fuckyouraw777

I met him on gayday back in the days when it was filled with people who didn't waste time chatting back and forth or just being total bitches. His pics looked nice enough and he said it was his "first time" and I wasn't doing anything better at the time (apart from wasting time on gaydar trying to pick up - lol). So he came over. Nice enough bloke, younger than me. He seemed quite nervous but wanted to get into stuff. We undressed in my bedroom, he's quite hairy but a nice almost-cub like body. Big bone structure, really. He actually wan't packing much weight or muscle - just a naturally built guy. We got to a bit of sucking and so forth but he wanted to be fucked for the first time. I'd honestly ran out of condoms (I was a student then - buying food for myself took precedence! LOL). I told him so; he demurred, got a bit half hearted and not being a forceful top at all I was half up and half soft. Still I figured, let's just lube his arse up anyway and if anything, a bit of dick rubbing on the outside wouldn't hurt. I got harder and eventually just aimed for his hole and started to push in. I'm not a big guy but I figured I actually was his first by the looks on his face and just decided to not move in or out - he could have removed himself from the situation if he wanted. After a while he seemed to relax, I went right in. Took me a bit to get used to -- I like my bottoms loose rather than tight (go figure!) -- but he kept on saying he was enjoying me which kept me up enough. And eventually after about 1/2 an hour of fucking I was like, "I'm going to cum." In those days I used to ask where they wanted it, so I did. He said inside. I did. Afterwards he seemed a bit shy and honestly I think he was just a straight guy wanting to see what it was like having a dick up his bum. I told him he'd be welcome back whenever he wanted. He never came back but I always wonder what happened to him after his supposed first experience.

I've always wondered; obviously it makes it easier to transfer HIV (and anything else I guess) - but doesn't it also introduce other complications? Last time I damaged my arse was when a rather large friend was fucking me with a condom (!) and honestly, I couldn't wait until it damn well healed. Not to mention any medical nasties one could get...

Sorry, the top just sounds like a sissy to me. If he shut up, they'd be good shoots.

An ex-flatmate of mine spat the dummy at me for drooling over him when he was in Dinotopia - I was saying, "Geez, I'd love him in my bedroom." Do him anytime, any which way.

http://www.tmz.com/2013/08/12/justin-bieber-guitar-photos-nude-naked/ I think the guy's a total douche and I'm not convinced about his face (seriously - I may not like bears or daddy types but he looks below age ). Nonetheless, I could do him in a darkroom. Heh.

Tried to fuck my undetctable poz friend bare, didn't work. So he fucked his cum up me instead.

I would...

You sure he didn't slur/mispronounce nasty?

When the regular 'flu shots come about there is a tick box to ask if the recipient is HIV+. Is this because the shots may interact differently with someone who is HIV+? Or are they concerned that it may play up with certain treatments commonly used/given to HIV+ people? Just curious really.

On the other hand, I think fucking with a known person who is definitely on meds and whose blood work shows undetectable is, on balance of probabilities, safer than someone whose blood work shows detectable (for whatever reason). Fucking guys who don't have any STIs, or whatever the current politically correct term is, then obviously you're not going to get any known STIs from them, condom wearing or not. If you do get "something" then you're the unlucky person/couple/sex partners who happened to get something unknown. I remember an older friend of mine who lived pre-AIDS days commented that condoms were for straight people to stop pregnancies and when he was younger men who had sex with me didn't bother using them (but did "pretend" that they got the clap from a female prostitute if they did catch it - heh). I don't believe there is an HIV+ person who cannot pass on the virus given sufficient determination. However under normal circumstances -- both your immune systems are healthy (in as afar as they can be healthy), there's no other STIs and the HIV is undetectable, it's probably "safer" to have sex with an undectable person than a person who is HIV+ and detectable but not completely "safe". Even with condoms it's not completely "safe" (they do break and such) and the only "safe sex" in my opinion is "no sex at all". However, that's not defining sex - celibacy isn't a natural state of affairs no matter what the various religions (and it's not just the Christians) might claim. Really, it's the original poster's decision and the original poster will have to way up the pros and cons of what the original poster proposes to do. In my opinion, it's probably a level of "safer" if neither of you have other STis or a cold/flu (or whatever) and you don't go out of your way to deliberately damage any of your bodies' linings (by toothbrushing or doing even more kinky stuff). Common sense says to me that a water based lube without spermicides generously applied is less likely to damage either parties' mucous membranes and provide less chance for the exchange of fluids into your actual bloodstream - again if the virus doesn't get into the blood stream there's one less method of the virus actually taking hold. If I understand the literature enough, though, I'm not sure it needs to actually get into the blood stream but common sense, again, says that if it doesn't get a chance to infect you by one less method, then it has a lesser but not necessarily zero chance of taking hold.

Has anyone ever heard of "BB Cream" - the beauty product, not the type of cream talked about here? Is it some type of inside joke by some person who wanted to make fun of the users of it? The name makes me chuckle! FYR (1) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BB_cream (2) http://www.ebay.com/itm/SKIN79-HOT-PINK-Super-Plus-Beblesh-Balm-Triple-Functions-BB-cream-40g-Free-gifts-/270988192286?pt=US_Makeup_Face&hash=item3f1827aa1e

I had a friend over for a weekend and he'd fuck me but come on my back (for some ridiculous reason). Maybe he'd converted and didn't want to convert me? Maybe he was feeling guilty because he had a boyfriend at them time. Long story short, I finally asked him why the hell he wasn't cumming inside me and that just set him off. There wasn't any cum outside an arse for the rest of the weekend - and he always was one to be able to fuck until his dick got sore (which was the sign it was my turn to fuck him - haha). No idea if he was pos or not, given that years later I still tested neg.

It follows that the more bodily fluids you stick your dick in, the more likely you'll get something - someone can still be HIV- (the real deal) but have HIV+ high viral load cum in their arse. If you top that, you're probably not really getting it from the bottom...

http://www.xtube.com/watch.php?v=45CVC-G563-

It's quite possible I've missed the question in the FAQ but I did look. Apart from the three social network icons, is there a like button or similar functionality? I can't seem to see one....

feels good both ways to me - prefer coming inside though.

Dumped a load in a poz friend tonight.

All I can advise for you is that if you want reassurance go to an understanding GP - even then fish about for answers.

I enjoy TIM and the other lot of videos but Eric Videos suits my fancy at the moment - even if occasionally one has to speak a spattering of the European languages to figure out what they 'actors' (?) are really saying. I know they're probably just as setup as any of the others but there's something about them that is just more realistic for want of a better word. Not in the old style porn where there was a semblance of a plot (please - last time I tried to pick up the pizza boy he stayed about as far away from me as I wanted to stay from him - good looking guys get bar jobs and such ) but where it's not just, hey, there's a bed/sling/whatever let's fuck. And just to overload this more, they seem to have a diversity, for me, of tastes. Anyone else like their stuff? \\

To fuck a known poz guy, low viral load but takes meds all the time or to find a supposedly neg 'stranger' to screw with...

Yes, I know - we're all asking wtf? But there's a definite different feeling to cumming in a condom and cumming in an arse or elsewhere. Not sure how to describe it; sort of restricted fluid around the tip of your cock. For me it doesn't do much apart from detract from the moment but it's different. And we all have different tastes and feelings. I'm sure some would like it. But would you? (and this isn't about taking a load or giving one, it's a question of the feeling of ejactulating in a condom)

I wonder, obviously don't have the research, but I'd suspect topping a "real" undetectable (i.e someone who has suppressed HIV whether by meds or it's just natural) with no other STIs is actually safer than topping "unknowns". I'd be willing to concede that undetectable in blood doesn't mean undetectable in ass secretions but it's sort of incongruent to argue that undetectable blood means undetectable ass secretions or whatever. Besides, why can't they test those as well?

If the cock's bare it doesn't bother me; however if they're using a condom it can become irksome. If they're anon/bookstore I just get myself out of the situation but if it's a regular they'll generally know what I'm like and stop edging themselves. It's not generally a problem because I don't wank when I am bottoming but if they've got the right dick or right technique they can occasionally make me cum without me actively touching myself - LOL - they shouldn't be so good at topping! Haha!

Tense up, don't let them in and then I fuck them. Raw of course.

To call someone out because of their obviously fake profile?