Yeasure Posted Sunday at 09:46 PM Report Posted Sunday at 09:46 PM What’s everyone’s opinion about barebackers who insist neg for neg only? Quote
Ready2DoThis Posted yesterday at 08:11 PM Report Posted yesterday at 08:11 PM I've seen plenty of neg4neg guys who were last tested a year or more ago. If any of those guys are sexually active, but have not tested in over a year, there's a chance they could be positive or have been exposed to any number of STIs. I'm their minds neg4neg might seem safer but there is no guarantee on that. 1 Quote
Iker80 Posted yesterday at 08:50 PM Report Posted yesterday at 08:50 PM I think it won't work. Lots of guys who are poz got it from a guy who didn't realise he had it yet. 2 Quote
verbalBTTM Posted yesterday at 09:11 PM Report Posted yesterday at 09:11 PM For someone trying to avoid HIV while engaging in risky behavior with multiple partners, they're deluding themselves. The law of large numbers always prevails in the end. There's to many variables that can't be controlled for that ruins the neg4neg theory. For those few who can't take PrEP, I have sympathy, but even they understand they can't be bathhouse cumdumps. 1 Quote
onlyraw Posted yesterday at 09:56 PM Report Posted yesterday at 09:56 PM I agree that “neg4neg” is maybe one of the riskier things you can do …. Very few guys get pozed up intentionally (even most of us on here) Most of us got it just whoring around, playing with guys who didn’t get tested very often “ oh ya, I’m neg, don’t worry” …. And true, at their last test they were neg …. But the test was 1 , 2, 3, …. Years ago if you are not on PrEP most people would say the safest person to bottom for is a poz guy who is good about taking his meds and is undetectable (neg4pozU=U) or if a poz guy on meds is still nervous making (and I get tract) …. go for “neg on PrEP 4 Neg on PrEP” …. Which gets a bit long for a posting on a hookup site 1 1 Quote
hntnhole Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago On 10/5/2025 at 5:46 PM, Yeasure said: barebackers who insist neg for neg only? Well, talk (or typing) is cheap - it's what a guy does that counts. If a guy needs raw cock, and wants to avoid something, he'll take the requisite steps to accomplish that. 1 Quote
blackrobe Posted just now Report Posted just now 1 hour ago, hntnhole said: Well, talk (or typing) is cheap - it's what a guy does that counts. If a guy needs raw cock, and wants to avoid something, he'll take the requisite steps to accomplish that. Agreed. We have ownership of our own health, so we need to take the steps to take care of it without abdicating our responsibility to someone else. And let's be real, neg for neg isn't a safeguard because there's always a gap from infection to when infection is detectable. That window renders neg for neg pointless as a prevention strategy in my estimation. You can't assume your partner is telling the truth, and you can't assume he knows with certainty what his status is. That being the case, you either need to abstain from bare sex, get on PrEP, or only fuck bare with verifiably undetectable men. Quote
Recommended Posts