hntnhole

On 10/31/2025 at 4:40 PM, tallslenderguy said:

Kinda cynical of me,

Hardly, but if you'd like another suggestion, how about two-faced (as though one isn't enough !)  I wouldn't trust her farther than the tips of that bottle-blonde hair.  

22 hours ago, tobetrained said:

It didn't make sense, she didn't understand the operations of her own campaign and staff roles.

That's true, but I doubt it was of her own making.  Virtually all political campaigns begin to prepare, settle on an agenda, gather support, all of that many months before the campaign gets into full swing.  She had a fraction of that amount of time.  Frankly, I wouldn't have blamed her at all for refusing, but she was a sitting V.P., and she had no choice in the matter.  

The utter chaos that resulted is demonstrated daily, but it's not her fault.  Harris wouldn't have considered tariffs for an instant.  She wouldn't be cutting off food stamps for the needy.  She wouldn't be tearing down the East Wing to build a Lord-alone-how-expensive ballroom .  She wouldn't have sent paramilitary soldiers into cities across the country, to arrest and deport whoever they could.  She possesses more intelligence than twenty trumps.  

19 hours ago, Letmeworshipit said:

I would urge folks to read Kamala's post-election tome, 107 Days.

I did, and read it shortly thereafter.  I voted for her, and proudly so.  That lady is more than capable of being President, and if the "loving shepherds" of a thoroughly decent, but fading man hadn't been so pushy in trying to maintain his Presidency, we wouldn't be in the mess we're currently in.  

But, it's election day in many parts of the country, so by tonight we should have a better situation.  The "government" can't afford to keep food on the table for the poor, disabled, but that "government" can afford to send paramilitary troops into our cities, arresting/jailing/deporting as many non-Caucasians as they can manage to grab off the streets.  

Occasionally, a "thumbs down" is actually taken as a compliment.  

On 11/2/2025 at 1:41 PM, Philatanus said:

Welfare is to help you for a while, not be dependent on it for life. 

 

What about the elderly, the indigent, those with health problems, and the plethora of other issues old folks are afflicted with?  How are those issues addressed by the government?  

I can understand how those who can work, but choose not to could be not included, but are the retired seniors, after a lifetime of contributing, they're cut off as well?  

For me, the thing about gloryholes is, they remove all the extraneous visuals, allowing one to concentrate only on that which is important:  the cock and/or the hole. 

Maybe the guy on the other side eats a little too much, doesn't get enough exercise ... maybe he doesn't fit one's idealized notion of a cumdump ... maybe this or maybe that isn't quite "perfect" enough.  But what counts is his cock or his hole, and gloryholes remove all the visuals that may not measure up in our  fantasies, and allow us to visualize whatever we find burning hot in our own minds.

As long as the booth-dividers are of thin enough plywood, guys can fantasize whatever makes them crave the cock/load the most.  

There are a number of social-service agencies around that offer hiv-preventative medications (as well as the lesser bugs).  One highly-regarded agency is the "Mistr" program,(intentionally misspelled), which anyone can apply for.  They'll want some financial information, of course, since their entire purpose is to save the health care for those that actually need it.  They send the pills in the mail, and provide a monthly testing kit that is mailed back for their testing purposes.  And, for most, it's completely free.  

19 hours ago, anonCUMtainer said:

Yeah - incredibly well said. I love you. You get "us" LOL.

and I love you back - all of you load-hungry bottoms.  I do "get" it - we Tops have what you crave, and you bottoms have what we need.  I call that a win/win all the way around.  

13 hours ago, backtails said:

A lot of bottoms are too shy, afraid or conservative

That's probably true, but the more interesting question would be ... WHY ?

Tops would be a really pissed off bunch of guys if there weren't bottoms in love with hard raw cock to breed them, over and over and over again.  If Tops really looked down their noses at cumdumps, they wouldn't interact with them, and certainly wouldn't breed them.  

Tops honor, respect, and uphold that which they crave.  Period.  If it weren't for cumdumps, we Tops would be one damn crabby lot.  Let's face it:  any guy can fuck other guys;  it's those that need, crave, and go get topcock breeding their holes - cock after cock after cock - that are the most-needed guys.  

16 hours ago, anonCUMtainer said:

So, I would as this question slightly differently to understand how many guys who have tried a sloppy wet hole would prefer it fresh and unused? LOL

I don't see a response doo-dad for a hand held up high, so ... 

It's not really a physical thing (meaning, breeding a previously cum-filled hole), it's the fact that I'm rutting in other TopPigs loads, which confirms for me that the bottom is indeed addicted to offering up his hole to any cock that wants it.  These are the kind of bottoms that I find the most exciting, since they're not talking a good line, they're actually living their greatest fantasies, their most foundational truths, and they love themselves fiercely for all of it. 

That's what I both respect the most, and thus, celebrate the most.  

and thank YOU,  blackrobe, for your addition to the conversation.  

I'll gladly grant you (and everyone else) that it's hardly the easiest goal to accomplish - particularly given the cultural taboos re: who we are, our truths, all that.  I realize that I was one of the lucky ones, in that I met my life-partner at a tubs, where we just so happened to be servicing either a cock or a hole, literally shoulder to shoulder.  The potential issue of one of us claiming they "didn't approve of wanton raw sex" would have been laughable in that circumstance.  

You address "ageism", and properly so.  It's an unfortunate fact that the younger crowd seems to always get the most attention, and that's probably the default circumstance.  That issue is widespread, even across-the-board regarding sexual attractiveness.  That facet, however, (attractiveness) is fleeting, as every guy already knows.  Maybe that's why some younger guys avoid a committed relationship with a not-that-young a guy, thinking that only younger guys are truly "hot".  By the time this type of gay guy figures it out, he's often on the edge of becoming seen as an "older" guy.  

12 hours ago, blackrobe said:

Ironically, I think it's easier for younger, attractive cumdumps to connect with promiscuous high-libido breeders, but the emotional maturity, experience, and communication skills are less likely to be there to make a long-term relationship successful

That's very well said.  It is odd how (seemly few) young guys simply can't see beyond their next birthday.  Sadly, it doesn't occur to some young guys that experience, skill, is worthy of consideration, particularly if they're unable to consider their future.  Posting about this seemingly universal concern will at least help the younger guys to - maaaybe - think a bit as well as revel in their sexual libertinism.  What is, simply is.  Please don't allow yourself to become melancholy; we don't live forever, so grab everything you can, and try to be satisfied with a slightly-reduced diet.  That sweet hole of yours might bitch a little, but - what is, just is.  

4 hours ago, tallslenderguy said:

Weirdly, the only politician in the republican party i feel a modicum of trust for right now is MGT.

I too am surprised by what appears to be a streak of courage running down her back.  I wouldn't go so far as to use your choice of noun regarding her, but then you're a most generous guy.  I like that old saying "trust, but verify", and while she's definitely on the right track lately, I haven't forgotten how she's been beating the wrong drum for so long.  

Question:  just how small is a "modicum" ?  If it could fit in a thimble, maaaybe I could say I "trust (but verify)" her ... depending on when she's up for re-election. 

Thanks for sharing that clip; I'd only seen bits and pieces in the major media so far.  

Great stories, and they have something in common:  

#1:  It's not productive in any way for one guy in a committed, monogamous relationship to think he can simply ignore/forget/disavow his true nature.  

#2:  That fact results in carrying guilt, shame, even embarrassment at his lack of willpower.  

#3:  #'s 1 & 2 result in a fracture - even if the "cheated-on' partner remains unaware - which begins to gnaw at the foundation of the relationship - even if the unaware partner remains blissfully ignorant.  The "cheater" feels guilty, becomes more distant, begins to withhold the fullness of his being, and the "cheated-on" partner will sense that.  He may not understand why, and begin to withdraw emotionally as well.  

The act of taking anonymous loads in fuckjoints like the above-described is an act of self-affirmation, it's an act, a demonstration of who and what he really is.  Who he simply needs to be.  Thus, if the relationship was founded upon the sand of dishonesty (however well-meaning), eventually the relationship will be damaged, even if the cheated-on partner never finds out.  It's the guilt that one guy feels for being the man he simply is.  A raven cannot simply will himself to be a bluebird, when foundational human sexuality is in question.  

Cumdumps are to be upheld, reinforced, celebrated in celebrating their truth.  It's simply not reasonable for a raven to be expected to turn himself into a bluebird or anything else.  That's an act of denial of one's core of being; attempting to become that which he most certainly is not.  We cannot simply change our very nature, we can only celebrate it with a life-partner who upholds his loved-one's thirst.  Thus, having that conversation - however long it takes - prior to establishing the relationship - is crucial to the life and depth of the relationship.  Avoiding our truth when considering a close relationship with a lover, partner, husband, whatever is planting a time-bomb with a loooong fuse into the bedrock of that relationship.  

For Heaven's Sake .... be open and honest about all the things you have to offer, all the things you want, including your sexual needs - desires - fantasies - requirements beFORE establishing a committed relationship.  Even if that disclosure ends the prospect, that's better then hurting the prospective partner.  Take all the precautions against disease if you need to.  Delineate certain times or places or circumstances if you need to.  Just share the wholeness of your life.  At the very least, the prospective partner deserves to know them all - each guy  deserves to know something that special. 

And, if it doesn't work out, at least ones integrity remains intact.  There are tons of men who adore cumdumps, and one of them will fill all the shoes, including the big black boots. 

4 hours ago, tobetrained said:

blush

LOL ..... I haven't managed to do that in YEARS !!!  ❤️

verbalBTTM, this story is simply fantastic. 

It won't be for every guy, and that's 100% ok - it's not written for every guy. 

For those men whose sexual explorations/fantasies/desires have included the rarified world of Leathersex, Bd/sm, it's manna for a satisfaction-hungry mind.  I'd guess that there are quite a number of guys that have fantasized about a life of service, but haven't found the courage to actually seek that life out. 

Beautifully conceived, beautifully composed, and sublime in it's focus, it's a pleasure to absorb.  Please continue to share your talents with us.  

2 hours ago, NWUSHorny said:

What are your thoughts?

To me, I believe it's becoming more dangerous to post anything online that would raise conservative eyebrows.  For those with a discerning eye, there are queens-aplenty in the current administration, but unless they have their tongues up Someone's ass (shudder - I mean FIGURATIVELY - ) , which tells me the aforementioned "Someone" couldn't care less personally about who's fucking who. 

That said, he could easily figure out that leaving the immigrants/minorities/folks-who-aren't-pale alone for a while; there are other targets for his plump fingers to point at.  For all I know, the Epstein files might contain some really surprising evidence; hence the desperation to divert attention from that whole sordid mess.  

To the question though, I don't post any particularly personal information on anything.  In the event that I want to, there are other, more old-fashioned (and safer) ways to communicate.  Plus, I've been "living in a foreign country" as well.  

tobetrained,

it's a complete pleasure reading, mulling your thoughts.  I admire the depths of insights, contributions, and particularly the links you post.  Thanks so much.  

21 hours ago, TownTravellerMan said:

Slammer 1,2,3

If you'll permit me;  the name of that fuckjoint is just Slammer. 

Here in Ft. L., it's located at 321 W. Sunrise Blvd.  Lots of locals refer to it as just 321 (as do I, with fellow residents).

On 10/18/2025 at 4:35 PM, TownTravellerMan said:

I don't know remember if there was one in ft Lauderdale

There was a number of years ago.  Lately, there's been an effort to re-open an Eagle bar here in Ft. L., but apparently the would-be owner is still searching for suitable locations.  Haven't heard much lately about it though.  From a "business" point of view, it would have to be at least as <polite cough> fun as the Wilton Manors Eagle, and have plenty of damn parking !!!  There are a number of suitable vacant buildings in the RamRod area, but I think the city would be hesitant to have two Leatherbars within midnight walking distance of each other.  Plus, there are a lot of guys that bought homes in the area, for obviously convenient reasons.  

Thanks, tobetrained, for those interesting links. 

Given the Administrations interest in Venezuela, and the 40B he's given to the despot farther south, do you think there's some kind of connection between the two?  For instance - oh - maybe a military base in Guatemala - or a naval base on that nations western shore, or anything else.  It doesn't appear that he gives anything to anyone unless he gets something in return.  I seems rather unlikely that he'd pay anything just out of the parsimoniousness of his heart.

Forty billion could buy a lot of "something". 

Given that Venezuela possess enormous reserves of (in ground) oil, and given that K.S. has been blowing fishing boats out of the water lately, and given that his Nibs has recalled an aircraft carrier group from the Mediterranean, now sailing towards South America, one could be excused for wondering why.  He's been blowing fishing boats out of the water for weeks now, claiming they were laden with illegal drugs.  Perhaps an ancillary motive would be to remove any auxiliary, fast, easily maneuvered Venezuelan boats that could contest (in theory, at least) an effort to displace Maduro from power, and simply install a puppet government in that nation.   

Said puppet government would likely allow the (perhaps behind-the-scenes)  usurping of these oil reserves, to the benefit of the US and it's endless thirst for oil.  This isn't attempting "three dimensional chess",  it's nothing but "I can, so I will".  I'm not actually predicting anything, of course - I don't have a magic hat - but nothing surprises me in DC anymore.  

Welcome, new guys !!!  There are all kinds of "threads" on BZ, and we look forward to hearing more from all of you.

On 10/26/2025 at 4:02 AM, Pozzible said:

Cheers, guys!

Cheers back, and thanks for your estimable contributions.  

On 10/24/2025 at 1:25 PM, NordicBtm said:

Im mostly worried about thieves tbh

Arrange to have a friend there, to keep watch (and maybe fuck if the crowd thins a bit before the ravening hordes arrive).  Be sure to put small, easily-pocketed items away prior to the event - no sense in tempting the susceptible.  

20 hours ago, Pozzible said:

The United States remains the only high-income democracy never to have adopted full universal coverage.

That is indeed a failure on the part of the US, and it's failure across the board.  Neither political party has championed full, universal coverage, to the shame of both. 

To the issue of taxation, a reasonable expectation is that when a Government gives universal care to it's population, and taxes that population to pay for it, everyone benefits.  Those that are already wealthy can afford to pay, and those who have always had little, pay less.  The hook lies in the fact that everyone pays at least something. 

The problems start, however, when the more affluent decide they shouldn't have to pay for everyone else (which, of course, they don't), and that excuse for "reasoning" is rampant in the US lately.  Greed is one of those "catching" diseases, and it can spread rapidly.  It takes leaders of conscience to keep greed at bay, which is glaringly absent in the US these days.  

19 hours ago, tobetrained said:

pressuring Europe to stop buying Russian energy (which helps fund their war effort)

We can add China and India to that list, which nations have actually increased there importation of Russian oil products (meaning crude + refined), and Turkey as well.  Apparently though, Modi is considering reducing India's dependency on Russian oil.  China however, remains the biggest customer of Putin's financial crutch by a substantial margin.  

Thanks for that most interesting commentary.  

19 hours ago, PaganzofLA said:

"why, who is it that wants to know?"

If you're hinting that there could be enemies reconnoitering, there's no reason to think they're not already here. 

Maintain courage though - so far, free speech (spoken or via the written word) is still legal.  

SOMEBODY knows is way around what Dominance/submission is all about; what that life truly is.   

I'm hoping that the reference to "Chapter One" means there will be more chapters to this magnificent prelude !!!