hungry_hole

Very good point and discussing the issue with partner. We are all men and we all understand each other need for just sex, impersonal, sometimes anon, with adventures. For me the only issue that HIV-neg guys face in a relationship is the barebacking with others. But talking is essential. The 3-way idea may be another scenario. I sometimes think that guys in monogamous-because-of-STDs relationships can take a few months break with sex. And each, on their own can fuck around, bareback if they wish. I find that the most important feelings for a partner are not the sexual ones. These can continue if the male couple is taking a break with sex. Of course, when bringing back the sex to the relationship, testing has to take place and appropriate window periods respected. It's just that for me being sexually monogamous "forever" makes no sense, even as a older guy. I couldn't imagine being in my 20's and committing to monogamy forever. Monogamy is for lesbians!

As a bottom I like being verbal with some moaning but mainly talking dirty to my top: "Go deep when you shoot!" "Nice, I like the way your cock feels..." But I must say that I hate screaming bottoms because then you can't hear the tops monaing and grunts.

I agree with barebacksaunaslut because although tops can sometimes cause a bit of pain, I am the bottom and at a top's service. Like the other night at the sauna, when I met an old fuck-buddy. I was in my room when he saw me, came into my room and I began to suck him. He got so horny that when I turned around he slamed his cock in very violently. It hurt a bit but I didn't complain. Why should I complain to a top who is too horny? If it hurts too much I then suggest putting more lube but I never complain angrily. I like being there for them and to please a horny guy.

I was once in the Sauna 282 in Santiago (Chile) and I found lots of bareback action. Bars open until 5 A.M. so I got to the sauna at 11 P.M. and stayed until 10 A.M. Lots of horny drunken guys after 4-5 A.M. when bars closed.

As a bottom with a very hungry hole I love to hear the moaning of the guy and the noises he makes as he pounds my ass, and of course, the grunting as he creams my hole. But it's so short-lived. So some years ago I began to record my bareback sessions whenever I could. I started with a cassette recorder but then later I purchased a digital voice-recorder. I have more than 100 files with audio of bareback sessions in my bed, in my gloryhole, and in bathhouses. I have a few memorable recordings still in tape that I should digitise. One is in my bed with two guys. I had hidden the cassette recorder under the bed and the microphone between the wall and the mattress. Every time I hear it I get super horny but I haven't in a while because it's on tape. I have another one with a black guy with a beautiful 8.5" uncut piece of meat. I can her him invoking God as he shoots inside my hole. Amazing. I have to digitise these two. I would feel bad using a hidden camera because the video is a bit too invasive. But audio keeps it confidential. A few weeks ago I saw a profile of a versatile-bottom tattooed pig in BarebackRT that I was sure had sex with at the local bathhouse a few years ago. So I contacted him and told him about my memories having sex with him. I had noticed him in his room looking to get fucked. Later I was in my room wearing my "Cream my Hole" black T-shirt and he goes by wearing his clothes, on his way out. I guess not many tops left as it was already late. He came into my room, took off his pants, rimmed my hole for a while and then he mounted me. He didn't last too long pulled out and left. He just wanted a hole to shoot his load before going home. I looked in my audio files and found the audio of that fuck (I just listened to it...wow...so hot to hear the guy as he shoots). When I contacted him he told me he was poz, but I'm not sure if he was poz in 2007 when I recoded that.

I don't like demanding anything from a top and whatever they give me I'll take. A week ago I went to the local bathhouse and a hot dude came into my room. I sucked him for a while but then he asked me to turn around and give him my hole. He was so horny that he just rammed his cock in my ass. It hurt as he pushed his cock in but I didn't say anything and let him continue fucking me. It was all worthwhile once I felt his load in my hole, he pulled out and left.

I never thought of this but it makes sense. As a bottom who also enjoys sucking I find that offering a good blow-job helps with performance anxiety. I've hooked up a lot in different sites and have lots of experience. Most of what we call "flakiness" is simply the fact that one minute a guy may be horny and the next he may not. Some guys agree on a time but they later meet someone else and get off so they are no longer horny. They forget about you. I never make long term sex-date with a guy I don't know. Once two guys enjoy getting together for sex there are less chances of flakiness behaviour. I like outdoor sex or sex-clubs and bathhouses. Guys are horny then and you don't have to explain how old you are or what kind of body you have. At a sex club you either hook-up right away or you don't. Plus there's always action in the darkrooms.

Strangely, what ends up confusing everything is the notion of "Sexual Orientation", and the belief that people are actually gay, straight and in-between. This was exactly what Kinsey warned against: "For nearly a century the term homosexual in connection with human behavior has been applied to sexual relationships, either overt or psychic, between individuals of the same sex... It would encourage clearer thinking on these matters if persons were not characterized as heterosexual or homosexual, but as individuals who have had certain amounts of heterosexual experience and certain amounts of homosexual experience. Instead of using these terms as substantives which stand for persons, or even as adjectives to describe persons, they may better be used to describe the nature of overt sexual relations, or of the stimuli to which an individual erotically responds." (Kinsey, et al., 1948, p.656) _Sexual Behavior in the Human Male_ "Feeling gay" is actually a normal excitement for bodies that are "like ours". It seems odd to me that Sexual Orientation treats the interest and excitement for men and women equally and it ignores the fact that men may be interested in cocks because men have cocks, and they may, for instance, want to compare. Men and women differ in the way they treat a cock because an "impersonal" or "anon" cock can in fantasy be a man's cock, especially because men can't usually suck their own cocks comfortably. When it comes to sexual behaviour treating men and women equally is another mistake. Because of the erection the interest and excitement that men experience for other bodies "shows" so boys learn to control and censor when to let go. Like not in the shower with other boys, whcih is not the same with women. Now, this is why for centuries men have been finding ways of validating same-sex sexual activities. The Sambia People had the belief that in order for boys to grow their own semen they had to swallow it from the older men. Google "Sambia people homosexuality" . Gilbert Herdt has done a lot of work in this field. What I'm trying to say is that feeling turned on by other bodies of the same sex is normal and that should not mean "being gay." I strongly believe all men should have sex with other men and only then men can be ready to deal with women. I also advocate anonymous/impersonal sex because I think is the best kind of sex a man can have. My only concer are STDs.

My best fucks have been with a black top in his 30's with a 8.5" uncock cock. His cock felt very nice as he plowed me and when he started shooting his load he would moan and say "Oh God!",. As I always do, I would open up my hole to recieve the load. He would slow down the rythm, even stop, and without pulling out he would continue fucking me and he would shoot a second time. It was so hot!

I have two black leather items, a blindfold and hood, which I usually wear these in conjunction with a black T-shirt with a glow-in-the-dark sign (Cream my hole) and a jock strap.

Totall BB pig bottom here and who likes any hard and juicy cock. I don't like cocks that are too long or too wide because it can hurt my hole and I can't continue getting my hole creamed. I sometimes prefer smaller cocks because they get rock hard.

That must have been a divine load...

I like BBRT, easy to use, great profiles and hot pictures to look at. I've also met guys on BBRT. Manhunt is good for hook-ups too. Squirt.org is good for hook-ups too.

To tell a guy that he doesn't have to pull out is too matter of fact, too cold. To improve my chances of getting my hole creamed, while I'm getting fucked I talk to my tops and say things that help turn them on. My favorite, "Go deep when you shoot your load" not only gives him the clear message that I want his load in my hole, the imagery of phrases like "You like that hole? it's nice and clean ready for your load" or similar phrases has the potential to send the top over the edge and he'll go deep to deliver his load. I've tested all this many times and it works. Once he starts shooting I open up and relax my hole, and let the top go deeper if he needs more friction. I don't squeeze hard like many bottoms do because then the top may pull out if his cock feels too sensitive. I like tops to keep pumping and pull out a limp cock, one that falls doen as soon as it leaves the hole.

I'm talking about a new concept and I'm fully aware of the issues that have to be resolved. But I'm convinced that many men would be willing to follow strict rules and commit to them if they knew that the pay-off is great BB sex with other horny STD-free guys. So what if a man has to jerk-off for 3-4 months, if he knows that then the quality of sex will improve and he will be able to fulfil his fantasies: multi-partner, maybe anon, with other STD-free guys. A club member would not be allowed to have sex with anyone who is not a member, and this only after the waiting period where jerking-off is the only sexual activity. How about my lover? He can also join the club. How about my wife? Maybe women can join with a special membership for those men who want to have sex with their wives/girlfriends, but also be able to fool around with guys. This would allow a married man to have sex with his wife and have sex with men without fear of "bringing something home." It's just a dream as nude_tomBS said. But I have a question to some of you who are HIV-neg: Would you adhere to strict rules about your sexual life, if you knew that following those rules will give you access to very hot BB sex without having to worry about any STD? (This would include access to fuck-fuddies and orgies.)

I think it is possible but under a lot of constraints. Also, a lot of thought has to be put into it before the idea can be implemented. But it is possible. I initially mentioned that health and counselling services would be involved because it wouldn't be a matter of saying "Oh, yeah, I'm negative." No, no, no. Men would have to follow very strict rules, which don't have to be followed forever. Men can join and leave the club, but every time a man joins requires a waiting period before he can start having sex. This period is used for performing tests. Two male lovers can independently join the club and that way they can have sex with each other and still maintain a valid status in the club, or bring another club member and have threesomes. There are all kinds of possibilities.

Like many of you I do have a BarebackRT profile. I read profiles that say "Your Status: Ask Me " which I can understand. But I cannot understand when guys write in their profile "My Status: Ask Me". Why "Ask me" when there are many other categories: Positive, Poz + Other, Negative, Other?, Not sure. Why guys say "Ask Me" in My Status? P.S. I wish BreedingZone had better information in profiles.

I've been thinking that it would be awesome if there was a bareback sex-club that was geared to HIV-negative guys. Sounds crazy and impossible, doesn't it? But just imagine being a member of a private club, most likely available on the Internet, where all the members are guaranteed to be HIV- and free of all sexually transmitted diseases. Members of this club can meet other members and have sex without having to worry about health. The club could also organize orgies and group sex where everyone can fuck everyone else without having to worry about health. For this to work there has to be participation of both health and counselling services. It wouldn’t be easy but I think this kind of sex-club is possible.

Last night I rented a room with a sling, put up a glow-in-the-dark sign saying "Cream my Hole", turned off the lights, opened the door, got on the sling with a glow-in-the-dark mark around my hole, and waited. It was Blackout Thursday so the place was pretty dark, perfect for raunchy action. Guys, curious about the sign, kept coming into the room, some played with my hole, others fucked me, 3 rewarded me with their loads.

But I guess "versatile" is sometimes being horny and needing to blow your load. Last night I saw a guy taking a load from another guy who I had seen getting his hole creamed in his room. If asked the guy may say he's verastile because he can give and recieve loads. But is he really versatile in the sense that he really enjoys toping and creaming holes? Or toping is just using a hole instead of the hand, usually shooting quickly. I don't top because I've tried it and don't like it. So when I get fucked I usually wait till I get home and jerk-off before going to sleep. What I do, jerk-off, is almost the same some "bottoms" do, but instead they use a hole. I think that to be versatile one has to really enjoy fucking as well as getting fucked.

The only raunchy part of me is the love for anon bareback, which includes being fucked raw and then rewarded with an anon load. So when I feel "raunchy" is usually go to a sauna with gloryholes, darkrooms and slings. But otherwise I'm pretty vanilla compared to other guys' raunchy play. I'm not into scat or piss or BDT or SM or you name it.

I'm alayws curious of those guys who label themselves as "bottom-versatile". I read many profiles in BarebackRT.com of bottom-versatiles who describe themselves as bottoms (I like taking loads, etc). When is a bottom-versatile toping? Any bottom-versatiles?

I think that the key to enjoying anon sex is to accept it as a legitimate form of sex. When referring to anon-sex one has to avoid terminology such as "unhealthy sexuality" or "fear of intimacy". All that's bullshit. I'm now in a relationship and for 1 year I have only been fucked by one guy. Contrast that with 10 years of heavy anon sex in bathhouses, gloryholes (had one in my apt), several long-term BB tops, taking videos. What I miss the most is the bathhouse scene, the gloryholes and darkrooms. As a BB bottom I find that in a way the anon scene is easier to handle. I used to clean when "I" decide to have sex (unless one of my FBs called me). But with my top guy around, I sometimes clean myself at the wrong time, or don't clean at the right time, if you know what I mean. I think that I'll eventually go back to anon sex. But if I do my guy will be the first one to know. It's been a wonderful time, I've been enjoying his loads tremendously, but the anon scene pulls me back. I find it amazing having sex with my guy, it's really hot, and I love to hear him when he starts shooting inside me. But, will I never have my hole creamed by another cock? I find that difficult to accept.

I have a somewhat different approach to the issue of knowingly infecting or having unprotected sex without disclosing an HIV+ status. Is the person being infected a woman or a man? Women are very naive and have no idea where men's cocks can be and in how many holes or mouths. So I object to when a woman gets unknowingly infected, when in fact she was after being loved. That's why I believe that when men start fooling around with other men in anon settings and bareback, they should stop fucking women. Who needs them anyway! Unless a man wants children, but in that case a man has to make up his mind. In the case of men, well, men should know better. If they have an insatiable apetite for sex they should know that trusting other men's sexual history is not a good idea. Men lie, or they were too drunk to remember. In situations where men intereact like human beings before sex , having a coffee, one should expect some honesty. But still, it's a bad idea to believe the other guy's sexual history because the guy may still be unaware of his poz status. But in anon situations, like bathhouses and nother sex clubs or quick hook-ups, in my opinion, anything goes and one should assume that anything said in anon situations culd be part of the sex fantasy taking place. In these situations I find that stealth fucking is acceptable and no one should complain. For instance, if a poz guy is horny and wants to unload before he leaves the bathhouse and a hole gets creamed, even if the bottom asks for status before getting loaded, it's all OK.