Can you go back after black?

[Guest]

Found darker shades of skin is much softer throughout the who body.  I love soft skin on men.  Darker they are, well the ones I've been with have really soft skin.  I love exploring their naked body and cock with my tong.  Then when they get up in my ass, Holly molly are they amazing.  My experience with darker is Mex and Black.  As long as there isn't any attitude I would stick with dark meat.  Some I knew thought they needed 24/7 Dominance.  The more freedom I have the hornier I get

[NWUSHorny]

On 7/17/2021 at 7:46 AM, evilalex said:

yeah. When people fetishize a race it freaks me out a bit.

 

5 hours ago, Alphpig said:

I get what you mean, I am uncut and I get treated the same way. 

 

On 7/23/2021 at 12:13 PM, BlackDude said:

I actually like reading these posts and I don’t feel objectified at all. Let me know what it is upfront. 

If we a going to be real, a lot of black guys look at it the same way. “If you’re a white guy, we have nothing in common, and you’re not fucking, I don’t care.” Hell, if I’m following a porn dude on Twitter, and he’s not showing enough ass, or talking too much I unfollow. So how can I be mad?

And not responding to anyone here, cause I don’t folks personally, but a lot of these guys who bring up this objectification issue don’t give a damn about black gays.... They just see that a preference is being shown, or in someway black men are strangely being “highlighted” about sexual prowess and they feel some type away about it. They use all type of a racial epithets to condemn a guy for missing a goal in soccer, but as soon as someone says they prefer black dick it’s “hey, wait a minute….”

 

 

I think the big difference here is that some guys don't mind being objectified/fetishized.  While I'm not a racial minority, I am 6'2" blonde, and have 8 thick uncut inches and often benefit from the objectification when it comes to getting casual gay sex, at least as a top.  I don't even mind when I find out it is just a one time fantasy for some of them.  

Edited July 26, 2021 by NWUSHorny

[BootmanLA]

3 minutes ago, NWUSHorny said:

I think the big difference here is that some guys don't mind being objectified/fetishized.  While I'm not a racial minority, I am 6'2" blonde, and have 8 thick inches and often benefit from the objectification when it comes to getting casual gay sex, at least as a top.  I don't even mind when I find out it is just a one time fantasy for some of them.  

While that's true, it's easier to "not mind" being objectified when you're already occupying a place of relative privilege within a group. 

[BlackDude]

50 minutes ago, BootmanLA said:

While that's true, it's easier to "not mind" being objectified when you're already occupying a place of relative privilege within a group. 

I agree. There is a difference with being objectified and with being glorified. 
 

 

[CumBustion]

Speaking as someone who is very, very partial to black men, yes, you can go back. Most of my BFs, fuck buds, and hook ups are MOC. However, I still find all kinds of guys attractive and it doesn’t stop me from getting with them. I prefer tall, muscular/heavy set, same aged/lil older black men with some scruff/body hair, but one of my fav Tops is an older (early 60s), clean cut, smooth, white guy. It’s all about what they bring to the table and the sexual vibe the give.

A lotta bottoms get hung up on dick size and the whole “black is bigger” thing. Is it true? IMHO, somewhat yes, black guys do tend to be on the larger side of the spectrum. But I’ve met hung guys in most other races, too. Keep in mind though, big dick isn’t always good dick. A dude with a foot long dick with no stamina or technique that nuts in a minute is a bad lay no matter what. 

[tallslenderguy]

On 7/15/2021 at 1:09 PM, bitchpigbottom said:

There's the old saying once you go black you don't go back, why is this? 

i  can read this question two different ways: 

1. Why is there a saying like this? or 2. Why is it that one does not go back once one has "gone black." 

 Sayings and generalizations exist in cultures for all sorts of reasons. Just reading this discussion exposes different reasons why one might ascribe to this saying as a truism.  Because sayings like this have a different meaning depending on the person, it is apparently not a universal truth, but a belief. I.e., if we were to but this to a quality, double blind , randomized scientific test where a bottom gets fucked by say ten guys of all different races (sign me up please), i'd bet we'd likely find no evidence to support the claim.  For instance, if we blindfolded the bottom and they didn't know if they were being fucked by a black man or one of a different color, would they be able to tell the difference?  Does the visual cue trigger a presumptive notion that affects the experience? Are we with the person or are we with our idea of the person? 

i think we all have notions, ideas, bias that have been culturally programmed into us. Those programs vary from culture to culture. Some cultures are more pervasive than others, and that influences the bias size and effect.  i think it's important to be aware and acknowledge the influence of the cultures we have been a part of. Not wanting to be affected does not mean we are unaffected.