Phallarchist

No, you have to find individuals who will use force. The search term is "CNC".

The topic title was so promising. Sad!

It started when a boy asked me to break him. I was instantly enthused and made thoroughly gratifying work of brutalizing him. His tears were of pain, but also of profound gratitude. It occurs to me now that I was the star of his rape fantasy. I hope he still enjoys the memory of my violent lust as much as I do. I don't know if I need to hurt cunt, but the mate who dutifully endures my occasional rough jab raises his value considerably.

It's the man's seed and his decision. If he's worthy of worship and service, then one of his many rights is to demand that his stain be displayed on my face.

Throats grip really well, and the lubrication is superb. There's also the matter of making the bodily conquest complete. The latter has made me appreciate men who take women rectally. I used to be uninterested in the phenomenon, but have come to appreciate their total domination of the female body.

By force.

Making you cry and choke is at least as important as the sensation of fucking. I enjoy an open throat as much as the next man, but it's best if I get to make things difficult for you now and then. If I met a boy who took it with great ease, I would be tempted to prolong the fuck until his throat got tired and I could watch him struggle.

I'm only into monogamy for the risk reduction. If diseases weren't a factor, I'd try to breed a new boy every day.

Condoms are offensive and unacceptable. If his raw rectum is unavailable, then I'll use his throat.

Depicted is a vagina, with a cervix. Would that it could be so.

No.

Yes, since the volume of ejaculate is a rough approximation of the amount of seed.

Beer is best.

To live a more phallus-centered life.

Yes, it would be a disappointing rape for all concerned.

It's an understandable and perhaps even valiant attempt to match the vaginal standard, but the primary problem is the shape of the passage rather than its inherent lubrication.

The rectum is often a poor match to what a man requires from cunt. The sigmoid turn offers some consolation, but mediocre stimulation leads many men to forgo the male role. Which muscles are these? I see no mechanism by which the rectal walls can be made to contract.

I haven't read the previous responses, so sorry for any repetition, but Like: * Comedic delivery (possibly unintentional) * "Sad!" * Kim Kardashian big-butt sentencing reform Dislike: Pretty much everything else

On a sex forum, political excreta shouldn't be allowed to pollute erotic content. If anything, the off-topic responses should be flushed out into a separate topic in whatever irrelevant garbage-pail section is appropriate. Of course, there are already countless such collections of identical opinions, and it would no doubt would be frustrating for people whose primary kink is delivering lectures to boys who get clit-hard over doughy dimwits in red hats. It would be much better for these misguided faglets to dedicate themselves to acquiring the latest pox or getting castrated—by a Democrat, of course.

I certainly don't read the screeds for content. It's just annoying to have to skip past walls of partisan blather to find the rare relevant response to the faggot's original sex question.

MAGA does nothing for me, but all of this pontificating makes me want to tithe to the RNC.

Could you give some examples? Is there anything distinct about their dominance as opposed to non-Trumpist alpha superiority"?

It absolutely isn't, but I do wonder how often illnesses are caused this way, say in the context of couple where this act is routine.

Follow the man into the bathroom and kneel next to the toilet with your mouth open. It couldn't be simpler.

1. Do you get hard when Men order you to strip? No, but I might be hard before it gets to that point. 2. While you know you should hate being called a faggot, does it actually turn you on? I don't hate it if it's true. It doesn't turn me on unless he's superior to me and therefore entitled to degrade me. 3. Are you most at ease when Men give you orders? No. 4. When a Man spits on your face, deep down, does it somehow feel right? No, I don't find spitting erotic, but I would certainly accept this treatment and express proper gratitude to a superior man. Perhaps it would become erotic in time. 5. When you jack off, do you imagine being dominated and degraded by Men? Generally not. I sympathize with the pleasure of superior men. The focus is on their male excellence and privilege. I do not generally expect to be their target. I more likely want to be in their position. 6. Do you like being fucked with other Men watching? It hasn't really happened. Once, I was lured by a young boy into a situation where he watched his ugly, old owner fuck me a bit. I only put up with it because I thought I would get a chance to ram the tight, little youngster in turn. I did not consider him functionally male and so his spectatorship had no effect. However, I would certainly help a superior man display his power and privilege to other men if he were to take possession of me and force me to be his cunt. If he is worthy of my obedience, then I should be glad for him to own me in public as he sees fit. I do think it likely that his pride in ownership and his demonstration of phallic ego would be arousing in the moment and satisfying in the long term. There is no shame in being degraded and penetrated by a better man. His every grunt, slap, sneer, and thrust must be regarded as an undeserved gift. It's the law. 7. Have you ever fantasized about being taken to a gay club, completely stripped and led around on a collar and leash? I suppose. As with the prior question, I would be happy to pay such tribute to a manifestly superior owner. I don't know that I would find it arousing in itself, but I would be emotionally and intellectually gratified to be able to magnify my rightful owner's power and glory. My own symbolic reduction to the status of his enslaved animal would be no cause for distress, but a proclamation to the world of the simple truth between us. I do believe that such a demonstration of hierarchy is the true form of marriage between man and fag. The man should have the phallic pride to bind his possession by the neck and hands, urinate in its face, and then mount it for all to see, like kings of old. 8. Have you ever let a Man piss down your throat? I positively begged for the privilege of being a urinal to a superior man. I do not believe that male domination can be truly complete without this act. His urine becomes sacred in its passage through his penis. 9. Has a Man ever ordered you to jack off in front of a group of fully clothed Men? No, nor would I expect a superior man to show any interest in the pointless erection or ejaculation of an inferior. I have no problem with the identity if it is imposed by someone worthy to rule over me. Perhaps it is better to say that I am a potential faggot. I admit the possibility as a matter of natural law. Men differ widely in their inherent quality, achievements, and phallic vitality. Many could effortlessly claim me by right. But generally they don't, so I think it's more likely that I will impose my own will on a more passive boy. Basically, I consider the dichotomy between man and faggot (or whatever you want to call it) crucial to any attempt at sexual relations between males. Anything else is just masturbatory game-playing.