Hey sluts, I need an official ruling

[tallslenderguy]

14 hours ago, NWUSHorny said:

I'd call it artificial insemination, it can work if your just trying to get inseminated, but no where near as enjoyable as natural insemination.

Brilliant!!

[Cumfilledbottomboi]

To me, no. 

[blackrobe]

On 3/4/2026 at 11:22 AM, NJRawDaddy said:

> Does getting fucked with a condom and pouring the load inside your hole count as taking a load?

Let's be clear, being fucked with a condom is an act of pure withholding. The whole reason for a condom fuck is to prevent his bare throbbing dick and load from touching you.  A man using a condom has no intent to breed you. Absent his clear intent to breed you, how can one say you took his load? You took his condom, that's all.

It might be mechanistic, but I think men who use condoms only fuck condoms. It's the condoms that fuck your hole. 

If a man fucked you with a condom, then removed the condom and poured his seed into your open hole himself, I think there's some intent to have his cum inside you.

A man who fucks and breeds a condom, with you around the condom, and then discards the condom has abandoned his load. The bottom picking the condom up and fingering or pouring some of the abandoned seed inside his hole hasn't been bred by the man who made it.  I think "artificial insemination" is a very close to the truth for this scenario. 

Absent *his* intent, *his* action putting his load inside you, my view is you didn't get his load. 

[P.s. If a top has you suck his bare dick and swallow his precum, but then only fucks you with a condom (because STIs), that's illogical *and* withholding.]

[YVRbugchaser]

Easy no.  If it didn't cum directly from the source into you, nope. 

[MarkSubGTA42]

no

[phillygwm]

Yes.  Not ideal, obviously, but you're taking almost the same risk as if someone dumped it in you, so it counts.

[NJRawDaddy]

I asked ChatGPT for an answer on this.  It waffled a fair bit, but I pressed it for an answer.  Here's what it finaly said:

Quote

There isn't a single universal definition in everyday slang, but if you wnat one clear rule most people default to, it's this:

A load is counted at the moment of ejaculation.

Under that rule:

• The person did produce a load when they ejaculated
• But they did not put a load inside you, because the ejaculation happened in the condom

So the definitive answer under the most common usage is:

Yes, it was a load - but not a load in you.

The later act of pouring it inside doesn't change the original event, because the "load" is defined by the ejaculation itself, not where the semen ends up afterward.

 

[BREEDmeRAW]

My definition STANDS !!   NO!

March 5, 2026 without ChatGPT, we know that a female can be impregnated without a cock entering her pussy. She can birth a child without a cock inserted in her Virginia. She was NOT officially Bred.

Original post stated "Yes" or "No" without flip-flops and I gave my opinion:  NO

I stated that cum can be delivered down the throat or inside the ass in a number of ways but it does not count as taking a load. I can jerk off into my own hand and then shove my own cum in my ass. My ass has cum inside but I did NOT take a load.

We can all determine our own definition for "taking a load" and I stand by my definition. I am not an expert with scientific research or a medical degree.

I am a Proud POZ CUMDUMP for Men that like to BREED. If you want to add your DNA to my hungry hole. -- contact me.

[Seedthissub]

Yes but prefer feeling the top empty in me

[likaleather]

Yes it is taking a load.