topblkmale Posted June 21 Report Share Posted June 21 Here's a fun one of who I call the bathhouse douche attendant. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ellentonboy Posted June 21 Report Share Posted June 21 @topblkmale - for a moment, I was really hoping he was real, lol. Then I realized it was AL, thanks for the post! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hntnhole Posted June 21 Report Share Posted June 21 I don't know anything at all about AI - but I could tell that some of the first images in this thread weren't "real"; they looked more like talented some talented artist's sketches. Some of the later ones though (other than the impossibly gigantic Cock, like the one of the john-attendant above), everything else fooled me. In that "photo", the stuff on the counter, the reflections in the mirror, the grout-lines in the tile floor, everything about the guy (except that impossibly huge Cock) fooled me completely. How do you guys tell the difference, when there's not some outlandishly oversized thing in the fake photo ??? I don't get it ........... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackrobe Posted June 21 Report Share Posted June 21 19 minutes ago, hntnhole said: I don't know anything at all about AI - but I could tell that some of the first images in this thread weren't "real"; they looked more like talented some talented artist's sketches. Some of the later ones though (other than the impossibly gigantic Cock, like the one of the john-attendant above), everything else fooled me. In that "photo", the stuff on the counter, the reflections in the mirror, the grout-lines in the tile floor, everything about the guy (except that impossibly huge Cock) fooled me completely. How do you guys tell the difference, when there's not some outlandishly oversized thing in the fake photo ??? I don't get it ........... There's lots of ways to tell. AI images leap out at me for their inauthenticity (for now). There's a bunch of tells depending on the AI system producing the image, neutrality of expression, eyes missing aliveness, skin/hair too regular and perfect, wrong textures, missing any text/nonsense text, nonsense tattoos, physics errors (E.g. douche attendant above has no reflection in the mirror behind him - not a vampire), too handsome/homogenized good looks, missing arms/legs/bodyparts, abnormal symmetry, anatomical improbabilities and impossibilities, mythical creature/animal hybridization, multiple subjects too similar/obvious micro-variations of two models, duplicate body parts, uncanny resemblances to famous people, airbrushed look, etc. etc. The better AI image systems can turn out very realistic looking people - mostly. For a fair sample across the spectrum from the obviously fantastical to the harder to spot, take a look at mengen.bdsmlr.com. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hntnhole Posted June 22 Report Share Posted June 22 Geez .... I never even noticed the lack of the refection ... come to think of it, there would need to be a reflection of whoever took the photo too. I feel really dumb, but at least no one has ever accused me of being an art critic. I'll get better at it ..... I think? ... 🙄 Thanks for pointing all of that out !!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now