Phallarchist
-
Posts
625 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Gallery
Everything posted by Phallarchist
-
No, I meant 'exists to be fucked' in the evolutionary sense. There is no mechanism for the mutual adaptation of penis to rectum, and indeed their interoperability is accidental and approximate at best. I think that's a tautology. I don't how it would be "intended", if it's an evolutionary metaphor. You would have to demonstrate that the men who fuck you have superior lineages to those of a similar cohort of men who do not. I expect that many in the first group will never even reproduce, so the proposition seems unlikely. If you are referring to a supernatural intention, then I leave you to it. Or perhaps you simply mean that you find yourself best suited to this function in life. I certainly wouldn't argue with the psychological need for meaning and purpose, but I would struggle to discern an "intention". Far more men will fuck through menstrual blood (44% in one survey) than shit. I can't prove it, but if I'm wrong, then I want a divorce from the human race. Anyway, menstrual flow is heavy for perhaps 3 days, so even with this restriction against filth, real cunt is more or less clean and ready for a man ~90% of the month. The digestive tract, on the other hand, has to be cleaned or at least checked before every fuck.
-
If I were the man responsible, I would want those shorts for a trophy.
-
I generally agree. The dichotomy in mating preferences arising from differences in obligate parental investment can make men and women seem more like different species than complementary sexes. But there is a huge difference between choosing a cunt because its owner is a slut who will gladly take a beating and choosing a cunt for its actual anatomical and physiological qualities. The exact same dilemma arises. In fact, even though it be eager, a faggot is not ready to be fucked on demand, because it needs at least an hour to be sure its rectum is clean. Real cunt is always ready (depending on your tolerance for menstrual blood), even as the female is fundamentally unwilling, because it exists to be fucked.
-
Do you bottoms wish you had a smaller cock?
Phallarchist replied to PussyBottomBitch's topic in Softcore Fetishes Forum
It's perfectly harmless and nearly invisible. Don't replace it with a nasty scar. -
It seems like wishful thinking to me that the male function requires any skill. The penis just needs to finds its target. The first thrust might need some guidance. All the rest are automatic, as is the delivery of seed, the only moment that actually matters genetically. The only skill I could see a man possibly needing would be cunnilingus, assuming the relatively rare event (historically) in which the woman could choose a partner for this skill. It's quite unlikely that he would practice analingus on a boy beforehand, and even if he did, it wouldn't translate very well.
-
I would say that it's neither particularly "gay", nor a fetish, nor in need of justification. I'm sure I should read the book, but to what genetic benefit is such experimentation? There are plenty of males who make do with their hands alone until first use of a female. Do these men have lesser lineages?
-
Sexually-normal men necessarily define masculinity by the sheer force of their overwhelming preponderance in the population. And that includes reproducing as a matter of course. I definitely give a man more points if he fucks women and makes babies, because, well, that's the basic purpose of a man, his penis, and breeding. All other things being equal, I'll choose to be penetrated by a man whose seed has been successful. Such choices hardly ever present themselves in my life, but the hierarchy of value is straightforward. In general, it's irrational to expect people who are attracted to males to desire anything other than the archetypes of the dominant hypermajority. That such men are largely unavailable is irrelevant to the fact of desire.
-
Some cunt is just delicate. You got lucky, I say.
-
It can't. It's as preposteous as it sounds.
-
You'll get no disease fetish from me. I'm positively avoidant. But there is no problem and there's definitely nothing wrong with your rectum or sigmoid colon. Penetration and copulation is an obvious misuse of these organs and the resulting minor bleeding is routine. It stops, you heal, and you're ready to be broken all over again. If you're worried about disease, screen your partners and reduce their number (to one perhaps). I love the damage. The prospect of seeing blood mixed into my seed every time I fuck raises the value of a cuntmate considerably.
-
By local standards, I would likely be considered celibate. I had all of the experimental, low-quality encounters I needed to figure out what's what and am now mostly interested in sex with people I think are candidates for a long-term breeding relationship. I do not count oral service as a full sexual act and am inclined on occasion.
-
It's an irrelevant organ to me. I don't care if it swings around. A tiny, bunched-up one (I guess from one of those horrible cages) looks like a deformity. In that case, an actual clitoris would be better, and I might not totally ignore it.
-
I can't imagine the competition to be the target. Bitches must be shanking each other.
-
Full-length body hair, always, everywhere
-
What is the smallest cock you would suck?
Phallarchist replied to Bigdickdaddy's topic in Cocksucking Discussion
I would estimate a lower limit of around 4 slim inches. If it's really thick, I might go lower. There would have to be some physical or personality feature to compensate for a merely nominal erection. -
I do want to believe.
-
Random guys at 18. Much too late a start with unimpressive men. I should have held out for quality.
-
My guess is that something that looks like semen was injected into the urethra beforehand.
-
1, 2, 7, 8, 9 and the obvious problem that seed belongs in the cunt. Anything that prevents breeding is evil.
-
Yes, because I don't believe in double standards and have always strongly wished that the boys I want to fuck had vaginas. I am indifferent as to whether they would have penises also.
-
It needs to be naturally hairy, no alterations.
-
Tight Holes: Question for Tops and Bottoms
Phallarchist replied to Ffistboi21's topic in General Discussion
I'm certainly not competing to be the cruellest of them all. I might be on the low end of the range, but inflicting a bit of pain for my erotic satisfaction fits the definition of sexual sadism as I see it. It's just not my only mode. I do find that plenty of men in general are at my level or above. Their urge to cause momentary suffering, at least, is commonplace and demands some accommodation. To what degree female masochism should be expected in return is a difficult question, but I doubt the realistic answer is "zero". From the dirt to the dryness to the ill fit to the pain, rectal penetration is an unsubtle abuse of the organ. The very wrongness of it has to be enjoyed for its own sake. We are not born to this difficult and unproductive joining, but our desires twist us to it. We mate by grease and force and it is a most glorious abomination. -
About to take my first MONSTER cock... any tips?
Phallarchist replied to VersatileBreeder's topic in General Discussion
Do you have an idea of how much you would be willing to suffer for him? Would you feel bad about asking him to stop? -
Nothing prevents the target from opening his mouth. The remaining facial deposits can also be scooped in once the spectacle is complete. In fact, I would insist in it.
-
Bukkake style, yes, with the right victim as the target of degradation. But I don't want a bunch of men just delivering free seed. The boy has to earn each load in turn. It would be a gang-bang with carefully targeted ejaculation.
