twstdpigboy

no actually it isn't an unsupported opinion ... he clearly had read and understood article. did you read the entire article? while the article does indicate that while "... this case is perhaps more typical of possible PrEP “breakthrough” cases ..." it then continues ... "It is rather that there were several factors that may have contributed to his PrEP not working: He did have a PrEP break five weeks before HIV diagnosis and we can’t rule out that the patient had sex closer to that break than he recalls. The LGV inflammation may have increased the likelihood of transmission. It’s possible, if not very likely, that he may have caught a virus with a degree of pre-existing resistance to PrEP. For some reason (such as efficient kidney excretion) this patient had rather low levels of the PrEP drugs and especially tenofovir in his system. While they should normally have been adequate, they may not have been so if combined with the other two or three factors ..." You are for some reason not understanding or you are deliberately misrepresenting what is written in the article in hope to sway opinion to your vision of the future but way is clear is you prefer the drama of your doom and gloom scenarios and the bleak future you see for the gay men on the planet. to what end I'm unsure. what I do know for certain is that because of your 'fake news editorial' there will be people on this site that had considered taking PrEP before reading your nightmarish hysteria, that now will have reconsidered PrEP as a viable alternative HIV prevention strategy after having read your posts. No preventative strategy is 100% effective - none. you could chose never to have sex with anyone and still end up HIV +. we can only assess what option is best for us based on the level of risk we are comfortable in taking and the likelihood that the sexual activity we consent to may result in an HIV+ diagnosis. we do that by making an informed decision based on the best medical science available to us at the time. not conjecture or opinion or by painting doom and gloom/the sky is falling nightmare scenarios. your editorizing only serves to fan the flames of ignorance and fear or worse leads to the same types of ill- or un-informed hysteria that dominates social media around preventative options for other diseases like measles or the flu. the last thing our community needs is the emergence of an anti-PrEP movement akin to the Anti-Vacination peddlers. either learn to read or stop editorializing things you don't understand. unless you were purposefully trying to sew the seeds of ignorance and doubt in which case - shut the hell up.

358

Funny to have discovered this topic as I was just discussing this last night with a sex partner - I very rarely shoot any more but my orgasms are incredibly more powerful, they take forever to arrive and they last longer that when I shot my load in a voluminous way. It is bad for a fast solo jerk-off but for partnered or group jerk session I can edge forever - very little left to shoot when most of the volume has gone to pre-cum. If you're someone who gets off on large volume on your face or in your mouth then your on the short end of the stick with me. But if it's the throbbing of the cock in your mouth or the spasm of the ass muscles around your dick that gets you to shoot your load then I'm your man ... so to speak.

Personally I'm cut. And I'm just lucky to be able to say that at all because women in general (at least North American women) haven't got a clue how to properly clean an uncut baby boy. Most women of a certain age were socialized not to be sexual or even sexually aware. The whole [banned word] on educating both men and women in the last 150 years regarding sex and sexuality has contributed to more medical and psycho-social issues in people than I care to think about but it is certainly one of the reasons that not only lead to the rise in circumcision in boys in North America because Mother's were never taught anything ... nothing about being a mother or a father for that matter - I'll say 'in the old days' to do the simplest of things like breast feeding and cleaning a baby's penis. With the incidence of mothers with babys in distress and pain over badly nfected dicks the standard practice of circumcision baby boys became the norm and some of us men of a certain age owe a debt of gratitude to this practice because we may have ended up with either horribly disfigured penises due to extreme infection or penile cancer as adults. I for one was not circumcised at birth - my idiot father made that decision. I say idiot because 1. he didn't ask why the doctors wanted to do that 2. what was good for home should be good enough for me and 3. never consulted my mother to see if she had a issue with taking care of an uncircumcised baby. The results of his decision lead to my mother needing to be sedated and me to be given an emergency circumcision because my little guy was 3 time it's normal size and red as a barn door. Having said all that sex education of both boys and girls in schools is improving and with the advent of prenatal classes for parents expecting a child, issues around penile hygiene of baby's, boys and men has vastly improved and the medical profession is now playing catch-up. Circumcision in most hospitals is now only performed when requested. Not all but madown and thankfully emergency circumcision rates are way down. Do I like being circumcised ... since it's all I know I can't say one way or the other but I am glad to have my penis. The whole cut or uncut takes on a different perspective for me. I couldn't care less about if the man I have sex with is or isn't and I certainly wouldn't deny having sex with come one because of it as some of the men here have said; I truly think that is an insult that cuts (no pun intended) to the very heart of many men and I'm not that mean spirited or short sighted. Do I have a preference? That really depends on context. Aesthetically, I like cut cocks on white men mostly because I'm a cut white man and it's what I'm used to seeing everyday and I find from an asthetic perspective the foreskin of a white man (not all but in my experience many) is less substantial ... it lacks gravitas. The cocks of men of colour who are cut in my opinion do not live up to their uncut brothers; again purely asthetic. Side by side photographically speaking I'd choose the uncut penis of colour every time. Sexually, I love them all especially if they are thick and long. Cocksucking an uncut man is a huge turn on. There's more play with with and they feel every every swipe, swirl and flick of the tongue on their heads and as the cocksucker the moans are almost reward enough. But a cut cock is easier to suck especially if you like not using your hands and you've been asked or ordered by your partner to concentrate on the head and not to use your hands it's definitely an advantage to the bottom to have a top that is cut at least when your starting off. Practice make perfect but all things considered in those situations less energy is expended getting the foreskin out of way which leave more to focus on the head. When I'm fucked I have no preference at all - size becomes the driver of enjoyment for me there. Cut men can last a bit longer but there's less clean up at the end ... and I do like clean up. that my 2 cents worth.

Go on PrEP. It doesn't protect from normal STDs but if it's HIV you're worried about then you'll have piece of mind (if you take as directed).

I'm POZ, so the need to have my guts marinate with cum really isn't required or enjoyed ... pig much more prefers to feel cumloads running down the inside of pig's thighs and over the taint and nutt sack. Now having said that; if I'm collecting loads because a DOM ordered pig to as part of play or for some particular reason and wants pig's hole plugged and returned once the requisite number of units has been collected then AWESOME! this pig will get loaded up and pluggeds and it will, with all the warm fuzzy feelings a good slut experiences for a job well done, open its hole and push out the creamy contents of its guts for HIM when pig returns ... and that pig does VERY much enjoy.

I am not a believer in the social construct of monogamy so I chose other. Monogamy does not work and most of the science stands behind that assertion. I think having one person to create a life with is a great ideal to work toward but I certainly don't think that imposing restrictions on a relationship that are impossible to meet is fair to either partner and dooms the relationship to failure. Having a frank one open discussion around the issue of sex outside of the relationship is not only wise but required. I don't expect the person I want to create a life with to be the one and only solution to every aspect in my life - best friend, confident, emotional rock and throw in perfect in everyway sexually?! No one can be that and it's unfair to ask for it and to expect it. We're all grown-ups and we expect to to be treated as one as well. Do I want to build a life with someone who life goals and values are a fit for mine? Yes, of course and to determine if that is even possible to achieve we need to have open and honest dialogues about everything; free of judgement and shame and ridicule. Why shouldn't we approach sex differently. Spellk it all out, diagram it out, make lists of everything then establish the rules and expectations around what is and is not permissibly and the consequences of violation of the rules - EVERYTHING. it's dry and boring and frustrating and can be shocking but it's also a great way to find out what truly turns your partner on and what doesn't turn you on as well. it's hard and potentially embarrassing and it relies on placing trust in the other person so there's incentive to hold back but it makes the issue of having to hide infidelity go away and makes for great conversations at coffee the morning after. When relationships end as a result of sex issues it's almost never about the sex but the lies and violation of trust. So yes I want a relationship and I want the sex I like sex too I just don't think that it necessarily needs to be the same person filling those role all the time and giving myself over to trusting and loving a person rather than being suspicious of them is how I'd rather construct a life with someone.

You (@losolent) have got to be the best writter I have encountered on this site. Thank you.