hntnhole

Two questions: 

Was that blue '49 Willys still parked in that diner's parking lot on the corner ??? 

One more:  Living in Chicago, were you from R originally? 

I can't think of any other reason for a Chicagoan to visit The Office 🤔

18 hours ago, Guest Guest said:

Wouldn't it be nice if we could live in a world where every member of the LGBTQIA+ community supported the rights of every other member of the community

Since we're not offered the opportunity (yet, hopefully), here's a substitute 👍 for my "upvote".

The Office, in Rockford IL.   Owned by a local cop (which probably allowed it to even be there). 

What a delightful dump  .... 

I haven't worn one for ages ...

I want as little obstruction as possible between my cock and it's target .... well-worn 501's ... one quick tug and presto - ready of action.  

14 hours ago, cockslutcumdump said:

If you know what mean 🙂.

Yeah, I reckon we do - and thanks for your response.  😉

15 hours ago, Pozzible said:

it DEPENDs on WHOSE hole.

I understand that completely .... just because some other guy(s) fucked/bred a hole, that fact doesn't translate into creating something that was never there in the first place.  The hole needs to possess certain criteria to be edible, which can (and should) vary from guy to guy, and these criteria vary from guy to guy.  

Thanks, Guest STS, for that most informative addition to the subject.  Clearly, you're well-aware of the issue, and I appreciate your commentary.

19 minutes ago, NordicBtm said:

It is very simply that

Well said.  Nothing difficult to understand. 

For Tops, sharing our dna with other guys is totally natural, emotionally healthy, and sexually thrilling.  Even better, the more we do it the more we need to do it.  If anything about raw fucking is addictive, it's because there's no better way to connect with our brothers than to fuck/get fucked - particularly in a group setting.  One to one is great, but a crowd of men breeding each other is fan-fukkin-tastic.  

Almost all the fucking I do is in one of the fuckjoints, which means I have to park and walk into the fuckjoint.  Thus, I have to be wearing clothes to get from A to B.  An old pair if 501's, a plain t-shirt, maybe a pair of engineer's does it for me.  

1 hour ago, Labtmguy said:

don't like to floss while I eat

LOL ..... I reckon I wouldn't either !!!!!

But then, for me, there's a bit of a difference between flossing and eating out a hot, hungry, well-seeded hole.  

I don't think of breeding guys asses as a "fetish"  -  for us, it's simply the way we have sex.  

Sure, when hiv came along, it was either bag it or else.  But the treatments came, we took them, and kept on fucking the natural way, just as we always have.

POLL:

SCOTUS considering the issue of trans athletes in public school intramural competitions today.  What they eventually decide may become the standard for a generation or three regarding sports competitions.    

This issue presents a number of questions regarding fair treatment of trans athletes.  While it’s reasonable to want all competitors to receive the same chances as every other competitor, how do we, as a nation aspiring to supporting  equal rights for all, manage to deal with this conundrum?  

Can it be “equal” competition if one competitor is biologically female, and another is biologically male?  Does society need to “adjust” for the inherent inequality between competitors of non-like biological make-up?  Can that even be accomplished fairly? Should some contrivance such as formula adjusting for the biological inequity be invented?    

While sexual orientation is a complex issue, surely a gay orientation shouldn’t prevent one from competitive sports.  How would the issue of medically “becoming” the opposite sex assigned at birth impact the issue of competitive sports?  Should some contrivance be engineered to compensate for the inherent inequality of trans competitors vs non-trans competitors?  How important is it for trans competitors to compete with non-trans competitors?   Is it even possible to “adjust” for the inherent inequality in physical strength?  

I’m sure we all want to be inclusive to the greatest possible extent.  Equal rights for all is a battle we’ve been fighting for decades; we don’t want to regress, but we do want to give everyone an equal chance at achieving their potential, whatever that may entail.  

How stands the (80K+) Crowns?

I think it's based on how much you 1) post original material, 2) reactions, and 3) additions to ongoing conversations/threads.  I hasten to add that I don't know if any of that is actually the case, but it would seem likely.

So, bareback-flipflop, congrats, and whatever you're doing, keep it coming 😉

1 hour ago, edward21uk said:

Not sure why.

To me, it's literally the physical "proof" that the bottom is my favorite kind of bottom:  one that's "head-over-heels" in love with hard, raw cock, and knows that displaying his love for many to witness, feed on, will only get him more hard raw cocks pumping more sperm deep in his hungry hole. 

A hole full of prior loads is a blunt, direct, in-your-face (literally) statement that he's my kind of cumdump ... for these guys, there's no such thing as "enough".  ❤️❤️💦💦

Thanks for sharing your sexcapades with us, NordicBtm. 

Guys that can't managed that kind of fuck-cation just yet will take immense satisfaction in reading about yours, and one day they'll be right next to you, doing what they must.  And, you're use of language is impressive.  

I think your work is great, Pozzible. 

Thanks for taking the time/effort to share your "experiment" with the rest of us.  

I've probably responded to this thread at some point past, so I'll just say that I like guys that don't look like me.  It's not that it's a "hard limit" - I just don't find guys that look like me sexy.  Grew up in a city full of guys that look like me - yawn.  

Welcome, new members, and Happy Breeding in the New Year.  Be sure to write and tell us all about it !!

I've been called every name that might possibly carry a negative connotation - and it hasn't impressed me one iota.  Occasionally, I've even thanked the jerk for the compliment. 

It couldn't matter less to me.  

On 10/16/2025 at 10:06 AM, SamBedManc said:

just didn’t wanna bore people if they weren’t interested 

Don't give that issue a second thought;  if a guy doesn't want to read it, he'll just skip it and go on to the next thread .... 

You've got a remarkably-filthy mind, and I'm sure plenty of BZ'ers want to hear more ... 😇

There's an interesting question of semantics afoot here, in that what's the definition of "highest" vs. "lowest" for us ?

For some, the "highest standards" would be called by some to be the "lowest", in that this level of of sexual lust (called the 'lowest" by some, since it includes complete abandon of selectivity) is, in fact, the most desirable level of debauchery that barebackers can attain:  for bottoms, any hard raw cock, any time, any place - and for Tops, any raw hole, any time, any place with the only qualifier being in some fuckjoint, a private home, i.e. somewhere the general public can't "accidentally" stumble upon the scene-in-progress. 

There are plenty of submissions in the various threads in the vein of "can you top this" - carrying the meaning of ever-deepening lusts for ever-more depraved sexual license.  But, as long as we understand each other, it hardly matters.  

OUR definition of "highest", "lowest" may be the opposite of other, less dedicated folks.  

You're probably right ... isn't it stunning how a person's mind can enable such poor behavior ???

Thanks, tallslenderguy.  

It's not easy to see how things will wash out, and both Elias and Jong Fast are worth considering.  Frankly, it is getting worse, and by the day.  

Where do we run away to, I wonder ..... Minneapolis is out of the running these days; that's for sure 😬 

I think the best course of action is to simply remain in place, and keep fighting for what we believe in.  

5 hours ago, DenverBtmDude said:

hey i just want to put the tip in

If I had a dollar for every time that one worked, I'd have a new Cadillac ..... every year. 

16 hours ago, Erik62 said:

A much harsher penalty would be Trumps complete humiliation in public,

I laughed my way through much of your post, Erik62; you possess a "gift" for insinuation.  That said .....

I'm not sure the man is capable of being humiliated, in the sense that a person would need some sense of self-worth to even feel humiliated, and he possesses not a shred of it.  He knows he's utterly without any measure of merit, he knows he's nothing but yesterdays turd. 

Yet, he craves endorsement of his craven neediness - surely a learned response to his self-knowledge of how desperately he has failed as a human being.  For instance, t's pitiful how he - or any leader - would beg for justification by receiving the Nobel Peace Prize.  If there were such a disgrace as the "Hitler Murder-Millions Prize," his craven thirst for recognition would probably want that one too.  This miscreant - this "accident of nature" - knows his worthlessness deep in the rotten recesses of his mind, which allows him to engage in outrage after outrage; ever deeper, ever more odious. 

There is only one answer, but I doubt my spelling it out would be at all proper.