Real life stealthing

[BannedWord]

16 hours ago, Breedingandseeding said:

...he very heavily hints that’s he’s Poz but never outright says it. He says he’s not on prep, talks about his “dirty load” and loves fucking virgins who aren’t on prep. He states he has a “one  and done” rule so he never hooks up with the same guy twice (multiple loads in one session he’s fine with) and he even brags about ghosting or blocking the young guys he breeds after he’s done using them.

I just went through this guy's feed. He claims that he is not Poz. Nonetheless, he's still on the hook if he knowingly misrepresented his status, but I reckon like the others that he's fueling a fantasy in order to get more eyeballs on his OF and JFF subscriptions. It looks self-produced with similar camera angles. And the one-and-done doesn't hold up if he's collaborating with certain others, a few were more than once. 

He's definitely hot, but I won't be purchasing a sub as it seems like all it would be is "daddy fucks Twink, more daddy fucks Twink, and...oh look, there's daddy fucking Twink".

[Toxload]

You play you pay

[drscorpio]

His one-and-done isn't consistent either. He mentioned one guy as being a favorite who he fucks whenever he can, and he said another was a repeat visit. 

[Breedingandseeding]

6 hours ago, TheSRQDude said:

I just went through this guy's feed. He claims that he is not Poz. Nonetheless, he's still on the hook if he knowingly misrepresented his status, but I reckon like the others that he's fueling a fantasy in order to get more eyeballs on his OF and JFF subscriptions. It looks self-produced with similar camera angles. And the one-and-done doesn't hold up if he's collaborating with certain others, a few were more than once. 

He's definitely hot, but I won't be purchasing a sub as it seems like all it would be is "daddy fucks Twink, more daddy fucks Twink, and...oh look, there's daddy fucking Twink".

Yeah I see the inconsistencies now…nevertheless I think it’s a strange strategy to get more people to his only fans/just for fans because the outside or breeding zone the Poz fetish/fantasy just isn’t widely liked. (And even on here there’s plenty of guys who dislike the Poz fetish). The dude has a great body and obviously has no problem finding cute guys to fuck. I’d imagine he’d actually make more money doing more conventional bb porn. The dude himself mentions that he can’t find collabs with other only fans performers.

[chargedodger]

Kind of amazed there aren't more men stealthing.

[iman2004]

4 minutes ago, chargedodger said:

Kind of amazed there aren't more men stealthing.

I suspect that there are they just don’t talk about it here.

[TwinkChaserSlut]

6 hours ago, Breedingandseeding said:

Yeah I see the inconsistencies now…nevertheless I think it’s a strange strategy to get more people to his only fans/just for fans because the outside or breeding zone the Poz fetish/fantasy just isn’t widely liked. (And even on here there’s plenty of guys who dislike the Poz fetish). The dude has a great body and obviously has no problem finding cute guys to fuck. I’d imagine he’d actually make more money doing more conventional bb porn. The dude himself mentions that he can’t find collabs with other only fans performers.

I wouldn't characterize him having a "great body". His body has a decent amount of muscle bulk but alot of body fat too. He is larger built & he looks like he hasn't missed a meal lately. That said, I don't mind watching bulky/stocky men pound waify little twinks. 

[BiCurious100]

On 4/26/2022 at 2:17 PM, ErosWired said:

In the United States, 12 states have laws requiring disclosure of HIV status to sexual partners. The criminalization of HIV is still very much a thing.

Here’s a link to an infographic about the status of HIV criminalization around the U.S.:
[think before following links] [think before following links] [think before following links] https://www.hivlawandpolicy.org/sites/default/files/HIV Criminalization in the US%2C CHLP 020122.pdf

 

Just because I could have easily locked my door does not give a burglar license to come into my house and steal my belongings. A person who presents a hazard to someone else’s health has a moral and ethical obligation to tell them before knowingly exposing them to that hazard. It’s as simple as that. The question of a legal obligation isn’t to promote liberty, it’s to promote deterrence.

Firstly, apologies if my previous post caused any offence, this wasn't my intension.

 

Thanks for the information/map - to be honest, this has taken me by surprise - I wasn't aware that the law in regards to this varied so much from state to state.

 

I think it's very sad that there are still a lot of 'anti-gay'/HIV views around, in the law-makers; not that I'm surprised, given that the former VP (Pence) was so openly 'anti-gay'.

 

For the record, I'm against any criminal activity and oppose the act of anyone delbrately infecting/hurting others, with HIV, without their consent/knowledge.

 

As for your example on locking the house, people shouldn't and have no right to burgle houses (burglars are one group of people that I detest), so you shouldn't, in theory, have to lock your house; however, sadly, there are people that would burgle houses given the opportunity.  

 

My point on PrEP is that preventing HIV transmission is now under your own control, without having to rely on your sexual partners being honest about their HIV status.  Asking sexual partners their HIV status is, in my view, probably a waste of time, given that (sadly) people lie...

Having said that, I believe that people should be honest, about their HIV status, with sexual partners.

 

I will soon be going on PrEP myself, which will allow me to be in control of my own health (in regards to HIV) and give me the peace-of-mind, when having bb sex going forward.  A sexual partners HIV status is something which I wouldn't have to worry about, which will allow me to enjoy the experience.

 

Anyway, I hope that clarifies my previous post.  Please feel free to message me - I'm still too new to send new messages myself, but can respond to messages that I'm sent.

 

[downtownswallow]

If you're going to Bottom, then YOU have a responsibility to be on Prep to ensure your personal health.  Any Top that stealths a Bottom is despicable...poz or not.

[BigPaleBottom]

On 4/26/2022 at 1:37 AM, Breedingandseeding said:

I recently came across a Twitter account with some content of a beefy daddy breeding mostly twinks. After scrolling through a bit and watching some videos and reading his posts he very heavily hints that’s he’s Poz but never outright says it. He says he’s not on prep, talks about his “dirty load” and loves fucking virgins who aren’t on prep. He states he has a “one  and done” rule so he never hooks up with the same guy twice (multiple loads in one session he’s fine with) and he even brags about ghosting or blocking the young guys he breeds after he’s done using them.

I gotta ask since so many fiction stories here involve stealthing, rape, or other morally questionable material, how guys on this site feel about this guy?

The sex is consensual, but he’s very likely stealthing young and dumb 18-20 year olds, and then ghosting or blocking them. Just curious how much of what’s on here is fantasy and what people are actually doing themselves.

(@BeefyBull3 if you feel like checking him out yourself; not an endorsement but you can see what I’m talking about)

It’s horrible behaviour and outright wrong if he did lie to them. 
 

i just object to “young and dumb“. At that age, and being gay maybe outside of BigTown, you’re not dumb. You’re insecure, puzzled, easy to manipulate, eager to fit in, uninformed, full of shame about your sexuality, naive and maybe too trustful. Alcohol at 21, but (toxic) loads at 18? I don’t think so. 
So let’s not victim shame. Undeniably the responsibility is with the top. 

[hungry_hole]

On 4/27/2022 at 2:20 PM, downtownswallow said:

Any Top that stealths a Bottom is despicable...poz or not.

I’ve said this before, but I have no objection to ANON-Stealthing because I see it at just another fetish totally OK at a sauna or sex club.  

Laws regarding stealthing are meant to protect women and guys who have sex with known partners and do not apply to ANON-Stetealthing. I doubt someone can legally claim having been stealthed at a sauna or darkroom. How do you tell the judge who stealthed you?

[gwmxyz]

Quote

i was arrested in Virginia in 1998, for asking an undercover vice cop pretending to be gay at a popular gay cruising spot, if he wanted to fuck me

I don't mean to sound cynical, but what do the police in such situations imagine think they are protecting the public against? The risk of accidentally finding themselves in a cruising ground looking as if they might want a fuck?  

[Guest]

for me the question is what he says if the bottom asks. or if the bottom says pull out. if it is totally anon and the bottom is aware he will take poz loads by being an "open to all" hole then the possibility is an unspoken agreement. but if the bottom is trying to show at least some hint of caution the partner is obliged to state the truth. however if he says "honestly" that he doesnt know but will breed the bottom regardless then he has met his moral responsibility and it is the bottoms choice to make.  when i first started taking unknown loads i'd ask the tops to pull out before they came. each time i found myself not stopping as he got close but each time they honored the request. 100% of the time!  the first time i got bred it was because when he asked if he could pump me with sperm i said "maybe, i don't know. i want to but never have". he warned me he was close, warned me he had no idea of his status, and i begged for his load which he provided! but he clearly told me so i would have to decide.  obviously many gay guys, even who love breeding, are of honorable nature.

[hungry_hole]

4 hours ago, nastysubbbbottom said:

if it is totally anon and the bottom is aware he will take poz loads by being an "open to all" hole then the possibility is an unspoken agreement. but if the bottom is trying to show at least some hint of caution the partner is obliged to state the truth.

I have a problem with censoring any kind of fetish in anonymous sex environments because anonymous sexual environments are for experiencing fetishes that otherwise cannot be experienced.

I've read many accounts of bottoms being excited about the risks of bareback sex and the fear and the possibility of infection is part of the excitement. The risk comes from the possibility of the bottom taking poz cum from either someone who doesn't know or from someone who knows but is horny and decides to hide the truth about his status.

Before the AIDS crisis I was bottoming the way every bottom did, bareback and condoms were not even talked about. I stopped barebacking like everyone else and then once a guy I had just met in a phone-line came over, started fucking me with a condom, but without me noticing he took it off and kept fucking until he blew his load. The fuck had felt different and when the guy is about to leave, he whispers in my ear "I left a present for you". I touched my hole and it was leaking his cum and the condom lying on the floor empty.

I think it's impractical to expect guys who stealth in anonymous sex places to stop doing it because it will never change. Plus now with Meds and PrEP stealthing is not what it used to be.

If guys who are not on PrEP want to avoid HIV infection the best is to always have sex with known guys and never, ever, bareback bottom at a sauna.

[ErosWired]

On 4/27/2022 at 1:20 PM, downtownswallow said:

If you're going to Bottom, then YOU have a responsibility to be on Prep to ensure your personal health.  Any Top that stealths a Bottom is despicable...poz or not.

It’s true that the bottom has a responsibility to safeguard his own health. Some Tops, however, take this argument and use it to support a claim that Tops have no responsibility to ensure that they are not disease vectors. The reality is that both have a responsibility toward each other, as well as themselves.