hntnhole

Well, just getting up in the morning poses a risk (slipping in the shower, some damn thing), so do we go back to bed and hide under the covers? 

No.  We proceed with our lives, and if/when the piper comes to be paid, we fuck the piper instead.  

You're all a bunch of PIGS .... so move the hell over and let me in too 😁

On 9/15/2025 at 3:11 PM, hntnhole said:

Recent reporting in the major media has it that the murderer is one of us:

This was repeated today, again on CNN, during the noon-hour broadcast.  

By "one of us", I meant the killer is gay - not one of us BZ'ers. 

Then again, who knows .......

My other half loved sucking cocks off most, but he loved taking loads up his gut too. 

One odd thing though - once he'd "had" a guy, he didn't want it again.  Always wanted to take "new" cock, which wasn't a problem for me at all.  We were a really great match, and I miss him a lot.  Not just for the sex, for everything else too.  

Gotta run .... PAX .....

1 minute ago, PozBearWI said:

The man is a  sink hole of need.

May I borrow that quote ???   PLEASE ????????????????

23 minutes ago, PozBearWI said:

Can  we suffice to say that the killer isn't "one of us" either?  

For me, sure.  

For the "kill the queers" crowd, I wonder .... 

For me, sure.   

For those who believe we should all suffer Kirk's fate, maaaaybe. 

On 9/14/2025 at 1:46 AM, Poz50something said:

Leviticus 20:13

This truly ancient book (third book in the Old Testament) dates from around 1400 BCE with parts to perhaps as late as the 3rd Century BCE.  

Interesting as a historical collection of documents, it reflects the needs of the then-nomadic Tribes as they wandered the Levant.  

Certainly of historic interest, but relevancy to our modern world is perhaps questionable.  Anyone can reach back into the distant past to find quotations that serve their own interests.  I am certainly not denigrating the value of these ancient beliefs, but we have advanced considerably in our systems of government, our knowledge of science, human sexuality, etc.  

Killing people who are different than ourselves is simply not excusable, and that goes both ways.  What the shooter did is inexcusable, as is excusing hatreds via ancient texts.  What was "wisdom" thousands of years ago is, of course, interesting, but we have progressed far beyond those ancient hatreds, haven't we?

Of ancillary interest:

Recent reporting in the major media has it that the murderer is one of us:  he and his trans "boy-cum-girlfriend" (unclear at what stage of the transformation is presently), suggests that Kirk's anti-gay pronouncements were at least a part of the killers motivation.  It's too early to be definitive about all of this, other than to say - yet again - that harming others, let alone killing others - is simply not ok. 

Even if any of this turns out to be true, it will none the less give license to those who hate us to further denigrate our very existence. 
 

On 9/11/2025 at 8:50 PM, SomewhereonNeptune said:

we have kids who are not yet maturationally developed at 13 or even younger

I see that as the crux if the issue. 

True, maybe there are some that actually are developed enough to make adult decisions about their sexuality, or even about the gender assigned at birth.  Those handful, however, are not anywhere near enough to accommodate the greater majority that are not able to understand the issue, let alone cause major alterations in their future.  

What counts is what's best for the greater majority of kids.  We can't legislate on the basis of what's (perhaps) proper for a slim minority.  Kids have plenty of their lives left after they achieve the age of majority, and we shouldn't manipulate the law to accommodate the few that might be affected. 

I wouldn't vote to change the age of majority.

On 9/13/2025 at 4:53 AM, Warmnsalty said:

Thoughts? Should I?

Of course you should, if that's the statement you want to make.  Were I you, I would - and I'd be ready to answer some questions. 

What I wouldn't be ready to do, is accept any judgements arising from fear or ignorance.  I'd parry firmly, politely, but parry none-the-less.  

After nothing but blathering idiocy about Chicago, it's Mayor, the Governor of Illinois, and who knows what else, it seems President TACO* has run out of oomph re: his threats to "take over" that "Toddling Town", in favor of sending his storm troopers to Memphis, TN.

This is in direct response to the State Government, the City Government, the citizens of that world-class city, as well as much of Illinois.  I lived there for much of my life, and I salute my former neighbors for their courageous stand against this man's perverse delusions.  I was a very, very small cog in the political machinery of that fantastic city for a number of years, and I remain a very proud (if ex) Chicagoan.  I'm hearing from many former neighbors, a handful of pols, and they're all damn proud of having the balls to stand up to the President.  Yes, Chicago has always had "big city" problems, as does every major metropolitan city.  Yes, Chicago has managed to keep the faith however, and gradually made life better.  His Nibs owns a tower on the N bank of the Chicago river, and I hear it's foundations are failing - just like the owner.  

So, take heart, non-maga folks.  He can be stopped. 

*his most recent moniker: Trump Aways Chickens Out (TACO for short), is in direct response to the State Government, the City Government, the citizens of that world-class city, as well as much of Illinois.  Faced with unflinching resolve by Illinoisans, he again has pointed his derangement elsewhere, rather than grow some shred of a backbone.  Fortunately for him, even he can recognize a battle he can't win.  

First, I will confess that I'd never heard of him before his tragic death.  Thus, I am unfamiliar with his message(s), or his points of view.   

What I am familiar with, however, is the fact that murdering people one doesn't agree with, politically, philosophically, religiously, what-ever-ly. is never, ever the answer.  Apparently, as I've learned in the major-media coverage, his message was crisp, sometimes blunt, but never calling for blood.  Yet, that's what some deranged kid answered with.  

How is it that some of us arrive at that answer?  Silencing the opposition?  Actually murdering someone we disagree with?  Varying points of view can - and should be - vigorously debated in our country, and there's nothing wrong - and everything right about that.  

I'm not a doctor, I'm not a psychotherapist, nor competent to clinically comment on whatever is wrong in that regard.  Surely, however, we can all agree to condemn murder as though that could ameliorate any political situation.  

I did notice, however, that the little man that runs the US Governmental Agency regarding events like these, held up the press conference for hours until his plane from DC managed to get to Utah, so his face could be included in the officials present at the press conference.   

My favorite fuckjoint. 

Attendance wasn't all that great - we're in the rainy season here, and lots of streets are flooded, so I wasn't all that surprised.  

15 hours ago, SomewhereonNeptune said:

Would you mind coming over on Nextdoor

At first read, I shuddered .... I haven't ever used Nextdoor, and I did notice your proverbial tongue-in-cheek, so I'm hoping for the best on your behalf.  

The neighbors to the North are drug guys, and literally "screaming queens".  They have parties (very loud, many guys) regularly that draw the cops attention.  I've never called the cops on them, since I have those thick, double-paned windows, and I tend to go with the "live & let live" agenda.  One of their "extended-stay" regulars hanged himself from a light fixture a couple years ago.  Seemed like a really nice kid - I even helped him fix his car once.  

The neighbors to the South are a pair of intensely "private" guys, and very quiet, but they do peek over the fence when I'm using the "outdoor" sling in the back yard.  That part I couldn't care less about.  Neither of them has a snowball's chance.  

6 minutes ago, verbalBTTM said:

clutching my pearls

LOL .... I'd gladly pay to see whatever horrified you to the point of "clutching your pearls" 😄

9 hours ago, Guest ���� said:

Unless it's a moderator misbehaving.

The moderators don't do stuff like that.  They're mostly referees, controlling what can be posted, what can't, and they're here for our protection; not theirs.  This site (or any other, for that matter) could turn into one big fat mess without the guidelines being explained and enforced.  

I just hope they get paid well for doing it, but it's n.o.m.b.  

Another option is to simply skip over whatever content the potential ignoree posts.  Just don't bother to read posts/replies of guys you don't want to bother with.  

I've been reading posts - on and off - on this thread for a while now:  what I can't quite understand is why guys like us would care one way or the other, whether the guy is "straight", "married", or anything else besides needing sex with other men.  

At the fuckjoints, I've never heard any guy say something like "I'm straight & married", or anything else even remotely similar.  Usually, guys say nothing more than "gimme that cock" or similar - if anything at all.  

A guy can call himself "straight", "married", "the man in the moon", or any other qualifier - and it doesn't change anything.  Talk is nothing more than that.  He's there to either suck cock, get sucked, fuck or get fucked, and that's the only thing that matters.  I don't give a hoot whether he calls himself "straight" or any other thing. 

He's bent over taking loads, and that's what  care about.  

oops .... Thanks for the reminder 🫢

Well, not much worth having is really free, particularly when the landlord and tenant are both in agreement about what "money" happens to be .... anything can be used as "money" 😁

19 hours ago, NWUSHorny said:

that had his ass protected by his clothing

I would have thought that would be enough of a statement too - it always has before.  It's usually in the '90's here this time of year, and everyone wears shorts (I don't mean underwear, I mean street-clothes shorts).  How that guy even saw me is beyond me.  That darkroom is pitch-black, and one navigates with hands out - sliding their feet along the floor -  feeling their way.  

Life is wonderful - full of surprises of all kinds.  

At my usual fuckjoint.  

One thing happened, though, that was unusual. 

I was rutting in a hole in the darkroom, and some guy somewhere behind me, didn't just feel up my ass (inside the shorts I was wearing), he reached around and tried to unbuckle my belt.  Since I almost never bottom, and then only with that one buddy I got through covid with (rather modest cock).  Thus, I do not engage in any of what I'll call a thorough, 'prep' regimen.  Just a plain old shower.  

This guy - sight unseen - seemed determined he was going to fuck me, and I had to hang onto my belt buckle to make sure he didn't.  There's almost never any kind of situation in the dark room - at least that I know of.  Besides - I was busy fucking a hole in the first place.  Lots of guys in the porn vids have a "fuck-train", and that's just fine when it's what each guy enjoys. Apparently, that guy simply assumed that every guy is versatile, which is assuming a bit too much.  And, my ass isn't anything to look at in the first place.  Never did get a look at the guy - but he eventually gave up and left the darkroom. 

Just because a guy is fucking another guy, doesn't mean he wants to get his own hole fucked.   

18 hours ago, SomewhereonNeptune said:

I gather that point got lost in how some folks might have viewed the OP's post.

Apparently it did.  

In my book, it remains the case that when I catch a bug, I won't go out breeding holes all night until it's over with.  That happens occasionally, and at least my conscience is clear.  I wouldn't knowingly share an std with anyone either.