Pimping out tops

[Ozpig]

You see so many stories about tops pimping out bottoms. What about bottoms pimping out tops? Sure. my ex used to pimp me out for guys to fuck and breed, but I also pimped him out so he could get his thick 8" raw cock into arse he wanted to fuck. If he wanted I would help him throughout the fuck too by kissing the bottom, playing with them, sucking  them, encouraging them to be a good fuckhole for him. If he said to me in a bar "I'd love to fuck that" I would take that as my queue to bring the bottom to the table, introduce them and at the right time would pick their hand up and place it on his cock and 99% of them would be shocked it first but once they had a feel leave it there. I would encourage bottoms to let him fuck them raw and would often distract them while he was fucking them so he could slide the rubber off so he could breed them. Pimping works both ways and how ,many of you bottoms pimp out your top.

[Guest RawCunt]

I am. and presume most other bottoms are too greedy to such things.

[ErosWired]

I wouldn’t have thought it would occur to most bottoms to try to pimp a top simply because of the question of performance. A bottom properly conditioned can take cock repeatedly for hours and on demand; a Top, however, is subject to various factors that can prevent performance at any given time, so can’t be expected to put out in the way a bottom could. In that sense, it’s really not accurate to say that pimping works both ways.

[Ozpig]

8 hours ago, ErosWired said:

I wouldn’t have thought it would occur to most bottoms to try to pimp a top simply because of the question of performance. A bottom properly conditioned can take cock repeatedly for hours and on demand; a Top, however, is subject to various factors that can prevent performance at any given time, so can’t be expected to put out in the way a bottom could. In that sense, it’s really not accurate to say that pimping works both ways.

I understand what you say but I did not mean it as an endurance or other matters I just simply meant it as a bottom pimping out his top, by helping him to procure arse that he wants to fuck and breed and surprising him with "presents" such as young bottoms to breed that he was not even aware of were coming around etc.

[rawsatyr]

The WHORING OUT concept is hot to me. For tops as well as bottoms!  I never cared much for the one-way possessive, jealous arrangements I witness others having themselves gotten into. Whores playing hypocritical holy-rollers of gay dysfunction! I know several where the bottom is a total whore, encouraged, sponsored and even expected by his top to take loads all day, wear his cunt out and do whatever... piggie should be in pig-heaven! All this while the top man is at work... sounds hot, except when the top dares to get action or anybody even touches him at a sex-party , the bottom goes semi-psycho or lays down 'his law'. Acting like an old-fashioned woman really... not fun to me.

 My man and I are 'versatile', meaning we mostly bottom but will selectively breed pretty, smooth, promiscuous bottoms (anything else is a stretch, that requires pills). There are so many bottoms out there, the easy meat market seems flooded with them! "NEED, NEED, NEED!" Locally they are mostly poorly-photographed, husky bears.... and herein lies the trouble: I can't fuck bottoms 'bigger' than me!  (to get to that point will require 'therapy' lol)

I have brought guys over for my man, being 'match-maker' like a farmer who brings a heifer to his bull. And SUCCESS when I see my 'semi-top'  glow and get a boner! And then I make sure I cut the formal crap so he immediately proceeds to mount and breed the 'offering'. "GET TO IT!" That shit turns me on. I also told him that we 'need to stay on TOP of our game'. That means: making concerted efforts not to become 'lazy bottoms', coaching each other to top more holes, SCORE MORE GUYS and move on without getting 'too close'. Letting the bros know all sex is ONLY A SPORT. And really, it's all about 'INCREASING OUR MARKET-SHARE'! (Yesterday, Friday went pretty well that way... one of the sluttiest days for the both of us hunting together)

My regular side-kick (besides my man) is the most promiscuous, successful bottom-hunter I have ever met. He only tops and prefers it bare and claims that 'only topping' has kept him from converting.... my greatest fun comes from 'bringing him TRIBUTES', sacrificial guys to breed. The problem is, he has virtually done EVERY hot bottom in town. But sometimes I SCORE POINTS when I bring him a 'newbie' and they hit it off, fuck like animals the whole night for all I care...

I get turned on when I know my top-bestie has played all night when I pop over. Most of his tricks are total strangers (to me), typically one sometimes two guys, and he typically says: "Why you still have your clothes on?" Sometimes I'm surprised seeing a now-grown-up, former twink I slobbered over in the 1990s to 2010 years. As a foolishly committed 'monogamist' back then, they were 'forbidden fruit'! Fucking stupid of me!  I had a crush on one who had a huge following as an internet jerker. He is still hot as fuck but has become an insatiable party-whore with too much baggage for me.  And here I see him and these other former crushes buck-naked, being raw-dogged by my buddy, posing shamelessly in amateur bb-porn. The more action he gets, the more it turns me on. Yesterday morning I came over when one of his 'toy-friends' was still naked with a boner, but getting ready for work. I took my clothes off before sexy James even left or got dressed! "DAY SHIFT TAKING OVER!" I joked, sucked the cock that just bred James, tasted good, and took my first load of the day up the ass and another all over myself... (he is insatiable and a multi-comer) All between 11 am and 2 pm, before returning to my man and his plans for hook-ups he gathered during the last hours at work. He works Scruff and Grindr and we have a few regulars that pop up as texts and via Facebook messenger. (for today, Saturday I lined up an all-bottom hottie for us both, a 'repeat' for my man, poz, fresh meat for me, a player who takes loads in New York like a champ) We are to tag him when his cheated-on big-dicked top bf thinks he is going to the gym. Too bad the TOP is supposedly 'not fun')

As to my bestie, the ALL TOP: It turns him on I get turned on by his promiscuity. Sometimes as we play around he lets me know a 'regular' is coming or a trick from Scruff. I typically want him to breed the dude by himself and rush to clear the playing field. (me being 'ALL TEAM', the opposite of typical CLINGY, NEEDY and jealous bottom turns my bestie on, he told me) It's actually exciting for me, living vicariously through the most popular top on the block or really IN TOWN (don't know how to verify that claim, but I KNOW he is top-league).  Lately though when I was anxious to leave, he has stopped me and told me to 'stick around'... he said: "Maybe we can take turns on him or I'll fuck you both!" 

Whoring out a top is a very hot fetish... and creates more colorful variations and combinations! I encourage it!

[Guest CuriousDallas]

On 7/20/2019 at 6:51 AM, Ozpig said:

I understand what you say but I did not mean it as an endurance or other matters I just simply meant it as a bottom pimping out his top, by helping him to procure arse that he wants to fuck and breed and surprising him with "presents" such as young bottoms to breed that he was not even aware of were coming around etc.

That’s what I do for the guy I’m kinda dating. He’s football player build, blonde, blue eyes, and a big thick uncut dick, but not everyone is into his size plus he’s smooth. We both are open and play around and When we first started dating I’d met up with this hot Latino guy, about 30 and DPD, he cheats on his husband and wanted bare but likes bigger guys. I showed him a pic of Jesse, the guy I’m dating, and he totally wanted to meet up. Jesse lives with his parents and the cop couldn’t host because he lives with his partner so I hosted. It was hot to see Jesse drill the fuck out of cop boy while he begged for the cum. I host the two pretty regular now and we’ve even got to the point where the cop fucks me and I fuck him too. Jesse loved that I lined this guy up for him and I started lining up other boys as like me he has a high sex drive and wants it all the time. 

[ErosWired]

2 hours ago, CuriousDallas said:

That’s what I do for the guy I’m kinda dating.

Here’s the main reason I have difficulty with the idea of ‘whoring’ or ‘pimping’ out a Top. Like @CuriousDallas, the guys who seek out bottoms for their Tops are generally doing it for someone they are close to. By contrast, the general sense of whoring out a bottom is that the whoring is something done to the bottom, who may or may not be known to the Top.

The difference lies partly in the perceived value of the sex role, and by extension its place in the masculine power structure. One cannot easily attach a term like “ten-cent whore” to a Top in the way one can a bottom; Tops are much too highly valued. Bottoms, regardless of an individual’s skill, are not, simply because of their ubiquity. And the contradiction has often been noted of the fact that a promiscuous Top is usually considered a ‘stud’ (praiseworthy) whilst a promiscuous bottom is considered a ‘slut’ (not).

As often as not, the kind of Top who truly enjoys whoring out a bottom in spite of all the effort involved is not doing it for the bottom, but rather for the titillation and sense of power he gains for himself in controlling how and when and by whom another man is fucked. The same kind of gratification would be very difficult to achieve with a Top, because the pimp’s control would be limited by the subject’s ability to keep an erection, meaning he has no satisfactory control at all.

There must be a better term for what these bottom guys do for their Tops than ‘whoring out’ - I just haven’t found it yet...

[clean cut]

Eroswired's comment is obtuse. Of course tops are just as slutty as bottoms. Just scratch one. Pimping out a top turns the ideologically correct tables and is perfectly understandable as a subversion of the scheme, to get all academic about it. A good top is as radical as reality itself and not likely to object to how he gets what he wants. And as piggy. 

[ErosWired]

3 hours ago, clean cut said:

Eroswired's comment is obtuse. Of course tops are just as slutty as bottoms. Just scratch one. Pimping out a top turns the ideologically correct tables and is perfectly understandable as a subversion of the scheme, to get all academic about it. A good top is as radical as reality itself and not likely to object to how he gets what he wants. And as piggy. 

‘Obtuse’? Well, there’s one I’ve never heard applied to me before. Perhaps if you gave the post more than a cursory glance you might have understood it better - you appear to have only skimmed the first paragraph and assumed it contained the sum of the argument (a regrettable habit persistent among struggling academics).

The first paragraph is nothing more than a set of musings on the curious semantic problem I sense in the terms which are the subject of this thread, thoughts based on common community observations.

The second paragraph examines the practical complications attendant on serial Topping that would additionally tend to render those terms problematic.

Thus in the two paragraphs the attentive reader finds a case for semantic dissonance undergirded by both sociological/linguistic analysis and discussion of psychosocial patterns of sexual behavior germane to the topic... to get all academic about it.

The final paragraph candidly concludes that I have no ready answer to the questions I raise, but implicitly challenges the reader to come to his own conclusions.

What my post does not do, obtusely or otherwise, is take a positive on political correctness, support an ideology, or make any statement about the sexual desire of Tops in general. (‘A good Top is as radical as reality itself’...? What a well-tossed word salad... )

In further support of my actual post, I might add this, in the hope that it clarifies my point: At July 2018 CumUnion weekend in Indianapolis, one year ago, I took 24 loads from late Friday evening to 1am Sunday morning, over half of them in the last six hours. That’s 24 full-service fuckings, in my ass, with loads deposited inside. I left disappointed that I didn’t get to 25. But the point is that I, as a service bottom, could provide the complete sexual experience the Top expected, all the way to his orgasm, on demand, 24 times over the course of a full day. I could have handled more without much difficulty. The conditions were very similar to those a bottom being aggressively whored out might experience.

 I defy you to produce a Top capable of providing an equally complete level of service that each bottom would expect - naturally, a load deposited after an energetic railing with a hard organ - 24 times in a single circle of the clock - or even consistently on demand at any given time in that series. It’s simply not reasonable.

Now, obviously I’m citing an extreme case to make the point that it seems awkward to use the same term for what’s done to bottoms and what’s done to Tops when there are marked differences - but I don’t really expect anyone to pay any attention to it anyway unless they enjoy that kind of mental exercise too. It’s just the sort of linguistic puzzle that tickles my obtuse fucking brain.

Edited July 23, 2019 by ErosWired