phillygwm Posted yesterday at 10:35 AM Report Posted yesterday at 10:35 AM I never have but I would offer a place to a guy I found hot, as long as he was there when I wanted him and maybe handled some jobs around the house. The concern is trust. I wouldn't rush into that kind of situation unless I knew there was no problem with drugs etc. I just don't need my stuff to start disappearing. 1 Quote
HWhittaker Posted yesterday at 11:57 AM Report Posted yesterday at 11:57 AM 1 hour ago, HWhittaker said: During my first week there, one evening I was standing over the kitchen sink washing some dishes after dinner. I was talking to one of the priests who happened to be in the kitchen as I washed the dishes, and eventually he came up behind me and gently brushed his hand against my ass; I noticed right away but pretended like it was nothing, I thought maybe it was unintentional, but then he did it again, and again etc. After the third or fourth time I went silent for a second and he rested his hand on my ass, and after a pause he groped my ass. I reached behind me and grabbed his now hard cock through his pants. Without another word we both went to the living room, he sat down, pulled his pants down, and I sucked his cock and balls for probably half an hour. He didn’t cum (he was 77 and had trouble cumming sometimes) but afterwards when I finished he just said to me “Good boy, we’ll have a lot of fun”. That same week, Sunday evening, both he and the other priest were waiting for me in the same room. I immediately got on my knees, sucked them both, and they both fucked me. One came in my ass and one (who didn’t cum the last time) on my face. Best years of my life. Often I would go to mass in the parish with their cum leaking out of my ass from under my cassock, and people were none the wiser. Both of them were adored by the people and they hid their little secret very well. For me the hottest part about what we did was the fact that they never once did anything for me. Never touched my cock or asked what I liked etc. I was their cum dump and that was it, once they were done with me they didn’t care until the next time they needed to cum. I was used to this anyway because I used to suck off two of my brothers who treated me the same way. I did some cross dressing in the rectory and I was sometimes “their little girl”. I love cd’ing now as a result. 2 Quote
hntnhole Posted yesterday at 06:51 PM Report Posted yesterday at 06:51 PM On 10/9/2025 at 10:25 AM, tallslenderguy said: Quid pro quo sex is just not sex to me, it's a sort of psychological condom LOL ... you always manage to come up with such delicious metaphors 😄 2 Quote
Seedthissub Posted yesterday at 07:10 PM Report Posted yesterday at 07:10 PM No but I had a landlord that bred me once cause i couldnt pay one month. then i payed him and he bred me anyway lol 1 Quote
hntnhole Posted yesterday at 07:37 PM Report Posted yesterday at 07:37 PM The concept of "money" is that it can be traded for whatever thing we happen to need. Thus, if a guy with something of value (oh, a place to live, for instance) wants something another guy has to offer (oh, maybe a hot raw hole to breed, for instance) commerce is ready and waiting. Cold, hard cash is only a contrivance we humans have invented to facilitate the transactions of our daily lives. "Cash" just makes it simpler, easier to "buy" what we need, The concept of trading X for Y remains unchanged. It's merely the vehicle - the method of payment - that comes into question. Trading housing for on-demand raw hole is not all that different than trading a dollar for a loaf of bread. 2 Quote
phillygwm Posted 20 hours ago Report Posted 20 hours ago 4 hours ago, hntnhole said: The concept of trading X for Y remains unchanged. It's merely the vehicle - the method of payment - that comes into question. Trading housing for on-demand raw hole is not all that different than trading a dollar for a loaf of bread. I think it's a matter of shame for some people because they "can't" get laid without paying for it. For most of us, it isn't that. I can get laid by guys my age, but not usually by the type of guys I like. So I wouldn't be opposed to paying for it, though it isn't something I seek out. 1 Quote
Cleanfaggot Posted 20 hours ago Report Posted 20 hours ago of course would offer my mouth and ass for fucking and breeding anytime for a free place to stay and would most likely stay naked as much as possible for easy access in hopes he would want me more often as well 💞💞 Quote
bbzh Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 14 hours ago, phillygwm said: I think it's a matter of shame for some people because they "can't" get laid without paying for it. For most of us, it isn't that. I can get laid by guys my age, but not usually by the type of guys I like. So I wouldn't be opposed to paying for it, though it isn't something I seek out. I take good care of my body and can get laid for free, but why sit online and fish and get ghosted when I can send a text to someone who I am attracted to and who is willing to satisfy my need at a rate I'm willing to pay? I've got way more money than I've got time left, which means my time is more valuable than anything. If you're not forming any kind of emotional attachment to a sex partner, then sex is already about as transactional as it can be. 1 Quote
phillygwm Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago 43 minutes ago, bbzh said: I take good care of my body and can get laid for free, but why sit online and fish and get ghosted when I can send a text to someone who I am attracted to and who is willing to satisfy my need at a rate I'm willing to pay? I've got way more money than I've got time left, which means my time is more valuable than anything. If you're not forming any kind of emotional attachment to a sex partner, then sex is already about as transactional as it can be. Well said. We're conditioned from an early age that sex is supposed to happen within a loving relationship. I think most of the people on here realize that isn't necessarily true. I just spent a couple hours looking at the apps in the hopes I could find someone but it didn't work out. If I had a "regular", whether someone living with me or something that is more short term, I'd be perfectly OK with that. 1 Quote
hntnhole Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 19 hours ago, phillygwm said: I think it's a matter of shame for some people because they "can't" get laid without paying for it. Well, thanks for adding that concept. I hadn't considered that as an issue. What, in your estimation, would "can't" - in this context - apply to? Some disfigurement that would deter others? Something else? Quote
blackrobe Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 5 minutes ago, hntnhole said: Well, thanks for adding that concept. I hadn't considered that as an issue. What, in your estimation, would "can't" - in this context - apply to? Some disfigurement that would deter others? Something else? Lack of conventional attractiveness, social awkwardness, autism spectrum, old age, infirmity, loss of mobility, some forms of disability. The TV show "Special" covered this in the context of Cerebral Palsy I think. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts