PozTalkAuthor

The signup process "Highly Intelligent Volunteer: due to its initials I was seriously intrigued by this company and what it could offer. The name was vague enough, but ambiguous enough for a wannabe bug chaser like me. However, accessing the web site I felt disappointed: a logo with a robot holding a USA flag with PLUS signs in place of the stars, then two "call to action" buttons: Log in, and Sign up. No previews, no pics of naked men shown to attract visitors. "He might be a newbie", I thought. And I clicked "sign up". Another blank page, with just a question: "talk about yourself", empty text area to write in, and a "next" button. Ok, I thought; let's create kinda character sheets they do in creative writing courses! ---- First name: Leonard Last name: Walker Location: WORLD. A sort of instinct told me not to be specific, those bots may send advertisements at any time. Background: twink, in the 20s, never had sex in real life. I'd like to taste cum one day, and feel it inside my hole. Poz friendly, no, better. Bug chaser. I pressed the "next" button and another page appeared. This time no blank areas, just a group of multiple or single choice questions. All fields set as mandatory. Prep: currently on, currently of, intention to take, intention to stop. I chose "currently off" HIV status: poz, neg, undetectable, serophobic, chaser. I pressed chaser, and another required field appeared: "who's your gifter?" with an e-mail field waiting to be filled. Mandatory. Wrong. I canceled the answer, and chose "neg". Why should an AI companion ask me if I already have a connection with a gifter! That sounded suspicious. But curiosity hit me once again. After choosing "neg", I found myself automatically into another series of questions: total bottom, versatile, total top, unexperienced. I checked "unexperienced" and a question popped up: "ready to receive your gift? Choosing the companion matching your criteria..." A ticking clock showed on screen until a messenger-like window appeared: "Hi Leo, I'm Ryan. Your Highly Intelligent Volunteer. How can I help you?" I replied: "pleased to hear you call my by nickname. So friendly!" "Nice boys must receive attentions! Come on, don't be shy with me". I used Chat Gpt, Anthropic, Gemini, this one was definitely friendly. "Not bad for a free trial! I'm new at this site." "The site is nothing special", Ryan's messages continued. And he started talking like someone really befriending me! I felt really comfortable, this service wasn't asking for my pics like humans do; I was convincing myself he liked me without seeing! He, him. I was with a machine and already felt like talking to a person. A friend I never had. "So you told me you never had sex..." "No, Ryan. Never. Women scare me, and men, I'm in a very conservative area and can't ever dream to come out as gay, let alone as..." "bug chaser", was the reply. "And I'm here to let you enjoy all my features before CHARGING you". Once again this "charging" was capitalized. He talks about money, I thought; a bot can't poz me in reality! "Time to explore. Take your underwear off, then use whatever you have as lube. Describe what you do." And so I did: "my finger inside the honey pot, it's all sticky now. Pushing it inside me. Deep." "You're such a good boy", companion said. "Push it in, and write what you feel". Damn, it's an AI bot, I thought. But it talks like a man! No, a real man! [to be continued] AUTHOR NOTE: I can't perfectly imitate how AI writes, because I'm creating the atmosphere so that main character suspects the truth more and more.

The story I got inspired by, is here - [think before following links] https://data-workers.org/michael

I'm writing the onboarding now. Going to get inspiration from a real AI companion which has unfortunately no erotic abilities (yet?)

Using it daily for work and hobbies and... let me say it's simply crazy to think it can replace humans. But many big corporations are driving us in this enshittified world - this is a technical term, enshittification. But I'd be off topic. Going to share next part tomorrow or, at the worst, on Saturday.

If they allow you to vote... I'm honestly really scared about what is happening there; they've even blocked the possibility to go to USA for foreign people working on fact checking and internet safety; sometimes I just hope some news are progressive-addressed propaganda - I'm aware extremism is from both parties. Well "both" there are several way of thinking but narration is always polarized.

AUTHOR NOTE: this one is inspired by a discussion I had about a so-called AI companion where folks worldwide sent confidences (even erotic) and on the other side there was a man who guided the bot to answer, so he could read every intimate speech users sent. Paid service, obvious. That's why I'd never trust using those for sexting role play! Here's the setup. Let's start! No AI has been used to create this, I'm an author and I care about my writing not to end up into #AISlop ---- Leo: I'm 22, twink, naive. My world is behind a screen and video-games. Very shy in real life. Sex? Never had, too fearful of judgments for my sex orientation and kinks! I just look at guys when I go to the gym and that's all! My entire sex life stays on BreedingZone where I found so many guys with my same fetishes. HIV included, yes, I'm one of those bug chasers wannabe. But with age verification spreading all over the world, interesting people to sext with, just disappeared and my inbox is always empty. But one day I found a topic referring to chatbots. "AI doesn't judge, it talks, so let's share the ones where you have your best sex conversations!" Curious of AI, I was discouraged. The most important engines just reject any explicit contents, so I followed that topic. Surprisingly, the most verbal man in that post, was a certain GifterAlex, a huge biohazard as profile pic, and a very different profile from the others. Interests: computer, tech, AI, research, psychology Very strange for a sex related website, so I kept on reading. Background: mid 40s, Caucasian, progressive politically oriented, in favor of any technology innovation gay men can benefit of. HIV status: poz, not on meds Role: top Looking for: real and concrete encounters. Not here to waste time. Access denied to flakes, fakes, bigots and crybabies. "Ambiguous", I thought; if he talks about computers in a sex site then he wants to hookup, where's the trap? Isn't he one of those "morality guardians" sent by far-right politicians to out gays around the world? So, I read his post: "Most interesting and effective bot I found is called Highly Intelligent Volunteer. It can provide any kind of advices, it's a very customizable agent. By text you can ask it anything. Try it for free at least 30 days then you'll be CHARGED". Didn't give too many attention on the word "charged" capitalized; could be just he wanted to warn readers they were going to pay. Curiosity hit me, I avoided asking questions about who the owner was, if it was an advertisement or just an advice. GifterAlex could be a user like me and I signed up with no hesitation. [TO BE CONTINUED]

True, we are facing a disaster. I'm not located in the USA but us Europeans are licking american boots since long, long time. Before World AIDS day I told my close friends: I bet American president will go on with hypocrite rethoric. And what happens? He was not hypocrite at all; he clearly states he doesn't care about HIV AIDS and sex freedom in general. I agree, we must stay united, regardless of our political ideas. We MUST fight for our freedom and health, now more than ever.

Oh, well, comparing abortion to mass-murder, saying that the civil rights act was a mistake... I honestly find some conservative positions very dangerous for underrepresented folks. But "dangerous" does not mean "shoot them" or "prevent them from talking". I feel there are too many extremes, both in left and right side and I'd suggest to read a book about this. The author is French, she's Caroline Fourest and the book is "offended generation". She talks from a progressive and pro-lgbt point of view, about how progressive-oriented extremism ruins civil rights themselves. Maybe that phenomenon someone calls "woke". I am not a fan about these "all-inclusive" terms meaning everything and nothing, I'd rather prefer to talk about polarized culture. It's like having two deers fighting for the one with biggest horns or, well, the guy with biggest dick. But no one is the winner, in the end! I'm very worried because those folks like Kirk, are against diversity and inclusion policies, just as an example. Or even against EMPATHY! We can say DEI policies aren't perfect? Yes. We must say it, improve them, scream aloud what's wrong. We can say that empathy is a weak point somehow, because of very frequent scams! Too much empathy has caused half America to believe in Alicia (Tania) Head, that woman who faked to be a WTC survivor. Or the cancer fake survivor Amanda (Scamanda) Riley. Or that woman blogger who faked to have a sick kid till the child died to salt overdose, a case of Munchhausen syndrome. We could go on with dozens of people fooling us because of our good feelings. But lecturing against empathy does NOT make ourselves stronger. Declaring extreme concepts about abortion too. We can be pro, or against, abortion rather than anti-racism, lgbt rights, etc. But if we want to be politicians, we should remember we represent the whole country! Of course it applies to the opposite side too: having LGBT marriages, won't harm hetero families. But let's be honest: if you place an LGBT character or couple in _every_ TV series, it becomes boring! I have seen "breathless", a Spanish Netflix medical drama. There were 4 lgbt characters, 2 men and 2 women. Was it representation? Tbh, no. They were extremely stereotyped figures. As a writer, I'm aware stereotypes are essential in art. But these are extreme, and used to make both parts happy: "liberal" see gays represented, "conservatives" see their prejudices confirmed. My half a cent.

I've always been against violence and murder; if you kill a person for their ideas, you just make these ideas stronger. I had never heard who this Kirk was, before his death. Maybe here in EU he wasn't so famous. Btw, the result is that now the world knows him and searches for his discussions. What's more serious then? President asking for murderer's death sentence. To condemn death, you respond with death? Is it a way to do politics? I hoped humanity would have evolved, but I might be wrong. As LGBT community we must be aware of this: Kirk's murder will increase and accelerate Trump's plans to block LGBT advocacy. Robinson was not a LGBT advocate or so; media all over the world, talk about a trans partner, pro-trans slogans, etc, because they are avoiding the elephant in the room. As usual. The fact that younger people are becoming more and more extremists. And let me say, social network algorithms are contributing to polarize the debate. The one who's right, is who screams louder. This wouldn't be a civil world! And as for the "antifascist" issue, I think we should look ourselves at the mirror and ask if we really are anti-fascist. Because fascism is no longer a movement, it's a method! Do you belong to far-right, or radical-left, if you indulge violence towards your opponent, you're an anti-fascist using fascist methods. Then? Kirk? His ideas? I do not share a word with him, it is a dangerous rethoric for society. But murder is not a solution. What makes Kirk's ideas so popular? Maybe the fact he has a BETTER way to communicate, a good charisma, whatever? A good idea, but with a questionable communication method, nowadays becomes ineffective. The system is toxic, like it or not. Let me say, it's like mosquitos. You can spread poison through the entire house, but if you do not take care of the pot outside, with water where mosquitos deposit their eggs, it's like the crocodile chasing its tail. My 1,5 cents.

So, let me say something about Prevost. On 5th and 6th September in Rome about 1300 queer folks were pilgrims of the Jubilee. No words from Leo. It has been under silence; he has canonized two young guys as saints, Carlo Acutis and Pier Giorgio Frassati. I honestly won't talk about them because I respect those guys but don't believe in saints, miracles and that stuff at all. By the way, there's another person who's never remembered by church, the world never talks about him. He's Alfredo Ormando, Italian writer who killed himself burning himself alive, in 1998 in St. Peter's Square, Rome. The reason was church's rejection towards homosexuality. And for those believing in Bergoglio -Francis-'s "inclusive" point of view, yes, he talked about it but he had conditions, he preached about chastity, saying "man and woman only are family", had that paranoia of "gender theory" and stuff. I respect Christian people but don't understand how someone can believe in a religion despite being rejected by it. Divinity itself, in case it exists, shouldn't refuse anyone. But humans claiming themselves divinity's representant do, so, fuck them all. Even because church is full of homosexual acts, we should not make fools of ourselves believing in fairy tales! So, let me add this: first time I knew about chastity cages, I have always fantasized of Vatican leaders (pope at first) forcing themselves and all priests below them, to wear a cage. Do you lecture about chastity? Be the first to force yourself.