're looking for a guy who is 25–35 y/o, athletic build, smooth body and at least  8" cock and you want that/him "right now," you're probably going to end up just jerking off. In general, if you're open-minded, adventurous, and have a drive to explore and blaze new trails, you're going to be more successful connecting for sex, whichever, apps, websites, and resources you use. The more preference restrictions you have when looking to hookup, the less successful you're going to be. Think about it—are you using the same stale restrictive filters (that you've used for years/decades) for the type of guy you're seeking? How's that worked out for you? Try stepping outside your comfort zone a little. You might be surprised at what you've been missing when you expand your view and cast a wider net! Good luck.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.