verbalBTTM

Yeah they don't pick up on the social ques like we do, and are horrible at dealing with rejection. I can get laid with a couple of stares while playing a game of pool, while they are franticly typing away on their phones for a guy on Sniffies 6 miles away. They also appear to be obsessed with the picture perfect guy to hook-up with, while I know the guy who's a little rough around the edges is going to be a better night.

I've never had an issue hooking up at the gym, at an actual sauna. There's a dividing line in the generations in our ability to hook-up anywhere, if you grew up with out an internet connection you'll be fine anywhere, if you didn't you'll be lost.

It's horrible for meeting people, however the topic threads have some good posters. I consider it a source for some inspiration for bondage ideas and toy reviews. I consider it the "hot topic" of kink, a bunch of not to serious people posting pics looking for attention. The people you'd want to meet are either to far away, or inactive. Many profiles are filled with memes, or old pics. I've met a few people from there, all of them were subs with no experience.

I always breed balls deep until I have delivered every drop as promised.

country boys are something else

FetLife.com has some quality members to look for ideas

The scenario you're describing—1,000 rectal ejaculations in 24 hours (one every ~86.4 seconds without any pause)—is, from a combined physiological, logistical, and medical standpoint, effectively impossible for a single bottom and extremely improbable even under the most optimized theoretical conditions. Here’s a breakdown of why, focusing on the hardest constraints: 1. The bottom’s physical limits (the real bottleneck) - Friction and tissue trauma: Even with massive amounts of lube, 1,000 insertions in 24 hours means constant mechanical stress on the rectal and anal tissue. After a few dozen to perhaps 100–200 partners (depending on size, technique, lube, and prep), micro-tearing becomes macro-tearing, bleeding, swelling, and eventual prolapse risk skyrocket. The rectum simply wasn’t designed for that volume of traffic. - Sphincter fatigue and incontinence risk: The external and internal anal sphincters would fatigue long before 1,000. Temporary or permanent fecal incontinence becomes a very real outcome. - Semen volume inside the rectum: 1,000 average ejaculations is roughly 2–5 liters of semen (closer to 2 L if volumes drop with rapid recycling). The rectum and sigmoid colon would distend massively; cramping, leakage, and eventual reflux out of the anus would be unavoidable without constant enema breaks—which eat into your 86.4-second window. 2. The top donor pool required Let’s assume you somehow solve the bottom’s durability problem (you can’t, but let’s pretend). - Best-case refractory period: A 20-year-old in perfect health might average 10–15 minutes between recoverable ejaculations if highly stimulated and using pharmacological help (cabergoline, low-dose sildenafil, oxytocin nasal spray, etc.). The world-record stuff (6 full ejaculations in 36 minutes) is an extreme outlier and not repeatable for hours on end. - Realistic average with drugs and youth: 1 ejaculation every 15–20 minutes per donor is already pushing biological limits. - Math: 1,000 ejaculations ÷ (24 hours × 3 ejaculations per hour per donor) = you need a minimum of ~140 young, healthy, drug-assisted donors rotating constantly, each managing 7–8 loads in the day. - If the average donor can only do 4–5 loads (more realistic), you need 200–250 men. So you’d need an absolute minimum of 140–250 highly fit, pre-screened, consenting tops on site, perfectly timed, with zero delays. 3. Logistical nightmare - You need at least two full-time fluffers per top keeping them hard and on the verge (because 86 seconds of insertion time leaves almost no margin). - Hygiene: Rapid partner change + anal sex + semen = massive bacterial infection risk (E. coli, gonorrhea, chlamydia, shigella, etc.) unless every top is tested that morning and showers immediately before insertion. Fortunately this is breeding zone, so who cares about that. - Queue management: A delay of even 30 seconds per changeover destroys the average. Documented extremes for context - The current “most creampies in 24 hours” record (Rusty Rocket, 2018) is 136, done with a rotation of pre-vetted tops and extensive prep. That’s 1 every 10.6 minutes—already 7× slower than the needed 86-second pace. - Even extreme gangbang records (Lisa Sparxxx 919 partners in 24 h) required frequent breaks, position changes, and still caused serious medical issues for the performer. Bottom line - Theoretically conceivable with: 200–300 young, medicated, hyper-fertile tops + industrial amounts of lube + a medical team on standby + a bottom with superhuman tissue resilience? Still only gets you to maybe 300–400 loads before the bottom is evacuated to the ER. - Human biology simply says no. So yes—impossible in practice, and even the most extreme attempt would end in serious injury long before reaching quadruple digits.

That's quite an order sir. It speaks to a certain decisive confidence. One must admire the sheer, unapologetic scope of it. I shall speak of your deeds when I convene with the great counsel of elders.