Phallarchist

On 6/22/2019 at 9:25 AM, ErosWired said:

@FaceLoad - Thank you very much for taking the time to give such a complete and honest answer to my question, which was indeed sincere. I find myself fascinated by the many different forms that the Top mind takes, and I have no instinctive understanding of any of them, so I ask.

My former Master was a Sadist, so your philosophy is not unfamiliar to me in principle. The difference in my case is that he very seldom fucked me (alas) but concentrated his will on shaping my mind and physical response using other means. He nonetheless assumed full, practical, physical ownership of me, to the extent that he possessed a paper deed to my body. (I still issue this deed on a limited basis to *very* select Men under special circumstances.)

I do not presume to judge either your motives or your practices. You are, of course, correct regarding the nature of injury to the anus and rectum as a result of sexual intercourse it was not designed for - my only observation being that for most of us the imperative is to mitigate rather than to exacerbate that injury. Still, you honestly explain your reasons, and I respect them as considered decisions even if I cannot advocate them.

The pleasure you take in the suffering of the submissive - your schadenfreude - may seem distasteful to some, but is the necessary accompaniment to the need for certain submissive personalities to submit and even suffer. We don’t experience catharsis without at least a semblance of cruelty. The degree to which cruelty crosses a line is less a matter of debate and more a matter of individual negotiation, unless the Top is a true psychopath.

On the one hand, I think it would be a fascinating experience to be bred by you. On the other, I very much hope that’s an encounter I never have.

Would experiencing Schadenfreude encompass situations in which I have inflicted the damage? I thought it had to be a matter of happenstance.

In principle, I see little difference from paddling a boy's behind until he can't sit down or slapping a bitch while you're fucking him/her. There's no direct justification for the pain and violence, but I enjoy it (and the victim might also).

I think this response is partly conditioned. When I was younger, I encountered a string of boys who begged me to fuck them hard, then screamed bloody murder at the first twinge of pain. As a convinced non-rapist, I withdrew immediately at their insistence. I was not being rough at that point. Perhaps my penis has a naturally cruel geometry, but I rather think these boys just failed to understand the inherent difficulties of rectal intercourse. For most receivers, it is usually going to hurt a bit for some time. It's just a built-in fact of the misused anatomy involved. I knew it to be the case because I had given my cunt to a number of superior men and understood that the pain of entry was the price I paid for the privilege of serving them, having them bodily inside me, and basking in the glory of their animal breeding power.

These recalcitrant boys weren't deliberate cockteases, but as a worshipper of men myself, I found their devotion to male dominance and pleasure lacking. Their self-regard offended my instinctive sense of the penis as the axis of the universe. They had carelessly disregarded the natural law that I embodied. They did not apologize and were not repentant. I could not forgive them and yet I could also not punish them or push them onto the path of righteousness.

These frustrations injected a bitter note into my sexual mindset. Anger became part of my male arousal patterns, and I began to be attracted to phallic rage in other men as well. I came to understand violence as a central component of maleness. It powers the hardest erections, drives the most vigorous thrusting, and propels infinitely pleasurable releases of seed that are miraculous to experience and awesome to behold. Penetration is the largest natural component of a meaningful life for a man, and it is inescapably violent. I agree with the radical feminists who say that a penis is a weapon. Only, I'm glad of the fact, while their enthusiasm for male hegemony is somewhat less in evidence.

A better man would have carefully set these thoughts aside, but as a habitual follower of my nose (and other protuberances), I began to seek out boys who claimed to be more reverent. I.e., they would shut up and take it. Mostly this quest failed, as I resembled them too much physically, whatever the dark corners of my soul. They wanted men who looked as rough as they fucked. I couldn't compete well in that arena.

Nevertheless, I did encounter a few who genuinely wanted to be taken hard. They openly encouraged my sexual hostility and one even asked to be immobilized so that he could not escape. That one bled profusely. It was both unbelievably exciting and frightening. AIDS was killing fags around me every day. The tyranny of the condom was firmly in place, so I was nominally protected, but it was still a shock to see my cock covered in his gore. I realize now that he was using my dick as a tool for his self-destruction, but the deed was done and bloodlust was instantly added to the many layers of my unreconstructed perversion.

Other willing victims bled much less or not visibly, typically a pretty drop or two in the toilet, floating in the lubricant. Those injuries were consistent with my own experience as cunt: rectal fucking occasionally leads to obvious rectal bleeding, and there's generally no problem as long as it's a small quantity, stops within a day or two, and no other symptoms arise. It's as healthy as anyone can reasonably expect an egregious assault on the colon to be. If you can't accept the terms of this compromise, then you shouldn't be offering men your digestive tract as a substitute for a vagina.

I don't think I generally fuck differently from other men. I'm just more likely to appreciate the beauty of those difficult moments when the boy's body tenses and he throws back his head in shock at his predicament. I will stop thrusting at that point to let his cunt adjust to me (unless he has explicitly invited me to sadism). But I will not pull out of him of my own accord. I believe that he has a moral obligation to satisfy me and I will not deny him the opportunity to fulfill the duty that he has willingly undertaken. He should think of coitus interruptus as the last resort. My fuck should be a sacred rite to him and interfering with my pleasure should be a sacrilege. Or he's the wrong boy.

It wasn't large, but the man was tall, slim, muscular, and hairy. Most importantly, he demanded service because he knew he had a right to use my mouth. He never warned me that he was about to come. He just held my head tightly and forced his load down my throat. I was so grateful to him and would have gladly spent the rest of my life on my knees, swallowing his seed, but he got bored and moved on to something better: pussy. I love bisexual men.

I dislike cockrings, just as I seem to dislike many things that are wildly popular with other fags. Most sexual accoutrements are silly, but cockrings distort what should be the natural perfection of the male organ. If an erect penis isn't inherently beautiful, then no amount of strangulation is going to improve it.

I briefly wore a rubber one in my youth to try to emphasize my bulge. It's not an enhancement that turned out to be necessary or useful. (I still believe in genital advertisement via appropriate clothing, e.g. sweatpants or dress pants with no underwear, tight-crotched jeans, and of course erections in public whenever feasible.)

I understand that many use cockrings to compensate for erectile dysfunction. I have some sympathy for this condition, but the failure to become hard enough to penetrate is a sign of the collapse of maleness itself. The afflicted need to fix the underlying causes (diet, exercise, psychology, etc.), or accept their fate and withdraw from the penetrative arena. Though I can somewhat accept pharmaceutical interventions, because I don't have to look at them or feel them.

On 3/25/2018 at 7:19 AM, happynleather said:

I got diagnosed with pre cancer of the rectum last month caused from HPV.  The doc put me on a six week cycle of an acid based cream, the shortened name of the cream is 5 f/u.  it stings a bit but not too bad.  Im honestly freaking balls about all this but the doc acts like it is common.  anyone else get diagnosed with a pre cancer?

No, but one of my cell cultures was abnormal once. It's scary. There have been disturbing rises in oral, anal, and penile cancer due to HPV. I put them in what I think is the order of severity, though all are horrible. Most fags don't strictly need their penises. Anal cancer is no doubt painful, but your elimination can be re-routed if necessary. Oral cancer is in your head, in organs you use constantly every day. And it could easily affect your face.

Rape/torture/murder. Serial-killer stuff. Specify that the victims are children and you have the ultimate horror. (Unless they're really annoying children.)

I'm aroused by some rape scenarios and might be tempted to argue that it's justifiable in some limited circumstance. The rest holds no interest even as fantasy.

On 6/18/2019 at 10:06 AM, ErosWired said:

Do you do this to every bottom you meet? What if the bottom is already a trained, fully compliant sub who already accepts your power over him and the demonstration isn’t necessary? What if he has no issue in yielding to your will? Just curious about this.

Also, it’s unclear from your post where you’re expecting the bottom to bleed from, but it sounds like you’re going for an injury in the wall of the rectum/sigmoid colon. If so, that is a dangerous practice. Although rare, is not unheard of for a cock to cause a perforation of the bowel, resulting in a need for surgical intervention. You may have the right to fuck dominantly, but you can’t claim the right to hurt anybody that badly, regardless of consent.

Of course, you may have meant that the blood would come from penetrating the anus - but even that could result in an anal fissure, which could sideline the bottom for weeks or months, cause excruciating pain (been there) and may ultimately lead to surgery also (been there, too). Why would you want to injure a bottom in such a way that he would then be unavailable for your use and enjoyment? I ask this not just of you personally, but to all Tops who aim to injure, because it’s never made any sense to me.

I think your questions and consternation are sincere, so I'll attempt to respond, probably with no great success. Fundamentally, I think I just enjoy a bit of  sexual sadism when i can arrange it, while you don't at all. There will probably be no meeting of minds. Nevertheless,

1. I do not brutalize every boy indiscriminately. The faggot must accept his fate and agree to the necessity of the ordeal that I will inflict on him. This level of submission in a boy is rare and beautiful.

2. There is no such thing as a generically submissive boy. Each man has his own requirements for total erotic fulfillment and each boy must be put to particular use/abuse to meet those requirements. Some men are easy to please. I admit to being cruel and difficult at first, but a boy who suffers for me endears himself to me. His self-sacrifice at the altar of my manhood could well inspire love. And as I indicated, this blood rite would generally just be a one-time demonstration of my phallic power. I would reserve the right to hurt him occasionally in the future to satisfy my perversity and renew our bond as man and bitch, but I would have no further need to break his cunt. Though, in truth, he will bleed whenever I fuck him, just not always visibly. The rectal cunt always bleeds because it is not meant to be used by men. Anal penetration is thus always inherently abusive. I just want to make the abuse explicit and purposeful in a ritual of initiation that fills me with a sense of absolute power.

3. What I perpetrate is no worse than any rough fuck. It's certainly less risky than fisting, which is shockingly common. I would indeed and be aiming for the sigmoid junction (it feels great), but the locus of the injury depends on the size of the boy and the anatomy of his cunt.

4. I radically disagree with the notion that I have no right to hurt anybody. Sadists and masochists have been hurting and getting hurt since time immemorial. Consent has no meaning if you can't agree to take pain and risk damage.

5. There's always the possibility of a more serious injury. That potential is always there, because a rectum has no substantial natural defenses against the depredations of penile invasion. I could tear him from his first hole to his second hole in the course of normal breeding. Or he could move the wrong way and fracture my penis. Or we could transmit HPV to each other and eventually contract anal and penile cancer. Every sexual act has known risks. It is possible that I could cause the boy great pain. He has to decide for himself whether or not it's worth the risk to accommodate my plainly twisted desires.

6. It's absolutely my intent to prevent the boy from receiving other men. I fucked him to own him, nothing less. I would give him about a week to heal completely before initiating regular breeding. In the meantime, his throat will serve me well.

7. The short answer (sorry to leave it for last) is that hurting a (consenting) bitch with my dick gives me the sort of thrill that I associate with brutal rape. I am not actually a rapist. I'm probably actually too considerate for my own good in most situations. But I believe that men should give expression to the primordial impulses for conquest and violent penetration that lurk in our genes whenever possible. Fags love a beast fuck. So do many women for that matter. We should pay this much tribute to the ancestors who raped their way into genetic immortality. Their example can inspire us even as we confine ourselves to the limits imposed by modern civilization. I love the power in my dick without reservation.

8. Finally, pricking the boy and enjoying his suffering strongly recalls the classic ruination of the virgin. In many cases، and especially on the wedding night، consummation would have consisted of heedless forcible penetration, leading to unlimited pleasure for him and pain and bleeding for her. You're a good person, so you no doubt abhor the thought. I, on the other hand, love the practices of patriarchy implicitly and regard traumatic penetration as one way to establish and enforce the correct, male-dominated, penis-centred marital and social order.

I hope I've clarified my intent somewhat. No doubt I remain a monster, but I am ill-disposed to prevaricate in this regard. Though I probably should have used my time to seek out and defile an innocent instead.

I want to hurt the boy deeply our first time. I drive hard inward to stretch his guts around my full length. A few sharp thrusts from there will reliably draw blood. I withdraw my weapon to wipe the boy's cunt gore on his agonized face and make him taste his defeat. When he accepts my power over him and my right to abuse him for my satisfaction, I can proceed with normal breeding. I might never need to hurt his cunt again, but it's essential that he be forced to yield to my will and learn the price of disobedience.

Bitch, then fag. Slave and object are automatically included in either of those.

16 hours ago, jerseyguyx99 said:

If i agree to meet up with a top, especially at his place, i'm giving consent. i also like to tell tops that before meeting up.

Yes, you gave him the right to take you by force when you entered his door. Withdrawing consent before he's done is despicable behavior for a faggot. Any man so betrayed should discard the useless bitch.

On 6/11/2019 at 12:02 PM, downtownswallow said:

It’s ironic, but I’ve never been with a Top (yet) that’s provided an ATM experience after he breeds me. I’d love to do it to see what it’s like. I’m always squeaky clean for My Tops, so it’s not a cleanliness issue for me. Since I enjoy it when I cum from being fucked and My Top uses my cum as additional lube (I prefer spit and precum only...not artificial lubes) if My Tops ever decide to perform ATM after breeding me I think it’d be super hot!

You could take the initiative and move to suck the man clean. Pause to give him the opportunity to refuse you the honor. He might need a few seconds to comprehend the depths of your depravity and balance his natural disgust against the satisfaction of completing the cycle of dominance.

"Cocksucker" is an identity as well as a gratifyingly demeaning insult used by normal men. However, "dick" is the word more associated with anger and active abuse. "Being a dick". "Dicking me over". Somehow "suck my dick, bitch" sounds more aggressive than "suck my cock, bitch", so I prefer it.

Although if the man is using his strength to forcefuck a throat, he can call his sex-weapon a "johnson" or a "pecker" for all I care.  Male sexual aggression is invaluable, whether it's silently contemptuous or accompanied by constant, hateful verbal degradation. The bitch is there to worship, choke, and swallow, not to have vocabulary preferences.

Fuck me while I'm asleep (probably drugged). Fortunately, it still counts as rape even if I want you to do it and ask you to take pictures while you're doing it.

In terms of an unplanned assault, it's more of a date-rape scenario where I tell him to stop because it hurts and he holds me down and forces it in me until he's finished. It's illegal, but also his natural right. It's immoral for a fag to interfere with a man's pleasure.

On 4/24/2019 at 2:18 PM, essexfuckwhore said:

…check that I am not dead or dying.

I like this standard. Fair game if he's still breathing.

If the faggot bitch is going to reliably swallow every drop, then it should kneel next to the toilet. Otherwise (e.g. full-face urination), it should kneel in the bathtub just as a practical matter.

He had a huge mouth and it felt like he had detached his jaw, snake-like, to swallow the whole thing. There was no scraping or struggle, just immediate deep entry to the tight wet cunt of his throat. It's a rare experience.

On 2/8/2019 at 11:04 AM, ChainedBoy said:

Have you ever considered putting the cummers hand on your throat so he can feel you swallow his seed?

I much prefer that the man reach down to grip my throat of his own accord. With one hand on the back of my head to force me down and the other wrapped tightly around my throat, he shows me his strength and his capacity for violence. I surrender to the threat and power of his male instincts as he forces his seed into me.

Roughly forced rectum bleeds pretty reliably. I hope you'll share the pictures of your haemorraging cunt next to the man's blood-soaked weapon.

I agree that it's scarce, but haven't found it to be better elsewhere. BlowBuddies does have a monthly event for it and their specialized piss area is generally open every Saturday.

On 2/17/2019 at 5:13 AM, orionboy1 said:

I have a hot 19 yo bottom boy I fuck on occasion, hes 5' 4" and 110lbs so he is definitely a fun size gay boy to play with, like me he is on PrEP and is cool with BB, but its frustrating because he gets off on guys cumming on his chest, I have only properly bred him once. : ( 

Does he at least have pretty tits?

4 hours ago, ErosWired said:

I don’t know if I wouls say I get a high from ass-to-mouth, but it definitely has an effect on me. I think it has more to do with my submissive desire for humiliation  - when a Top has defiled my slit with his organ and then pulls it out dripping white with the proof, holds it under my nose and says “This was just in your ass, you whore, now clean it with your tongue,” he’s reminding me that not only has he degraded my body, but also that my ass has another, non-sexual function, and only the lowest, most worthless man would allow that cock to enter his mouth.

Then I open my mouth, wrap my tongue around his shaft, and taste his cum and my ass juices together, and I know exactly what I am.

And once I’ve done it, it’s all over for me. There’s no way back from that. I will always know that I let another man dominate me like a bitch, leave his DNA deep inside me, and make me clean his cock that had just been deep inside the place where my dung comes out with my tongue. Once I’ve done it I don’t have any excuse to refuse, so this is just the beginning for me... and each Top who makes me will degrade me further than I was before, until... ? Is there even a bottom that can be reached? Is there any place I can go where men will look at me and say, “He can’t sink any lower”? Because then one of them could just fuck my ass and then fuck my mouth, and I’d go lower still.

I don’t know if that counts as a high, but it ... motivates me...

Yes, a thousand times yes! Beautifully worded. It's degradation and debasement, perfected. Men, fags who won't suck their cunt stain off of your prick are pathetic and insubordinate. Demand complete service and deny them the dick until they start showing you respect.

13 hours ago, aargosbot said:

It's criminal what you are doing. hIV without treatment is a death sentence. 

I'm not into HIV and wish the whole topic would remain in the past where it belongs, but it's certainly not illegal or immoral (as if that mattered) to give a faggot bitch what it's begging for. It sounds like he has many satisfied, if dumb customers.

I need males to have natural body hair. I like everything from thick shoulder/back hair to just cunt and front hair. Just leave it natural. I myself don't have nearly as much as I'd like. (Boys love hairy men.)

4 hours ago, VicBCtop said:

Oral is not necessary before anal sex but it is necessary After anal sex.  

Clean my Stick

It's not a suggestion or a request. It's the Law.

On 1/17/2019 at 8:25 AM, nelly26 said:

When black men are casted, it's very noticeable that they will have a nice body and a large penis but lack in the face department (meaning, they're more or less ugly).

I think there is truth to this observation for a lot of porn. As far back as the 1980s in my recollection, I noticed that some standards were only applied to white performers. They didn't seem care about the faces of the black men hired and sometimes not even their bodies. It was all about the "Interracial!" taboo and big dick. It often seemed like they had just gone to a random street where there were lots of black men and took the first few who said yes. Some looked like they had rough lives. Some were OK. Few would I have categorized as cute or handsome.

The good news is that it's never been cheaper to make porn, so anyone with concerns about representation can meet them head on with productions that reflect the faces, bodies, dicks, and themes that he wants to portray as the alternative. 

On 1/19/2019 at 9:45 AM, DrrAld said:

Totally agree about the faces being subjective. What attracts one might not attract another. However, the issue isn’t about aesthetic beauty and doesn’t change the fact that you don’t see White guys, “attractive” or not, being courted, marketed, or labelled as having “Big White Cocks”. If anything, it’s simply normalised to “Big Dick” or “Monster Cock” and race isn’t involved.

Actually, we do: "big white cock" in Google returns about 25 million results. It's a relatively recent (last 10 years?) sort of reaction to "BBC".

I have never understood the particular obsession with "big black", but I've come to accept that there are probably more black men at the extreme end of the scale size-wise. I don't know how else to interpret the abundant visual evidence and the many testimonials I've heard from people who aren't generally given to exaggeration or crude bias. This clustering at the top end of "endowment" would naturally lead to a disproportionate representation in size-focused productions. However, the existence of this minority does not necessarily make the average penis size among black men any larger than the general population.

We also know for sure that penis size is at least partially determined by genes, so I wouldn't discount the possibility that there are sub-populations with widely divergent average sizes among men with significant genetic African heritage, given the large genetic diversity within Africa.