All Activity
- Past hour
-
I want to feel his cum inside of me! -
Witham Woods @WithamWoods - gonna recycle that beer?
Guy4GuyCOS commented on pupHawaii's gallery image in User Galleries
I want his raw.cock deep in me now! -
I need my.man pussy filled like that! -
Outercourse Another New Term For Non-penetrative Sex
Bokkierob replied to NWUSHorny's topic in General Discussion
I don’t get any of that. As a man with a healthy sex drive I’ve gotta be balls deep inside a man’s asshole, pounding him hard till I breed him. Alternatively cumming deep down his throat works. Not into touchy-feely stuff. Hot sweaty man fucking is what I need. And yeah, I’ll take a ruff pounding as well. -
Now that's a hot cum filled pussy
-
11 with a neighborhood kid, his father found out and then he made me suck him while i fucked his son. Then a couple of older teens who introduced me to weed and coke and piss.
-
That cock looks so thick and just perfect for fucking, I need it in my faggot hole -
Can only find reports from 2020 🤷
-
Ordinary men turned into toxic rubberpig pleasure centres
-
-
This is my favorite position too. Even when I'm blindfolded.
- Today
-
Ike changed their profile photo -
Of course, all the way down my throat! And as another poster said, learn to take it all. Then you won't be gagging and all of that. You can just relax and give the top the pleasure he deserves like a good fag. -
Have you ever taken money to fuck or be fucked ?
phillygwm replied to Thedogsbolloxxl2's topic in General Discussion
I tend to agree and don't make a habit of paying for it. But occasionally a guy asks for a few bucks and it's pretty clear he could use it. In that instance, especially if he's drained me thoroughly, I'm happy to help. I even had a few FBs like that. I draw a line between that and an actual escort situation which is more of a business transaction. -
Any recommendations on cam sites/groups for gay sex? Thanks.
-
Really strange. When I was younger, you needn't have told me twice. As I've gotten older, oral is easier and more enjoyable. Either way, there's nothing wrong with avoidance of doubt but I always do it as a statement, not a question: "I'm gonna get you pregnant" or "I want you to swallow my babies." In the off chance I've misunderstood, the bottom has a chance to tell me (and I have a chance to leave.)
-
I know this feeling so well, only I never got my night with 'Malcolm' in Brighton, before he passed away (HIV) over thirty years ago. But he is kept alive in my heart and in a horny scenerio in my mind, where he gives me a special gift. A well written and horny story, but with a softer side and a sad ending.
-
Giddyupyeehaw joined the community
-
So inviting where do you start first -
Have you ever taken money to fuck or be fucked ?
Thedogsbolloxxl2 replied to Thedogsbolloxxl2's topic in General Discussion
I think it would be cool and sexy, if i could do a London weekend sex trip , and finish the weekend having covered my costs of travel and expenses. I've no idea how i'd go about it, but would certainly be an interesting life challenge -
There is another layer: the artificial creation of indivisible blocks of space that are subject to centralized extraction that are too juicy for psychopaths to ignore. The premise of this conundrum is that instruments of government can be built to do ONLY good without inherently being empowered to also do evil. It is also premised on the idea that human nature would magically change so that the pool of humans would somehow be GOOD. Another way to manage the projection of evil is to stop building political structures that subject large groups of people to the rule of a single psychopath. Smaller scale government would not change human nature but WOULD limit the extractive tools available to any one psychopath. Anyone who builds a new bureaucracy for GOOD should go in with eyes open that psychopaths will see this new instrument as a juicy banana to subvert
-
Scotus considering trans vs non-trans sports competition today
KinshipLab replied to hntnhole's topic in LGBT Politics
Two other severe problems with this whole topic: 1) people tend to overfit socially centric issues to “science” and ignore other variables that rightly affect the rules of the game. Those who think a “solution” should be derived solely from “science” are abusing science by treating it as a sacred arbiter of conflict and increasing the likelihood that it will be corrupted to politics. They are also underusing the skill of sound judgement. 2) The scale and scope of Federal government and the use of Federal tax money drives us to the least empowering method of spending energy on the topic. In this scenario, I have 1/340,000,000th of stake in the matter, $0.53 of my annual tax assessment is used to subsidize leagues in Alabama, Vermont, and all the states ideologically in between. Instead of letting this be a decentralized decision for each team and league to make with their own resources, it gets marketed to people as something they should have an opinion on but which leaves them with nothing to do but execute against central policy. While I definitely feel the pain of individuals, for reasons of not having the connection of thought and action be completely broken in two, I’d prefer to see each league pay for itself and navigate the complexities of decision-making at a “team-sweat-equity,” “paid-for-by” so ownership-rule-making alignment. The continued usurpment by the Federal government of local flavor and initiative has completely recast people as passive complainers trying to hijack others’ leeway with one-size-fits-all policy and tiny amounts of tax money confiscated from people of whom a significant minority will be opposed to the policy. -
It’s dull because for whatever reason, explorations of how to create futures have been dumbed down to how to spend other peoples money. This framing crowds out all participants but critics and passive observers, driving the topic away from creation and self-empowerment and toward bickering about the size of someone else’s slice.
-
Love it bro...
-
There is a critical qualifier that frequently goes below the radar so that a comparison of “individual” versus “collective” becomes almost non-sensical. To make any sense of the balance, you must determine whether the collective was voluntary or involuntary. Since this distinction is often obscured in commentary, we lose a lot of nuance in simplistic working agreements that collectivism is “left” and “individualism” is “right.” It REALLY matters when someone’s agency is removed from the equation. It allows people to retain the silly notion that big things can be done only if the government imposes a single solution on everyone. Rhetoric long ago hypnotized those involved in civil discourse to think democracy looked like voting and then imposing the majority decision on all. Real democracy may look much more like a population of individuals exposing their opinions, which enables voluntary coalitions to form around not only the majority views (forced on 100% of the population) but also minority coalitions, who can use their energy to advance their goals. If you’re tempted to argue that crises sometimes necessitate 100% alignment, then you should also concede that non-critical conditions do NOT necessitate involuntary adherence to majority votes. The issue hiding behind the ridiculous divide between “collectivists” and “individualists” is centric to “autonomy.” Under what conditions should someone or some group have the right to curtail someone’s autonomy?
-
So sexy. I love dark meat and ass. -
Outercourse Another New Term For Non-penetrative Sex
KinshipLab replied to NWUSHorny's topic in General Discussion
As someone almost religiously awed by cock-and-cum-in-ass and to a lesser extent mouth-cock, I hated the sterile idea of a side. I would never try to hook up with a side, but I HAVE come to appreciate sides as a fallback in group sex when I feel a connection but not a sexual compatibility with an awesome guy. It’s at best a fallback but given typically uneven top-to-bottom ratios in generaland the exacerbation of unevenness when the top minority gangbangs a bottom, it’s useful to open the aperture of sexual enjoyment when you’re spending time with cool guys who are not sexually compatible
.thumb.jpg.5226ec95ef476fb7bed17d3a949e9f65.jpg)
.thumb.JPG.4bdb1c728939ce3f01d8db49ed477439.JPG)
