NYBBGUY58

I've taken various sizes, and am not really a size queen. As others have commented, extremely large dicks can really hurt, depending on any number of factors. In the end (pun intended) it's about a lot more than volume or length or a guy with a particular build. I'm not really a monogamous sort of boy, but I like there to be a connection and meeting of minds in addition to the intersection of body parts! "Variety's the very spice of life, That gives it all its flavour." William Cowper, 1785 Or a slutty modern version: "So many men...so little time!" 🙃

You're welcome, thanks for creating this space and maintaining it! 😍

PLEASE NOTE: THESE OPINIONS ARE SOLELY MY OWN! There certainly have been protests and the media has reported on the more egregious violations. I think a lot of people are terribly confused about what can be done to respond. The opposition in the US has depended on tried and true tactics: protest marches, boycotts and letters/calls/emails to elected representatives. My personal take is that those tactics aren't terribly effective any longer. There's no real consequence for the powers that be when they're ignored. Part of that is the historic relationship of "progressive" movements with the Democratic Party. While I don't think the Democrats are in any way the same as the GOP/Republicans, in the end they largely have chosen to co-opt social motion to leaders that aren't willing to shake up the status quo of power arrangements. While there are things I didn't care for about Mr. Biden, he walked the walk in that he diversified the racial/gender makeup of his administration. I think it was best described by an article that came out years ago - 2008 or 2012 - in Vanity Fair. In the United States we are governed by the one percent FOR the one percent. My own feelings are mixed; while the Democratic Party put an end to discrimination in the military, Sam Nunn (former Democratic senator for the state of Georgia ) was adamantly opposed to allowing gays in the military and blocked it at every turn and Bill Clinton put into place the disastrous "don't ask, don't tell" policy. Joe Biden forced the Obama administration to push for marriage equality, yet Bill Clinton signed the Defense of Marriage Act. Pardon me if I still feel at best skeptical of the Democratic Party as an institution, though apologies have been offered. To put it bluntly, we in the US don't have a reliable vehicle to push to save reforms let alone enact them. I trace some of the anger to the absolute abandonment of any real programs to help with poverty, both in the inner cities and rural poverty (e.g., Appalachia and the so-called Rust Belt states). Add to that the real lack of consequences to the perpetrators of the sub-prime mortgage debacle of 2006/2007, and you have an enraged electorate that feels fucked over. With good reason. At this point, I feel much more sympathy to the progressives in pre-WW2 Europe. I used to wonder why didn't they do more, where was the left when the right was busily exterminating Jews, Roma, Catholics, and Socialists? I have a better answer to that now: like them, the progressive movement in the US was too timid and did not do more than call for marches which lead to nothing changing. Incumbents were unwilling to risk their comfortable government jobs and pensions to create stronger safeguards. So here we are, basically fucked. Personally, I am investing my time and money in immediate help for those affected and in creating electoral reform - things like open primaries - so that the current bipartisan policies of upholding the stranglehold of money and incumbency on our political process. PLEASE NOTE: THESE OPINIONS ARE SOLELY MY OWN!

"Wanted" with Al Parker and Jack Wrangler. My favorite scene wasn't hot, I found it funny: Jack Wrangler is a prison guard "supervising" a chain gang while fucking one of the inmates and shouting "I can still see you!" When he realizes that the inmates are making a break for it, he grabs for his gun, but his "playmate" pins him in place with his ass...

That depends on whether I'm going to get fucked or not - I save it for the day of. This means, of course, that I can't get together at the drop of a hat. I don't mind that being an issue.

I don't think I've ever used one. I just "vote with my feet" and move on.

Well, sleazebags have their place. Using men for sex only goes both ways, after all. I guess for me it's usually that I take a load and then....BREAK TIME! I'm an old man, my legs, hips, thighs, and hole need a minute to recover. Or else a different guy takes over, so I get a new load. In that way i can take four loads in a night, including getting DP after being warmed up.

I personally count by the load delivered. If it was four loads, then that's four fucks for one encounter.

In my youth. I don't think the site will allow me to state the exact age...

Well, if it is a requirement, then I'm a terrible cocksucker for reasons other than my hypersensitive gag reflex. I have no desire to yuck anybody's yum, but I have no interest in an exchange of fluids other than saliva and cum. While I'm here, I especially hate it when a guy pisses in my ass after cumming because it acts like another "douche" and I don't get to to keep the cum inside me. Only one man did it to me...WITHOUT asking. Needless to say, I didn't go back for seconds.

YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Same here...though him rimming me is actually negotiable. I get very disappointed if he doesn't want me to rim him!

Bareback...it was LONG before HIV was even a thing. But I'm old! 😁

The load, definitely. I've said my favorite game to play with a top man is "How many loads can my ass squeeze out of him..." It's a win-win proposition.

I think it's about taboos and breaking them. That's how I believe this website operates - breaking the [banned word] of "every single time with a condom." The specific you're pointing towards is harder to wrap my head around given that then and now the extreme political right is all about shoring up traditional gender roles. There was a group of gay Nazis who were used by Hitler and others, who were then "purged" after they ceased being useful. Again, that's part of the [banned word], breaking it is the excitement of embracing something forbidden with the possible danger an added "space." Note the above is an opinion not a statement of fact!

It's certainly a little confusing. There are men who have sex with men who don't identify as gay, bi or pansexual. Even as I type that I'm not sure quite what that means - I have a hard time wrapping my head around it. Sexual expression is far more varied than our current rather puritanical culture allows, I suppose. All that said, people identify how they identify. If you can get together and have fun, who really cares how he identifies. So long as you're both consenting and no one is getting hurt I don't see that there's a problem. I personally wouldn't plan on having a lasting, committed relationship with someone like that, but I really don't do "couple"; I prefer friends with benefits.

It can become an issue. My solutions: 1. Make sure to do a lot of foreplay, sniffing, sucking, licking, dick balls and ass; during the fucking, I'll squeeze his dick with the sphincter and play with his balls....BLAST OFF! 2. Say "Uh, my hips are getting tired and my legs are falling asleep, can we switch positions?" 3. I've also been known to say: "THERE ARE NERVE ENDINGS THERE, BRO. WATCH IT!"

I certainly have!

I agree with all prior comments. While there are risks involved in bareback sex, as long as you're on medication and your viral load and T-cells are at decent level it will be okay. Shop for a new doctor, one who doesn't seem to have an agenda that "BAREBACK SEX IS BAD!" I stopped going to a particular urgent care center after getting a lecture when I needed treatment for gonorrhea. That is a risk of sex without condoms, one that I'm okay with paying. I personally can't tolerate Doxy prep, and have been sidelined by treatment for prostate cancer just now anyway (NOT RELATED TO HIV). If it's any comfort at all, similar objections were voiced when birth control pills became available. While those have some clear medical risks as it turned out, a chunk of it was just moralistic bombast about the world going to hell in a hand basket because contraception was now simpler. We live in a sex-averse society that bombards us with messages about being sexy and attractive, but heaven forbid you enjoy yourself. I'm sorry you have to deal with a medical cretin.

Sorta. I dated a guy who had a bike, was into leather/S&M, and was also a devout Catholic. I found him incredibly attractive, as in weak knees when I saw him. The only problem was after the first night he made me into his good, Catholic wife - NO SEX! Sigh. This is part of why I stick with friends with benefits.

I heard Moms Mabley tell that one! Thanks...

Does it matter? She served as a figurehead for anti-gay hatred, and was rendered irrelevant. Her music career was destroyed and her entertainment venues went bankrupt. Plus, her views are now apparently mainstream GOP. It's at best a pyrrhic victory in which I take little satisfaction. A joke circulated during the early years of her ascendency: I saw Anita Bryant on TV and she looked AWFUL. You know why? She can't find anyone to do her hair!

About 25 years ago, I was prescribed testosterone shots after I had multiple negative reactions to some of the early HIV meds, so it was only indirectly caused by HIV. Apparently it's clear if it's a definite causal relationship: [think before following links] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7990869/ There are other articles that clearly state it's a known complication if you run a Google search. If you're one particular medications, check out what the known side effects are. In other words, I dunno. Sorry not to be of more assistance.

Do I rim? ENTHUSIASTICALLY!

I'm not at all surprised by your research. I've taken the meds for years, and they definitely have significant side effects. It's a matter of risk/benefit in choosing to take any medication or supplement, for that matter. I can understand your reluctance to continue.

The idea of size mattering has been drummed into us, but I concentrate on pleasing a person not calculating just how big the dick is. I've been topped by guys of all shapes and sizes, and I enjoy pleasuring others. To me, that's what a bottom should concentrate on. My most enjoyable sex partner currently isn't huge, isn't small - he's around 7.5 inches I guess. I don't bother to measure. He "gets" me though - not only understands what I like, but enjoys me enjoying him enjoying me...etc. So if you wanna top, let me know...just be prepared to have your ass licked and worshipped like it's never been before...