PozTalkAuthor

That's an issue not just with virgins if someone develops feelings when you want just sex but when virginity is involved, the family-oriented culture we all grew up makes some bottom assume you deflowered them so you're linked to them for life. NOT NECESSARY! In my case the virginity detail sealed our connection but a deep bond was already there.

I have many sides people don't know! LOL Let's say it must be all natural and whatever you put "on the table" when facing first experiences in sex, the only thing you should be prepared to, is to have all your plans go upside down.

Perfectly aware of what you're talking about, I wanted to finish mine before USA elections but I fear I won't manage to - unless I spend another week-end on my desk and I won't! I am an author I love to write but there are even beloved PEOPLE who need my presence and I neglected them because of work during the whole September and October months. Everything has priority, a day is 24 hours long, we all must choose!

Definitely horny and let's say it, intense. Knowing it was his first experience with male sex, our mutual trust, the fact he let me enter bare with no fear (I'm poz, undetectable but generally hetero men feel fear when facing practice, despite science theory). It has meant and still means a lot, happened around these days in 2022. We were best friends and co-workers then, and it drastically changed. Not friends any more, ever more... We are PARTNERS. Still feeling proud to have introduced him to male sex and he enjoys, but at the beginning of it all I was scared that everything could unrecoverably break down. It happened in the positive way.

I hardly label myself when talking about politics, but I'm scared. Very scared. I am strongly in favor of "diversity equity inclusion" stuff, but my horrible sensation is that we are being USED by both parties: left side for a propaganda, right side for the other. I feel like both are pulling my feet, and causing me pain. To explain it better, even not approving the choice, I perfectly understand why many LGBT, people with disabilities, black, and so on... prefer to address themselves toward conservatives rather than the opposite. It's the paradox of choosing someone who use hate for propaganda and then in the end might not even care about us, rather than voting for someone who uses us, says a lot of good words, then sit down and change nothing (or change things slowly, wasting time discussing). I was just talking about this with a friend who is totally blind. We were talking about tech related topics, the eternal debate "open and closed, free or paid, AI or not AI". It's endless. And my friend reported that they find too many "left-oriented" folks saying "let's fill AI with fake news and make it useless so people stops polluting and wasting water for that bullshit. Let's boycott blah blah blah" but I have seen it with my eyes, how AI tech and "big tech" in general, give quick help to people with disabilities. So my friend said "how could I trust 'free-oriented' people if they then give me fewer help? I won't because I reason differently but my instinct would bring me to vote to the right where I have the illusion they do something". I personally don't hate DEI policies, I hate how they are adopted! No sense in selling pride-related gadgets in June, sending social network posts, hashtags and webinars all around, if then the gay/poz/whatever person is bullied at work for some reason. Useless to create a women-friendly policy when men look at the woman's butt when she bends down to pick up a product from the vending machine. Inclusion is not made by inventing the stories about thousands of queer characters where they have basically nothing to do with the plot, or having a black woman interpreting the role of a Caucasian character. Or worse, "just gay actors can play the role of gay characters". I'm a writer, a damned amateur writer. I'm sighted, HIV positive, attracted by men. Someone should explain why despite being sighted I couldn't write about blind. Or being HIV poz I couldn't impersonate a neg character, or talking about a man-woman affair, despite being partnered to a man. I never choose to enter the commercial circle because I don't want my own creativity to be ruled. Because inclusion and equity for me is a deeper battle, intersectional. And real intersectionalism can't be made by marketing and propaganda. It need empathy with no doubt, but empathy is useless without culture, awareness and education. Human rights are not a card to play and to bet on. My 2 cents. P.S. - to make what i mean a little clearer, I bring up an example based on entertainment. Netflix Spanish tv show "Breathless", based on medical plots. There are 4 LGBT characters, two men and two women; in Spain it's 18 years they have same sex marriage and families so, we could say, "they would be treated like other families". NO. Spoilers... The two gays meet in a chems related party, one is a doctor and the other is addicted to substances and has contracted all possible sti's in this world, HIV included. The two women, one is pregnant and her partner then leaves her just before birth. And then kidnaps her newborn baby... Many LGBT folks feel represented by this kind of stories, and I don't. It's surreal. It seems that to satisfy a large public, they feed representation and stereotypes at the same time! So they cause extreme reactions "better nothing than this". And in more serious matters the risk is the same, and it's just behind the corner.

I was waiting for your stories to continue, you basically disappeared.

I was referring to the same virus because they attended the same party. About the fact Peter gifted Rob as well, it couldn't be possible. Let me know about next part

Damn, you work as a therapy. I just said, let's go to bed I have worked hard, I'm dead tired. But your story made me hard as a rock! Let's go on and convert the other guy - but, did TJ's father get poz from the same virus?

My "introduction" had been a 13 days long ban, but I understood why: one was a misunderstood message (I wrote it badly and could be read as an encouragement to self-harm when it wasn't) and the other was a story written with "fan fiction" model, assuming it was correct. But I didn't ask the first author for a possible story sequel so they were right, to kick me temporarily out. But then it's 2 years I post and never got infractions any longer. I have publicly dirty-talked with someone as well. Maybe it's something rude on politics or other stuff?

The idea of fucking a converting hole is so hot, especially knowing to be his gifter!!!

Not having sex but we were hand in hand. My current partner and I. His hetero marriage was over, he jumped bed after bed and she had another man. Long story. And she caught us having a more intimate contact than we were used to have as "best friends" like we officially called each other. It was the time they finally buried the past in an already open grave! Would it have been hotter to be caught in bed? YES, without any doubt! And we didn't do anything to encourage the "secret" story, aware that our mutual "official" relationships were over and it was matter of signing papers.

The best sex is when you give and receive. My ass your load, your ass my load. Or even using tongue, fingers, all our body can be a transmitter or receiver for pleasure. Those biased people make comparisons between us and their own couple dynamics because they associate some behaviours to men and some others to women, not admitting what makes them curious is just sex; one of them just said "you or your man must necessarily be the woman, or you both engage in a virile sword fight?" Imagining who knows what kind of play with our mutual members. Caged. They assume a human body is like a puzzle where pieces must go one inside the other.

They are biased, with a mindset locked into the fascism era, I try to reason but it's not always so easy; let alone if I would share the matter of "side", I mean, not necessarily rely on penis to obtain physical body pleasure. I feel pity for those caged people as they have explored nothing in their life! My man was hetero before me and says I made him discover a whole new world! Being side-versatile with not defined roles, makes sex life very balanced and reciprocated. And as for house roles, we both have our own places and know how to manage them.

This is for couples: open, closed, no matter. When some hetero relative or friend asks you "who's the man, who's the woman?" what do you reply? They generally would like to investigate who's the receiver (bottom) in order to judge him negatively. During my very first experiences I felt very offended and angry, with the only result to feed their inappropriate curiosity even more. But I've learnt it with time passing by and experience, getting angry causes them the perception as the "guilty dog" who barks the loudest. So, my current standard reply is: "we are both men, but as you question us, we assumed you could be the woman. There's the whole house to clean, dishes to wash, clothes to iron, etc". Sexist as it is, but it's the only answer which succeeds sending them back to their places. At least for me. No one of us both looks as the stereotype gay, no one of us paints his nails or has female-like tone, so... And lately I am always excited knowing that the most inappropriate stereotyped straight asking those questions, still guesses that my man is the alpha and I'm the one "who takes it" because his cliché-driven mind thinks that writing and playing piano is for women. LOL. What he doesn't know is that my guy's penis has been locked since October 1st and stays this way till he decides to stop - for me it's October 31st but it could be sooner, or LATER if he gets tired. Former alpha LOL

Play with objects on my partner's ass. Then, the other fetish I can't mention out of the backroom (at least porn and sites like this one made me discover I'm not alone and it has a name).

too bad the author hasn't continued it!