TRUE Breeding in Porn: WHO Decides???

[latinocumwhore1]

I would totally be into studios like SketchySex, Eric Videos, or even the Czech gay porn if they did internal shots.  

[DirtyBruin]

On 1/4/2019 at 2:52 PM, Saturn1 said:

I think a good way to know that a Top REALLY DID Cum inside the Bottom is by looking at the Top's Dick. While the Top was Fucking, the Dick was HARD. When the Top DOES Cum, the Dick begins to go soft almost immediately. Know what I mean? 

I know what you mean, but that's not the case if the top has used Trimix - the cock just stays hard until it wears off.

[NLbear]

I'm not an expert on making porn at all but from a business perspective I would think it's the producer and/or director who calls the shots (so to speak). They know what type of movie they want to make, e.g. a "true" breeding scene or a pull-out-and-show-the-money-shot type. The actors do as they are told (yes/no?). If an "accident" happens and the tops actually cums in the bottom when he was supposed to pull out they can always save that scene for a next "true breeding" flick. Just my thinking.

[ObligingBottom]

My opinion on this:

Bareback - not wearing a condom during the scene. Cums either inside or outside the ass.

Breeding - cumming inside the ass. No pulling out.

I mean, seriously, let’s look at the term itself. Breeding. Implies someone is getting pregnant. Most likely NOT going to happen if someone pulls out, dumps most of the load somewhere else, then pushes the cock inside.

It really fucks me off when I’m watching a “breeding” clip and the top pulls out. Bareback, it was. Breeding, it wasn’t.

</rant>

[phukhole]

The studio tells the actors what they want from the scene. The actors don't get paid if they don't perform to the studios wishes.  The studios film what they THINK you want to see, so make comments on the studio websites and blogs. Send them a twitter message. Enough people wanting to see breeding (internal cumshots) will make the studios film it.  Studios have always wanted money shots. I don't think they realize that that isn't ALWAYS what people want.

 

[ObligingBottom]

17 hours ago, phukhole said:

The studio tells the actors what they want from the scene. The actors don't get paid if they don't perform to the studios wishes.  The studios film what they THINK you want to see, so make comments on the studio websites and blogs. Send them a twitter message. Enough people wanting to see breeding (internal cumshots) will make the studios film it.  Studios have always wanted money shots. I don't think they realize that that isn't ALWAYS what people want.

 

Totally understand this, but the word “breeding” means just that. Don’t strap an icecream cone on a cow’s head and call it a unicorn. It’s false advertising.

[bihairy]

On 1/16/2019 at 4:41 AM, ObligingBottom said:

My opinion on this:

Bareback - not wearing a condom during the scene. Cums either inside or outside the ass.

Breeding - cumming inside the ass. No pulling out.

I mean, seriously, let’s look at the term itself. Breeding. Implies someone is getting pregnant. Most likely NOT going to happen if someone pulls out, dumps most of the load somewhere else, then pushes the cock inside.

It really fucks me off when I’m watching a “breeding” clip and the top pulls out. Bareback, it was. Breeding, it wasn’t.

</rant>

I hate it when it’s labeled bareback and there is a condom that magically gets put on and they try to hide it. I turn that crap off. I want it bare and prefer cum inside like we all do. 

[phukhole]

@ObligingBottom Understood. Too many people are free and loose with the term "breeding". If a description says hottie1 breeds guttertrash2, I expect the cum ti be inside him!  I think the issue is also THAT - who is writing the desriptions? Is it from the DVD jacket and the studio itself, or is it generated by the tube site based on keywords that sell?

 

[bareback-flipflop]

I can’t exclude that this is connecting to the klicks. I don’t know whether in English the expression klickhunter exsists, but I guess the maintainers of websites are interested in more klicks because of the advertising. So, if they write breeding more visitors will klick on the video than on a simple bareback. Moreover I many times start to watch a video under bareback label where the guys are wrapped. It annoys me more. 

However I find cuminside videos many times under the label creampie. 

[ObligingBottom]

2 hours ago, bareback-flipflop said:

I can’t exclude that this is connecting to the klicks. I don’t know whether in English the expression klickhunter exsists, but I guess the maintainers of websites are interested in more klicks because of the advertising. So, if they write breeding more visitors will klick on the video than on a simple bareback. Moreover I many times start to watch a video under bareback label where the guys are wrapped. It annoys me more. 

However I find cuminside videos many times under the label creampie. 

Like breeding videos, I have found quite a few creampie videos also have a guy pulling out, cumming, then pushing it back in.

The one term I have started to use with limited success is "impregnates".

[Read1]

If you're topping and providing internal cumshots (and not pulling out!), wouldn't you be inseminating your bottom, literally putting your semen in a boyhole? Breeding, impregnating, inseminating are all synonyms, methinks. Just my 2 cents' worth of cum! LOL!

[barejackbro3]

What BottomInNeed said! It's down to the company - they decide what happens, at times down to serious detail.

The porn I did about 7 years ago was pretty heavily scripted. Back then condoms were used for fucking, but in one scene, I ended up on my back (as per the script) and four guys around me (as per the script) and two of them shot their loads on my face (as per the script) while the other two shot across my chest (scripted again), before rubbing it into my face (scripted) and fingering my ass with cummy fingers (scripted) before I shot my load last (scripted).

You get the point. The setup was pretty detailed, and before each take we kinda had a run through from the director about what he expected. There were a few points where we could get spontaneous but not often.

Therefore I can;t imagine that in bareback porn the setup would be any different. TIM Porn looks a lot more spontaneous, as was Triga, but I reckon most of the rest will be scripted.

[Guest Saturn1]

Hey, barejackbro3! Just curious, what was the preparation for the shoot like? Do they make you shower and give the Bottoms enemas? I heard that the Studios want the Bottoms to be REALLY clean up there! Is it true? Did you think doing Porn was fun? What were the other Boiz like? Friendly or assholes? Any hook ups off the set? I always wondered if Boiz who did Safe Sex Porn totally Barebacked off Camera.

[barejackbro3]

49 minutes ago, Saturn1 said:

Hey, barejackbro3! Just curious, what was the preparation for the shoot like? Do they make you shower and give the Bottoms enemas? I heard that the Studios want the Bottoms to be REALLY clean up there! Is it true? Did you think doing Porn was fun? What were the other Boiz like? Friendly or assholes? Any hook ups off the set? I always wondered if Boiz who did Safe Sex Porn totally Barebacked off Camera.

We sat around chatting in the living room (the whole house was a porn studio but they'd left the living room reasonably untouched) waiting for everyone to turn up, and then yeah we all went upstairs to shower and douche our asses really thoroughly. Yeah the director made it clear that even the smell of poop was way off limits. So I douched the hardest I ever douched in my life, every time for every scene!  

For me it was fun, because I knew I wasn;t trying to make a career out of it. I was a total tourist. A couple of big studio DVD scenes, and a handful of pay-per-view scenes that never went anywhere. Various photoshoots that got into those free magazines you get in gay bars. Still do them every now and then. I didn;t even get so far as having a porn name. Just used the name 'Jack' or 'Johnny' for most of it.

But I did work with a couple of proper bona fide porn stars, and I'll be honest they were kinda broken people. One of them was friendly but really fragile and obviously fucking himself up big time, the other was a total asshole. He hated me almost on sight, but he was also really into me sexually, so it made for a weird chemistry on set! Meeting them really underlined for me that yeah I definitely don;t want this for a career!

In my case I did safe sex porn because the directors all insisted. Funnily enough I did all the scenes right at the time when I was starting to bareback so yeah in my case it's true what you say.

Hook-ups off set, didn't happen for me but to be honest I was like got the money, had the fun, see ya! about it all. But a couple of scenes did get a wide distribution around Europe, especially the Triga stuff, and I did kinda get recognised a few times (as in 'I've seen you somewhere before, god its bothering me cos i don;t know where', or a strange look in a gay bar from a guy with his boyfriend... or a husband with his wife and kids on the train staring at me oddly a few weeks after one of the DVDs got released!) which once or twice I was able to turn into a hook-up... and once managed to turn a boring sauna night in London into a bareback fuckfest after being 'kinda-recognised-seen-you-somewhere-before' - I just told him and he told half the guys I was a porn star, which for the purposes of getting gang fucked I did not correct him!

I'm glad I did it - there are definitely experiences both fun and surreal to be had in a porn studio that you definitely don;t get anywhere else.

Well that's my essay done for the day!  

Edited January 22, 2019 by barejackbro3

[Guest Saturn1]

Thank you SO much for the detailed response! It does sound like you had an AWESOME experience!!! YAY!!! I thought that the douching thing was true! Lol! It sounds like doing Porn is a VERY cool experience if you just want to have a good time and go! Lol!