Favorite posjo

[Guest]

As a bottom at the baths in the 1980s, I insisted on being on my back so I could look into the sunken eyes  of guys with KS lesions breeding me with their AIDS bug. Staring into their wasted faces turned me on just as much as feeling them quiver when they spewed their toxic sperm deep inside my guts. But I'd also take it on my knees doggie style as long as there were mirrors on the wall so I could still witness their bodies and reactions while impregnating and infecting my guts. 

[Tanbbottom]

1. Missionary  ... love to see his face as he's painting my gut walls 

2. Doggy  ... especially if a stranger and through a glory hole 

3. Sling  ... love it, but I just get so few chances 

[BootmanLA]

3 hours ago, gangbangsuperstar said:

definitely not. getting fucked in a sling you are at the height that is actually calculated to be the best for most guys to fuck you, plus your legs are held back in place by the ankle cuffs so your fuckhole is easily available and on display for fucking. guys can actually see your gaped out fuckhole dripping cum between fucks. the closest think I have found to a sling is getting fucked on picnic tables in parks. pretty much the same height but no leg restraints so the top or the men watching (I love that) have to hold your legs back.plus not nearly as comfortable. a good cumdump can lie in a sling literally all night collecting loads. I have even slept in bathhouse slings, only waking up whenever a guy is fucking me. so for a good powerbottom, in a sling is definitely its own position. I LOVE getting gangbanged in a sling by anonymous strangers. the more the better. plus I love how everyone can see who the cumdumpster in the public sling is but because of the lighting right in my face behind the top I can never really see any of the men breeding me.

All of which may be true, but they don't address the question. Every time, without fail, that I've seen "positions for sex" illustrated for comparison, there's no reference to furniture, surface, or whatever. "Position" is always illustrated as the relationship between the two bodies fucking. Doggy style is still doggy style, even if you're resting your chest on a footstool or pile of pillows. Standing/bent over is still standing/bent over, whether or not you're bending over a deck railing or just supporting yourself.

And I still contend, on your back with legs raised is on your back with legs raised, regardless of whether your back is in contact with the floor, a table, a sling, or a stack of National Geographic magazines with the pages stuck together from decades of spunk splattering on pictures of half-dressed natives of foreign lands. A sling may be more comfortable; it may (or may NOT) be "at the height that is actually calculated to be the best" for people - I've seen slings at varying heights in places across the country. Height is a matter of personal choice. Some slings don't have stirrups or ankle cuffs.

None of that has to do with "sexual position". They're details - important details to some, but it's not a position.

[gingerdaddyG]

31 minutes ago, BootmanLA said:

All of which may be true, but they don't address the question. Every time, without fail, that I've seen "positions for sex" illustrated for comparison, there's no reference to furniture, surface, or whatever. "Position" is always illustrated as the relationship between the two bodies fucking. Doggy style is still doggy style, even if you're resting your chest on a footstool or pile of pillows. Standing/bent over is still standing/bent over, whether or not you're bending over a deck railing or just supporting yourself.

And I still contend, on your back with legs raised is on your back with legs raised, regardless of whether your back is in contact with the floor, a table, a sling, or a stack of National Geographic magazines with the pages stuck together from decades of spunk splattering on pictures of half-dressed natives of foreign lands. A sling may be more comfortable; it may (or may NOT) be "at the height that is actually calculated to be the best" for people - I've seen slings at varying heights in places across the country. Height is a matter of personal choice. Some slings don't have stirrups or ankle cuffs.

None of that has to do with "sexual position". They're details - important details to some, but it's not a position.

I’m sensing frustration in your response. It’s really not worth getting worked up about it. Sorry if you feel I posted an inappropriate answer and that others have agreed with me. 

[Pigforcum]

Love being on all fours

[BootmanLA]

1 hour ago, gingerdaddyG said:

I’m sensing frustration in your response. It’s really not worth getting worked up about it. Sorry if you feel I posted an inappropriate answer and that others have agreed with me. 

Worked up? Hardly. You'd know if I were worked up.

Put another way: I've seen guys laid face down in a sling before, being fucked with all four limbs hanging over the sides/ends. Is that the same "position" as someone on his back, wrists grabbing or restrained to the chains from which the sling is hung? After all, it is "in a sling".

If I were to say my favorite position was "in a soybean field" or "in my garage", would that convey any meaning about what the position actually looked like or how it worked?

“When I use a word,’ Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, ‘it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.’

’The question is,’ said Alice, ‘whether you can make words mean so many different things."

 

[Sfmike64]

5 hours ago, BritFFPig said:

We used to have small sexclub here in Paris called the Transfert. It was so small that if you didn’t get the sling first everyone fucked standing up. The toilet was even small and always crowded. You could get fuck by 4 or 5 just waiting to piss, or even while pissing 🐷

OMG. I loved Le Transfert. I was at Keller's one night (in 98 before going to the Gay Games in Amsterdam) watching this hot guy get fisted. When the top was done, he just walked away so I helped the bottom get out of the sling. We ended up chatting and he invited me to go to Transfert with him. I finally rolled into my hotel around 5AM. I was covered in piss and smelled like sex. 

[NYBBGUY58]

On 8/18/2022 at 9:16 AM, Bottom Jim said:

As a bottom I do have favorite positions

1. on my stomach ass in the air allows top to go in balls deep

2 Doggie style

3. spooning with top 

4. on back legs in the air 

any comments or your favorite 

Pretty much whatever the top wants, but I guess each has their own appeal:

1. On my stomach makes me feel dominated!

2. Doggie style lets me reach back and play with the top's balls and t'aint; depending on size and my state of limberness, his ass crack...😍

3. Missionary (a.k.a., "on back legs in the air") allows me to reach the balls, the t'aint and the ass crack. Drove one guy crazy while he fucked me (saying he had girlfriends that were pretty and he liked fucking them, but that none of them knew to touch his ass like I did...🥵🥵🥵🥵🥵)

[Guest]

11 hours ago, BootmanLA said:

a stack of National Geographic magazines with the pages stuck together from decades of spunk splattering on pictures of half-dressed natives of foreign lands.

Damn @BootmanLA you're giving me hard-on talking filth like this. 😉 

[Guest]

Missionary, definitely 😱

Ideally, his weight on me while pounding hard, kissing, spitting.. (last nights anon date was such an experience again.. loved it)

[backtails]

Doggy style. It's the most natural position for male-on-male buttfucking. Bottoms look absolutely fucking beautiful in the butt-shot position. It's comfortable, because you don't have to support yourself much. You can go deep. You can grab on to his sides. And you can lick or bite his ears, back, or shoulders, so he knows how vulnerable he is when you're breeding him.

A variation: reverse fucking, where the top penetrates then turns around or pushes his cock back between his legs and you fuck ass-to-ass. I like it because I can do it, and it's impressive AF because it's so exotic and rare. It doesn't feel amazing, you can't do it for long, and it's not even common in porn, but it's memorable, fun, and definitely worth trying.

On 8/18/2022 at 6:54 PM, BootmanLA said:

Not to be too pedantic, but isn't that covered by "on back legs in air"? "In a sling" to me is a location option rather than a body configuration one. After all, you're in the same position whether you're in a sling, on a table, on a bed, on the ground, or whatever.

Granted, the details are a little different - there's typically something to support your legs being up in the air, for instance - but is that really a "position"?

Those feel very different for the top. If the bottom is on his back on a bed, you have to support yourself with your arms, and you tend to press your body close to his. It's an intimate, almost romantic way to get really deep in his ass and mash the hell out of his prostate until he cums all over himself. (It's the easiest position for me to make a bottom cum.)

If he's in a sling, you're standing, so you don't have to support your body. It's a convenient way to just service him by thrusting your cock in; it's not intimate. (Plus, he's often pre-lubed, and you can decide whether you want to cum or just leak precum inside him then hand him over to the next dude.)

There's a middle ground where the bottom is on his back at the edge of a bed or some other surface. The top can stand or kneel, so it's more comfortable, and it feels more intimate. It's like a sling for the bedroom (if you don't have a sling in your bedroom).

[BootmanLA]

6 minutes ago, backtails said:

Those feel very different for the top. If the bottom is on his back on a bed, you have to support yourself with your arms, and you tend to press your body close to his. It's an intimate, almost romantic way to get really deep in his ass and mash the hell out of his prostate until he cums all over himself. (It's the easiest position for me to make a bottom cum.)

If he's in a sling, you're standing, so you don't have to support your body. It's a convenient way to just service him by thrusting your cock in; it's not intimate. (Plus, he's often pre-lubed, and you can decide whether you want to cum or just leak precum inside him then hand him over to the next dude.)

There's a middle ground where the bottom is on his back at the edge of a bed or some other surface. The top can stand or kneel, so it's more comfortable, and it feels more intimate. It's like a sling for the bedroom (if you don't have a sling in your bedroom).

Not always true at all. It may be true that for a bed that's only a foot and a half off the floor, you have to support yourself with your arms as a top; but on many beds, mine included, a top standing next to the bed has his cock about 6" above mattress level. And yes, I'm referring to the bottom being on the edge of the bed.

And I think positing unknowns like "often pre-lubed" (not all slings are in a public setting, not all bottoms in slings have already been fucked and bred multiple times before you) kind of defeats the argument - if you have to add a bunch of qualifiers to make a statement true, it implies the original statement isn't necessarily valid in a broad sense even if it's sometimes accurate.

Most of all, however, dismissing all sling fucks as "not intimate" is just - geez, I dunno, does that mean every couple who has a sling has made their sex "non-intimate"? 

[backtails]

On 9/28/2022 at 12:48 PM, BootmanLA said:

Not always true at all. It may be true that for a bed that's only a foot and a half off the floor, you have to support yourself with your arms as a top; but on many beds, mine included, a top standing next to the bed has his cock about 6" above mattress level. And yes, I'm referring to the bottom being on the edge of the bed.

And I think positing unknowns like "often pre-lubed" (not all slings are in a public setting, not all bottoms in slings have already been fucked and bred multiple times before you) kind of defeats the argument - if you have to add a bunch of qualifiers to make a statement true, it implies the original statement isn't necessarily valid in a broad sense even if it's sometimes accurate.

Most of all, however, dismissing all sling fucks as "not intimate" is just - geez, I dunno, does that mean every couple who has a sling has made their sex "non-intimate"? 

They're generalizations. There are low beds and high beds, and there are private and intimate sling fucks. It just feels more straightforward to talk about it as if they're all the same. I know they're not.

But if there's even more diversity among face-to-face fucks inside and outside a sling than I said there were, then the positions are even more different.