hntnhole

Agreed.  And, there just may be a sliver of a chance after November.  

If there is a decisive victory for the Dems (it's possible, given the enraged women having lost their rights to health-care), and majorities are reached in each branch (applicable to State races too), we might be able to ditch it once and for all.  Now, given all the electronic doo-dads which are part of voting, the contrivance of the E.C. seems particularly antiquated. 

XX = fingers crossed 

When I was a really little kid I decided to be a garbage man when I grew up.

They got to hang on to railings on the back of the garbage truck, had to jump off and grab the can, empty it, put it back in the yard, and jump on the truck again, so they were all fairly muscular. 

At 6,7,8 years old, it looked like a lot of FUN ..... 

On 4/16/2024 at 6:03 PM, anonCUMtainer said:

This produces the necessity for condoms.

Actually, no it doesn't.  

The choice to pursue 'outside' sex between the two men is what necessitates condom use (to mitigate contracting std's).  The assumption that any/every pair of men that form a relationship must therefore also fuck outside the relationship is faulty.  There are tons of gay men in "closed", happy, fulfilling relationships, 

On 4/16/2024 at 6:03 PM, anonCUMtainer said:

IMHO the reason most "reasonable" men are NOT breeding one another is because of the RISK associated to random, anonymous, M4M sex in contracting all sorts of unpleasant STIs.

It's hardly inflammatory, and one common through the various threads.  Most sexually active gay men take advantage of the medical advances (PrEP, for instance), and reduce the risks of hiv substantially.  Most men don't "pursue" the lesser infections, and get tested / treated regularly against them.  I suppose one could argue that some men don't have sex at all, for fear of std's, and my response to that mindset is, there's risk in everything we do.  

I don't know where you live (the Golden Horseshoe used to be a pancake-house chain, as I recall?), and I'm not asking.  That said, if there's a dearth of Breeders wherever you live I'm sorry to know that.  That said, I can absolutely assure you that there definitely are men Breeding each other, and have been for a number of years, given the advances in the medical arts.  I haven't so much as seen a condom in any of the fuckjoints around here, and there are plenty of them. 

Perhaps that's because most men that are sexually active (with many partners) make the choice to protect themselves as much as possible against the std's, while maintaining their sexual lives.  Perhaps it's because there are a lot of men who simply won't give up their lust for raw sex.  

Merely living our lives is about choosing between different courses of action, how we decide to find our "place" in this life. 

37 minutes ago, ellentonboy said:

MUTE

LOL .... the only difference is there's a diphthong involved .... that was a delicious play 😄

Oh - one could (and probably has) do a lot worse than A.M. 

15 hours ago, DallasPozzible said:

But under electoral college, our votes don’t count equally at all

You're completely correct:  There are some antiquated practices enshrined in our election process that should have hit the bricks decades ago, and that's a big one.  

My impression is the E.C. was created because there were a substantial number of uneducated (i.e., basic reading/writing skills), when the Nation was formed, and those unfortunates relied on that system to partially alleviate the built-in inequity between the literate and the non.  

Since the E.C. is enshrined in the Constitution though, ditching it would be cumbersome, and it seems that there are always more pressing matters at hand.  Now that the antiquated system of Electors has been used in an attempt to overthrow the electoral process, as well as Democracy itself, the proof of that pudding's lack of viability could hardly be more clear.  

I'd love to see it go away. 

On 4/15/2024 at 6:04 PM, anonCUMtainer said:

TOPS believe they can find the "right" hole

I doubt that.  For most Tops, almost every raw Hole is the "right" Hole.  

There can be certain issues that a Top might avoid - every guy has certain likes & dislikes - but all we really need is a hungry Hole - all the rest pales in comparison to the need to Breed.

13 hours ago, DallasPozzible said:

Seems to me the structure of the US political system is failing us

Actually, it's equally likely that it's we who are failing the electoral system.  Not all of us, but it doesn't take all of us to effect a dramatic change either.  The electoral system has functioned rather well for hundreds of years, not because it was perfect, but because it was closer to perfect than any other form of government.

If we don't participate in the process of Democracy, then we weaken it by our non-presence.  If enough people just complain about this, that, and the next thing, and can't be bothered to sit down, think things through, and arrive at a decision - and then go vote their choice - it's we, the electorate, those who refuse to participate, but non-the-less are wiling to throw road apples who are weakening our Democracy, and all the systems that implies.  

The whole point of Democracy is, each of us gets to 'voice' our beliefs by voting, and all those ballots are counted equally.  Maybe not the most perfect way to run a country, but - there isn't a better, more Just way that I've ever heard of.  

To the Original Post, why would any bottom taking anonymous loads in some fuckjoint even care?  

In my experience, bottoms don't care about the history of who's been fucked by which Cock, or who that Cock seeded before - all they care is that it fucks/Breeds THEIR Hole. 

Frankly, that's how it should be.  

Tops asking their (prospective) bottoms not to prep their Hole is a new one for me. 

To each their own, all of that .... but be sure to include me out !!! 

21 hours ago, JamesL100 said:

I believe this submissive sexual arched back is called lordosis

How interesting ... I've never heard of that.  It's apparently an illness of some sort?  

Hopefully, when a guy assumes the position for <polite cough> other purposes, his spine will go back to it's former, normal curvature when he's been fucked full.  🥴

21 hours ago, NewCumdumpSlut said:

I hopped on the fuck table

Cool .... which one?  

20 hours ago, viking8x6 said:

can (or are willing to) define it

Well for Heavens Sake !!!  I can hardly believe that !!! 😂

7 hours ago, Davidc said:

Ass up and lubed , an arched back is a turn on for me.

Well said.  Here's one way to accomplish it:

The position should allow your Hole to draw the eye of Tops first - the rest of you secondly, if at all.  

1.  If it's on a plane surface, put your shoulders down on the fuckbench/whatever, turn your head to the right or left, whichever is most comfortable.  Your arms can be anywhere they're comfortable, stretched over your head, bent at the elbow cradling your head, whatever.  

2.  Spread your knees as far apart as is comfortable. Then, bend your spine (only as much as is comfortable, of course) concavely, thus elevating your Hole higher than the rest of your body. 

That will not only enhance your Hole's attractiveness / availability to Tops, it will allow the rest of your body to slightly "fade' away from the principal target, which is your hungry Hole.  Even in the darkest of darkrooms (i.e. when only "feeliing" his way), any Top will encounter your Hole first - and the rest only if he wants to - but the prominence of your Hole should be apparent and obvious to every guy.  

3.  If in a sling, the same principle applies:  Hole juuuuust over the edge of the sling, legs as far back towards your head as possible, and spread as widely as possible.  

9 hours ago, StraightBottomSlut said:

Wow bet I took over a hundred loads

Which area did you find the most productive?  It's <<polite cough>> about time you altered your screen name a little bit 😉

9 hours ago, StraightBottomSlut said:

How worried should I be?

Don't be.  Worrying is counter-productive.  You will catch one of the lesser bugs occasionally.  If you're not on PrEP, then get on it asap.  That'll reduce your chances of serious illness substantially.

Simply get tested regularly, to catch the inevitable bugs early, get them treated.  Then, get your load-counter strapped on your arm and keep on doing what you know you simply need to do.  

On 2/25/2024 at 4:46 PM, marriedsub said:

In public if I'd dare...

and one of these fine days, you will 😉

21 hours ago, ellentonboy said:

Maybe I am in the "fantasy" portion of this Forum,

I had to learn that lesson the hard way ... got my knuckles rapped several times, so now I just scroll up to make sure before I click "submit". 

Often, the threads drift away from the Original Post, and that's understandable (to me, anyway).  It's like a conversation progressing, gradually drifting off course - I doubt any guy actually intends to reply poorly to the OP, but winds up replying to something that has already drifted off course. 

It's much appreciated when one of the moderators slips a warning into the body of the thread before handing out demerits.  Just the other day I deleted a reply (of mine) that was apropos to the conversation, but well off the OP.  

It seems that the likelihood of a serious blunder is taking shape in the Middle East, with increasing likelihood on an hourly basis.  

The age-old game of tit-for-tat between Iran and Israel is getting to the point of really serious trouble breaking out, dragging the US (by virtue of our tight diplomatic ties to Israel) with substantial attacks on each other's sovereign territory.  The heat has been building, gradually, and nothing good can come of this mess at all.  

While I've made no secret of my view on troubles in the Levant, this time it seems that Iran is stirring the pot more than Israel, despite the attack on Iranian leaders a few days ago.  What would seem to me to be a better course of action, would be to assuage the hellish nightmare of serial starvation, gradual, systematic denial of the most basic needs to survive to the unfortunate innocents in/around Rafah, rather than more and more military attacks.  

If /when a general war breaks out, I can already hear the screaming for US military involvement echoing through the halls of Congress.  And, that might sink Mr. Biden's hopes, as well as the hopes and prayers of millions of decent-minded American citizens.  Not to mention, of course, the hopes and prayers of the Ukrainians. 

Meanwhile, the boy-blunder ran a quick side-trip to the architectural disgrace known as MagaBlargo to kiss something completely unmentionable - even here on BZ !!  

I hope some of you guys that don't give a hoot can explain to others how to learn not to give a hoot.  It's exhausting.  

But, for a smile:  I saw a demonstration by very angry women somewhere on tv.  One woman had a sign saying "Women (and their friends):  Remember in Roevember".  I think it would make a good t-shirt too.  First phrase on the front, last phrase on the back.  Short, slightly humorous, and right to the point.  

1 hour ago, NWUSHorny said:

I usually mentally relive one of the dogpile orgies

You do realize that you're the ideal kind of guy, don'tcha ..... 

1 hour ago, BootmanLA said:

I'm not sure from your post whether you (and/or he) viewed this relationship in "role play" terms or not.

Thanks for the opportunity to clarify.

I used the word 'boy' in an affectionate way, usually preceded with another word - for instance, hotboy, hornyboy, goodboy, sweetboy, dirrrrrtyboy, fuckboy, etc.  

The relationship lasted around 3 years, he was/is naturally submissive - me, not so much.  It only ended because he couldn't leave the drugs alone*, and I finally had enough of all the associated bad behavior that comes right along with that mess.  That said, I still see him quite often, and we're good friends, but I don't fuck him anymore, since he's not "mine".  He comes over frequently, I go over there frequently. He still asks me about decisions he needs to make (i.e. financial, business), things like that - and we respect each other.  He's living with another man now (who I'm also good friends with), and that's fine with me.  I also call him by his name quite often.  Come to think of it, he almost never calls me by name though.

So, I don't view it as role play at all.  It's just who each of are naturally; hope that makes it more clear.  It's all good now.

*my life-partner and I never hung around with drug-guys; I didn't really have much knowledge of how radically that serious stuff affects/alters a guy's behavior, until one of my best buddies ruined his life completely, totally through drug addiction.  An occasional toke of weed here and there was about it.  When he passed though, so did the dope.  

7 hours ago, stef85hki said:

when there is no cum yet

Assuming there are only two guys: 

Spit.  The more the Top eats the Hole, the more saliva he will generate, and the more thick and slippery it will become.  Win - win for both guys.

Obviously the very best lube is other guy's loads, but plenty of spit is second-best in my book.   I must have 10 bottles/tubes of different brands of commercial lube - and hardly ever use them.  

I can understand there may be a fetish for condoms that are 'doctored' so they break easily.  That implies that both/all guys are "in" on the fetish, and know the score.  

What I don't quite get though, are guys that don't disclose that the condom may break (particularly when they're certain it will).  

What is "guaranteed" to make me cum ...... interesting question ...

Well, any number of things, I suppose.

I enjoy aural encouragement from other guys waiting in line, or lined up next to me on another Hole.

Also, the bottom's sounds of satisfaction, or other bottoms taking loads nearby; i.e. the 'music' of group breeding. 

I enjoy mentally replaying some of the particularly thrilling Holes I've fucked.  I enjoy when other guys shoot their loads onto my Cock while I'm still rutting in a Hole. 

While it doesn't happen often, when another guy is felching cumdump's Holes close by, and then snowballs the loads to another guy, that'll do it every time, particularly if it's me ... 

Probably the most important 'one thing' though, is a really intense 'connection' with the other guy.  When I know that I'm not just Breeding his ass, but also his mind, his soul, his innermost needs, it's always the most satisfying for me too.  

I miss the Cubby Hole too - used to stop in there fairly often for a bite of lunch (and dessert around the end of the bar- or the john).  

I guess there's only one thing that's guaranteed in life .... which is that everything changes over the years.  I've been to the Eagle a few times, but it's just not steeped in the moral rot that's soaked into every inch of RR.   I guess we better get busy up there at the Eagle, but it's almost summer (mid-80's today), and wearing much gear is downright uncomfortably hot.

 But, so far there's always Slammer 😉 

oh - latest rumor is RR will close in June.  I still think that we should buy Decades, get rid of all that furniture, board up the windows, and turn it into a "Slammer-ette" .... 

Specula are an interesting and commonly used tool in the Leather/BDSM world,  They aren't particularly dangerous, when used properly, and can intensify the bottom's focus on the importance of his Hole.  Most bottom's already know their Hole is their most attractive physical item, and gently stretching a particularly tight Hole can make the fuck better for both (or all) guys.  

The only real danger is gaping too much too soon.  They're best used gradually, accompanied by plenty of praise / encouragement from the Top, and only gradually increasing the width over time.  Given the "original" purpose of a Hole, it naturally contracts to keep in that which shouldn't be excused during sex.  Once the prepwork is done though, the bottom can gradually re-train his mind (with guidance from the Top) that a Hole (properly prepped) can be do wonders for his sexual life.  

As always with BD/SM tools, it takes plenty of time to build that sense of confidence in the bottom's mind.  Experience counts. 

I understand fisting as another form of Domination, reserved for men who have already established a "connection".  It's that connection that forms the foundation for deeper ways of "connecting" than Cock to Hole.  

It can be dangerous, if the Top doesn't know what he's doing, and for guys just trying taking fist for the first time, it might be productive for that scene to take place in a group setting.  The bottom has to really trust the Top, and the Top must be willing to accept that trust and take care not to violate it.  Fisting is dependent on the mental/emotional connection being established first, especially for those who aren't habitual fister's / fistee's. 

Fisting is an advanced skill-set, it's more of a spiritual/emotional fuck between the two men than Cock-in-Hole fucking is.  Done right, it can be a fantastic experience for both guys.