hntnhole

and it just keeps getting worse ...

Today, the major media is reporting that our "president" is after ... wait for it .... GREENLAND !!!!   That landmass has "belonged" to Denmark ever since the Age of the Vikings (check out the Kalmar Union for a more detailed explanation).  

After seizing an oil tanker heading to (apparently) Russia, the arrogation of "standing world order" is not merely undermined, it is "in-you-face" threatened, with implications for NATO, Russia, China, and beyond. 

The implications are world-wide, and threaten realignment on a world-wide scale.  There is, apparently, no depth of depravity the leaders of the US will not stoop to.  

On 1/5/2026 at 4:22 PM, NordicBtm said:

My big issue is though that many tops will pound very hard without gripping the hips properly

That's just one of the issues Tops need to learn.  There are too many guys that think that just because they Top, they don't need to hone their skills, and just hammer away.  

I'm all for a Top learning/making certain techniques "his own", but just banging away at a hole doesn't begin to cut the mustard.  Topping is a "skill", and we're not born with it.  We Tops may be born "to it", but we need to learn our skills just as we expect bottoms to learn theirs.  And, just banging away, without a shred of finesse, is amateurish at best.   That old saying "make love, not war" (from the Nam days), applies equally, and across the board.  

I want a bottom that knows his craft, and expects the same from his Tops. 

10 hours ago, bareback-flipflop said:

I love eating holes. I can’t imagine sex without rimming. It belongs to my normal routine of sex. I use it to open a hole and also to keep it wet. Finally I love to eat coms out of it. It’s just better if it someone else’s cum.

^ This.  Perfectly said, bareback-flipflop.  

Eating a good-lookin hairy hole that's been busy taking loads (hairy holes help keep the loads from dripping out) is simply the most "haute" of all sexual cuisines for me.  There's not much I won't do, but my veryveryvery favorite is eating/breeding an already well-bred hole.  

13 minutes ago, tallslenderguy said:

trump, putin, xi jinping, are birds of a feather. I

I appreciate the nod to a traditional phrase, but I think cockroaches would be more accurate.  

15 minutes ago, tallslenderguy said:

as he references the Monroe Doctrine.

His Corpulence wouldn't know the Monroe Doctrine if it walked up and kicked him in that huge mass of blubber, a.k.a. his ass.  

18 minutes ago, tallslenderguy said:

"promoting the general welfare."

Since ^ is the farthest thing from what passes for his mind, His Corpulence couldn't possibly care less.  There's no such thing as satisfying his ego.

23 minutes ago, tallslenderguy said:

suggesting that trump saw himself as an "alpha."  i loved  many of the responses, particularly from the Alphas among us, eschewing even the notion that trump is alpha. And yet, it only takes a few minutes of listening to realize that many of trumps sycophants and followers see him as such.

Trump thinks he's an Alpha ????  He's barely on the scale at the Omega position, and hanging onto that with all his greasy fingernails.

That's why his "cabinet" is jam-packed with worthless syncophants;  Anyone with any shred of ability wouldn't service his breathtaking need for lip service.  

30 minutes ago, tallslenderguy said:

Our wishes will not be represented and our freedoms will diminish unless we refuse to be divided and band together and fight back. i think banding together is key, because alone, we simply do not have the power to resist, and stave off exhaustion.  

That's how we'll survive, if we survive this morass we're in.  The current situation - worldwide - is fraught with tremendous problems, but there are ways we can a) fight back, and b) push these cretins back into their baby cribs.  

Thanks for sharing your most estimable view, tallslenderboy.  

16 hours ago, Erik62 said:

Kidnapping might be a too soft solution

Well, I definitely agree .... but then he's just an overgrown "kid/spoiled little brat" in the first place.  

wellllllllll .... I don't know of any fuckjoints around here that aren't all raw .... if some guy uses a condom, that's the rare exception. 

30 minutes ago, hntnhole said:

What did our church do?  Collected as much money as possible, bought that building out from under the initial buyer, and tore the place down.  And that took care of that

(correcting an error)

It wasn't just that particular building, destined to become a "bookstore" that was acquired and torn down, it was the entire block that was purchased, torn down, and turned into an adjunct parking lot for the church, 1 block away.  All of this happened well after I had taken it on the lam and ditched that burg.  My dad was on the church board (natch), which is how I heard about it.  

While we (meaning the US) doesn't know all that much yet, it appears that the majority of oil reserves in Venezuela are quite heavy, dense, underground oil fields, as oppose to those in the Middle East, which are lighter, less "dense" crude.  

It doesn't sound to me like Venezuela possesses the infrastructure to refine that heavy crude, at least to the extent that would make it a rather profitable expenditure of State funds.  So, what is the US going to do with the Venezuelan oilfields?  A certain someone hates to wait for his gratification, like most infants, he wants it now, and even he knows he won't live much longer. 

So what's the point of all this mess?  Yes, there are drug-runners in Venezuela, just like there are drug-runners in numerous countries in this hemisphere.  However, as any high school level economics student knows, shutting down one country's drug-running efforts just moves the action so some other country.  I wonder just how crucial to this folly the issue of "drug-running" really is.  The issue of taking a country-full of heavy crude, still in the ground seems unworthy of all this sturm und drang,  The issue of shutting down a source of illegal drugs coming into the US seems equally questionable.  

It's also possible that dividing the globe up into hemispherical "spheres of interest" could be the crux of the issue, in which case the Greenlanders (as well as the Taiwanese) need to figure out other sources of support, at least potential sources.  

On 1/4/2026 at 1:42 PM, Pozguyinchi said:

I think there is more than one bar there now.

Well, glad to know that.  It's been ages since I was back there - so hopefully things have picked up.  After posting that, I remembered one event that demonstrates just how anti-gay is used to be.  

So 6th St was "Lutheran Church Row".  For at least a mile there was a big old Lutheran (ELCA) church every few blocks, and the one I grew up in was on 5th Ave & 6th St.  One block east was a business-district street (7th St), and it was a bit rundown in those days.  Someone bought a store-front building on 7th St (one block directly east of the church), and rumor had it that the new owner wanted to put in a "dirty" bookstore there.  

What did our church do?  Collected as much money as possible, bought that building out from under the initial buyer, and tore the place down.  And that took care of that.  

I'm glad to hear that there's another gay bar there (hopefully cleaner) now.  

20 hours ago, Str8convert said:

I can't stop thinking about it and wanting to try it again.

Congrats, str8convert !!!  Sometimes it can take years before we recognize that sweet song, calling us to our sexual fulfillment, but at some point that magnetic  music manages to sink into our consciousness.  There's no reason to "stop thinking about it" or "wanting to try it again", and every reason under the sun to spread your sexual wings and keep whoring your load-starved breedhole.   

Isn't it cool to figure out a part of our nature that we hadn't considered before ???  Congrats all over again.

22 hours ago, IntoBBvisitor said:

that you could fuck who ever you wanted

welllll .... sorry to burst your bubble, but the fact is that no, tops don't get to fuck whoever we want.  We usually get to, but not always.  

On 10/28/2025 at 7:21 PM, Pozzible said:

Spcing

LOL .... perfectly done 😉

LOL .... welllllll .... to paraphrase an old saying:  "a cock in your hole is worth two waiting in line ..."

I completely understand that your focus would be entirely on the cock fucking you, rutting back on it properly, and focusing on that cock and the one after it, rather than a couple of unfortunates.  You were busy, I appreciate that.  

It's guys like you that inspire so many other guys to work towards achieving their own sexual goals.  ❤️

8 hours ago, Pozzible said:

don’t know how i missed this when you posted it. Where did you go to school that they had nude swimming? Now, it sounds very hot. But when I was in 7th grade, I felt a lot of shame in the showers because everyone else had much bigger cocks. (Maybe not everyone, but that’s how I remember it.) I don’t think I ever showered after PE class again. 

Grew up in Rockford, Illinois.  Went away to undergrad, and never moved back.  Visited the parents somewhat regularly, all of that, but always left as soon as I thought it was appropriate.  There was a grand total of one gay bar* there, in the second-largest metro area (including burbs) after Chicago & burbs.  There were, of course, a number of "boners", and those guys got razzed like crazy, and I only remember one guy actually shitting in the pool.  He was a hero - his act of heroism got swimming class cancelled that day.  

Just a guess, but I think the naked swimming thing was just so the parents didn't have to go buy swim suits for their kids. Generally, back in Rockford, pennies got pinched to the point of Abe Lincoln getting ingrown whiskers ..... 

*in a rundown-stretch of State Street, no one ever used the front door, but would park in a lot behind all the stores-buildings and go in the back door of the dump.  Owned by a cop, which is why it managed to exist in the first place.  The really closeted guys parked a block further away, by 1st Svenska Lutersk Kyrka (1st Swedish Lutheran Church), as opposed to other Lutheran churches of other Synods.   

On 1/2/2026 at 4:53 PM, NordicBtm said:

waiting to breed me and not fucking the 2 bottoms next to me

Couldn't you have suggested to a couple of tops waiting in your line to at least rut in those other two bottoms next to you?  They could save the load for your particularly hot hole, and the other two could at least get some action while the lineup for your hole proceeded from cock to cock to cock .... 

Maybe I'm just too altruistic ..... it's been an issue my entire life, I guess.  

Well ...... they were never all that high in the first place, so I guess I never did have that far to fall .... 

All I really care about is whether or not the bottom has done his preparatory duty properly.  

22 hours ago, PozBearWI said:

But real guys, in person, is what I crave, not a pretty fake picture.

AMEN !!!

I think of AI porn pretty much the same as I think of "regular" porn, either printed or on tape - i.e. something that's better than Readers Digest, but not much.    

When all is said and done, real, in-the-flesh actual guy-to-guy sex is what interests me.  Porn is ok, if it scratches the itch, but in the end, it's just imaginary, but at least the actors are "real".  

In the survey, I thought I'd be among a handful of other voters, but - pleasantly surprisingly - I voted with the majority both times.  I'd call that a "throw-down" to the AI folks:  Improve your product or suffer the consequences.  

19 minutes ago, PozToxVersPig said:

I might shoot you a DM if that's okay

Of course it's ok.  Consider yourself invited !!!

My favorite fuckjoint - and it was simply crazy over there last night.  Even though it's unusually been cold here (40's nights), it was packed.  

I don't feel badly at all about 2025, sexually speaking.  So, if 2026 turns out to be similar, and I see no reason it shouldn't be, that'll be fine with me.  

21 hours ago, PozToxVersPig said:

"life without taking loads was simply not worth living."  I don't think that's fair or representative of what occurred.

Thanks for your interesting response, PozToxVersePig.  I appreciate it; these discussions are one of the major reasons I enjoy BZ.  

to the quote above, the implication is/was the fact that a certain type of learned behavior was suddenly cut off, in the view of the majority of their peers at that time.  As you point out, yes - I was a part of the community at that time, and while it seemed a stunning choice for most, there actually were guys that felt that their lives were so interwoven with their sexual practices, nothing else was worth the bother.  I thought then, and I think now that was an over-reaction to all the burgeoning mortalities, but that's my un-researched opinion.  There were guys I tangentially "knew" who became so depressed, they simply ended their lives, rather than wait for the grinding down of their bodies, that whole horrific process.   

For that matter, when one of the gay news-weeklies (Gay Chicago) began publishing all the notifications, it went out of business because no one wanted to pick it up anymore.  I'm not saying that level of despair was widespread, but it did exist, and I find no fault with the men who made that seemingly-impossible choice.  One guy simply laid down in our driveway and died.  Imagine trying to process that in your mind.  

21 hours ago, PozToxVersPig said:

had a formal position on resisting the use of condoms and started a resurgence and perhaps created the sub-culture of "barebacking" as a subcommunity.

That's an interesting p.o.v., and perhaps it has merit.  I'll chew on that one for a while ... 

I think that being "forced" into using barriers (assuming one wanted to live for a myriad of reasons), automatically created an 'anti-barriers' reaction in men who had become immersed in the various "anti" movements in the country, and either felt that "it couldn't happen to me" or simply didn't care anymore.  After all, we had marched, we had organized, we had almost kicked down the societal doors to be allowed out of the closet, and that was a huge achievement.  There was a mindset of "yes, we can and we will", at least in the major metro areas.  Rather than "created", it was more a re-normalization of what had always been the norm.  

21 hours ago, PozToxVersPig said:

I don't believe they were "so attached to fucking 'raw'" as you put it

If you accept that there is a level of "connection" between two men when they fuck raw, that is unavailable when they use barriers, then perhaps you can understand how displeasing barriers was/is to some men.  This website exists for men that are disinclined to use barriers when they fuck, and those types of men have always been around.  Thus, I stand by the phrasing initially used.  Thank you for your perspective, never-the-less.  

22 hours ago, PozToxVersPig said:

So I think you over simplified, by a lot,

Sharing opinions about all kinds of issues, relevant to our particular needs or not, is probably the most pleasurable part of BZ for me.  Thanks for your opinions and your post, however I don't believe I oversimplified by a lot (sic).

On 8/17/2025 at 9:29 AM, BarebackedBear said:

"The forbidden" that we must never do

... if we wanted to live our our lives.   There were a handful of guys that were so offended by having to use rubbers - in other words, became so "attached" to fucking raw - that they actually kept taking raw cock, knowing it may very well kill them.  This was before PrEP or similar appeared.  

I can't quite wrap my head around those choices, but I knew a few for whom life without taking loads was simply not worth living.  When any one "thing" simply takes over one's life - whatever it is - the results can be tragic. 

Now, of course, the medical arts can offer us ways to live our lives and maintain a sexual life relatively free of what used to be virtually guaranteed mortality.  Every single one of us should be grateful for the choices we currently have. 

Those choices came at a terrible price. 

On 12/28/2025 at 1:26 AM, Guest Josh said:

Just curious where do the day pass guys keep their stuff?

Well, you don't have to keep the door to your room (if you get one) cracked open.  Just keep the room-key (comes with an elastic wrist-band) so you can close and lock it.  That way, if a guy you run into wants a slingfuck, you and accommodate* him (or, obviously, the reverse). 

Cruise around, do what you want/need to do, anywhere you decide to do it.  You have options at I. L.  

That said, be certain to check the local weather forecast.  Lately it's been really cold, and that's about the only thing that can put a damper on outside sex.  Around here, the mid 60's is considered really cold.  There wouldn't be many locals around, when the weather isn't in the high 70's/low 80's. 

I wonder what attendance at the fuckjoints will be tonight:  Hopefully there will be plenty of guys full of "anti-freeze" out tonight 💦💦💦

*there's a sling in every room.

Actually, not at my usual fuckjoint.  

Was invited to a small group-event Sunday night at a guy's place (I know him of course, but we're not close friends), there were 6 guys there, 3 of each "persuasion".  One was his "new" boyfriend (read "latest"), a guy from the Islands.  He's the type that, if he's going to do it, he does it to the 9's - there was plenty of great food/drinks, his pool was heated (it's been cold as cunt around here lately), and there's a sign forbidding any swimming suits, lots of cock-sucking, plenty of fucking - all raw.  It was a lot of fun, and I didn't have to drive  - just walked over there.  

Welcum new members ... we look forward to hearing more from each of you !!!