hntnhole
Senior Members-
Posts
6,953 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Gallery
Everything posted by hntnhole
-
As mentioned: I don't think it's ever a decent thing to lie. Whether it's a this or that, that or this, or a mix of both ... lying is simply not ok. Whatever the contrivance; it's just not ok to lie about stuff. Guys and parry, guys can change the subject, guys can do any number of things to avoid telling the truth. Any astute hearer of the previous will be able to understand quickly that the guy is simply not going to be honest, and either move on or accept the situation. Some may say that the guy in question should not be expected to answer certain questions, and that's a different discussion. The question in this topic though, is clear and unmistakable. And, my answer is no. If/when asked, any decent guy should tell the truth.
-
How and when did you know you were addicted to cum ?
hntnhole replied to IntoBBvisitor's topic in General Discussion
It isn't. What is addictive (or at the very least, habit-forming) however, is the wanton sexual behavior that earns a bottom a Top's load. Better yet, a number of Tops. More, that addiction, properly identified, is extremely addictive, thank Whatever. -
-
"Is stealthing morally okay?" ^ the title of this thread (it's almost a whole blanket of threads by now) could easily be expanded to a wider question: "Is dishonesty morally okay?" While there may be situations where lying can save an innocent life - in wartime, for instance - the basic question would be as directly above. I doubt any person likes to be lied to, and thus that person (i,e. every person) that doesn't care for being lied to should, obviously, refrain from lying to others. There are ways to parry unwelcome, obsequious probing questions, some more blunt than others. In either case, dishonesty is not the proper way to parry the offense. A reply with something like "talk some other time" (the more polite version) or "it's really none of your business" (a more blunt response) is always better than returning a lie with another lie. At least the respondent doesn't stoop to the liar's level.
-
and that is completely honorable, P.T.V.P. It's not asking too much to be completely honest with our (potential) fuckmates; whether in-the-flesh or here on BZ (to a lesser extent, obviously). There's everything right about being honest, and nothing wrong with it; particularly in sexual contexts. If some potential trick doesn't care for some facet of me, that's fine. There are plenty of other holes in the fuckjoint, so each guy can find what he most needs. I too am completely comfortable with being honest about sexual proclivities at the fuckjoints.
-
It never occurred to me to attempt to count .... there would be a number of zero's involved though if I did.
-
-
-
-
What turns you on the most that isn't cock or arse?
hntnhole replied to ff69's topic in General Discussion
Probably two attributes, unrelated to each other: 1. A really debauched, filthy mouth, and 2). A really winsome smile. -
I haven't really noticed this - at least in my favorite fuckjoint. In the darkroom, no one can see anyone; it's just rut in a hole, switch to another one, etc. And, in the rest of the joint, I can't say I've noticed any negative behavior relative to race, or any other divisive qualities. There are some guys that eat way too much, but that's a choice, not a racial or misogynistic thing.
-
My preference is having the bottom bent over, taking loads, one after another after another, and I just squat down, feast on his hole, stand up and start rutting. Speaking isn't necessary, but if he does some drrrty talk, I'll respond in kind.
-
I think that this issue is causing some misunderstanding: Since I was in business for years, I feel able to comment cogently on the issue. I had to hire people, and one of the facets I considered was their "cultural identity", if that makes sense. But it was only one, and not the most important one. Competence, ability to do the job was paramount. However, when there were - oh - say 3 relatively equally-qualified candidates, It was my "right" (and, in my mind, my duty), to consider any cultural issues as well, stressing competency of course, but also having the luxury of more than 1 equally qualified people, I could actually 1) act on my beliefs, and 2) engage an employee on an "equal" basis with every other employee. In that instance, I could allow myself to "empower" at least one minority of some sort (racial, cultural, whatever), simply because that is something I believed in, and it was my company, so I could do it. Only once (out of a number of hires) did an "inclusive" choice turn out to be a poor choice who had to be let go. Now. Since I did have the ability to run the company the way I felt was right and proper, I was able to put my cultural conscience into the mix of issues, and hire someone from an underrepresented cultural group, and I'd alter nothing today, if I still had that company. Point: not everyone has the ability to make decisions that impact underrepresented groups, but everyone can do whatever they're able to make the "playing field" more equal. Whether it's something as small as a kind word, or a smile, or as impactful as hiring someone that needed a job - it all counts equally as doing what we're able to do to make our world a tiny bit more just, more inclusive, more equal, and a tiny bit better.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
double scorp trouble - hot uncut fuck slab.jpeg
hntnhole commented on ff69's gallery image in User Galleries
-
-
-
Other #BBBH Sites…
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.