All Activity

I guessed 201-500, but I honestly have no clue. Since the late 90's if I had a random hookup with one stranger per month, that'd be in the 300's.

I regularly suck off guys at an adult xxx theatre. I suck in front of 10 or more other guys. Usually 4 or 5 come over and I suck the cum out of all of them while the others watch. Some guys are too shy to get sucked off while others are watching. Some guys just jack off near my face and when they're ready to cum, just push their cock in my mouth and shoot. I swallow every drop and keep sucking. Once the show is over, sometimes the shy ones come over and we go in a corner or end row and I suck them there. I have a real preference for much older men, 60's,70's,80's, but I will suck anybody.

I've sucked hundreds of cocks and fucked plenty, but most have been with condoms. Started Prep last fall, so now looking to up my breeding count. Any tops in the area wanting to add to my count DM me

Not sure how I can tell one top from another when I'm bent over in the dark, hole on offer. My guesstimate is over 200 "different" tops have cum inside me. That said it could be the 1 guy who has cum in my hole multiple times. Don't think so,though!

When I was 16 I snuck into an adult theater and sucked off 8 guys. That was back in the late eighties. More recently I gave a couple guys a blowjob a park in the middle of the day

Here are a few thoughts. I skimmed through the article and notice a couple points that could indicate sloppy methodology. These are common minor omissions that probably wouldn't alter the results, but are example of common faults that can be found in studies like these. I also think that the study failed to go far enough to establish meaningful conclusions. Disclaimer – I did not read every word of the article so I may have missed the inclusion of these points. If that occurred, that's on me. So on to my critique. For a study to achieve successful results, and to be interpreted properly, all relevant terms need to be clearly defined. The two terms most relevant to this study are “Empathy” and “Moral Judgment”. You may have a personal impression of what these terms mean, but for the study to be properly interpreted, you need to know how the author defines the terms. They do in fact define “empathy in an italicized sentence that begins: “Here we define empathy as . . .” On the other hand, there is a discussion around , but no clear definition of “Moral Judgment”. If you are going to assign a difference in results to a term, that term really needs to be defined – even if you think it's obvious. Second point is, there is no link to a sample questionnaire. The description of the studies include a mention of the type of questions asked, however no example of a full question and no links to sample questionnaires were given. This is important – especially in studies where results may be different than expected – to show there was no inherent bias to the questionnaire. Third. No control group to check for online bias. All participants were selected from paid online websites. Three of the studies used the same site. Previous studies have show that people who are constantly online with social media, and who use the internet as their sole or primary source of news, have a different world view from those who are not constantly on the internet and who get news primarily from other sources. It would have been very easy for the authors to set up a survey at their university or canvas a local town to acquire random live results to use as a control. Without the inclusion of control groups, the results of a study cannot be said to reflect the views of the general population. At best it can only be said that the results apply to the participants. Another point on solely using online sources; while each study found a trend, three of the four failed to reach results that were statistically significant. (The point of doing the fourth study was to try to achieve a statistically significant result.) More studies are using online sources for data collection because it can be cheaper and faster to find participants, however data is not always as accurate, per previous paragraph. Collecting data through multiple avenues may have given a clearer result. Fourth issue is incomplete demographics. While a total percentage of race, gender, and political leaning of participants is given, there is no comparison or breakdown of results by race or gender. Also, there is no mention of the age range of the participants. Finally, I don't think the study went far enough. The authors are assuming the differences found are the results of “Moral Judgement.” Why not ask a question to see if participants are aware of their own biases? I also think the authors should have included a section to the questionnaire that asked participants their views of members of their own political party vs. the other party, and what issues are of concern to the participant. Remember that these studies were conducted in that post-pandemic period between 2021 and 2023. I think more should have been done to examine whether and how world events and how they are portrayed in the media contribute to differences in results.

The first guy to cum in my ass was my best friend 41 years ago, he was 14 and I was 13. I was 99% bottom taking multiple raw cocks and gangbanged weekly throughout my teens. Since then I've fucked and been fucked by 1000's of guys but not all of them had cum in my ass.

Thank you for bring this story to top! It first time I have read about twin brothers pnp together!! Loved this story! @btmbob2

got a cum dump that wants a few discrete/anon loads in him, no chat/talk, just arrive, fuck/breed then leave scenario.

Dang I need trails like this near me.

I honestly have no idea of the exact number. I have been bi and having sex for 40 years and there was a ten year span where I was a total whore and tried to fuck, get fucked or suck a cock every day. So Its hundreds for sure. For oral its over a thousand I know that

Join the site and PM me dirty guest man💋

I love cum down my throat no matter what I am doing. But yes I have been spit roasted a few times

Gave a stranger head during Pride festival in a park where there was an event going on. Sucked a guy off in the parking lot of a gay club. Ended up with a few more guys surrounding me with their cocks out. I love public sex and do it as much as I can

This is yet another brilliant, horny poz story from @jagmanaz who I hope continues to overcome the occasional writers block and continues with at least another another chapter to this wonderful story. Later I hope to read more published more stories similar to this. I enjoy the poz stories and they all are different which displays an inventive and horny mind. Thank you so much for giving me such pleasure and may you long continue writing. I like the idea of taking off the cock cage and being able to fuck after he's experienced the fuck flu. Experiencing the new high viral load making him feel like I want to fuck all the time so becoming versatile and enjoying his life to the full as poz guys should do.

Fuck yeah that's hot💋

I don't know what it is, but I just have to taste my hole every day, I dip a long handle dessert spoon 🥄 in piss and slightly drag it across my hole until it's clean, I love it for some reason.

Damn this great love story!! Hope that there is more coming! Alex and Luke are great together! hot thanks @badjujuboy

Exactly 💋

I like dirty 💋

He's still around and still bodybuilding, although leaner than what he looked like before.

So um, do we know what the identity of the border agents who sent them away? (If this happened) They could have been from The Religion You Don't Want To Talk About™. We have no idea.

Another great chapter. Thanks for continuing his journey.

love to find a good place for a cum dump to spend a week want to find a group and be a dedicated RAW bottom for . no drugs , but feel free to send me home carring all your seed . hung POZ to the front . Have Telegram