What are your instincts when you are fucking a recently bred hole?

[Luvbbslut]

Because we're animals

We enjoy nasty filthy sloppy piggy sex

And I love having my cock covered with other men's spunk

[Erik62]

2 hours ago, Luvbbslut said:

Because we're animals

We enjoy nasty filthy sloppy piggy sex

And I love having my cock covered with other men's spunk

WE are also glad that we can provide a filthy, sloppy pig hole for you to fuck 🍆 & play in. 

[hntnhole]

On 3/3/2025 at 12:59 PM, blackrobe said:

It discusses the penis as a semen displacement device,

This is an interesting (potentially) issue.  It's nothing I'd known of prior, and I'm not sure I buy into very much of this thought-train.  

While it's entirely possible that in truly ancient times, males felt some kind of competition (between themselves) to supplant other males sperm with their own, and thus propagate their own individual characteristics via this "replacement" theory, it's hard to imagine that mind-set lingering on for very long.  The notion that (every? almost every?) male wants his own dna propagated, to the exclusion of other males I hadn't heard of until reading that reference material.  

I rather doubt that any man's individual urge to procreate goes much farther than his lusts do.  Of course, making "love" to his "loved one" is fully sanctioned by society, and for good reason.  Once that goal is accomplished, why would that "instinct" carry on much farther?  I wonder if there's much "instinct" at all involved in the "displacement theory" material.  Men have the instinct to procreate, of course, but to the extent that men instinctually want 'their" own dna to continue, as opposed to procreation as a by-product of their instinctual pressure to fuck is where I'm missing the premise. 

I think "the penis" is - for the vast majority of males - an instrument of pleasure, and making love to a loved one, which also doubles as handy piss-tool.  More, I don't think most men give a hoot who else has fucked the woman (as long as it's not their own property ... er.... I mean "wife" other men have fucked).  

Edited Friday at 08:43 PM by hntnhole
clarity

[PozBearWI]

32 minutes ago, hntnhole said:

This is an interesting (potentially) issue.  It's nothing I'd known of prior, and I'm not sure I buy into very much of this thought-train.  

While it's entirely possible that in truly ancient times, males felt some kind of competition (between themselves) to supplant other males sperm with their own, and thus propagate their own individual characteristics via this "replacement" theory, it's hard to imagine that mind-set lingering on for very long.  The notion that (every? almost every?) male wants his own dna propagated, to the exclusion of other males I hadn't heard of until reading that reference material.  

I rather doubt that any man's individual urge to procreate goes much farther than his lusts do.  Of course, making "love" to his "loved one" is fully sanctioned by society, and for good reason.  Once that goal is accomplished, why would that "instinct" carry on much farther?  I wonder if there's much "instinct" at all involved in the "displacement theory" material.  Men have the instinct to procreate, of course, but to the extent that men instinctually want 'their" own dna to continue, as opposed to procreation as a by-product of their instinctual pressure to fuck is where I'm missing the premise. 

I think "the penis" is - for the vast majority of males - an instrument of pleasure, and making love to a loved one, which also doubles as handy piss-tool.  More, I don't think most men give a hoot who else has fucked the woman (as long as it's not their own property ... er.... I mean "wife" other men have fucked).  

It was admittedly half a century ago, but one woman I slept with at the time explained to me that her birth control was that semen competed with other semen and in her thinking, canceled each other out.  I never did find out the name of the baby...

[Erik62]

3 hours ago, hntnhole said:

This is an interesting (potentially) issue.  It's nothing I'd known of prior, and I'm not sure I buy into very much of this thought-train.  

While it's entirely possible that in truly ancient times, males felt some kind of competition (between themselves) to supplant other males sperm with their own, and thus propagate their own individual characteristics via this "replacement" theory, it's hard to imagine that mind-set lingering on for very long.  The notion that (every? almost every?) male wants his own dna propagated, to the exclusion of other males I hadn't heard of until reading that reference material.  

I rather doubt that any man's individual urge to procreate goes much farther than his lusts do.  Of course, making "love" to his "loved one" is fully sanctioned by society, and for good reason.  Once that goal is accomplished, why would that "instinct" carry on much farther?  I wonder if there's much "instinct" at all involved in the "displacement theory" material.  Men have the instinct to procreate, of course, but to the extent that men instinctually want 'their" own dna to continue, as opposed to procreation as a by-product of their instinctual pressure to fuck is where I'm missing the premise. 

I think "the penis" is - for the vast majority of males - an instrument of pleasure, and making love to a loved one, which also doubles as handy piss-tool.  More, I don't think most men give a hoot who else has fucked the woman (as long as it's not their own property ... er.... I mean "wife" other men have fucked).  

Hej, missed😘 your commentaries 🤣. Digging into my memory banks (30yrs) & nursing background I recall theories being discussed regards "Displacement Theory". FWIW it is a valid theory when you also link it to the theory, "survival of the fittest" & how female mammals (lions, horses) will allow multiple inseminations, for the strongest seed to survive & continue that genetic line.

Aren't we ALL glad that we just want the fucking 🍆 & the load 💦💦💦 without any other considerations. 

[blackrobe]

20 hours ago, hntnhole said:

This is an interesting (potentially) issue.  It's nothing I'd known of prior, and I'm not sure I buy into very much of this thought-train.  

While it's entirely possible that in truly ancient times, males felt some kind of competition (between themselves) to supplant other males sperm with their own, and thus propagate their own individual characteristics via this "replacement" theory, it's hard to imagine that mind-set lingering on for very long.

Your overall point is well taken.

We are in the realm of evolutionary biology here, so it's not about feelings or a mind-set. I used the word instincts above deliberately as it's the closest I could come to asking about what impulse we might get from our most basic "reptile brain" where our deeply instinctive drives come from. It's no surprise that we are mostly not aware of them at all except when they drive risky behavior that we look back on and wonder why we did that. Fucking is the powerful drive - passing on our DNA is just something that happens when we do.

I was wondering whether there was an instinct about evacuating previous breeders seed or whether our basic instinct to fuck hard and deep plus the natural selection of males with a more pronounced coronal ridge (better removing competing seed) resulted in their sperm being more competitive and successful. Less effective penis morphologies just didn't get passed on as much as the most effective ones with a larger coronal ridge. 

[hntnhole]

19 hours ago, Erik62 said:

Hej, missed😘 your commentaries 🤣

Well, thanks ... the political mess has been heating up around here (thank Whatever).  Had around 500 at this week's demonstration - not bad for the 3rd week (after all - this is Florida ....)

 

1 hour ago, blackrobe said:

Fucking is the powerful drive

Of course - and it seems to apply across the board - MtoM, MtoF, FtoF,* whatever.  And, we all fuck one way or another - but what I'm wondering about is the idea that men (or males) are  trying to negate the sperm of previous men** (this obviously applies to straights) via a fuck subsequent to the load off the previous cock.  Once a cock - any cock - has pumped a hole full of sperm, it's already too late to attempt to "negate" the load off the previous Cock.  

*via a dildo or similar

**whether gay, straight, bi, or some other amalgamation, there's no way that I can think of to get rid of previous loads other than a thorough douche (or feast 😉).  And even then it may already be "too late".  Those frisky little swimmers can do the deed before we even pull out, (depending on the degree of propulsion, of course).   

 

1 hour ago, blackrobe said:

a more pronounced coronal ridge

Interesting thought - I suppose it would definitely help evacuate the Hole of previous loads, assuming the Cock pulled entirely out, was wiped off, etc etc ... But, so would a hungry tongue searching out the remains of previous loads.  As far as I know however, the little swimmers can get to where they're headed fairly quickly, and there are waaaay more than enough of them to do the job.  

This whole subject is something I've never heard of before, but it's an interesting subplot to the OP.

[Travlincat]

We should do a trial and see what the average top does. I'll be the bottom...

[funpozbottom]

On 3/3/2025 at 12:59 PM, blackrobe said:

I keep an eye on research topics of interest and I found one that is pretty fascinating. 

"Semen Displacement as a Sperm Competition Strategy in Humans" 

Gordon G. Gallup, Jr. gallup@albany.edu and Rebecca L. Burch rburch@oswego.edu

It discusses the penis as a semen displacement device, how penis length, shape, and ejaculation pressure may play a part in competition to impregnate females. 

After reading it, I started to wonder about the instincts of top breeders when fucking a recently bred bottom. I've noticed when I have multiple loads in my ass, and especially when men have watched other men fuck them inside me, subsequent men seem to fuck vigorously and I always end up with a pool of mixed seed on the sheets and floor under where they mounted and fucked me. I wonder if they are responding to an instinct to evacuate my hole of previous seed before they plant their own.

So, top breeders, what are your instincts when you're fucking a recently bred hole? Does your fuck pull all the previous seed out before yours is bred inside? Do you just enjoy the cummy hole or is there some evolutionary sperm competition creeping in? Also, how do you think the size and shape of your dick and the coronal ridge contribute to whether the seed stays in or gets fucked out?

I'm not impressed by Gordon Gallup. He did do some good work early in his career, but for the last 40 years or so, he's primarily been involved in study reviews and not doing actual research. My guess is that he needs to publish something every so often to maintain tenure. Without a big research budget, many professors resort to doing study reviews. They formulate a hypothesis then cherry-pick results from existing studies that they can spin to support their premise. I don't know if it's the case here, but is seems like it "could". (I put "could" in quotes because it is a favorite word in study reviews. The evidence cited rarely shows the premise to be true, it merely suggests that it ... could.)

My rebuttal to the article's premise is not based on studies produced by others, but solely based on my own experience as a human male with a penis and the exploration I have done with it (and with observing, feeling, sucking, etc., many other human male penises) for over half a century.

The article posits that the shape of the (human male) penis evolved as a means of removing or displacing semen from a previously bred hole. In my opinion, that's just silly. Evolution doesn't act like a jealous lover. Instead, Evolution is a kinky bitch. Evolution wants that genetic material spread around as much as possible. If you want to describe the action of evolution in a single word, just say: Bukkake. ("Come on boys, shoot your jizz! Lets see what comes of it!") Once a DNA matrix becomes viable, Genetics takes over and tries to keep the genetic code constant. Between the two, "Genetics" is the prudish sister that sits at home and won't let anyone have fun. "Evolution" is the wild one.

Alrighty then. If the shape of the penis didn't evolve to favor those who enjoy "sloppy seconds", what purpose (if any) could there be? That's super easy to answer: stimulation and lubrication. Humans are not particularly moist in their fuck holes. Fortunately, the vagina and rectum produce more lubrication with stimulation. The penis is sized to provide a snug fit within the love tunnel, with the coronal glans -- ribbed for your pleasure -- providing additional subtle stimulation with each thrust. With each thrust, the vagina begins to relax and self-lubricate. As the penis is withdrawn, the coronal ridges draws any fluids back into the foreskin where it is redistributed over the head of the penis, providing lubrication for the next thrust. As lubrication increases, the penis is able to penetrate a little harder which increases stimulation, which in turn increases excretion of fluids in a nifty little feedback loop. In addition to stimulation of the vaginal or rectal walls, the glans also (in theory) stop the penis from pulling out prematurely. The ideal is to keep the cavity warm and wet for smooth penetration. If the hole has been previously fucked, semen from that first load provides additional lubrication which allows the second round to go harder, deeper, faster than the first.

That is how penetration is supposed to work. Unfortunately. man invented Circumcision which fucked with the sensitivity of the male penis, and the ability of the couple to maintain lubrication, Without a foreskin to collect fluids on the back stroke, fluids are inadvertently pushed out of the hole, requiring artificial lubrication. Man also invented the Hallmark channel which also fucked with sensitivity, but that doesn't have anything to do with a discussion on evolution. 

OK, I think I've rambled enough. To sum up, The penis shape stimulates the cavity and distributes lubrication. Guys like fucking cummy holes because they tend to be more relaxed, pre-lubed, and feel good to fuck. You don't need some lazy researcher to tell you that.

[Erik62]

9 hours ago, funpozbottom said:

I'm not impressed by Gordon Gallup. He did do some good work early in his career, but for the last 40 years or so, he's primarily been involved in study reviews and not doing actual research. My guess is that he needs to publish something every so often to maintain tenure. Without a big research budget, many professors resort to doing study reviews. They formulate a hypothesis then cherry-pick results from existing studies that they can spin to support their premise. I don't know if it's the case here, but is seems like it "could". (I put "could" in quotes because it is a favorite word in study reviews. The evidence cited rarely shows the premise to be true, it merely suggests that it ... could.)

My rebuttal to the article's premise is not based on studies produced by others, but solely based on my own experience as a human male with a penis and the exploration I have done with it (and with observing, feeling, sucking, etc., many other human male penises) for over half a century.

The article posits that the shape of the (human male) penis evolved as a means of removing or displacing semen from a previously bred hole. In my opinion, that's just silly. Evolution doesn't act like a jealous lover. Instead, Evolution is a kinky bitch. Evolution wants that genetic material spread around as much as possible. If you want to describe the action of evolution in a single word, just say: Bukkake. ("Come on boys, shoot your jizz! Lets see what comes of it!") Once a DNA matrix becomes viable, Genetics takes over and tries to keep the genetic code constant. Between the two, "Genetics" is the prudish sister that sits at home and won't let anyone have fun. "Evolution" is the wild one.

Alrighty then. If the shape of the penis didn't evolve to favor those who enjoy "sloppy seconds", what purpose (if any) could there be? That's super easy to answer: stimulation and lubrication. Humans are not particularly moist in their fuck holes. Fortunately, the vagina and rectum produce more lubrication with stimulation. The penis is sized to provide a snug fit within the love tunnel, with the coronal glans -- ribbed for your pleasure -- providing additional subtle stimulation with each thrust. With each thrust, the vagina begins to relax and self-lubricate. As the penis is withdrawn, the coronal ridges draws any fluids back into the foreskin where it is redistributed over the head of the penis, providing lubrication for the next thrust. As lubrication increases, the penis is able to penetrate a little harder which increases stimulation, which in turn increases excretion of fluids in a nifty little feedback loop. In addition to stimulation of the vaginal or rectal walls, the glans also (in theory) stop the penis from pulling out prematurely. The ideal is to keep the cavity warm and wet for smooth penetration. If the hole has been previously fucked, semen from that first load provides additional lubrication which allows the second round to go harder, deeper, faster than the first.

That is how penetration is supposed to work. Unfortunately. man invented Circumcision which fucked with the sensitivity of the male penis, and the ability of the couple to maintain lubrication, Without a foreskin to collect fluids on the back stroke, fluids are inadvertently pushed out of the hole, requiring artificial lubrication. Man also invented the Hallmark channel which also fucked with sensitivity, but that doesn't have anything to do with a discussion on evolution. 

OK, I think I've rambled enough. To sum up, The penis shape stimulates the cavity and distributes lubrication. Guys like fucking cummy holes because they tend to be more relaxed, pre-lubed, and feel good to fuck. You don't need some lazy researcher to tell you that.

Yeah, what funpozbottom said in his last chapter. I don't care if the cock 🍆 is small, medium or large, wide, pencil. All I want is the cocks fucking me, hard raw BB & rough. The seeding can go as deep as it wants. As long as I go home with lube, piss & bucket loads of cum dripping down my legs, proudly screaming, "I've been fucked all night & I'm full", then I'm happy. Even more so if someone can't resist picking me up. I'm just a hungry, pig slut looking for the perfect fuck cation.