funpozbottom

I try not to let things bug me but here are a few things that annoy the shit out of me:

Tops who try to use poppers but drop the bottle and spill it on me.

Tops who can't get hard, and tops that stop fucking if someone is watching.

Tops who pull out and cum on the floor.

Anyone who tries to stick a finger in my hole dry and with a broken nails.

Bottoms who try to play with my cock while I'm getting fucked.

Bottoms who try to take a top away after we've started to play.

Bottoms who try to eat the load out of my ass. Especially if they've already done something else on this list.

On 5/3/2022 at 9:47 AM, hungry_hole said:

All I was saying is that as I was watching the woman describe her horrible experience, I was getting turned-on by the kinky idea of being at a sauna on a public sling in a similar situation. By "kink" I mean a self-centered sexual encounter with anonymous people so that fetishes can be realized more freely.

You took an account of a real life crime and spun it into a fantasy situation that you would enjoy. That does not make the two comparable in any way. You continue to overlook the issue of consent. You can say, "Oh, I'd love to be raped like that."  but by saying that, you have given your consent for it to occur.  Also the way you define "kink" in non-standard.  Probably, no one else would have interpreted your intent that way.

On 5/3/2022 at 9:47 AM, hungry_hole said:

I think that the biggest differences are between how men and women relate to "kink" and this poses a problem for "straight" men who do not get the good quality kink that only men know how to provide.

"Good quality kink that only men know how to provide?"  As Dana Carvey's Church Lady would say: "It seems that someone is feeling just a little bit superior to all of us. I wonder who could have made that happen ... "

No, actually, kink is equal opportunity and has no restrictions based on race, color, gender, sexual orientation, age, religion, political affiliation, or any other factor.  

On 5/3/2022 at 9:47 AM, hungry_hole said:

I have been advertising my private gloryhole in Doublelist and I like a type of guys that respond to my ad, many of them in relationships with women. They tell me that the anonymity turned them on and wanted to try a gloryhole. I avoid asking personal questions and the only thing I want to know is what their cock is like. 

So far I like Doublelist because I think they've become tough on their censorship. I've been very explicit in my latest ads and they have been approved. What I like the most is that many of the men who respond to my ad love the idea of totally anonymous action, but they would never go to a sauna or an ABS. Instead, they feel comfortable walking into an apartment and there's a gloryhole waiting for them.

I think that many men like having sex with men not because they like "men" but because they like "the way men have sex".

A problem that many people in relationships have is that they hide chunks of themselves from their partners. They feel they can't really show themselves for fear of losing them. Personally, I think if people were more open when they were dating they might ultimately find someone more compatible. Also the whole monogamy thing is sort of unrealistic -- humans are complex multi-faceted being and to think that only one person is capable of augmenting all of someone's needs, hopes, and dreams, is for many, impractical.

But that's a little off topic.

Guys who visit anonymous gloryholes are turned on by the anonymity, I think, because it gives them a way to cheat and maintain deniability.  For some guys, they feel that if it's not with another girl, it's not cheating, and if you don't see who it is you can deny having sex with a guy. Some guys will say that oral isn't really sex at all. And I'm sure it's happened to everyone that you're following the Easter bunny and when he jumps into a hole, you try to follow but the only thing that fits through is your penis. And, yes, you may have ejaculated while trying to pull it back out, but that's not the same as having sex, right? It's just a strategy to justify having sex, having more sex, having different types of sex, than may be seen as socially acceptable.

But your talk about gloryholes has nothing to do with your original example. I think you should clear up that discussion before moving to new ground.  Just admit that there were aspects that you hadn't considered that made it a poor comparison for what you were trying to say. Then, find a more appropriate example, and move on.

I will neither confirm nor deny reports that I have driven naked. But I will say that starting out shirtless on a late night drive may lead to arriving at a destination pant-less.... and sitting on a dildo.

I agree that kinks are subjective, but your frat party comparison probably isn't the best example as it compares two different people under two different circumstances.  It's true that someone with a rape fantasy could weave that type of situation into their role play, but it doesn't really convey how a person would feel if it were to actually happen to them.

Instead, how about considering the reactions of one person with a kink  in different situations. For example:  A guy may love watersports, but might not be turned on accidentally wetting his pants on the way to a business meeting.  Another example might be cars. A lot of people like having sex in cars. Families have been started in cars. But those same people probably aren't turned on in a traffic jam even though they are surrounded by cars. Or, consider underwear, which is probably one of the biggest kink or fetish around. Lots of people are turned on by underwear, but most people wear it daily because it's a utilitarian garment that moderates heat, controls sweat, prevents chafing and supports various  jiggly bits.

Pretty much anything could be a kink under certain circumstances, but that same thing could be a distraction or impediment at other times. Do you have any example of having a kink or fetish but actually being turned off by them at times?

I've seen people stash things in their socks. and wear arm, wrist, or ankle bands.  Some harness manufacturer makes a lube carrier that attaches to a belt or leg harness -- can't recall who but they are out there. I've also seen small "fanny packs" worn and I saw someone with a Crown Royal bag tied to his jock. 

I'm going to give you 3 more suggestions with links. The links are not product endorsements -- just provided as an example of what I'm talking about to give you a reference when you do your searches.  I think each style has advantages and disadvantages, depending on what position you tend to find yourself in, but I think they would all work to keep your hands free and your lube and stuff close at hand. They are also all fairly inexpensive -- all are under $15

First is a "Sport Pouch" or "runners belt". They are similar to fanny packs but usually slimmer. They're still big enough to carry a phone and keys and should be able to carry all you need at a bathhouse. The down side is that it might be bigger than you are looking for.

[think before following links] [think before following links] https://us.wholee.sale/products/17766817?msclkid=20f5a01b43091e55bc38c27f6234ba95&utm_source=bing&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=USWM_Msite_Shopping_E_Click_Galaxy_SD_Sports Apparel_0214&utm_term=4588605626345509&utm_content=Sports Apparel_Outdoors

Second, again, is probably bigger than you are looking for, but if you want something over the shoulder, try looking for a "mini messenger bag"

[think before following links] [think before following links] https://www.amazon.com/Cellphone-Crossbody-Shoulder-Removable-Climbing/dp/B0834Z57TN/ref=sr_1_9?adgrpid=1343603773292124&hvadid=83975306773355&hvbmt=be&hvdev=c&hvlocphy=73122&hvnetw=o&hvqmt=e&hvtargid=kwd-83975579035152%3Aloc-190&hydadcr=7469_10533333&keywords=mini%2Bsmall%2Bcrossbody%2Bbag&qid=1650727834&sr=8-9&th=1

Third suggestion is a massage oil "Bottle Holster".  These are designed for massage therapist so they can have their massage oil at their side as they move around the table. They make them for one or two bottles and you can get them with or without empty bottles. The one I link to holds two bottles and has a small zippered pocket.

[think before following links] [think before following links] https://www.clinicalhealthservices.com/holster.aspx

Again, these aren't endorsements, just giving you some suggestions to think about

10 hours ago, hntnhole said:

Well, we gotta wear something ...... jeans and a T-shirt aren't a "costume" - they keep us outta the clink ......

We wear clothing to protect us from the elements and self/socially imposed modesty.  To that extent, Yes, we need to wear something.  But when you buy a particular brand or style of clothing for it's "fashion", then you have take your attire beyond it's necessary function. While there is a small semantic difference, costume is just another word for fashion. Fashion usually refers to current trends and costume is used for pretty much everything else, however, since trends change so frequently, today's fashion could be tomorrow's costume -- and visa versa.

The point that I was trying to make is that, the fashion police don't need to be called out just because someone is dressed differently -- especially when you're talking about what someone wears to a sex club.

9 hours ago, AlwaysOpen said:

 I think back centuries ago when I was a kid and the Saturday morning cartoons had the 2 overly polite and courteous chipmunks Chip and Dale, who always were falling over each other trying to be nicer,kinder than the other one. 

Chip and Dale were two of my favorite cartoon characters. There was something about those two living together that I found ... intriguing.

My thoughts on your thoughts:

Quote

Gay men have been discriminated against for so long but why do we find it so easy to turn on each other like that?

Sadly, it seems that when someone has a history of feeling marginalized and then finds a group that accepts them, they often judge or reject others that share their former situation or don't "live up" to their expectations or what they imagine the group should stand for. Personally, I had enough of being judged when I was younger -- I don't have time to put up with that now.

Quote

Most guys dress in fetish gear because it turns them on - I think there likely are a few who benefit from what it can hide, but it's not the reason people are into it. 

The funny thing about people who bash various "costumes" is that they don't realize they are wearing a costume themselves.  Jeans and T-shirt? It's a costume.  Suit and tie? Just another costume. Drag, Harness, Motocross gear, Murrsuit or pup hood? They are all just costumes that may say a little bit about a person's imagination, level of acceptance, and the role they wish to take on at a particular time. If wearing a particular costume or gear set makes you feel good, gives you confidence, or turns you on, then I say wear it and have fun.

Quote

If you try shopping for fetish gear it is very hard to get anything in larger sizes or cut for the 'fuller figure', especially in London and Berlin. Made to measure is the only option. 

I've been trying to think of a good home-based business I could get into once I retire,  so ... how big of a market would there be for this?

Quote

and lastly, Fuck 'em:  I'm about to get my gear on and head out to Woof for the afternoon. Not only polishing this turd, but rolling it in glitter and enjoying every minute. 

I like to spit polish turds but glitter gets stuck in my teeth.

I want the cock in my mouth. I've had guys try to shoot at my open mouth and miss it completely. Sort of a waste of a good load, in my opinion.  I also prefer it not so deep that it's in my throat because I like to taste it as it floods my mouth and hold the load in my mouth until he has pulled out. But once he's cum, and before he can pull out, I'll take the cock all the way to my throat again. That usually draws out another moan or two.

There's an old saying to "put your money where your mouth is."  Same  sort of thing here: If you say you're submissive, and say your hole is clean, are you willing to do something that proves it? 

For me, the turn on is showing a top I'm willing to clean his cock no matter what.  Some tops don't want it or their cock's are too sensitive to touch, but others appreciate the offer.

Yes, I have an odd sense of humor but one idea I've thought about but forgot to mention  is maybe doing a variation on a neon open sign.   A tat that says "Always Open" ,  "Come In We're Open",  "Open Late" with an arrow pointing toward the hole,  or  "Playground Now Open".  I don't know how others would react to it but I think it would provide an invitation and might be amusing.

I'm surprised no one has hopped on this and replied yet. I guess that means none of the members here are frogs. Anyway, here is my completely unscientific and somewhat satirical opinion/essay on the nature of human sexuality and the relevance of its relationship to frogs.

The first rule of animal studies is: Don't ascribe human characteristics or morals to animal subjects.

The second rule of animal studies is: Don't ascribe human characteristics or morals to Alex Jones.

(Yeah, it's a cheap joke, but it was sitting right out in the open waiting to be said.)

And so, lets talk about frogs. Frogs are interesting creatures, although I have to admit that, personally, I'm more of a Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle kind of guy. I'm not a hardcore TMNT fan -- I've only got one box under my bed filled with copies of every issue of Eastman and Laird's original comic book series, a set of turtle watches, plushies and action figures, lunch box, cups, and some other assorted merchandise including a 5 foot tall movie standie.... OK, so maybe I am a fanboy (blush) and I wouldn't hesitate to let those heroes-on-the-half-shell have my ass anytime they wanted. But I digress. This isn't about animated cartoon reptiles, this is about natural wholesome frogs.

If we start over and hop back to that first rule about making observations in nature, I must reiterate it's not appropriate to anthropomorphize animal behavior. Animals are not studied to see what we observe in them that appears the same as humans, but the opposite. Animals are studies to observe what is naturally occurring and from there, assess which traits are common across many types of animals, and which are unique or specific to certain species.

Humans and frogs are not particularly close relatives, so if we can observe similar behaviors or traits in both frogs and humans, we can hypothesize that said human behavior is perfectly natural and somewhat common within the animal kingdom. Observed differences can also help us gain insight into our own human condition. Here are a couple examples of what I mean:

Frogs are active mostly at night, so they rely on things other than vision in their mating process. Male frogs will encircle a pond and use vocal calls to attract females to places that each male thinks would make a good place to mate. This same type of behavior is seen in human males who stand around dimly lit bars and emit calls of “Hey babe, can I buy you a drink?”

Frogs have poor eyesight, so they have a tendency to approach anything that is remotely shaped like a female frog. Once contact is made, the frog can quickly determine if the other object is a female who is willing to mate. Inebriated human males will also approach anything that is remotely shaped like a female frog. This random approach strategy is often called, “If it don't run or kick you in the balls, fuck it.”

Male frogs do not have penises. This is a clear difference from humans that upsets some trans-phobic individuals because it shows there is more to differentiating gender than simply observing external genitalia.

Another difference is that male frogs squirt sperm directly on eggs. If human males try that, they get thrown out of the restaurant.

So, we can observe frogs and see some correlation to human behaviors and some differences. But what about homosexuality? Is there observable behavior to suggest that frogs might be gay? The short answer is: no. Actually, true homosexuality is rare in creatures other than humans. And by “true” homosexuality I mean that, when given equal access between a receptive female or a second male, the male test subject will actively and consistently select to engage with the second male.

Many of the animal behaviors that have been labeled as “gay”, are not signs of homosexuality. Things like males tending offspring or fostering orphans is not a sign of them being “gay”. It is a sign of a male actively participating and trying to maintain viability of the species. Male on male mounting behavior – particularly in the absence of females – also is not a sign of being “gay”. It's merely a sign of frustrated efforts to satisfy biological needs.

It's true that male frogs will sometimes mount another male, however this isn't because the frog wants to be with another male. It's because the frog can't tell who is who until he's literally on top of them. The frog is not looking for a long-term commitment. All the frog wants is to find the situation/position that will release his sperm. There is no evidence that male frogs seek out or prefer other males instead of females. Occasionally mounting a male does not mean a frog “likes” males and is gay, but likewise, mounting a female does not mean the frog “likes” females. It does not mean he'll try to get her number and text her the next day. It simply means that with a female, he is able to more consistently initiate the genetically programmed sequence to trigger the release of sperm. Terms like “gay” or “straight” are out of context when you are talking about frogs. They simply do not apply.

Just a little aside here: It seems that frogs like to hop on top of each other. They all do it – it doesn't matter which gender they are or the gender of the other frog, and it has nothing to do with sex. The most plausible explanation is that, since frogs are cold blooded, they hop on anything that might give off a little heat to warm their bellies. (Just a little aside to my aside, frogs also have a habit of peeing on the frogs they hop on. Whether it's because they like it warm and wet – I mean who doesn't – or are just amphibian pranksters is anybody's guess. Either way, this shows that frogs can be just as kinky as … turtles.) But anyway, if you really wanted to look for signs of homosexuality in frog hopping, your best bet might be to look at mounting behavior in female frogs. If you could establish that female frogs mount other females in an attempt to get them to release eggs then you might be able to propose a theory, however it would be hard to prove whether there was intention in mounting or if she just thought that other frog was warmer than a rock.

Seriously, anyone who thinks they can prove frogs can be gay is probably better off just trying to host a fantasy conspiracy based radio show or podcast.

This leaves one unanswered question: If homosexuality is so rare, is there an evolutionary advantage to it occurring in humans? Is it even possible to find an answer to that question? To which I say: Of course we can answer that question. This isn't some stodgy research facility encumbered by scientific knowledge, this is a sex forum on the internet. We. Can Do. Anything!

We can do anything … except fit all of my thoughts and bluster in one post. I'll decode the puzzling nature of homosexuality in humans in part 2.

And, yes, there will be turtles.

Those little spermies would have to be exceptional swimmers to make it all the way from your rectum to your mouth. And, actually, it's a scientific fact that the only things you can burp up from your rectum are hot dogs.

But seriously, as @ErosWired said, it's most likely an illusion from noticing the smell of cum in the air. Even if it is an illusion, it's still pretty hot to imagine having enough cum inside you to fill your whole system. It definitely would make me want a few more loads.

This sounds fun.  I've been curious about Casa Puente so might be a good time to check it out  ... and get fucked by a porn star.

1 hour ago, EricX said:

I’m curious as to why someone would switch to this if they are doing well on their current pill regimen, especially if it is more expensive? The only instance I can see this solving a problem is for patients with compliance issues. Otherwise it seems more difficult to go to the doctor every two months rather than to just pop a daily pill. 

There are a few reasons why I would consider switching if I had the opportunity. The first is that I don't like pills. I've always had trouble swallowing pills but I've never had any anxiety about getting shots. Given the choice between 1 shot or 60 pills, I'll take the shot.

The next reason is potentially fewer side effects.  One of the biggest reasons people switch meds is because the older classes of drugs are damaging to the body. Getting a single dose of a medication every two months, in theory, will be less damaging than the continual exposure one gets from a daily pill. This becomes more of an issue the older you are, and the longer you are on meds. I'm over 60 and have been on meds for 9 years. Biktarvy works fine for me and my labs are good, but being able to reduce the amount of drugs going into my body is something to consider.

Third reason is it frees my schedule a little. I like to travel. If I don't need to be home to pick-up a prescription every month, or worry about whether I'll have enough of my meds to last until I get home, it makes scheduling trips a little more flexible.

Last is cost. Yes, its more expensive if given on a monthly basis, but if the shot is every 2 months, then the cost averages out the same. The thing is, they are studying whether this and some other meds are effective with an even longer interval.  If it can be extended for 4 months, then the cost becomes half of other medications, and can be incorporated into regular office visits. But that will take longer to happen unless people switch to provide more real world data on safety and effectiveness.

I am also a bottom with no tattoos but have thought about it a bit over the years. I can't tell you what might attract tops, but I can offer my general opinion on various ideas.

I think a QR code might be good as an arm tattoo. You can display your interests in public without being too obvious about.  As a tattoo on your butt, however, I think it's being a little too clever. You'd probably get more guys coming up asking if the code will scan than having guys come up because they read it.

Just Do It is overused, but all things go in cycles so it will probably be trendy again in another 10 years.

Service entrance is ... serviceable and Fuck Harder is practical, but if you are in a position where you are showing someone your butt,  they probably have an idea you are do-able.  You might want to look for something that hints at interests or limits, so, for example, something like  "anytime anywhere",  "latex free", or "fist friendly" might draw attention. 

Personally, I've been thinking about a tattoo of a dragon (because I like dragons) or a dog pissing (because mmmmm piss).

I'm not fem, so if you are asking if I'd want a pussy instead of a cock and balls, the answer is: Hell no! I love my cock.

If you are asking if I'd like a fully functional female reproduction system in addition to my male anatomy, again the answer is: Hell no. I don't want to make babies. 

But, if you are asking if I'd like to add an extra hole dedicated for sex without the risk of pregnancy then I'd say, Fuck yeah -- it would give me more options for getting fucked, plus I wouldn't have to clean out my ass every time I wanted to get fucked.

Even though it's been a few years since I topped, I usually describe myself as "mostly bottom" since there are occasions that I see someone and think:  "I'd really like to fuck that."  But it is very specific. I'll take loads from almost anyone, but I have to be really turned on to want to fuck and fill someones hole.

For me, getting fingered can be a turn on since it shows I'm receptive and submissive and ready to give up my ass -- as long as I'm lubed and the top's nails aren't too sharp.  If you scratch my ass it totally turns me off. Actually, I think it's more likely damaged cuticles / hang nails that are the problem.  So a little advice to tops that want to finger their bottoms, go get yourself a manicure. It will make your bottom happy, plus it makes your hands look good in all your selfies.

On 11/19/2021 at 9:29 PM, ErosWired said:

Since we can’t seem to get rid of the fucking term, how about we repurpose it - from now on, any time I see someone use the term ‘BBC’ I’m going to assume he means ‘Bigger-than-Big-Cock’ or ‘Beyond Big Cock’ or ‘Butt-Bruising Cock’ or something of that nature, because that’s what it amounts to anyway. (I came up with those because it’s kind of hard to imagine shoving the British Broadcasting Corporation up your ass.) If someone has a need to specify the skin color of the cock’s owner, he’s just going to have to be explicit - and he’d better have a damn good reason.

Funny you said that. The first time I read the term "BBC" I wondered what the British Broadcasting Company had to do with sex.  Actually I wish we could do away with every acronym and just say what we mean.

Anyway, back on topic, the rest of the comment by @ErosWired covers it pretty well.  Personally, my hole tends to be tight and dry, so my method of preparing myself for use is to use a dildo in conjunction with my clean out. After douching, I'll insert a dildo to help relax and open my hole, lube my rectum, and align the entry. It also helps to verify that I have properly cleaned out -- if the dildo slides into me easily and comes without any questionable slime, then I'm ready for cock. I have two dildos I use for this -- one that's about average cock size, and the second steps up to an above average. (I could add a larger dildo to prep for pumped cocks but haven't had the need for it ... yet.) Taking time to prepare before you meet your top should reduce or eliminate pain of insertion. If you have pain deep inside while being fucked -- if it feels like the cock is jabbing into your guts instead of sliding through the colon -- then you might want to try different positions to get one that suits both of your anatomies.

The first time I tasted cum was my own, but it took a while for me to do it. I'd think about wanting to taste it as I jacked myself, but once I'd cum, I'd lose interest and wipe it all away. It probably took a couple years until I worked up the nerve and stayed horny enough after shooting my load to actually try it. I remember the first time I licked it off my hand expecting to be disgusted but once it landed on my tongue it was like: Wow! this is pretty good! From that point on, I would always swallow my cum. When I had the chance to suck off a guy for the first time, I had no hesitation and was eager to make him shoot in my mouth and taste his cum. At first, sucking cock was all about getting that load as fast as I could, but as I got older, I stated to appreciate other aspects of the act, like enjoying the feel of a cock in the back of my throat, being turned on by the submission, controlling the edge, and taking pleasure from giving a random guy pleasure. But when I say I like the taste of cum, it really means that I **love** the taste of cum.   

As a dirty shameless slut, I usually celebrate holidays by spending as much time as I can cruising for cock and cum.  How do you "celebrate"?  Do you abstain from sex and spend time with family, or do you use the time to pig out as much as you can? Do you find holidays easier or harder to find anonymous hook-ups or find more or less action in bookstores and bathhouses? 

Regardless of how you spend yours, I wish you all a Merry Pissmas and a Cum-filled New Year

According to [think before following links] https://gaysexpositions.guide it's called a "Rim Blow Sandwich".  Personally, I think the users of this site have more creative ideas for names.

I have to say that I have mixed feeling about getting pissed in. I mean -- I love piss. I love the taste and smell and love feeling it dripping down body as I'm getting drenched. And while I'm certainly willing to take it in my ass, it makes me a little disappointed because I can't experience those things I just listed with it. Plus it tends to douche out the lube and cum loads I've worked to build up in there over the evening. 

The last time I got pissed in was at a bathhouse.  After the fuck I found a dark corner where the floor was sticky and smelled strongly of piss and cum. I squat down and let it splat on the floor, then scooped up what I could and rubbed it over my body. I was happy to have some piss to play in but would rather have had it direct in my mouth instead of sidetracked into my ass.

Here are a few of my thoughts:

First off, this topic should have been posted in the "politics" section. You could ask the mods to move it for you.

Second, the next presidential election is 3 years away.

Third, neither person is in office, and neither is a candidate or declared they would run,

Fourth, saying you want Trump because you don't like Hillary is like saying you want small pox because you don't like CoVid: neither is a good option and (in my opinion) you might want to protect yourself from both.  And that leads to ...

Fifth, the question pits two highly controversial people against each other, which may be entertaining in a fantasy football kind of way, but it has no bearing on real life -- at this time.

Sixth, are Trump and Hillary the best you can do? I mean, out of the millions of people who would be eligible to run, isn't there someone who could do a better job than either of them?

And finally, You don't say which Trump, or which Hillary.  If it's Eric Trump vs Hillary Duff, then I'm Hillary all the way. 🙂

NNN is an internet challenge to see if you can go the entire month without cumming, and then there is a ranking based on how many day you succeed.

Here's a graphic from [think before following links] https://orantalula.blogspot.com/2021/11/no-nut-november-other-months-list-2021.html

Here's the rankings:

And of course there is an alternate challenge to No Nut November that uses the same alliteration called:  Nonstop Nut November.  That challenge is to cum at least 3 times a day for the entire month.

When it comes to useless information and pointless challenges, the internet has you covered no matter what you are looking for.