BREEDmeRAW Posted 10 hours ago Report Posted 10 hours ago NO !!! It does Not count as taking a load. Direct Deposits REQUIRED to count as a load. The ass can be filled with cum and a good feeling for the bottom, it does not count as officially taking a load. Some guys do "freeze" several loads and later inject it in the ass with a full feeling, it does not count. Swallow the load is acceptable but does not count. Especially for men that are chasing and/or bugchasers. HIV is not transferred if exposed to air. You can lick cum off a wall/floor or mixed with food and down your throat. Mailed cum to be inserted are all options, but Direct Deposits are REQUIRED to be counted as Officially taking a load. Quote
indianowned Posted 10 hours ago Report Posted 10 hours ago In my case I am never used with a condom. Quote
norefusal Posted 7 hours ago Report Posted 7 hours ago anyone saying no is obviously french and trying to pull some champagne type bullshit. 😜 let me put it this way: if someone toxic fucked u with a condom and then left and you, never having asked his status, go ahead and shove the condom up your ass smearing the toxic jizz alll over your stretched out walls and you get the fuck flu weeks later - guess what: it fucking counted as a load taken. when the police pull you over w a dui they don't give a fuck you only drank "sparkling wine" 😜 10 loads up your ass is 10 loads up your ass. not "but only 9 counted" 1 Quote
hntnhole Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago First, Thanks to NJRawDaddy for coming up with an entertaining thread. There are more entertaining facets to this question than I would have believed. My thoughts; 1. "taking a load" means sperm being transferred from one man to another (at least here on BZ), generally from one guy's cock/balls to another guy's breedhole. No intermediary needed, simply cock to hole, no "vessel" of any kind needed for the transfer. Otherwise, it's merely a contrivance, as opposed to a raw fuck. There's zero chance of "connection", it's simply a substance (however delightful and needed) being transferred from one man to another. 2. About as exciting as staying home on Saturday night to watch reruns of Lawrence Welk. 1 Quote
PozBearWI Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago Yes although I fail to see the point. If I were going to pour the jizz into my hole anyway, why not directly? Quote
tallslenderguy Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago (edited) To me? partly. i have a fairly complex view of the Top/bottom dynamic. To me, a Top has two cocks, His physical cock and an internal cock that drives the external, physical cock. i don't think i've ever met a Top Who wore a condom because He loves the way it feels, He does it to protect Himself against potentially catching an STD, or maybe He has cleanliness concerns. Either way, He is sacrificing part of His total desire to penetrate, fuck, orgasm, inseminate, breed. As i see it, all of those involve His physical cock and His internal cock. With a condom, he is sacrificing the element of skin on skin, To me, He's literally avoiding/sacrificing that component of Topping, even if He's the one Who ultimately empties the condom into His bottom. Two parts of bottoming i desire/need (crave lol) is receiving all of those parts i listed. While i perceive orgasm and insemination as closely tied together, i also see them as distinct. So, even if He ultimately empties the condom into me and seeds me, He disconnected it from His skin on skin orgasm inside of me. He not only sacrificed His physical skin on skin breeding of me, He also sacrificed some of the pleasure of His orgasm. i am impregnated and bond to both., and that's missing with a condom. Edited 1 hour ago by tallslenderguy Quote
Recommended Posts