hntnhole

1 hour ago, Cutedelicategay said:

During the AIDS era we got brainwashed by authorities regarding condoms

I disagree.  As the hiv crises unfolded, condoms were the only way to maintain any kind of sexual license.  Guys we knew, guys we didn't know, guys everywhere were dying daily.  At first, no one knew why, other than the fact that "some disease was killing us" out there.  Our fuckjoints became ghastly reminders of our previously celebrated lives.  Bars closed.  Bathhouses became forlorn monuments to what was.  We retreated to our homes, and tried to keep in touch with our friends on the phone.  Guys were dying in the streets, in the clinics (assuming they could find one that wasn't already filled to the rafters), there were constant announcements of "celebrations of life" as more and more of us died horrible, terrible, agonizing deaths.  Condoms (and ceasing all sexual activity, save for our life-partners, were the only possible protection at the time, and condoms were not 100% reliable.  

You sound like you're young enough not to have gone through those hellish days.  If that's the case, be thankful.  No one "brainwashed" us, we just wanted to live to see another day.

20 hours ago, Cumfilledbottomboi said:

Not now, not months from now, not two years from now, not 3 years from now.

If you don't mind .....

Of course he will leave office - either in an ambulance or a paddy-wagon.  His support is waning quickly, and not just in Congress.  All the usual reports - never lowered high prices for goceries, etc .... imposing tariffs that only he believes are useful .... trying to hide the Epstein shit .... tearing down the E wing, in favor of some garishly-furnished ballroom, .... beating the wardrums in South America, to say nothing of his paramilitary hooligans creating mischief throughout the county,  

There is only one possible way he remains in office after 3 years from now:  creating some national "emergency", upon which he will attempt to disband the Constitution.  That would be his final act of desperation, if he even lives that long.  The more desperate he becomes, the more clearly those who actually still believe in him will see the error they've made.  He is fading fast - both in body and in spirit.  

I don't think it'll be all that long; the Bearded Blunder will assume his Constitutionally-appointed role, be evicted at the next election, and we can begin the task of rebuilding our Democracy.  Far too many millions of Americans are genuinely exhausted of this lurching from crises to crises to even worse crises.  He'll become the sorriest footnote in American history, and rightly so.  

On 11/10/2025 at 6:16 PM, SamBedManc said:

he’s become a total slut

That's interesting .... I would have thought he'd become less so, but then that's just an impression. 

It doesn't seem logical to become even more cock-starved after that kind of alteration; maybe it points to more to the thought-process than an actual biological reaction? 

Those two reactions (intellectual & biological) may well work in tandem to deepen, expand the inexhaustible sexual hunger?  When I kept that cumdump a number of years ago, the first thing he wanted (after a bit of "bathroom" time) was loads fucked up his breedhole.  Often, mine was his first load of the day, but he was focused only on hard raw cock up his gut.  He was one of those "butch" bottoms anyway, and had a huge list of guys that he'd take, whenever they wanted him.  But then, that was his purpose.  Often, when I had something else to do that morning, when I got home there would be several cars in the driveway, parked nearby, and when he heard me come in the door, he'd call out "Daddy, I'm in the slingroom taking loads ..."  If there were groceries to put away, I'd do that first, but then go into the slingroom and praise him, welcome whoever else was in there waiting their turn.  He was relatively hairy, and his hole always tasted great.  I think hole-hair helps hold the loads in place ... at least until breakfast time anyway.

Hope you're managing to deal with your sexual requirements ... lust is a terrible thing to waste.  

22 minutes ago, PozBearWI said:

Will they behave differently in the coming months?

Well, my fingers are crossed.  The impetus seems to be that finally the Epstein shit has hit the fan, His Nibs is shaking in his booties, and lo - after these many years - the R's are finally smalling the rot they've been supporting.  It's all in flux presently, but that won't last all that long.  

Once the R's realize that His Nibs is a liability, not an asset to their careers, they'll stumble over themselves to preserve their jobs; perhaps too little, too late.  

Ever notice how beautiful - almost ethereally beautiful - a guy is when he's mouth-worshipping a hard, raw cock?  

Especially when he's got another one rutting in his hole .... 

21 hours ago, Phallarchist said:

You're jamming something big and hard into a soft and easily damaged internal organ.

On the contrary;  I don't just "jam it in".  I have zero interest in causing harm or pain; I want the bottom to feel fantastic.  I want to reinforce his dependency on taking loads off raw cock, and doing it to the best of his ability.  

That means I take the time to eat the hole (unless he hasn't prepped), make love to the hole orally, play with it, finger it, and when he's ready, give him what he needs.  My goal is to give the bottom a fantastic fuck ... reinforce his lusts ... enhance his enduring hunger.  I don't want to harm anyone; that's completely antithetical to what I believe in.  

The one exception to these first two paragraphs, is if I'm negotiating a B/d S/m or 'Leather" scene, which requires a formal "negotiation" between the two men prior (by at least a day or two) and in some non-sexual environment.  Usually, I meet them and buy us lunch, and conduct the negotiation that way.  I never just "jam it in", but I do fuck bottoms in the fuckjoints that have been taking loads for a while, and are already loose from taking previous loads.    

I have absolutely zero interest in harming a guy, as you suggest in the above quote.  Your assumption is false.  

This is one of those "odd" situation:

Yesterday, my doorbell rang, I opened the door to find a good-looking guy with one of those unmistakable "fuck me" smiles on his mug.  I don't use the "fuck-apps", and I had no idea who he was, but obviously one of the guys in the 'hood had made a hook-up arrangement, and the guy rang the wrong doorbell*  However, I knew that a certain "snowbird" who lives two houses down the block, and has more than his share of hungry bottoms off the fuck-apps, had just arrived from back north.  

I suggested to the guy that maybe he was headed to that house, not mine (I'm no "trick-thief" - I'll get my own, thankyouverymuch), so I just suggested he might want to confirm the address with his soon-to-be ass loader.  He smiled brilliantly, said thanks, maybe some other time, and I agreed.  

*which, in this neighborhood, would generally be no problem at all.  In my block, at least half the homes are "friends".  

12 hours ago, BlueSaphir said:

Democrats have to be more united

Agreed.  That said, fortunately or un, Dems tend to be far less regimented than R's, and more like a herd of critters running in all directions at once.  Given that there are tons of issues to consider (politically), it's almost a miracle that Dems coalesce on anything other than the major issues of the day.  We may be a fractious lot, but our hearts are in the right place.  The more good for everyone, the better for everyone.  

Spit is better than commercial lube, but nothing beats loads from previous cocks.  

Pozzible:  

Thanks for those links:  from your fingers to Whatever's ear !!!  

17 hours ago, Pozguyinchi said:

Sounds like you would fit nicely.

Since I'm an ex-Chicagoan (lived there for many years), maybe it did !!!  😜

Lived up in the 49th .... 

21 hours ago, tobetrained said:

I’m unsure how you interpreted my comment by your reply

What I meant reflects the old political saying;  "all politics are local", in that the local pols are actually available for individuals to interact with; "in-the-flesh".  

You're really a first-class storyteller ... particularly on subjects like this one.  I hope you publish one of these days; you owe your talents to an even wider audience. 

On 11/10/2025 at 2:43 PM, Str8BottomFaggot said:

I think it is merely an acceptance that a Man fucking a faggot is an act of violence.

I see it differently, but then I'm not a bottom either.  

Men fucking men is, at least to me, a celebration of their true selves, sometimes when either/both feel that they must mask their true selves for a variety of reasons (cultural, work-related, whatever). 

To me, when a Top fucks and fills a bottom, he's offering up his innermost, core sexual needs to breed, to another man whose innermost, core sexual needs are to take hard raw cock into his body, and receive the load as a reward for his acceptance of who and what he is.  I have never felt a sense of violence (or the anger that would engender that sense) when I breed other men.  For me, it's a joy-filled experience, so much so that I seek it out over and over and over again.  

15 hours ago, PozToxVersPig said:

fuck that treasure island media shit

LOL .... you're not kidding !!! 

I suppose the filmmakers want the viewers to see that the cock actually did shoot a load, and then the residue gets pumped up the hole.  And, I suppose that some of the load could get fucked up the hole after the show's over, but it seems to be weak as water .....  Far better to pump the entire load up the hole, and then some sperm-starved bystander can spoon it out with his tongue to prove the point,.  

tobetrained & Pozzible: 

Just so you're both aware, this is a fascinating discussion, and I'm sure there are plenty more BZ'ers reading, learning, and appreciating the exchange just as much as I am.  Thanks.  

1.  That's something that needs to be mentioned up front, and I consider corporal actions as needing prior notice.  

2.  Of course.  A group of men celebrating their sexual depravities en-masse is always more fun.  

3.  I don't particularly like really tight holes.  If I'm not the first/only Top, I'll more likely compliment a looser guy.  

On 11/5/2025 at 3:00 AM, yoursinmine said:

when continuing to fuck would feel better? 

4. above.  We Tops generally think of pumping our load the farthest in as possible as more possessive (I mean, in that moment).  Thus the "connection" is amplified, concentrated.  

5,  I don't know .... I seldom do that.  Maybe they like to watch a hungry hole gobble their entire cock, over and over again?  

6.  Never.  If the day wasn't what it should have been, then I'm not inclined to drown it in another guy's hole.  Mental acuity on the Top's part is really important.  

7.  C,  

19 hours ago, Pozzible said:

I have to clean house tonight so that housekeeper can come tomorrow.

LOL ..... I thought I was the only one that did that !!!  Plus, the housekeeper is a very "experienced" gay man, knows just about every other gay man in Ft. L.  Usually, we talk politics more than he pretends to clean .... great guy though. 

I make it a point to be doing something else while he cleans the bathroom ...... 

On 11/8/2025 at 6:50 AM, Pozguyinchi said:

I know I will never be tight so I should learn to embrace it.

Well said.  Each of us probably wishes we were x, or had y, or this or that.   Being a bit on the thick side, it's just easier for me to rut in either an already well-fucked hole, or a guy with an elastic hole that can open more or close up more, depending on the cock fucking him.  

Really tight holes aren't my first choice .... or second or third.  

On 10/31/2025 at 2:51 PM, tobetrained said:

I think this is a Dem tactic as they run so many of the our cities.

That may be the case, however the closer any elected official is (I mean proximity), the more closely they can monitor where the electorate happens to be on any given issue.  This would reasonably enable those locally-elected Dems to be in close touch with their constituents, which would be a good thing.  

It seems the farther up the food-chain a pol is, the less they tend to be in touch with any local issues in their district.  The way to change that isn't all that tough:  have demonstrations, write letters, make phone calls, organize - in other words, do something.  

On 11/10/2025 at 2:51 PM, NordicBtm said:

a guy has cum inside after I asked him not to

Wellllll .... I don't quite agree, but that's just my own view.  If a bottom says fuck me, but breed some other hole, I respect that.  On the other hand, I can respect your viewpoint too.  Basically, you let the Top decide which hole he's going to breed, and if you look anything like that pic in your profile, you'll get all the loads pumped your hole that any guy could ask for .... 

6 hours ago, Pozzible said:

Factions can align with different parties on different issues.

Excellent point.  Thanks.  

On 8/19/2025 at 8:58 AM, hungry_hole said:

On 8/19/2025 at 8:58 AM, hungry_hole said:

"Go deep when you shoot your load",

 

Well, at least you got it how you wanted it ... sounds like a win/win to me .... 

What's worst about this "numbers" thing is, how can we be expected to remember guys we fucked decades ago?  Some guy walks up to me, says this or that about me fucking him, and I have no idea when or where, let alone how long ago. 

I just try to murmur something affirmative, smile, glance at my watch, and say "seeya around" or somesuch.  

The usual fuckjoint .... it's always waaaaay worth it.