Is anyone using AI to generate erotic/explicit images?

[rawTOP]

If you're using AI to generate erotic/explicit images I could use your help. No pay, but could be fun and I'm willing to do other things that may be of benefit to you…

I tried Midjourney and quit after it told me "shirtless" was a banned word. (SMH…) Then someone pointed me to PornPen.ai but it does pretty crappy images of guys. I tried it three times and this was the best it came up with - just some generic "stud"… It didn't seem capable of anything more creative.

If interested - either respond here or DM me.

[cheatingjock]

There is a BDSMLR blog with a lot of AI generated art [think before following links] https://holymale.bdsmlr.com/search/ai 

Might reach out to that person (assuming he is the one generating it).  Some of the best I've seen. 

[Guest]

No not me. 

[cheatingjock]

4 hours ago, DevilsSubSissy69 said:

No not me. 

is that your blog that I mentioned?

[Guest]

I have no idea. I just saw a question and my natural instincts are to answer. Sorry if I was wrong.

[cheatingjock]

19 minutes ago, DevilsSubSissy69 said:

I have no idea. I just saw a question and my natural instincts are to answer. Sorry if I was wrong.

No prob 🙂 

[rawTOP]

11 hours ago, cheatingjock said:

There is a BDSMLR blog with a lot of AI generated art [think before following links] https://holymale.bdsmlr.com/search/ai 

Might reach out to that person (assuming he is the one generating it).  Some of the best I've seen. 

I get a 500 Server Error when going to that URL. I thought it was because you had to be logged in, so I created an account - but still an error.

[Guest]

1 minute ago, rawTOP said:

I get a 500 Server Error when going to that URL. I thought it was because you had to be logged in, so I created an account - but still an error.

I got that same errror the first time.  Then I removed the search/ai/ part and just went to the main profile.  That came up.  After the main profile came up I added /search/ai in the browser field, and it ALL came up.  There is tons of it and VERY good stuff!

[cheatingjock]

2 hours ago, rawTOP said:

I get a 500 Server Error when going to that URL. I thought it was because you had to be logged in, so I created an account - but still an error.

Sorry about that! Hope what @justsexnowatl aid works for you. Worth it!

[cheatingjock]

2 hours ago, justsexnowatl said:

I got that same errror the first time.  Then I removed the search/ai/ part and just went to the main profile.  That came up.  After the main profile came up I added /search/ai in the browser field, and it ALL came up.  There is tons of it and VERY good stuff!

Thank you!  I swear I wasn’t making it up lol. 

[cheatingjock]

A few selections @rawTOP

 

 

Had more picked out to load but out of room. Story of my life lol

At least if I were a top! 

Edited May 10, 2023 by cheatingjock
Added comment

[NLbear]

Wow! Certainly the last one doesn't look like AI generated at all

[ErosWired]

Out of curiosity, why would you want this? Like every other creative endeavor potentially under threat economically from the potential of AI content generation, this seems like a way to marginalize actual human beings trying to make income from producing genuine depictions of genuine human beings, and can’t be a good thing for the industry.

In addition, if we thought porn up til now has had a seriously negative impact in skewing our view of what normal, healthy make human bodies look like, and what human sexuality is like, what happens when AI starts churning out paragons of masculine “perfection” -because it can- exclusively? What happens when all our images start looking like the samples above? None of us will resemble that “reality”.

Earlier today I happened to glance at a feed from an adult video industry blog that talked about new talent and new releases, etc., and I found that not one bit of it interested me at all. I had to study on it a minute to think why none of those men depicted, or their scenarios, was at all stimulating. Then I realized - they were all perfect. Perfectly groomed, perfectly lit, perfectly posed, not a blemish on anyone’s skin. And the stories were totally contrived; they were plastic people doing plastic things. In short, none of them seemed at all real. And that was the result using actual people, handpicked for physique and looks, then visually doctored to create a specific illusion - what, then, when the whole thing gets turned over to the machines?

Because it will, you know. Because Ai doesn’t require contracts or age verification or identity checking, and it doesn’t have to worry about getting STDs or overdosing, and there’s no drama. Because instead of having to hire a model and a cameraman and a lighting technician and schedule a shoot, you just have to type some commands into the computer and Hey! Presto! Porn! Sooo cheap.

Frankly, now that Pandora’s box of smut has been opened, I don’t know that it can be shut, but is this really what we want? I think the far more compelling material is already among us - just go to the “Show Us Your Holes” thread, and look at the  incredible, spectacular, gorgeous, delicious variety if real men, blemishes and all. I defy you to match it with AI.

[JamesL100]

Surely AI learns from the inputs. So feed in images of real, 'blemished' men and some less porn-type output is produced? Though Eros has neatly questioned the motive.

[swytch360]

I played around with one tool that can generate nsfw images and it was extremely limited for what body types you can prompt. “Hairy” wasn’t even an option.

Responding to ErosWired, The use I had in mind was illustrations for stories. AI generators are unlikely to go away, and it would be nice to see it exist in parallel with real artists with the understanding that there don’t seem to be a lot of artists interested in making the niche kind of nsfw artwork I’d find appealing.

But I’m also not sure anyone has built one that is capable of producing something other than this generic “ripped stud” persona.