fuckholedc

Wearing a jock strap and a hood.

Felons may or may not matter in the USA. Trump is a felon. For him it doesn't matter. Wolfe is reported to have had a significant cache of child porn. That is horrific. He wasn't tried on those charges. Why not? Perhaps the prosecutors didn't really have a case. Instead Wolfe is being charged with an incitement of a minor charge. This is a federal charge. The alleged minor is reported to have been 15. The intent of that charge is child prostitution. However Wolfe is not being charged for prostitution but on sex with a minor. He still faces 10 yrs to life for sex with a 15 yr old. That is unreasonable. Maybe bring the charge in line with heterosexual sex with a minor. Because heterosexuals DO NOT face 10 yrs to life for sex with a 15 yr old unless rape was involved. Rape is not charged with Wolfe. The law that Wolfe is really being charged under has a clause that permits prosecutors to do whatever they want. That is dangerous and unfair. Watch Trumps DOJ use this law systematically over the next few years to target gay men. They will probably do exactly that. If Wolfe had a ton of child porn then charge him on that and we are done. Otherwise the charge is likely unfair because it is not in line with how heterosexuals are charged. Trying to articulate the above resulted in the seemingly political digression. It's not a digression. It's a warning.

The US has at least 9 national police in the form of federal police. The FBI is best know one. Trump is weaponizing them for his authoritarian purposes. In June 2020 Trump deployed Special Operations teams from the Bureau of Prison's to the streets of DC without their name badges. Trump has recently weaponized ICE and CBP and is literally disappearing people on a daily basis. Historically ICE DID aggressively deport people until a couple of major lawsuits in the last 170's when they deported at least two US citizens (one because he didn't speak English although he was around 18 yrs old). [think before following links] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homan_Square_facility [think before following links] https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/feb/24/chicago-police-detain-americans-black-site [think before following links] https://www.wnycstudios.org/podcasts/takeaway/segments/inside-chicagos-secret-detention-center [think before following links] https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/oct/19/homan-square-chicago-police-disappeared-thousands [think before following links] https://www.cnn.com/2015/12/15/us/chicago-homan-square-hearing [think before following links] https://www.vox.com/2015/2/24/8102717/homan-square

Sorry. The USA is a police state like Nazi Germany or the Soviet Union or like the USA of the mid-late 70's when people could be regularly targeted by federal and local police or like the USA of the 90's and early 2000's which had secret prisons in Chicago -this last one was run by the Chicago police. Given that the current Presidential admin wants to revive the USA police state (which they DO want to do since they are literally disappearing people and running a gulag system by paying El Salvador to house prisoners that the USA dumped in their CECOT prison AND also claim they have no details about the prisoners and they denied due process to all of these prisoners) and given that there is a clause in the enticement law that might permit prosecutors to basically do what they want, then because of the special geographic circumstances of NYC, DOJ could set up entrapment of gay men by sending in 16 yr olds that they have legal leverage with. It's a dream law for the fundamentalist religions branch of MAGA to begin to reenact their fascist (gays must die or be completely excluded from society and may not fuck ever, gays can't be employed since they are disgusting and want to spread their diseases so we have to impoverish them, gays are pedophiles and what the Iranians do to them is what we should do too, we need to set up gay men and remove their evil from society). You know, a revival of exactly what the USA did to gay men before around 1977.

Okay. This seems to be a federal offense in the Wolf/Smith case because Wolf had sex with a 15 yr old who also crossed state lines (unless Wolf tried to prostitute the 15 yr old). With the position of the current WH and DOJ, they can wait in NYC and arbitrarily declare a lot of sex with young men in violation of the enticement law. They could easily target people they want to put in prison or possibly use it to put sex businesses out of business or parties if they mess up, maybe even if they do everything right but the 16 yr olds they use to set people up have seemingly legitimate but fake id's. And the NJ->NYC fake id thing has been a real issue since basically forever. We know for a fact that law enforcement targeted people in the past while forcing a person to comply with their trap attempts (when this happened last in a methodical way, people who were discovered to just be gay alone could then be forced to entrap others, in the military in the 80's and earlier with pawns who were used by local police forces - nowadays if a 16 yr old came up on a drug charge in say NJ, they could be enticed to lure a gay man in NYC into sex and then the police could claim that the person entrapped had originally enticed the 16 yr old because of the fact that they crossed state lines). The 16 yr olds themselves don't have to know that they are being used to entrap people either. This specific law seems to be ready made to help enhance the transformation of the US into a toxic police state and use the power of the state to get rid of gay men.

While I like to go to a party and be a cumdump I found out that I liked being a cumdump at a now vanished bathhouse in PS in the 90's during a White Party. At this bathhouse they had a video room that had a low carpeted bleacher, behind which was a two story fuck wall with cubicles. The top story had some 4 or 5 open cubicles that could find at least three guys fucking. The bottom story also had about 4 or 5 narrow, deep cubicles that you could crawl into and either be ass up (maybe if you wanted someone to eat your ass or fist you because your ass would be nearly at the roof of that cubicle if you did that) or you crawl to the back, maybe 6-8 feet but it seemed much deeper, lay on your back with your feet resting on the roof of the cubicle with your asshole ready for dick. This was a kind of fuckbox. I really, really liked that and haven't seen anything like it since. The other one would be a reverse gloryhole, to get fucked in. So a fuckbox or a reverse gloryhole setup.

Isn't that Chaturbate now? Although there did used to be live stream buttfucking.

Who is this twink?

The age of consent in NY is 17. The age of consent in Connecticut, MA, PA, NJ and VT is 16. So the crossing the state thing is to specifically try to convict Wolf/Smith of a federal crime, enticement of a minor. This seems targeted and to some extent trumped-up. If they can't get him on actual child pornography charges then this seems excessive. Unless of course he did try to get the young man involved in prostitution. Otherwise the sexual activity detailed so far, while a criminal offense, seems to have been excessively trumped up. Also this law seems to possibly conflict with the age of consent from the state that the young man was/is resident in. The intent of this enticement law seems to be to stop trafficking, exploitation and specifically prostitution, although "or any sexual activity for which a criminal offense can be charged" leaves quite a bit of wiggle room to permit prosecutors room for an excessive prosecution. Also, when was the last time a female having sex with an underage boy was actually prosecuted? There have been some but they were invariably women (often teachers) exploiting elementary school kids. I haven't even heard of a woman having sex with a middle school kid being prosecuted (although perhaps there have been) and certainly not with a high school kid, other than to loose their jobs, unless the hs kid was deemed not mentally competent. For example, the infamous case of the child actor JB at age 17 having had sex with a 37 year old actress in a hotel room in CA. The age of consent for CA is 18. The actress admitted that she did indeed have sex with JB but this was basically treated like a Hollywood tempest in a teacup. The then 37 yr old actress was also a leader in the MeToo group that accused Harvey Weinstein of his abuse. There was indeed a major financial payment made to JB but nobody was talking about 10 years in prison for the actress.

The initial charging documents emphasized Wolf's possession and alleged online distribution of child pornography (using Telegram), like hundreds of such files. By child they specifically meant children under 12 ("SMITH possessed sexually explicit images of minors, including images of prepubescent minors and minors who had not attained 12 years of age.") Some of these files allegedly depict beating and rape of a child around 10 years of age. These initial charges are truly horrific, if true. If he is actually on trial currently for statutory rape, then either the two child pornography charges couldn't be supported or they added the charge in order to secure a conviction or they dropped the child pornography charges entirely and just went with the statutory rape charge. The age of consent in NY state is 17 years old. and the minor involved was allegedly 15 at the time. They are either going to throw the book at him because they couldn't sufficiently prove the two child pornography counts (which are horrific if remotely true) or they are going to add those charges in a separate case. Did the prosecutor drop the child pornography charges and if so why? It might have been the case that Wolf/Smith wasn't really aware that the young man was under 17 (even though it is reported that Wolf/Smith said he did know that - so there seems to be some kabuki [as in the Japanese theatrical form] going on here). This would have been easy enough to assert by his defense lawyer at any rate and would have been probably difficult to challenge. Perhaps he has been advised to essentially plead guilty to the lesser charge in order to avoid some kind of legal problems that arose with the prosecutor's case? Incredibly it appears that the child pornography charges only carry a 10 year sentence while the Advocate claims that the statutory rape charge is 10 yrs to life. Either way, 10 years to life for having engaged in consensual statutory rape seems excessive (although those terms are NOT at all excessive for the child pornography charges [except that life imprisonment is an excessive punishment in modern countries] ).

The mount parties in PS and Augusta GA - How are these parties? It sounds like my kinda party but it also says that broncos are harnessed and cowboys can wear anything or be naked. Does that mean that I have to bring a harness is I want to be a bronco? Do the cowboys actually rope the broncos? Is it basically a bondage party or is this more like a dick riding cumdump session for the broncos? Thanks. Okay I just saw that with the VIP bronco pass you get a harness.

Some people really get off on that. I used to be an erotic dancer/stripper in DC (a long time ago, back when we had that). I had just bought a new jock strap and had been using it for a few sets stripping at a porn theater. After one set this guy comes up to me as I'm dressing and offers me $20 for my (new) jockstrap. Of course I immediately handed it over.

Cum in my ass. Never really fails (failed one time in Germany though - because that guy wanted to fuck me safely so he pulled out). But otherwise doesn't really fail.

Actually Pig Week spans the gamut - for some people it can be quite vanilla while literally next to them is the most intense fisting (or if not directly next to them, it's not hard to find). The intensity isn't for everyone but not everything is totally intense all the time.

That one I don't remember (I was there last around 2022). Is that by the kind of movie theater area? Also do they still have the two open window rooms on the 3rd floor?