Opinion about Neg4Neg

[Yeasure]

What’s everyone’s opinion about barebackers who insist neg for neg only?

[Pozzible]

To each his own. 

[Ready2DoThis]

I've seen plenty of neg4neg guys who were last tested a year or more ago. If any of those guys are sexually active, but have not tested in over a year, there's a chance they could be positive or have been exposed to any number of STIs. I'm their minds neg4neg might seem safer but there is no guarantee on that. 

[Iker80]

I think it won't work. Lots of guys who are poz got it from a guy who didn't realise he had it yet.

[verbalBTTM]

For someone trying to avoid HIV while engaging in risky behavior with multiple partners, they're deluding themselves. The law of large numbers always prevails in the end. There's to many variables that can't be controlled for that ruins the neg4neg theory.

 

For those few who can't take PrEP, I have sympathy, but even they understand they can't be bathhouse cumdumps.

[onlyraw]

I agree that “neg4neg” is maybe one of the  riskier things you can do …. Very few guys get pozed up intentionally (even most of us on here) Most of us got it just whoring around, playing with guys who didn’t get tested very often “ oh ya, I’m neg, don’t worry” …. And true, at their last test they were neg …. But the test was 1 , 2, 3, …. Years ago

if you are not on PrEP most people would say the safest person to bottom for is a poz guy who is good about taking his meds and is undetectable  (neg4pozU=U)

or if a poz guy on meds is still nervous making (and I get tract) …. go for “neg on PrEP 4 Neg on PrEP” …. Which gets a bit long for a posting on a hookup site

[hntnhole]

On 10/5/2025 at 5:46 PM, Yeasure said:

barebackers who insist neg for neg only?

Well, talk (or typing) is cheap - it's what a guy does that counts. 

If a guy needs raw cock, and wants to avoid something, he'll take the requisite steps to accomplish that.  

[blackrobe]

1 hour ago, hntnhole said:

Well, talk (or typing) is cheap - it's what a guy does that counts. 

If a guy needs raw cock, and wants to avoid something, he'll take the requisite steps to accomplish that.  

Agreed.

We have ownership of our own health, so we need to take the steps to take care of it without abdicating our responsibility to someone else.

And let's be real, neg for neg isn't a safeguard because there's always a gap from infection to when infection is detectable. That window renders neg for neg pointless as a prevention strategy in my estimation. You can't assume your partner is telling the truth, and you can't assume he knows with certainty what his status is. That being the case, you either need to abstain from bare sex, get on PrEP, or only fuck bare with verifiably undetectable men.

[757pozzybear]

It'll inevitably become a poz4poz scene when the unknowingly poz "neg" guy who thinks he's neg unknowingly transmits HIV to the neg partner.

[topblkmale]

On 10/5/2025 at 5:46 PM, Yeasure said:

What’s everyone’s opinion about barebackers who insist neg for neg only?

 

Tell them to create a breeding.zone account and bookmark these fun topics:

Not sure if stealthed
First time fucked and being stealthed
The Night I Was Stealthed: A True Story

 

[CumCravinHole]

Neg4Neg = PrePoz

[RawCountryGuy69]

Like saying I’m only going to fuck someone if they are only neg is really taking a blind leap of faith that the other person whose says their neg is truly neg. A person’s HIV status is the least important factor for me. I could care less if they were poz, neg, or undetectable, because at the end of the day if you are a good person I’m going to sleep with, but you aren’t then you will have to find someone else. 

[Ready2DoThis]

39 minutes ago, RawCountryGuy69 said:

Like saying I’m only going to fuck someone if they are only neg is really taking a blind leap of faith that the other person whose says their neg is truly neg. A person’s HIV status is the least important factor for me. I could care less if they were poz, neg, or undetectable, because at the end of the day if you are a good person I’m going to sleep with, but you aren’t then you will have to find someone else. 

I'm a good person. 😉

[hntnhole]

On 10/7/2025 at 7:07 PM, blackrobe said:

you can't assume he knows with certainty what his status is

Frankly, one can't assume anything when raw sex is involved. A guy in heat will say anything to get loads.  

Thus, for guys that want to avoid hiv, take every precaution one can for oneself - that's the only facet we actually can control.  

[SubOhioBttm]

23 hours ago, RawCountryGuy69 said:

Like saying I’m only going to fuck someone if they are only neg is really taking a blind leap of faith that the other person whose says their neg is truly neg. 

Right. I'm neg, I used to ask status and and if they were not neg, most of the time I'd say oral only, or  I'd ask for a condom. But if they replied that they were neg, I'd be much more likely to play BB. I knew I was being ridiculous. As if them saying "neg" gave me some sort of permission to fuck raw. I'm not sure if I felt permission or protection. Obviously, both of those concepts were just mental gymnastics.  Meanwhile, I got STD's from plenty of 'neg' men.