Jump to content

viking8x6

Moderators
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,312

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

viking8x6 last won the day on May 22 2024

viking8x6 had the most liked content!

Reputation

3,562 Superstar

390 Followers

See all followers

About viking8x6

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Baltimore
  • HIV Status
    Don't Ask, Don't Tell
  • Role
    Versatile
  • Porn Experience
    I wish
  • Looking For
    Fucking / Getting fucked - facial & body hair a big plus

More Info

  • BarebackRT Profile Name
    viking8x6

Recent Profile Visitors

33,270 profile views
  1. viking8x6
    Neither narrative ("voted in massive numbers to Dump trump" nor "4 years later [en masse] changed their mind") is at all accurate. They were just media fiction. Depends on what you consider "massive numbers" of course, but even Obama in 2008 had a higher popular vote margin than in either 2020 or 2024.
  2. Levi started following viking8x6
  3. viking8x6
    At one point, I was dating someone I had met in a public restroom. He got cold feet and left me to go back to his girlfriend. Then 6 months later I saw him at the video store with another guy. Moral: Don't try to date closet cases. It doesn't end well.
  4. viking8x6
    Sean Maygers, with Will Angell topping. And clearly doing a good job... just look at those toes curl! A delightful find.
  5. Tosk started following viking8x6
  6. BugchaserJosh started following viking8x6
  7. viking8x6
    So far, you're correct. But if the data is correct, 11 million illegally crossed the borders from 2020 to 2025, the number includes jumpers through the Southern border as well as visa overstays and those through other means including human trafficking. Obama did it too. Obama also deported more illegal aliens than several other recent Presidents and started the family separation protocols, but this isn't something that our American media likes to cover. (And yes, I can find the stats on both). Errr.... and these are related... HOW? This discussion, um, argument... free-for-all? ... appears to have jumped the shark. Given the original post, I suppose I should not be surprised by that.
  8. viking8x6
    Perhaps not the best example to choose here. The left-wing and right-wing media have each, in their own different ways, manipulated the facts (as best we can determine them) of this case. I'll just point out here that his alleged association with MS-13 is just that, and that the immigration courts who gave him due process in 2019 ruled that he could not be deported back to El Salvador, an order the Trump administration chose to ignore. https://www.factcheck.org/2025/04/due-process-and-the-abrego-garcia-case/
  9. viking8x6
    We moderators do our best not to take sides, except of course in those cases where the "side" in question is contrary to the rules we're supposed to be enforcing. That said, we are fallible humans who have our cranky days and are doing this on a volunteer basis. It isn't clear, in this particular instance, whose side exactly you think the moderator is taking. If you honestly think a moderator has made a mistake, you should private message that moderator to discuss it. You should not make snarky and/or oblique comments in the topics themselves. You also shouldn't assume you know whether someone else has received a warning or penalty for their post, and proceed to jump on their bandwagon.
  10. viking8x6
    Infractions and penalties on BZ are private information. They can only be seen by the staff and by the "offender".
  11. viking8x6
    You are right. In an effort to provide something relevant on the topic, I neglected to carefully vet my google results. My bad.
  12. viking8x6
    I am saying that the particular US government website referenced by @insatiableholeinTO appears to be promoting "conspiracy theories" in the guise of information about the origins of Covid-19. It makes a lot of unsupported statements. It engages in a great deal of casting blame in the form of unsupported allegations at specific individuals or groups. It characterizes specific actions or agendas as negative when there were excellent public health reasons for those actions. So yes, @insatiableholeinTO, I'm saying that the government is "lying" (or to be precise, misleading). Regarding the specific issue of Dr. Fauci, I did a good deal of web searching across a variety of different sources to try and find out exactly what it was that he did do with regard to the publication on Covid-19 that is the leading item on the covid.gov web page. Yes, he did recommend to the authors that they omit the possibility of a lab leak as a potential origin of the virus. Does that mean he's to blame for the pandemic. No. Does that mean he instigated the publication in question (which appears to be what the web site is trying to imply)? No.
  13. viking8x6
    Be assured that a walk through the ocean of most souls Would scarcely get your feet wet. Fall not in love therefore; It will stick to your face. Gracefully surrender the things of youth: The birds, clean air, tuna, Taiwan And let not the sands of time Get in your lunch. --National Lampoon
  14. viking8x6
    That would be true, if you had made an argument. You haven't. Arguments involve taking a clear position and supporting it with relevant information. Your post from May 10th contains neither of those, just a link to a page that has the hallmarks of propaganda. [in case you were confused about that: https://cognitivepsycho.com/how-to-recognize-propaganda-a-guide-to-protecting-your-mind/ ] Indeed you don't, when the government has done it for you.
  15. viking8x6
    Here's a non-paywalled article on the same: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/sen-mike-lee-wants-a-national-definition-of-obscenity-here-s-why/ar-AA1EtQv1
  16. viking8x6
    Kudos to @brnbk for that thoughtful and detailed input!
  17. viking8x6
    The devil is in the details, but numerous non-US governments have issued travel advisories for their citizens about difficulties with traveling to the U.S. At least one such incident that is specific to gay people comes up in a quick google search: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3122632.stm Oops. I take it back. That reference is from 2003, as correctly pointed out by @harrysmith25.
  18. viking8x6
    🤣 The mathematical implication about your sex life is brilliant. TY! Oink!

Other #BBBH Sites…

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Top Bareback Porn Sites…

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.