Jump to content

Phallarchist

Senior Members
  • Posts

    625
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Phallarchist

  1. I am. Expelling a man's seed in his presence is disrespectful and demonstrates a complete failure to understand the cosmic importance of the sexual act and the male orgasm. I would consider a physical rebuke for such a transgression entirely appropriate. It is the moral obligation of the inseminated female to retain the man's payload as long as possible. If there is some contingency that necessitates its intentional release, then the female should wait until the man has left. He should be able to continue through his day with the thought that his gametes are surging ever forward, up into the fertile cunt that he worked so hard to gift with his essence.
  2. Why are there are so many rape-victim fantasies and so few would-be rapists? A lot of cunts are going un-violated.
  3. HPV has to be #1, since it's easily transmitted, often asymptomatic, and not included in STD testing.
  4. If it's an actual matter of size, where his erection is thicker than your jaw's maximum aperture, then you can only do your best. It just doesn't fit, and it's a good thing your cunt has no teeth. It seems unlikely that your mouth is actually that small, though. The only way to know for sure is for him to take control and force it into your skull up to the limits of his comfort. You'll learn what's possible and work towards that goal when you worship.
  5. Thank you for using the correct form of address. The burden of pregnancy is enormous, so women are instinctively selective about the quality and resources of the men who breed them.
  6. He always struck me as a particularly congenial and natural cunt boy. I think this video must be from a while back.
  7. You only need to bleed once a month, but bruises can be pretty.
  8. The male is penetrating. There's no reason for him to pause and ponder his virtue. His erection is an objective fact that has an objective reaction to the objective stimulation of the cunt underneath him, an organ that works just fine when it's owner is unaware that it is being used. I didn't use the word "rape", in this case, to mean anything but a wholesale violation in the total absence of any possibility of acquiescence or refusal. Nothing you have ever written would lead me to expect you to understand why I might find such an act to be a tremendously pleasurable and fulfilling, peak male experience. But I know myself well enough. If an exceptional victim were splayed before me, the twin miracles of his physical perfection and my phallic power might just compel me to force a glorious union. If I did it, I might take unbounded pleasure in forcing his cunt at length and releasing my seed into his gut. In contrast with a side of beef, he is very much alive and his cunt is soft and warm and I naturally [but erroneously] regard him as bursting with fertility that I must conquer and claim. I don't mind leaving him sore, but excess brutality is beside the point. This rape is primarily to force my genetic material into an irresistibly beautiful female [functionally speaking] and to watch and feel my extraordinary penis stretch him repeatedly from anus to sigmoid. It's a total exploitation that I have reason to believe I would find utterly exhilarating and satisfying as I am perpetrating it.
  9. It's going to be a beautiful marriage.
  10. You look like good rape, sweet-faced and ripe of cunt.
  11. Asidd from the occasional curious taste, no. Seed is for mating and only has meaning in relation to another person.
  12. "It's so big." I am not a first-place sizewinner, but plenty of boys have been shocked by what I point in their general direction. Their wide-eyed fascination and trepidation is wonderful to behold. "It hurts" or more lyrically, "ouch ouch ouch", is how they phrase it during coitus when they really want to get me going. "Rape me" is impossible as a request, but a great way to get to "ouch ouch ouch" and a bruised cunt coated in my seed in no time at all.
  13. So, did it? I want to make a boy sit at work, squirming and oozing my seed into his underwear, periodically taking pictures of it for me and wiping up, bit still terrified he'll queef out the whole greasy, slimy load at once and become known to everybody in the office as a fucked faggot from the big, wet stain in the seat of his pants. I would then have to come to his workplace, seat-towel in hand, to drive him home, but mostly to show everyone there that I am the one who did it to him and am enjoying myself at his expense.
  14. Even if you ask him to pull out? That was the nature of the question.
  15. I can watch sucking for a long time if the fellator is exceptionally skilled and beautiful, but that's rarely the case.
  16. Why? Does the enjoyment of violent sex with an awake person somehow preclude the enjoyment of raping an unconscious one? They're separate delights.
  17. I consider active choking too dangerous, but a firm hand wrapped around the trachea is a satisfying threat and gesture of ownership that perfectly matches the natural violence of rectal copulation. In a perfect world, I would love to squeeze a bitch hard and finish in him whether he's conscious or not. Passed-out cunt is beautiful.
  18. For those less interested in the health aspect, I recommend this topic in the "Hardcore Fetishes Forum": Arse-To-Mouth. I actually don't consider it "hardcore" or a fetish, but you can't have everything.
  19. It's possible, I guess, but most people don't get HIV via the oral route, much less the type that is largely confined to West Africa.
  20. The acts you describe have various formal and informal terms already, "analingus", "rimming", and perhaps "felching". "Ass-to-mouth", by contrast, is a somewhat awkward construction that refers to penetration or re-penetration of the mouth immediately following penetration of the rectum. No direct contact between a mouth and an anus is involved.
  21. is not the topic. "Ass-to-mouth" refers to the male's practice of removing his penis from a rectum and inserting it into someone's mouth. In the normal case, the rectum and the mouth in question belong to the same body. Any pathogens in the mixture of mucous, blood, and (hopefully no more than infinitesimal amounts of) fæces will already be present in his victim, so most of these health warnings would not apply. Only when the fuck filth is introduced into the oral passage of a third party do that person's risks resemble those of analingus.
  22. I wonder why this discussion is in this section. I don't think it started as a health inquiry.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.