viking8x6

The full-on search tool (the one you get when you actually click the search icon) can do that for you. Set content type to "Image" or "Album" and put the gallery name (or a bit of it) in as the search string. You can search by author too, but it's problematic because the system insists on a search string.

To find your own image content, it may be easier to create a filter for it - I started with the "Content I Started" from the Activity menu and narrowed the content type to "image + album" and my albums and photos popped right up.

Assuming you're talking about tags, I believe the system allows you to create new tags, so if people mis-type "bareback" (instead of typing it correctly or selecting it from the drop-down) it will create the erroneous tag. Therefore, there are a great many typos for "bareback" that have become tags over the years that the system has been in operation.

I suspect you have nearly reached your total allotted space for attachments. If so, you will have to prune them down a little. We recommend posting your images in the Gallery when possible, to avoid filling up your attachment space.

Works fine for me. I was having a problem a week or so ago wherein the site would occasionally crash my browser, but it seems to have cleared up.

And now for something completely different...

Ran across this article on non-(straight monogamous) sex in other species, and if you are curious about that sort of thing, it's a lot of fun. Turns out the naturalists of the 19th century were a wee bit narrow-minded, shall we say...

[think before following links] https://nautil.us/overthrowing-the-patriarchy-through-ecstatic-sex-21451/

No, nobody does.

And this is why we still have to fight for equality.

23 hours ago, DarkroomTaker said:

I personally do not wish to see SCAT PICS in the main gallery section or holes that are bloody or everything hanging out of the hole like a prolapse.

I'm not big on any of the above, either. The latter two are not against the rules, but it's fine to "dislike" them, and in fact I recommend that you do.

Scat, however, and in particular images of it, are not allowed anywhere on the forum. If you see any, please report them!

1 hour ago, BareLover666 said:

And after five days it's a bit late for PEP.

My bad. Missed the "this weekend".

18 hours ago, hntnhole said:

To less secure-minded folks, the world seems to be careening out of control: Russia on the march, financial instabilities, commodity scarceness, unreliable trade agreements

... global climate change, pandemic disease, peak carbon ...

The world is careening out of control. One has to be secure-minded indeed to face it every morning. It helps to remember that control - of anything other than oneself - is largely an illusion.

And now, back to our regularly scheduled program...

I consistently shoot larger loads when I have am aroused for a longer period (either foreplay or edging) before I ejaculate.

Comparisons are odious.

That said, for me personally, none of the features described would constitute a controlling factor in which person was more attractive. Except possibly being willing to participate in a particular role that suited my mood of the day (I'm 50+ versatile and sometimes really want to top, or bottom, though I'm almost always willing to do both).

Factors that matter a lot more:

Can they put more than two words together in communication and conversation? Are they passably good at indicating what they enjoy and understanding what I enjoy? Can they plan a connection and show up for it in anything less than geological time?  Do they look like a man and not a prepubescent person? Etc...

On 6/27/2022 at 11:37 AM, twinksterkink said:

Then an hour later he came back again with a buddy and the two of them raped me. I mean it was pretty much consensual but the bareback part wasn't really.

If it "wasn't really", they did rape you. You can choose what to do about that, but it is absolutely OK to call it what it is.

On 6/27/2022 at 11:37 AM, twinksterkink said:

And the two guys both told me that they were poz after then finished breeding my hole.

You can get PEP for that if you do it promptly. I suggest that doing so might help you to feel more in control of the situation and give you time to make a considered assessment of your feelings about HIV risk.

21 hours ago, TotalTop said:

That is never going to happen.

It would be unwise to rely on that... as someone said earlier in this topic,

Quote

nobody can actually accurately predict the future.

1 hour ago, fuckholedc said:

questions about the efficacy of the vaccine over 50+ years

The only sure way to find that out would be experimentally... and the necessary experiment cannot ethically be done. In theory one could look for antibodies, but that wouldn't give an actual efficacy number.

On 6/2/2022 at 2:15 PM, fernwish said:

There were a couple of stories on here called "Craigslist Meetings Turn Me Into a Demented Slave" that used to be on here, but I can't find them anymore. So fucking hot! Don't suppose anyone might know where they could be found?

Those were removed because they included off-limits fetish material.

8 minutes ago, BlindRawFucker1 said:

It seems to me, that interracial marriage could also be at risk.

Gee, do you think he'll recuse himself if they take up a reversal of Loving vs Virginia? 🤨

1 hour ago, rawTOP said:

So yeah if you think I don't think trust doctors - you're absolutely right. I question everything and only do what makes sense to me. If a doctor is bothered by my questions I find another doctor. I do take their opinion seriously, but I make the final decision.

I'll second this. My choice of words wouldn't be that I don't trust them, rather that I'm aware that they are just people, too, and have their limitations and make mistakes sometimes. Medicine, for all its progress, is in many ways still more a practice than a science.

1 hour ago, rawTOP said:

And pharma companies - they're only in it for the money - not for saving lives.

True. Having worked in that industry also (not in marketing, thankfully), I can say that while many of the people in the industry are in it because they believe in saving lives or improving quality of life, the companies are in it for the money. Because capitalism.

Extremely well done. Kudos! and Thanks!

Biggest - probably a friend of mine who's at least 9" (real measured inches, by comparison with mine which I know accurately) and medium thick. Alas, he's not an anal top, but I deepthroated him, which was delightful.

Smallest - just this year, a local baby cub (legal, but barely) who's about 4" but the tip is super slender, only about 0.5 inch diameter (under 2" girth). It's a bit thicker at the base. He has fucked me once so far. I enjoyed it, but more for the load and the connection than for the physical sensation of being fucked.

It's not my favorite word coinage, but I don't find it off-putting.

My understanding, though, is that the etymology of that use of "taint" is that it refers to just the perineum, which is not really his crack/anus, nor his balls, but just the part in between: " 'taint " one thing or the other.

That's a sad ending. And I suspect that in Italian culture a happier solution is out of the question. 

Very sorry for your loss.

You might want to say "HIV phobia" or "poz phobia" rather than "AIDS phobia". Most poz men (at least in the US) don't actually have AIDS at this point.

Also, don't forget that "safe sex" is not just about HIV - there are a heap of other STDs in various flavors of preventability, treatability, and permanence. Of course, condoms aren't a guarantee against some of those, either.

Gosh, you'd think people would benefit from actually having a conversation about this, wouldn't you? 😉

But just this morning the (married, to a woman) guy who was plowing my ass raw said, "I hope you're clean."  Bit late to be hoping that...

5 hours ago, TheSRQDude said:

The chart will give indications of underlying conditions like prostatitis, urine, metals, even jaundice and STIs.

Fair warning: The chart is somewhat inaccurate. It does not match the text, for starters...

Loving this! And what perfect attention to detail!

On 6/16/2022 at 2:02 PM, chi4loads said:

I'm sure the ice cream had started to melt, since we only got a few things put away before I had him bent over the counter forcing my bare cock back into his hole.

💓

On 6/18/2022 at 9:10 PM, TotalTop said:

No it is not BS, a myth, or rare. Getting other strains of HIV or reinfected with the same original strain causes medication failure, and the HIV patient progresses to AIDS much faster.

You've made a lot of assertions here, and not all of them are equally true. I'm going to discuss them separately to avoid people being misled:

No it is not BS, a myth, or rare. True. Research (see below) shows superinfection rates of 0-7% worldwide.

Getting other strains of HIV ... causes medication failure, Partly true. It can cause medication failure *only if* the new strain is resistant to the medications the infected person is taking. It certainly does not inevitably do so.

...or reinfected with the same original strain... Meaningless. You literally cannot get "reinfected" with a virus you are already actively infected with. Your body is already full of that virus.

...and the HIV patient progresses to AIDS much faster. Sometimes true. This is true *only if* the new strain is "more fit" than the one the infected person already has. Sometimes that is true, sometimes it is not.

All of the facts I'm stating above are put forth in a 2013 research paper in Lancet Infectious Diseases (a reputable scientific journal). Here's the link: [think before following links] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3752600/ The Pathogenesis section is of particular interest.

Here's a link to the CDC page on HIV Superinfection (the technical term for this discussion topic): [think before following links] https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/basics/hiv-transmission/hiv-superinfection.html