Jump to content

Phallarchist

Senior Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    719

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Phallarchist

  1. Phallarchist
    Yes, it's a beautiful way to connect your moment of glory to the assaultive degradation of your victim. You might want to read a previous discussion.
  2. Phallarchist
    Your post was excellent in every detail.
  3. Phallarchist
    No, they're functioning as female for the penis, factually. There is no such thing as breeding without a vagina analog.
  4. Phallarchist
    Which is to serve and be used as female. Penises become erect solely for reproductive purposes and reproduction is exclusively the coitus of male and female. Offering a man your rectum as a vagina substitute is inescapably, and gloriously, to perform a female sexual function. It's just how penises work. Looking or behaving like a real typical girl or woman ("femininity") is an entirely separate matter. For my taste, you should never aspire to be anything but a boy. But all men who fuck need cunt and encouraging them to think of your rectum in quasi-vaginal terms properly recognizes the nature of breeding. Your rectum only works for sex with a man to the extent that it resembles a vagina and you should be proud when his penis responds to it as if it might be the real thing.
  5. Phallarchist
    Right, but that's not a given. I just don't want to have anything to do with such a person.
  6. Phallarchist
    I'm glad a worthy man claimed your raw cunt and proudly took your true virginity. Breeding is the path to erotic intimacy. Did receiving his seed cause you to consider him as a potential long-term mate? Did he show interest in possessing you?
  7. Phallarchist
    Define "bad at it.".
  8. Phallarchist
    A thundering herd of desperate faggots tramples you in their rush to lick up the spill.
  9. Phallarchist
    Since you'll presumably be unable to control the brutality level, you should also consider the availability and quality of emergency medical care. If you're looking to be violated without needing a colostomy, then you might want to pursue a "consensual non-consent" arrangement with someone less likely to do permanent damage.
  10. Phallarchist
    It's not what I wrote or intended, but your proposal is certainly pleasant enough.
  11. Phallarchist
    The physical aspects of length, girth, and hardness all matter, but pride and aggression are fundamental to phallic power. Let them flow and cunt will surrender.
  12. Phallarchist
    Yes, a man has to keep in mind that the excitement of forcing a faggot can come at the expense of optimal performance. There might be a balance worth finding. But something would be missing for me if there were no coercion at all.
  13. Phallarchist
    I agree with the spirit of this assertion in this context. I believe that consent to provide oral service should automatically imply consent to throatfucking. That is, it should be the normative understanding between men and faggots. If a faggot doesn't want to have his throat forced, he should make it clear in advance. And personally, I have always found it hard to respect men who hold back or, even worse, ask for permission to do what comes so naturally.
  14. Phallarchist
    Yes, that's definitely the dominant legal standard. There's no contradiction. You have a right to enjoy being violated and otherwise choose how you react.
  15. Phallarchist
    I think they're super-ugly and anyway, the point would be to destroy his manhood with my own.
  16. Phallarchist
    I so wish that it were true. It would be satisfying indeed to take ownership of a boy and rob him of his his erectile capacity while enjoying my own.
  17. Phallarchist
    Gang rape in the shower at college: I'm somehow the leader. My co-perpetrators hold the young athlete down. Muffled screams, tears, blood, and victory! I proudly show the victim the instrument of his undoing and smear the detritus on his lips before leaving his broken cunt to the rest of the team. It's not particularly original, but that's what you get at the "roughest" extreme.
  18. Phallarchist
    I have to agree. Blood and seed are the perfect combination.
  19. Phallarchist
    I have to admire the escalation of sexualized violence, but wouldn't personally go to this extent because of possible brain damage.
  20. Phallarchist
    By "affirmative consent" standards, it's definitely rape. By predominant legal standards, it's arguably rape. But it sounds like some version of a good day for a faggot. Do you actually consider it rape and does it trouble you?
  21. Phallarchist
    I've never seen a convincing deception. There's too much focus on the man fiddling with the condom. If it's split from the start, then it's too easily discovered. If he has to spend 45 seconds breaking it, then it's obvious. I would favor 1. Rapid and silent complete removal. It takes practice and probably a lot of lubricant inside the length of the condom. The used condom needs to be hidden and seeding needs to be completed quickly before the victim finds out and protests. The victim will discover the deception immediately after the orgasm, so the man has to be prepared to make a quick escape or deal with the resistance. Obviously, this option is best for male pleasure. 2. Snipped or punctured tip, for when breeding alone is the primary goal. The smaller the hole, the harder the man has to work to expel the seed into his victim. There is a trade-off between ease of insemination and plausible deniability. It's mostly a psychological pleasure. 3. Seemingly natural breakage. Even with water-based lubricants, I have shredded several condoms in the past through some perfect combination of size, vigor, and the incompatible anatomy of the faggot cunt. They were sliced open lengthwise, so I had full raw contact with boy guts. Covertly adding some mineral oil to the lubricant mix would help this method along. This method is unreliable, but has a balance of pleasure and plausible deniability, as the man never has to withdraw from the cunt and can claim shock and ignorance at the breakage afterwards. "Didn't you feel it?" "No, baby, I just thought you had a magical snatch".
  22. Phallarchist
    No, I don't think there's anything inherently wrong with your reactions. Many rape victims tend toward promiscuity, and promiscuity is the natural tendency among males anyway. In homosexual contexts, it's difficult to even avoid. Violence is basic to maleness and male sexual expression. You were suddenly exposed to the extreme form, but it was always there in the background, so it's no wonder that your erotic attention was turned. Whether or not these natural reactions are ultimately good for you is a different question. Re-exposure to a traumatic stimulus can be part of a therapeutic course.
  23. Phallarchist
    I don't think there's all that much distance between male desires and pornographic content. The urge to dominate and degrade is widespread. And you probably have a face that makes for an attractive target.
  24. Phallarchist
    Which country is that? I'm making travel plans.
  25. Phallarchist
    Your other cunt is in your face. I think you're morally obligated to give it up to all the men you've teased so far.

Other #BBBH Sites…

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Top Bareback Porn Sites…

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.