Incest cum swallowers

[michiganmom]

There's no greater way to show your love for your family than pleasing them and offering your body to them

[Guest jason385]

On 3/24/2018 at 1:55 PM, Thepilot said:

Has anyone ever sucked off a family memb? My first time was when my daughter had just given birth to her second son. I was babysitting my grandson while her man was visiting them in the hospital. He came home. Grandson was asleep. We watched a Knick game, had a few beers. I fell asleep on couch. I woke up a little later. He is watching porn. His BBC is out and he’s stroking it. I just stare at it. He catches me staring. Asks me if I like sucking cock. I said that as a matter of fact, I enjoy it! He said come over here and work this dick! I’ve been sucking him two or three times a week for the last 6 years. He wants to fuck me. Should I let him?

Yes you should fuck him.  A family that goes Black is a happy family. I would love to suck and ride a Black Cock like that.

[Dinoo]

My brother who’s a year older and I used to play around until shortly after I turned 18. It was mostly body contact and mutual masturbation looking back on it, but I always wanted more which he was very unwilling to do. But in those 15 or so years he let me suck him off three times - and of course I always swallowed like any good brother would.

[Beardybear]

My 5yr older brother started playing with me when I was younger.  Loved it.  He took my anal cherry too.  Very fond memories 

[Guest]

I didn’t suck my brother but I did drink his cum and fingered some in my ass.

 I was still a teenager, my older brother must have been 18 or 19 at the time. I wasn’t a Virgin anymore and was definitely exploring way further than other guys my age. Anyway my bro use to go out with a girl and she was coming to see him often on Saturday or Sunday afternoon.

Once I sneaked into his bedroom when he wasn’t there to have a look (I knew he kept porn magazine and other shit hidden) . I was a curious kid and was always searching for stuff I wasn’t suppose to find.
Anyway after a few minutes looking around I came across some used condoms in the litter bin! My heart started to race. I wanted to take one so badly but I was too scared at first. I slowly told myself there is no way he will know or even notice one less condom missing from a bin. So I took the fullest one and put everything back exactly as it was and run back to my room. I started to wank playing with the condom, touching it, licking it, putting it in my mouth and rolling it under my tongue. Thinking about it now,  it didn’t even crossed my mind that the condom went inside his girlfriend; in my head it was just a condom full of the semen of a guy, and that guy was my brother!
Then I untied the knot and put my finger in it carefully to coat it with cum, I took it to my nose to smell it then licked it. I did that a few times, sucking my finger like it was a cock, before to start fingering myself with some of the jizz. I ended up putting the condom inside out and putting it in me. It was so wrong and so good at the same time. Needless to say the orgasm was intense.
Fuck I am still ashamed and horny thinking about it now.

[Sfmike64]

On 4/23/2018 at 7:35 AM, Puppyhole said:

I've swallowed my uncle's cum for years. Altough he prefers to leave it in my ass

How could any man resist that amazing ass.? Damn

[Guest]

On 11/15/2018 at 8:27 PM, Kayne said:

On 11/15/2018 at 4:27 PM, FJLinNYC said:

Never understood the big [banned word], what's wrong with giving your dad or brother or uncle for that matter head? I give head to strangers though a gloryhole, why wouldn't I suck someone's dick that I love?

Largely, it's a power dynamic. Once we take ancient and archaic traditions out of the mix, that's what we are left with.  well, that and the insidious nature of X'tianity that seems to invade every other culture religion or belief system...

Much the the toxic virus tha boils in our balls. 

Dont yer ne wrong I feel mixed gender incest is wrong. simply because of the baby that may result. but. a kinda wish I was born into an African or Arab culture system where Dad and or brothers sharing each other's sex was a normal part of growing up. -instead of my reality.

 

Very true.  Nothing is ever wrong with enjoying sex when all are willing and able and no harm comes of it. You wouldn't want to allow inbreeding, child-abuse is def. wrong and it's probably nog a good idea to only 'keep it in the family'.

But having gay sex with fathers, brothers, cousins and uncles is just hot. And growing up one has to explore ones body and learn how to enjoy it. 

 

The social t.aboo-thing is a bitch though. And even in our age guys who identify as straight can get really conflicted when dealing with they enjoy sexual acts with a guy besides the incest thing.

 

And in response to the OP (Original Post):

Hell yes. It's Big. It's Black. It's a Cock.... And he's not even family. You should submit your ass to your son-in-law.

And if he ends up making your entire family his bitch: more power to him.  😈

 

Edited April 7, 2020 by BareLover073

[Guest]

On 4/5/2020 at 3:53 PM, Dinoo said:

My brother who’s a year older and I used to play around until shortly after I turned 18. It was mostly body contact and mutual masturbation looking back on it, but I always wanted more which he was very unwilling to do. But in those 15 or so years he let me suck him off three times - and of course I always swallowed like any good brother would.

One should always swallow your bro's load and feed him yours. (Family or not).

Shame you didn't fuck each other though. 😜 

[breedmypiggycunt]

On 11/16/2018 at 6:27 AM, Kayne said:

Largely, it's a power dynamic. Once we take ancient and archaic traditions out of the mix, that's what we are left with.  well, that and the insidious nature of X'tianity that seems to invade every other culture religion or belief system...

Much the the toxic virus tha boils in our balls. 

Dont yer ne wrong I feel mixed gender incest is wrong. simply because of the baby that may result. but. a kinda wish I was born into an African or Arab culture system where Dad and or brothers sharing each other's sex was a normal part of growing up. -instead of my reality.

 

In the end, power colors the experience. 

just my 2 cents 

Of course it is.

i’m not going to ‘sugar coat’ this because, frankly, I’m stunned at the insensitivity of some of the comments above.

Guys, those of you who were sexualised young and emerged from it undamaged (and perhaps even advantaged by it from your own perspective) must surely recognise that’s your sheer good fortune. You’re the exceptions.

Most who endure such things as children ARE damaged by it and you know, from previous threads on this subject, there are members who were exploited by people in whom they should have been able to trust.

Nor am I going to pretend, with literally zero experience of incest or similar in my life, that I don’t find stories about on the subject exciting, etc. But that’s because I know they’re stories and they’re told from the safe perspective of adulthood.

It’s beyond belief that a serious person could post trash like “what’s wrong with giving your dad, etc” blowies.

FFS, it’s not wrong for the child to think about it or even do it. What’s wrong is that an adult would exploit their power advantage over a child in a manner that could very well destroy that child for life.

Seriously, you cannot be so idiotic as not to realise there are people in here that don’t revel in the way they were sexually exploited as children the way you do. If you’ve not seen their comments when the sexual exploitation of children is celebrated, then you haven’t been paying attention.

[Guest]

2 hours ago, breedmypiggycunt said:

Of course it is.

i’m not going to ‘sugar coat’ this because, frankly, I’m stunned at the insensitivity of some of the comments above.

Guys, those of you who were sexualised young and emerged from it undamaged (and perhaps even advantaged by it from your own perspective) must surely recognise that’s your sheer good fortune. You’re the exceptions.

Most who endure such things as children ARE damaged by it and you know, from previous threads on this subject, there are members who were exploited by people in whom they should have been able to trust.

Nor am I going to pretend, with literally zero experience of incest or similar in my life, that I don’t find stories about on the subject exciting, etc. But that’s because I know they’re stories and they’re told from the safe perspective of adulthood.

It’s beyond belief that a serious person could post trash like “what’s wrong with giving your dad, etc” blowies.

FFS, it’s not wrong for the child to think about it or even do it. What’s wrong is that an adult would exploit their power advantage over a child in a manner that could very well destroy that child for life.

Seriously, you cannot be so idiotic as not to realise there are people in here that don’t revel in the way they were sexually exploited as children the way you do. If you’ve not seen their comments when the sexual exploitation of children is celebrated, then you haven’t been paying attention.

Actually I might probably agree with you. Some of the posts cross some boundaries that shouldn't when they concern minors. One (I reported it and hope it's been deleted or is going to be ASAP) mentioned the word 'child'. Abuse can have devastating consequences and the adult in question is the one responsible for those consequences.

So children are sacred and shouldn't be touched.

Period and exclamation point. 

 

However in the post you quote I don't so much get that it's about abuse or that it's meant as an apology for pedophilia (let's call this thing you're upset about by it's proper name) but about consenting incestuous relationships between same-sex partners who are old enough to make the decision to do it, or choose not to.

And personally I like t's jab at X'tian religions because these condemn all sex outside of marriage between one man and one women but have succeeded at the same time to HAVE damaged countless children by letting them be sexually abused, often by the people in positions of power within said churches.

[Guest]

2 hours ago, breedmypiggycunt said:

Of course it is.

i’m not going to ‘sugar coat’ this because, frankly, I’m stunned at the insensitivity of some of the comments above.

Guys, those of you who were sexualised young and emerged from it undamaged (and perhaps even advantaged by it from your own perspective) must surely recognise that’s your sheer good fortune. You’re the exceptions.

Most who endure such things as children ARE damaged by it and you know, from previous threads on this subject, there are members who were exploited by people in whom they should have been able to trust.

Nor am I going to pretend, with literally zero experience of incest or similar in my life, that I don’t find stories about on the subject exciting, etc. But that’s because I know they’re stories and they’re told from the safe perspective of adulthood.

It’s beyond belief that a serious person could post trash like “what’s wrong with giving your dad, etc” blowies.

FFS, it’s not wrong for the child to think about it or even do it. What’s wrong is that an adult would exploit their power advantage over a child in a manner that could very well destroy that child for life.

Seriously, you cannot be so idiotic as not to realise there are people in here that don’t revel in the way they were sexually exploited as children the way you do. If you’ve not seen their comments when the sexual exploitation of children is celebrated, then you haven’t been paying attention.

Thank you for posting this.  First, I think a lot of people make stuff up on here and is based on their own fantasies.  From my own experience, I was definitely damaged by what happened to me when I was younger.  It's all very, very complicated when it comes to the after effects.  It all affects my sexual behavior today as an adult, and my affinity toward Alpha Daddy Tops.  I talk about what happened to me, because it's how I come to terms with it all how I deal.  In no way would I wish my experiences on anyone else.  It was terrifying to be exploited and to be taken advantage of by an adult.

[Cumslut3883]

I've sucked my father many times over the years 

[breedmypiggycunt]

7 minutes ago, BareLover073 said:

Actually I might probably agree with you. Some of the posts cross some boundaries that shouldn't when they concern minors. One (I reported it and hope it's been deleted or is going to be ASAP) mentioned the word 'child'. Abuse can have devastating consequences and the adult in question is the one responsible for those consequences.

So children are sacred and shouldn't be touched.

Period and exclamation point. 

 

However in the post you quote I don't so much get that it's about abuse or that it's meant as an apology for pedophilia (let's call this thing you're upset about by it's proper name) but about consenting incestuous relationships between same-sex partners who are old enough to make the decision to do it, or choose not to.

And personally I like t's jab at X'tian religions because these condemn all sex outside of marriage between one man and one women but have succeeded at the same time to HAVE damaged countless children by letting them be sexually abused, often by the people in positions of power within said churches.

First, to be entirely clear, I’m not “upset” about anything. I was, as I thought I’d made abundantly clear, concerned for some other members who, in previous threads where there seemed to be some celebration of sexual exploitation of children, made known that they’d not been so fortunate and did seem to feel it necessary to point it out.

Secondly, the narrative did swing again to some celebrating sexual relationships with family members and others in childhood. It was not just one post that, in my view, crossed the line. It was a number of them, albeit some more obliquely than others. 
My sole intention was to remind all that, whilst I am genuinely pleased that they feel their childhood experiences were positive, others deserve due consideration for theirs being negative. Hopefully, between our efforts, we can perhaps all be more sensitive in that regard.

Finally, I do wonder why you felt it necessary to raise Christianity and others’ issues with child abuse. My concern was clearly in relation to posters seemingly celebrating their early sexualisation. I’m not here to judge their views of their own history. Nor did I even comment on the broader issue of incestuous relationships between consenting adults. I regard those as, essentially, none of my business.

My concern was, and remains, focused on those referring directly and indirectly to their childhood experiences in that regard as a thing to be celebrated.

We ought to be able to raise concerns among ourselves without resorting to diversions such as “what about Christianity?” When it comes to us crossing the line, or even potentially nearing it, “what about Christianity?” is indeed the right question, just with an incredulous tone rather than one of admonition.

 

[lovetobefucked]

Dannyboycmh.  No fantasies here and nothing made up. I am truly sorry for your experiences as a child. The men that did that to you should be hung. To continue to blame it for your choices as an adult is equally as wrong. You are now an adult and have a choice in what happens to you and how you interact with others.  Do not even begin to presume that the experience of others is 1) a fantasy just because of your experiences or 2) not what we ourselves sought out and understood. You can only speak of your own experiences and of your own understanding. There are things i wish had never happened as a child.  Pursuing sexual relations at 12 is not one of them. I make my own choices. Even at 12. Period. And i certainly do not blame others for my choices as an adult. 

Now, those who take advantage of inexperience and innocence show themselves for what they truly are. That abuse does not belong to any particular race, religion or creed.  It does not belong to christianity exclusively as some continue to point out.  It also belongs to Islam today with their worldwide willing abuse of children of both sexes, it belongs to the boy scouts and to the Leftists who pursue child trafficking for their nefarious purposes, and to a myriad of individuals who are just sick and twisted.

Some of us though actually CHOSE it as youths, knowing what we were doing.  We are probably in the minority but don't discount us.

Edited April 7, 2020 by lovetobefucked

[Guest]

Ok.

Still think we actually agree for at least 80 % and perhaps in full.

 

1 hour ago, breedmypiggycunt said:

First, to be entirely clear, I’m not “upset” about anything.

Well, I am upset when I learn of child-molestation / pedophilia. It's sick and upsetting.

 

1 hour ago, breedmypiggycunt said:

Secondly, the narrative did swing again to some celebrating sexual relationships with family members and others in childhood. It was not just one post that, in my view, crossed the line. It was a number of them, albeit some more obliquely than others. 

I hope everyone that reads those posts reports them, like the one that made me frown - where a member of this site said he wished he 'had a child'. (Paraphrasing here, not looked up what it said literally if it's still up). There's a button in the right upper corner of every post one can use. See this as my call to action, not only li'll ole me preaching. ;-) 

 

1 hour ago, breedmypiggycunt said:

My sole intention was to remind all that, whilst I am genuinely pleased that they feel their childhood experiences were positive, others deserve due consideration for theirs being negative. Hopefully, between our efforts, we can perhaps all be more sensitive in that regard.

Finally, I do wonder why you felt it necessary to raise Christianity and others’ issues with child abuse. My concern was clearly in relation to posters seemingly celebrating their early sexualisation. I’m not here to judge their views of their own history. Nor did I even comment on the broader issue of incestuous relationships between consenting adults. I regard those as, essentially, none of my business.

My concern was, and remains, focused on those referring directly and indirectly to their childhood experiences in that regard as a thing to be celebrated.

Agreeing with you that victims deserve consideration.

I'm adding a nuance to this, that the same consideration is warranted to those for whom pubescent sexual experiences - with family members included - was a positive thing. Those clearly weren't cases of rape or abuse. 

So we're not disagreeing on this one. I do feel that openness about natural sexual expression makes it easier for victims of (child-) abuse to come forward and will create a climate where such abuse might occur less frequently. Abuse and rape are not about sex but about misuse of power and a form of violence. 

(Not saying you're NOT saying that, just mansplaining it for the benefit of the general reader here).

 

1 hour ago, breedmypiggycunt said:

Finally, I do wonder why you felt it necessary to raise Christianity and others’ issues with child abuse. My concern was clearly in relation to posters seemingly celebrating their early sexualisation. I’m not here to judge their views of their own history. Nor did I even comment on the broader issue of incestuous relationships between consenting adults. I regard those as, essentially, none of my business.

To be very clear: I certainly did not intend to also raise 'others' issues with child abuse', because I singled out the hypocrisy within X'tian doctrine, churches and communities on purpose. I'll come back to this in a bit. But I would like to write here now, that the OP you quoted referenced this in the first place. As you singled out this one I was being on topic. I singled out the X'tian churches because as we know since a couple of years, that the number of children that were abused while in their care have been shockingly high and those cases have been covered up for at least decades. 

Again: that's sick and upsetting.  Hopefully that answers your question.

 

1 hour ago, breedmypiggycunt said:

We ought to be able to raise concerns among ourselves without resorting to diversions such as “what about Christianity?” When it comes to us crossing the line, or even potentially nearing it, “what about Christianity?” is indeed the right question, just with an incredulous tone rather than one of admonition.

This I disagree with and I'll explain why, besides the obvious freedom of speech argument of course:

 

When discussing sexual norms which aim it is  ( at least I hope it is )  to protect children and their unharmed development  it's not a bad idea to also address values concerning sexuality and where they come from, especially the Abrahamic religions as they together are the largest group by number of followers. (X'tianiy, Islam and Judism together). 

Calling something a faith doesn't exempt those adhering to that faith from being scrutinised for hypocrisy or for preaching a repressed sexuality that can be viewed as psychologically very unhealthy.

X'tianity (as that's the most influential one in my nick of the woods I'll single this one out again) certainly doesn't view sex as natural or fun.

That fucks people up because sex of course is al those things.

 

it's my opinion that being taught a more relaxed attitude towards sexual expression growing up - as the OP you quoted wished for - in the end will be more effective to prevent child-molestation. Last but not least I think that with less taboos, the victims of those horrendous acts will feel more free to come forward to accuse and ask for help when it DOES happen.

And I felt it useful in my earlier reaction to this thread to distinguish for all readers, not you per se, the difference between incest on the one hand and abuse on the other. And that's exactly what you were and are saying but I felt it could do with an extra bit of attention in my own words. Hope you don't mind. I think our discussion is beneficial.

 

And if I stepped on some oversensitive religious toes in the proces I don't really give a flying fuck.  Religion doesn't have a monopoly on ethics.  One could even argue that religious communities might be judged to higher standards than - say -  a website devoted to having unprotected penetrative sex.  

\m/