Jump to content

fuckyouraw777

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    197

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by fuckyouraw777

  1. fuckyouraw777
    Visiting another city, finally found a guy who wasn't a flake on Grindr; came over, sucked me off a bit and then bent over, doggy style and fucked him until I blew in his arse, Sadly, he didn't keep my load in him but I'd gotten what I wanted :)
  2. fuckyouraw777
    I don't believe I changed anything myself to disable recent profile visitors before logging in this morning. When I looked at another person's profile, I noticed that the "Recent Profile Visitors" sections was "Disabled" (with an Enable link). I looked at my own profile and it was "Disabled" so I "Enabled" it (by click the Enable link). It reappeared on other people's profile, as "Enabled". So I disabled it again (personally, I'm rather indifferent to the feature but that's not the subject of this post). So I disabled it on my profile again. But it's visible/enabled on everyone else's profile presumably. Unfortunately there isn't an easy way for me to verify this as "some other user with some other level/status". So I'm guessing if: The block feature where blocks can be enabled/disabled exists (it clearly does), but is it meant to be exposed, pun unintended, to us? If the "Recent Profile Visitors" block is disabled on one's own profile, should one be able to see it on someone else's profile? Am I seeing a glitch in the Matrix, so to speak? The more common way to say that is, have I noticed a (fleeting?) bug? Thanks. ps. thanks to the people who mod/run the site too; this isn't a complaint, it's just something that I've not noticed before and I've been around for quite a while.
  3. fuckyouraw777
    Realistically I'm average size as are -- by definition -- most guys you'll meet given a large enough population size but no-one's complained about that yet. If there's chemistry it'll work for me, if not - it won't for both or all parties so to say.
  4. fuckyouraw777
    A black/hispanic man fell from the sky? 🙂
  5. fuckyouraw777
    Some tops like the feeling of someone clinching or pushing out - if you have one who does, and you want to do it, and you're clean, then you could choose to just do it and enjoy the pleasure of pleasing the top.
  6. fuckyouraw777
    When I was younger, not that I'm that "old" now, I wanted sex 24/7; up until about 35 or so I guess. Now I'm closer to 50, I'm happy with what I can get where I am...and there's not much chance of burning out on sex or any kind of entertainment at all at the moment.
  7. fuckyouraw777
    Them: "Hi, I'm not what you want!" Me: "You're not want I want!" Them: "Now I'm offended..." I never get, in the sense of "understand", that; now if I'm in the right mood I can be chatty and sometimes people on hookup apps or sites really are just lonely and might want to chat. But if I said to some profile, "Are you into bb sex?" when they have "condomsonly", then get annoyed because they say they're not interested...honestly, what answer was I expecting? That said, I could list the winning lottery numbers or give the ingredients and recipe for the elixir of eternal life in my hookup profiles and noone would be immortal, and the lottery would still jackpot.
  8. fuckyouraw777
    Years ago when I lived in a city where there were parks that were cruisy and worked, I fucked a few guys who were probably homeless: so long as you give my dick a home, does it matter?
  9. fuckyouraw777
    The sex is hot...not so sure about the music though 🙂
  10. fuckyouraw777
    It really depends; if they're a random, I don't really care or think too much about it. If they're someone I know and might have sex with again, and it was good, I think maybe a potential regular FWB but nothing particular changes for me.
  11. fuckyouraw777
    So long as they're not so loose I'm literally fucking thin air, it's all good for me.
  12. fuckyouraw777
    There are fetishes for absolutely anything -- including I suppose not cumming inside a guy's hole even if you're fucking bareback...but what's the point of fucking bareback if you don't cum inside? In fact, the whole point of a guy's dick, when aroused, is to cum inside someone: our entire evolutionary "goal" is to put our uncovered dicks inside someone and cum in them, lest the species fade into existence.
  13. fuckyouraw777
    There are some weird combos of interest you can find on Grindr tags and such, e.g: BB & CondomsOnly And this on profiles that are probably real people and not on profiles which have obviously just pushed all the buttons. And then there's the people who say BB but then want to use condoms (you'll not usually find them lurking on this site but I've encountered them). Honestly, were I in or near a larger populace, it would be easier go to a SOPV (sex on premises venue): whilst people at them can also be picky and stand about etc. at least you know what they are there for and can see what you're getting, if you're not in the dark room of course.
  14. fuckyouraw777
    Yeah, I get very sensitive after blowing and unless the bottom's really gentle and knows what not to do (usually means they're a regular), it can look like I'm not interested after cumming or suffering post clarity: when it's really just animal instinct running things for a few moments.
  15. fuckyouraw777
    IANAL but if you pressed the charges and got a lawyer willing, they could probably at least put up enough of a case that you didn't get dismissed out of court for wasting the court's time with a frivolous case. However, I seriously doubt you'd win the case if you told the judge/jury what you told us here: a good prosecutor could likely introduce enough doubt, if not total doubt, that you "did not implicitly give consent" to be fucked: you were hooded, knowingly hooded, you had a butt plug in, you didn't describe resistance, you didn't go to the police and possibly more. Now a good defense lawyer would keep that part silent and hope that the prosecutor didn't get a hold of what you'd written here: the law is about what is legal, and it really has little to do with the actual truth -- it can only deal with what it can discover as true and if you somehow stuck to your guns and described a situation where it could be construed legally as rape (and their lawyer didn't introduce sufficient doubt), you could still win for sure. But with what you've written...I doubt it. Civil case for damages? Maybe if one could invent a claim. But beyond reasonable doubt...I doubt it 🙂
  16. fuckyouraw777
    Ideally, I like to get things so that the bottoms arse is gripping my cock's skin so that I can slowly pull my head into my foreskin (inside their arse) and push it back out again into their bare, unprotected hole; it's easier to do without any lube.
  17. fuckyouraw777
    Did your friend score?
  18. fuckyouraw777
    "I've never done it without a condom before." (after I'd just fucked him bare in a park) "I don't like taking risks" (as he fucked me bb, after I'd tried fucking him with a condom, failed, took it off and basically told him to deal with it) "You're big" (I'm average although on apps if I was like many other profiles I could probably claim I was - some guys think you've never seen an 8" cock/ruler before)
  19. fuckyouraw777
    Ahem, not if your name is Bill...
  20. fuckyouraw777
    Honestly, whilst I'm not explicit about wanting BB, it's not clear to me how "cumming inside you doggy" could mean anything but. Not to mention the other things in my profile on Grindr (e.g. about not sharing face pics). I swear I could: Give the winning lotto numbers (if I were some deity who could predict that) and maybe only 1 out of 1,000,000 viewers might actually win the lotto GRRR.
  21. fuckyouraw777
    I never ask that question (if I wanted to know if they had HIV or were undetectable or had an STI/STD then I'd ask that). I just assume people mean: "Have you douched" or "cleaned out" if they ask that 🙂
  22. fuckyouraw777
    I don't remember my first: too long ago. I do remember my first known load from a guy who was - I should say is - poz. He was already barebacking me fairly often, but one day we just decided, "it would be OK if I made sure to expel his cum from my arse afterwards." It actually was OK because he'd been undectable many years and still is.
  23. fuckyouraw777
    The conservative answer, if one could get sued for being "wrong", would likely be "yes" but this likely assumes the other person had HIV in sufficient concentration as usually measured to transmit it. My personal answer would be that: "maybe possible, however extremely unlikely to the extent where a reasonable statistician would call it negligible; we need far more information about the other person to give any better answer than that."
  24. fuckyouraw777
    If it's a regular and I know they like it and I'm in the mood, I will; otherwise it all depends on the situation.
  25. fuckyouraw777
    Hot! I guess burying your dick in your arse was one way to avoid mosquito bites on it!

Other #BBBH Sites…

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Top Bareback Porn Sites…

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.