Poz50something Posted Wednesday at 11:06 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 11:06 PM Seems to me that they finally got Austin Wolf on actual statuary child rape. This all began with the ‘gay celeb’ sharing coercive sex and outright child rape videos…I am perplexed…did the distribution of pedophile videos not count? There have been many cases where people were imprisoned for much less. As far as what he is, and whether the child gave consent, a child cannot give consent to a sex act. And Wolf will have register as a sex offender. 1 1 Quote
Poz50something Posted Thursday at 02:49 AM Report Posted Thursday at 02:49 AM On 6/24/2025 at 8:35 PM, brnbk said: . If a 14 or 15 yr old with some kind of license driving a car gets into an accident are you going to say he is a minor and therefore cannot be held responsible for his actions? Some situations do require us to ignore the fact that the individual is a minor and look at his actions as an adult. Any 14 or 15 year old isn't permitted to drive in any province in Canada, and if one was caught driving, you can be sure the parents would be prosecuted. But driving falls within the permitted actions of 16 year olds. Sex with an adult isn't. Was it just Austin's responsibility or does the 15 yr old in question share some responsibility as well? As the adult, oh yeah. There's no excuse for not finding out the partner's age. Moreiver, as an adult fil, star, he is responsible as well. . The fact that Mr. Wolf has consistently met men for sex, almost at the rate or twice a day for the past twenty years , shows how committed and loving he is. meeting MEN - yes....meeting an underage boy, (yeah he's a BOY at that age) NO. Who is this other adult? Irrelevant, as it's simply for prurient interests of leering fans..... If it was a text message, how did the two come into contact. I mean its not like Austin is a teacher and used his position to get young underage peoples number. It is actually more likely that the young angel contacted Austin rather than the other way around. May I ask, why did this young angel travel to another state to have sex with an Adult? Did he know that he would be breaking the law and put his sexual partner - the older guy- at substantial risk. as we tend to punish adults in cases where they have sex with minors, because we assume that they gave the mental capacity to distinguish right from wrong - Wolf knew he was doing something illegal, period. Your use of 'young angel' is unnecessary..you are imputing thst there was a devious action on the part of the 15 year old boy to get Wolf in trouble. Can we do that? Wolf also shared files, including the brutal rape of a 10 year old...so we kinda have to deduce that his intentions were. If Austin is to been punished for breaking the law, so should this young angel— and be tried as a juvenile criminal. I don't understand how you came to this conclusion...even if the the child wanted to meet for sex, how is he considered to have given his consent, when children cannot consent to sex? He's the victim here.... Wolf was the adult....how is the child a juvenile criminal? Quote
ffabbian Posted Thursday at 03:31 AM Report Posted Thursday at 03:31 AM I don't condone adults having sex with underage teens but I disagree that every adult is equally guilty. My friends 14 year old son had a grindr profile and snuck out at night to hook up. If that went to court I would disagree that the adult hook ups did something wrong. When I was underage I had sex with a lot of men. It was pre- internet and looking for it in adult spaces. There is no reason for them to question my age, I coerced it in a place where I should not have been and pretended to be something that I wasn't. I feel that they did nothing wrong but the ones that knew broke the law. Quote
timidrawbttm Posted Thursday at 01:34 PM Report Posted Thursday at 01:34 PM On 6/28/2024 at 4:14 PM, Justaholeff said: Beauty is definitely on the inside! It doesn't matter how big that dick is OR how good looking you are if you're ugly on the inside...you UGLY! Yeah, just look at Ron Jeremy....wait, nevermind 1 Quote
brnbk Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago On 6/25/2025 at 10:37 AM, ellentonboy said: READ THE LAW. You're an idiot. Defending a convicted pedophile? You actually think that Wolf didn't know he was not of legal age? .............................................YOU DO REALIZE YOU ARE DEFENDING A CHILD MOLESTER WHO ACCEPTED A PLEA DEAL AND ADMITTED HIS GUILT IN COURT. Oh, and for the record, your profile reads you are a Canadian Yelling pedophille is not going to change the complexity of the case, nor is calling the guy arguing the case names like Idiot, Canadian eh, etc. scare me from stating what I think. What I have stated is not "nonsense" but a nuanced understanding of the Law. Pedpophiles are btw, people who have an interest in pre-puberty children¹. Young individuals hit puberty around 11 to 13 yrs of age and slowly start developing an interest and understanding of sex. Children who where earlier believed in the stork delivering babies story find the story hard to be true and begin their transition towards adulthood learning the about the human body and life. This transition is not necessarily smooth and neither is it universally similar. Some kids start earlier than others. Some kids are interested in the opposite gender and some to their own. Some are interested in their own race and some other races. Some find certain body types attractive while some find other types repulsive. There is great diversity in what the young person wants. The Law in its wisdom at some point decided an age of consent to try to facilitate this transition. I believe its intentions where noble and good when formulated but it ignores some of the ground reality of our times and perhaps of all times. What is strange about the U.S. is that it is the country which invented the modern pornography industry and yet has one of the highest age of consent in the developed world. . Many European and South American jurisdiction have much lower ages of consent, around 14 to 16 I believe. Before you form a judgement on Austin's behavior, I want to pose some questions to you: Do you think your neighbors would treat you well, if they got to know that you routinely have casual sex not just with one but sometimes with multiple men! Agh. I am sure your coworkers in your office will start avoiding you if they know you have had casual sex with stranger multiple times in the last month or year. Thus, before you start judging other peoples sexual behaviours and situations, first try to see how society views you and then try to give some thought to the yardsticks we use to judge others. Austin Wolf is an exemplary gay celebrity who made a lousy decision. However, he is not a rapist or pedophille or any such things. I will stick to the present charge against him ie of inducing a minor or rather actually having illicit sex with him. I have addressed my thoughts on his previous charges in another post. The judge owes it the community and the cause of justice to find out more about this little angel. How many people has he had sex with? how many people has he contacted over social media or texted for sex. How did this sexual encounter see the light of day. Did his parents report him to the police for having sex with an adult porn star? Because you have made personal, xenophobic and quite frankly, rather racialized observations about me- Canadian etc, that are unfair and uncalled for I am going to state something about your profile. You do have a headless shot? Is that really intentional? you don't have the balls (or butt, if you prefer) to show your face to the world on a barebacking site, but u want to throw arrows at Austin Wolf who has been an Out gay celebrity for almost 20 years for an alleged crime that honestly seems just too bizarre to be true. and for the record, my biggest question if on an app if you see a top stud whose profile says Canadian, are u going to pass him just because of his nationality? In a sauna when you are frolicking with guys, are u going to say No to a Top who is not from the U.S. ? On 6/25/2025 at 7:06 PM, Poz50something said: As far as what he is, and whether the child gave consent, a child cannot give consent to a sex act. And Wolf will have register as a sex offender. A 15 yr old guy who apparently travelled interstate to have sex with a adult porn star and another adult, and who likely has been sexual with a lot of adults and young adults his age is not a child, but a misguided youth who does not care about the consequences of his actions. This young angel's behavior during this sinful and shameful mélange is again proof that he is not a child. Did these two grown men behave like devils and hold this innocent angel down and force their sexual desires on him OR did this guy willingly and wantonly have sex with these grown men because of his out of his own volition and to satisfy his own curiosity or pleasure or worse a habit that he has acquired and started to enjoy, the unfortunately illegal fantasy of having sex with handsome porn stars like Austin? It sounds to me that the latter case is true as at no point did this young angel or his parents contact the police and this illicit act only came to light when the police started investigating Austin. The two situations are radically different and I believe Austin should be judged based on what actually happened. People do sexually illicit things all the time, affairs with their best friend's wife, cheat on their wives or husbands with prostitutes or escorts, leave marriages inspite of being married for 30 years etc. These things are immoral but not illegal. It does seem that the law in the U.S. at the moment seems to suggest that Austin is the guilty party but don't forget there was a time in the not so distant past in the US, where sodomy ie sex between two men, even if adults, could land them in jail and the distant past where cheating on your wife i.e. adultery could land u in jail as well. The law must be fair to all parties. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ¹Although girls typically begin the process of puberty at age 10 or 11, and boys at age 11 or 12,psychiatric diagnostic criteria for pedophilia extend the cut-off point for prepubescence to age 13.[4] People with the disorder are often referred to as pedophiles (or paedophiles). - [think before following links] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Text Revision, 5th Edition. American Psychiatric Publishing. 2022. pp. 794–796. ISBN 978-0-89042-575-6. Quote
brnbk Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago On 6/24/2025 at 1:36 PM, PervBugChaser said: exactly. I wonder how many guys here started to have sex at underage. Quote
muscmtl Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago What noone talks about is the fact of being rejected by a 50 yrs old when u 14 years old messes you up bad. You get into the "not even hot enuff for a pedophile" territory. So to all the older men who said yes to a horny teen, thank you. Quote
muscmtl Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago On 6/25/2025 at 7:06 PM, Poz50something said: Seems to me that they finally got Austin Wolf on actual statuary child rape. This all began with the ‘gay celeb’ sharing coercive sex and outright child rape videos…I am perplexed…did the distribution of pedophile videos not count? There have been many cases where people were imprisoned for much less. As far as what he is, and whether the child gave consent, a child cannot give consent to a sex act. And Wolf will have register as a sex offender. Wolf is an asshole, confirmed douche, so no one cries over him. 1 Quote
Toadstool Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 1 hour ago, muscmtl said: What noone talks about is the fact of being rejected by a 50 yrs old when u 14 years old messes you up bad. You get into the "not even hot enuff for a pedophile" territory. So to all the older men who said yes to a horny teen, thank you. I relate to this so much! It really messed with me when I was rejected too. Quote
brnbk Posted 55 minutes ago Report Posted 55 minutes ago On 6/25/2025 at 10:49 PM, Poz50something said: Any 14 or 15 year old isn't permitted to drive in any province in Canada, and if one was caught driving, you can be sure the parents would be prosecuted. But driving falls within the permitted actions of 16 year old's. Sex with an adult isn't. You are incorrect, there. Alberta allows 14 yrs old to get on a learner's driver and 15 yr olds can do the same in the three Northern Territories.¹ On 6/25/2025 at 10:49 PM, Poz50something said: as we tend to punish adults in cases where they have sex with minors, because we assume that they gave the mental capacity to distinguish right from wrong - Wolf knew he was doing something illegal, period. Your use of 'young angel' is unnecessary. You are imputing that there was a devious action on the part of the 15 year old boy to get Wolf in trouble. The minor in this case acted like an adult. He wanted to have sex with Austin Wolf, presumably because Austin is the type of stud he fantasizes about or is willing to have sex with until he finds his ideal mate. If a 15 yr old can drive a car.. he can most likely decide if he wants to have sex or not. I am not for a second advocating that teenagers should have sex with older guy. I strongly believe that in an ideal society where gay are truly accepted and treated as regular and normal folk and gay marriage is universally accepted: gays would be almost exclusively be monogamous. However we do not live in the ideal society, at least yet, and the law and social guidelines need to take into account the way human being in that society actually are and live their lives. A poll here on BZ where about 1350 members have responded shows that the majority of them 27% had anal sex between the ages of 13 and 16 and the age category that came sex i.e. 20% where between the ages of 10 to 20.² I believe the courts needs to listen to how gay men actually live their lives rather than how they ought to perhaps in an ideal world. This young gentleman is not necessarily devious, at least I hope not, but he was callous and blind to the possible consequences of his actions. He must be held equally responsible for the mess he knew he was going to get the other two men into, if he went ahead with his fantasy. This young angel was not in any way coerced by the two adults, at least, as far as I can see from the details that have been released to the public. "Persuading someone to have sex" hardly sounds like a crime to me. Of course it depends on the age and mental faculties of the person in question. I mean there can be a guy who is an adult but not of a sound mind and sex with such an adult would be wrong. Often the courts will decide to charge a juvenile as an adult because of the crimes he committed. I think, the court does need to spend some more time investigation the young gentleman in question and take a look at his actions before it makes up its mind about Austin OR what really happened. I do think the authorities that should release more details of the case so that the public can make up their mind as to who is guilty here. _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ¹[think before following links] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Driver's_licences_in_Canada ² 11 hours ago, brnbk said: Quote
Recommended Posts