Phallarchist
-
Posts
695 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Gallery
Everything posted by Phallarchist
-
By "affirmative consent" standards, it's definitely rape. By predominant legal standards, it's arguably rape. But it sounds like some version of a good day for a faggot. Do you actually consider it rape and does it trouble you?
-
I've never seen a convincing deception. There's too much focus on the man fiddling with the condom. If it's split from the start, then it's too easily discovered. If he has to spend 45 seconds breaking it, then it's obvious. I would favor 1. Rapid and silent complete removal. It takes practice and probably a lot of lubricant inside the length of the condom. The used condom needs to be hidden and seeding needs to be completed quickly before the victim finds out and protests. The victim will discover the deception immediately after the orgasm, so the man has to be prepared to make a quick escape or deal with the resistance. Obviously, this option is best for male pleasure. 2. Snipped or punctured tip, for when breeding alone is the primary goal. The smaller the hole, the harder the man has to work to expel the seed into his victim. There is a trade-off between ease of insemination and plausible deniability. It's mostly a psychological pleasure. 3. Seemingly natural breakage. Even with water-based lubricants, I have shredded several condoms in the past through some perfect combination of size, vigor, and the incompatible anatomy of the faggot cunt. They were sliced open lengthwise, so I had full raw contact with boy guts. Covertly adding some mineral oil to the lubricant mix would help this method along. This method is unreliable, but has a balance of pleasure and plausible deniability, as the man never has to withdraw from the cunt and can claim shock and ignorance at the breakage afterwards. "Didn't you feel it?" "No, baby, I just thought you had a magical snatch".
-
No, I don't think there's anything inherently wrong with your reactions. Many rape victims tend toward promiscuity, and promiscuity is the natural tendency among males anyway. In homosexual contexts, it's difficult to even avoid. Violence is basic to maleness and male sexual expression. You were suddenly exposed to the extreme form, but it was always there in the background, so it's no wonder that your erotic attention was turned. Whether or not these natural reactions are ultimately good for you is a different question. Re-exposure to a traumatic stimulus can be part of a therapeutic course.
-
Guys that pull out of your mouth to shoot
Phallarchist replied to TravelGuy1956's topic in Cocksucking Discussion
I don't think there's all that much distance between male desires and pornographic content. The urge to dominate and degrade is widespread. And you probably have a face that makes for an attractive target.- 58 replies
-
- 5
-
-
- cocksucking
- cum
- (and 2 more)
-
Which country is that? I'm making travel plans.
-
Bi Guy - New to this site. Have been filmed taking bb cock
Phallarchist replied to scotlandbi2020's topic in The UK & Ireland
Your other cunt is in your face. I think you're morally obligated to give it up to all the men you've teased so far. -
Herpes is forever when you get it. A lot of people have mild symptoms, but some have extreme pain. HPV infection is also a certainty. You will only know about it if you happen to get warts. They can grow inside your anus. There is no treatment, except to remove the warts surgically. Some of the many HPV strains are largely asymptomatic but can go on to cause anal cancer. There's nothing inevitable about the shift from having a few raw encounters to exposing yourself to an endless stream of disease. You can choose to find a boyfriend/owner, or at least limit your risks. Youth is on your side for now.
-
Videography and editing decisions
Phallarchist replied to daemien's topic in Bareback Porn Discussion
At least they realized that condoms are ugly and offensive. -
...is adulthood. Women are responsible, too, probably moreso, and they're not men.
-
Videography and editing decisions
Phallarchist replied to daemien's topic in Bareback Porn Discussion
I want to see the full process of insertion, whether it's a slow push or a brutal one-stroke slam to the hilt. I don't know why studios so often cut from suck to mid-fuck. -
Fundamentally, 1. Have a penis that gets hard. 2. Use it to fuck and breed. Of course, there are other secondary sex characteristics and factors that determine degrees of manhood. E.g., fag breeding is a simulation. If you've never fucked your seed into a vagina, then you're clearly missing an experience that's central to having a penis and being a successful male of the species.
-
No, not at all. Natural body hair is essential.
-
I'm sure no one thinks it's a legally-binding document. As you suggest, it would be a way to make sure the candidate knows the parameters of the proposal and to gauge his actual level of desire for it to happen.
-
I have digestion mostly in mind. A faggot has to have an empty stomach or an empty and cleansed colon to be useful. It's unrealistic to impose both conditions on a boy's body every day. It's better that that he take enema rest and heal on alternate days at least. A 2:1 ratio also goes some way to satisfy the male ego and desire for variety.
-
I would match one man with two boys. Faggot cunt requires a lot of maintenance time, so having two in circulation increases cunt availability for the man. If a boy had a random male urge, he could dissipate it in the other boy (with the man's permission) and return to female service.
-
I'm not getting loads and its driving me crazy
Phallarchist replied to 1000GUYS's topic in Your Last Load...
Men have limited opportunities to ejaculate, so they tend to choose their targets carefully. You should try to find out why men find you undeserving of their seed. It might be some factor that you can improve. -
Actual Female Cunt™ has even more hair than the average ass.
-
Leave it and grow more!
-
I am looking for completely untouched hair growth below the neck. I prefer an extremely hairy cunt. It's just beautiful. But I am perfectly happy with less hair as long as it's natural.
-
On this opposite side of the equation, I would have to agree. An abundance of aggression and other secondary sex characteristics, like muscularity and body hair, can be decisive. A short man can certainly get inside me by displaying and using male power. The difference is that a tall man can intimidate and force me effortlessly if it's in his nature, while a short one has to work harder to achieve the same effect. I greatly admire the smaller men who spare no effort to seize the advantage and prove their manhood against me. Their determination is inspiring. Nevertheless, I retain a general preference for the human pattern of sexual dimorphism. Males should ideally be larger.
-
This process is vitally important, but I submit that the effect is largely in the mind. What bodily integration does occur cannot be detected, and I believe that most seed leaves the colon by the unfortunate mechanisms of that organ. The oral route is actually more effective in the sense that all seed ingested is digested. I don't really interoperate with the terms "top" and "bottom". Even a normalization to the more useful concepts of male and female is somewhat unsatisfactory. There is only a man's desire and its consequences for the cunt he chooses. Semen is valuable because it is the concrete manifestation of his will to breed. The thought process of his volunteer victim is a fly-buzz distraction. This expectation is the crux. Female preference aside, I would agree that deep insemination must be the objective if a man has only one opportunity to breed. However, I do not assume the promiscuous model. I always have in mind an ownership relation between man and cunt-provider, wherein the man retains nearly unlimited long-term penetrative access and is thus assured of frequent delivery of his reproductive payload to its quasi-natural destination. In this context, any number of violent or degrading practices are available to him for the satisfaction of his phallic sadism and pride. These complementary acts reinforce his power and drive his lust for the subsequent productive copulation that he knows is forthcoming.
-
Penetration has, at the point of release, been well achieved, and possibly into both cunts in alternation. A bred load is quickly lost to the interior. An ejaculation into the face is a frontal assault on the (hypothetical) dignity of the victim. It also allows the man to view the splendor of his seed strewn over the (presumably attractive) face he has just fucked. I would also regard pissing or spitting on a face to be dominant. Slapping even more so. Is there any doubt that these acts convey contempt?
-
Yes, impale the little bitch from both ends. Or break his tiny cunt wide open with both cocks at once.
-
Facial ejaculation is for domination and degradation. Oral ejaculation addresses the reproductive urge. I would never give up either, and fortunately, they're not mutually exclusive. What hits the face can be scooped into the mouth.
-
Yes, I crave a large difference in height. 5'4"/1.63 m and below is best. I want to be able to easily control the boy's position and feel like I'm splitting him in half and stabbing up into his guts past his navel. Small hands trying to encircle my shaft look amazing, even while I prefer a generous mouth for obvious reasons.
