SDCumPup

Actually, there are several issues at play here. First, 50 US Code 1542 requires the president to consult with Congress before sending the US Armed Forces into another sovereign country for any sort of emergency action, Trump failed to do so, thus violating federal law. Second, by ordering US Armed Forces to enter Venezuela and engage in aggressive operations in order to abduct the head of state of Venezuela and his wife, Trump has committed an overt act of a war of aggression, thus violating international law. Third, add in all of the blatant and unprovoked attacks against the smaller vessels leading to the sinking of said vessels in international waters, yet more violations of international law. Fourth, sanctioning the second strikes against the shipwrecked vessels with survivors in international waters, which is not only a violation of international law but also a clear crime against humanity. Finally, and this is actually the keystone, Trump, in his idiocy, has placed Maduro on trial in US federal courts, forcing Maduro to actually enter a plea. Maduro is a recognized head of state for a sovereign nation, meaning that he has diplomatic immunity granted to him automatically and isn’t subject to any courts of law outside those of Venezuela or the International Criminal Court. That’s why Safdam Hussein was put on trial in Iraq. That’s why all of the various defendants from WWII Axis countries were tried in their own home countries. Rudolf Hess had been held in prison in Britain since 1941, but was still returned to Germany for trial. Nicholas Maduro isn’t subject to the laws of the United States nor to our judicial system. However, because Trump, a fellow head of state, refuses to honor the sovereignty of other nations and the diplomatic immunity granted to the heads of state of other nations, he’s effectively forfeiting his own. That means the next time he wants to go play golf at one of his resorts in Scotland, the Scottish can nab him and drop him at the ICC before anyone else can respond. Quite frankly, if they did, pretty much all of Europe, North America, South America, Oceania, Australia, New Zealand, Africa, East Asia, Western Asia, and I’m pretty certain Central Asia would defend Scotland.

Absolutely! Make certain that he can’t access your accounts! This will protect you from any potential fraud and abuse just in case!

If you both entered into a 5 year contract and the original terms of that contract specifically stated that there was to be no anal sex then he is NOT free to alter the contract in any manner during the 5 years without express WRITTEN CONSENT from YOU stating that YOU agree to the changes. That’s how contracts work. If both parties don’t agree to the terms of the contract, then there is no meeting of the minds therefore no contractual agreement. You are free to immediately change all of the access codes to your accounts for banking, social media, etc without consulting him. I would strongly recommend doing so in order to protect yourself and prevent any potential fraud and abuse.

I hope everything is alright with the author. It’s been a while since any updates on this story.

Dillon Anderson and Pierre Fitch can double fuck me as much as they want and whore my faggot pussy out to anyone and everyone!

I’m #5 waiting for a second giant cock to work its way inside my faggot pussy alongside the first one! Breed my slave cunt 2 at a time, destroy it and leave it overflowing with man cum to be used as lube so this faggot can get its pussy fisted and punch fucked into jello!

My condolences on both the losses of your dear friends and your ability to further process this experience with the key participants you shared it with. I can certainly empathize with the loss of friends in the kink community who you’ve shared a special experience with, especially if you’ missed an opportunity for something more. *hugs*

Slight correction regarding the Catholic countries and their involvement in the Western Hemisphere, Spain, Portugal, and France all built numerous and extensive civilian colonial settlements throughout the territories they occupied. The Portuguese were limited entirely by treaty negotiated under the auspices of the pope and only had Brazil. The French, unlike the other European nations didn’t approach their venture by attempting to conquer, instead they attempted to cooperate and coordinate with the indigenous peoples which was a considerably slower process but far less costly. They were also dealings with some other issues back in Europe at the same time. The Spanish on the other hand went hog wild on the colonization of pretty much everywhere they could lay claim to. The entire state of California has a string of cities built around and named after mission churches built by the Spanish colonial powers. There’s an entire genre of architecture called Spanish Colonial Revival based on their buildings. Mexico City is a colonial city literally built on top of the previous Aztec city of Tenochtitlan. The cathedral in Mexico City is literally built right on top of the primary temple of Tenochtitlan. St Augustine, Fl is the oldest city in the United States and is a Spanish colonial city. There’s an entire string of theme parks called Six Flags which takes its name from the fact that several Southern states have had the flags of six different countries flying over them with Spain being one of them. They didn’t just come here mainly to exploit the resources. They didn’t treat the Americas like they treated subsaharan Africa. They came here deliberately for land to expand into. The Spanish conquistadors were promised land grants from the crown with titles of nobility to accompany them here.

I would like to point out that the Louisiana Purchase which was a sizable chunk of land that is now several of the states that make up the central portion of the continental United States was purchased from France. The French, much like the Dutch, didn’t conquer when they came to the Western Hemisphere as explorers and traders. Unlike the Spanish, Portuguese, and British, they legitimately did come here strictly to explore, set up trade networks, and build colonies where the indigenous populations would permit them to. Unlike the Dutch they did not attempt to barter for land, the French simply looked for potential locations and made certain that the indigenous peoples were OK with them establishing a colony or trading location there or if it would disrupt a preexisting local agreement. I’m uncertain about what the situation in Alaska was with regarding the Russians before they sold that to the US government. Of course the worst case wasn’t actually conquering so much as an illegal overthrow of a legitimate government at the request of private business interests owned by US citizens and enabled by the use of US military personnel. That would be the annexation of the kingdom of Hawaii btw. The sugar barons, all of them US citizens, who were private citizens and private business owners requested that the US government provide them with US Sailors and Marines in order to depose Queen Lili’uokalani the last and rightful monarch of the kingdom of Hawaii, establishing the short lived Republic of Hawaii, which very quickly became the US territory of Hawaii. A few decades later, after enough White people had moved to the islands to outvote the Native Hawaiians, it became our 50th state. I should also mention that the entire concept of there being separate races of Homo sapiens with vast differences that can be scientifically detected and measured is complete nonsense. It’s totally founded in the debunked pseudoscience of eugenics and has absolutely zero scientific evidence supporting. There is only a single extant species of human today, Homo sapien, and there are no subspecies within that species. The distinctions that are detectable are quite literally only skin deep, and that’s it. They’re pretty much just limited to the amount of melanin that is present in the epidermis, the way in which the hair grows, and eye color. There are a couple of things like sickle cell anemia which is more common in people whose ancestors were from areas that had large amounts of malaria, but that’s related to the fact that malaria was present and nothing else. Since malaria was extremely widespread from Africa to the Middle East, and the entire Mediterranean basin, that’s going to include a huge number of people. A couple of other extremely location specific adaptations have arisen in particular populations, but again that’s more because of the specific location than anything else. This whole argument about immigration is nothing more than racism based on pseudoscience mixed with xenophobia and nationalism. No nationalism isn’t patriotism, and it isn’t better than patriotism either. It’s worse than patriotism, and it’s actually worse than hating your own country. Nationalism is worse than hating your own country because, when you hate your country at least you’re able to notice & acknowledge when it’s making a mistake. Nationalists are simply incapable of recognizing that their country is even capable of making mistakes in the first place, let alone recognizing that it’s making one in the moment. Thus when it’s doing exactly that there’s no one to keep it from going past the point of no return. Nationalists always doom themselves to failure and defeat, ALWAYS. They can’t see their own mistakes, so they can’t learn from them, they can’t improve themselves, and they can’t think outside of their own tiny little boxes, or I should say echo chambers. They wallow in groupthink and don’t understand that they’re stuck. That’s why they don’t understand that diversity actually is a strength. They view it as a weakness, but their ideology of having everyone assimilate into one homogeneous culture is the weakness. If everyone looks, talks, thinks, acts, and believes the same and a problem is encountered, what happens when they try everything they can think of and none of it works?